Emerging Hardball Confirmation Tactics and Public Support for the U.S. Supreme Court

REFERENCES

• Armaly, Miles T. 2018. “Politicized Nominations and Supreme Court Legitimacy in the Polarization Era.” Justice System Journal 39(3): 193–209. doi: 10.1080/0098261X.2017.1370403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armaly, Miles T. 2020. “Who Can Impact the US Supreme Court’s Legitimacy?” Justice System Journal 40(1): 22–36. doi: 10.1080/0098261X.2019.1687371.
   Google Scholar
• Armaly, Miles T., and Elizabeth A. Lane. Forthcoming. “Politicized Battles: How Vacancies and Partisanship Influence Support for the Supreme Court.” American Politics Research. 10.1177/1532673X211064299.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azari, Julia R. and Jennifer K. Smith. 2012. “Unwritten Rules: Informal Institutions in Established Democracies.” Perspectives on Politics 10(1): 37–55. doi: 10.1017/S1537592711004890.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baird, Vanessa A. 2001. “Building Institutional Legitimacy: The Role of Procedural Justice.” Political Research Quarterly 54(2): 333–54. doi: 10.2307/449160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, Brandon L., and Christopher D. Johnston. 2012. “Political Justice? Perceptions of Politicization and Public Preference toward the Supreme Court Appointment Process.” Public Opinion Quarterly 76(1): 105–16. doi: 10.1093/poq/nfr032.
   Google Scholar
• Bartels, Brandon L., and Christopher D. Johnston. 2013. “On the Ideological Foundations of Supreme Court Legitimacy in the American Public.” American Journal of Political Science 57(1): 184–99. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2012.00616.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, Brandon L., and Christopher D. Johnston. 2020. Curbing the Court: Why the Public Constrains Judicial Independence. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berinsky, Adam J., Gregory A. Huber, and Gabriel S. Lenz. 2012. “Evaluating Online Labor Markets for Experimental Research: Amazon.com’s Mechanical Turk.” Political Analysis 20(3): 351–68. doi: 10.1093/pan/mpr057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bishin, Benjamin G., Thomas J. Hayes, Matthew B. Incantalupo, and Charles A. Smith. 2015. “Opinion Backlash and Public Attitudes: Are Political Advances in Gay Rights Counterproductive?” American Journal of Political Science 60(3): 625–48. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boddery, Scott S., Laura P. Moyer, and Jeff Yates. 2019. “Naming Names: The Impact of Supreme Court Opinion Attribution on Citizen Assessment of Policy Outcomes.” Law & Society Review 53(2): 353–85. doi: 10.1111/lasr.12401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bronner, Ethan. 1989. Battle for Justice: How the Bork Nomination Shook America. New York, NY: Union Square Press.
   Google Scholar
• Caldeira, Gregory A. 1989. “Commentary on Senate Confirmation of Supreme Court Justices: The Roles of Organized and Unorganized Interests.” Kentucky Law Journal 77: 531–38.
   Google Scholar
• Caldeira, Gregory A., and Charles E. Smith, Jr. 1992. “Campaigning for the Supreme Court: The Dynamics of Public Opinion on the Thomas Nomination.” Journal of Politics 58(3): 655–81. doi: 10.2307/2960437.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, Jeffrey P., Peter H. Matthews, and Okomboli Ong’ong’a. 2004. “Why Punish? Social reciprocity and the enforcement of prosocial norms.” Journal of Evolutionary Economics 14(4): 407–29. doi: 10.1007/s00191-004-0212-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassens Weiss, Debra. 2017 March 31. “White House tells ABA it won’t be asked to review lower court judicial candidates before nomination.” ABA Journal.
   Google Scholar
• Christenson, Dino P., and David M. Glick. 2015. “Chief Justice Roberts’s Health Care Decision Disrobed: The Microfoundations of the Supreme Court’s Legitimacy.” American Journal of Political Science 59(2): 403–18. doi: 10.1111/ajps.12150.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christenson, Dino P., and David M. Glick. 2019. “Reassessing the Supreme Court: How Decisions and Negativity Bias Affect Legitimacy.” Political Research Quarterly 72(3): 637–52. doi: 10.1177/1065912918794906.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christenson, Dino P., and Douglas L. Kriner. The Myth of the Imperial Presidency: How Public Opinion Checks the Unilateral Executive. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
   Google Scholar
• Clifford, Scott, Ryan M. Jewell, and Phillip D. Waggoner. 2015. “Are Samples Drawn From Mechanical Turk Valid for Research on Political Ideology?” Research and Politics 2(4): 1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curry, James M. 2019. “Congressional Processes and Public Approval of New Laws.” Political Research Quarterly 72(4): 878–93. doi: 10.1177/1065912918819860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, Richard. 2005. Electing Justice: Fixing the Supreme Court Nomination Process. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, Lee, and René Lindstädt, Jeffrey A. Segal, and Chad Westerland. 2006. “The Changing Dynamics of Senate Voting on Supreme Court Nominees.” Journal of Politics 68(2): 296–307. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2508.2006.00407.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, Lee and Jeffrey A. Segal. 2007. Advice and Consent: The Politics of Judicial Appointments. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, Lee, Jeffrey A. Segal, Nancy Staudt, and René Lindstädt. 2005. “The Role of Qualifications in the Confirmation of Nominees to the U.S. Supreme Court.” Florida State University Law Review 32(4): 1145–74.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, Lee, Jeffrey A. Segal, and Chad Westerland. 2007. “The Increasing Importance of Ideology in the Nomination and Confirmation of Supreme Court Justices.” Drake Law Review 56(3): 609–36.
   Google Scholar
• Fehr, Ernst, and Urs Fischbacher. 2004. “Third-party punishment and social norms.” Evolution and Human Behavior 25(2): 63–87. doi: 10.1016/S1090-5138(04)00005-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, Toni. 2018 September 28. “Kavanaugh Hearing Ratings: How Many People Watched the Senate Testimony?” Forbes.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L. 2015. “Legitimacy if for Losers: The Interconnections of Institutional Legitimacy, Performance Evaluations, and the Symbols of Judicial Authority” in Motivating Cooperation and Compliance with Authority, 81–116. Bornstein, Brian H. and Alan J. Tomkins, eds. Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L., and Gregory A. Caldeira. 2009. “Confirmation Politics and The Legitimacy of the U.S. Supreme Court: Institutional Loyalty, Positivity Bias, and the Alito Nomination.” American Journal of Political Science 53(1): 139–55. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00362.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L., Gregory A. Caldeira, and Vanessa A. Baird. 1998. “On the Legitimacy of National High Courts.” American Political Science Review 92(2): 343–58. doi: 10.2307/2585668.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L., Gregory A. Caldeira, and Lester K. Spence. 2003a. “The Supreme Court and the U.S. Presidential Election of 2000: Wounds, Self-Inflicted or Otherwise?” British Journal of Political Science 33(4): 535–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L., Gregory A. Caldeira, and Lester K. Spence. 2003b. “Measuring Attitudes toward the United States Supreme Court.” American Journal of Political Science 47(2):354–67. doi: 10.1111/1540-5907.00025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L., Gregory A. Caldeira, and Lester K. Spence. 2005. “Why Do People Accept Public Policies They Oppose? Testing Legitimacy Theory with a Survey-Based Experiment.” Political Research Quarterly 58(2): 187–201. doi: 10.1177/106591290505800201.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L., and Michael J. Nelson. 2014. “The Legitimacy of the US Supreme Court: Conventional Wisdoms and Recent Challenges Thereto.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 10: 201–19. doi: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110413-030546.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L., and Michael J. Nelson. 2015. “Is the U.S. Supreme Court’s Legitimacy Grounded in Performance Satisfaction and Ideology?” American Journal of Political Science 59(1): 162–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson, James L., and Michael J. Nelson. 2017. “Reconsidering Positivity Theory: What Roles do Politicization, Ideological Disagreement, and Legal Realism Play in Shaping U.S. Supreme Court Legitimacy?” Journal of Empirical Legal Studies 14(3): 592–617. doi: 10.1111/jels.12157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, Sheldon, Elliot Slotnick and Sara Schiavoni. 2011. “Obama’s Judiciary at Midterm.” Judicature 94(6): 262–301
   Google Scholar
• Harbridge, Laurel and Neil Malhotra. 2011. “Electoral Incentives and Partisan Conflict in Congress: Evidence from Survey Experiments.” American Journal of Political Science 55(3): 494–510. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2011.00517.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helmke, Gretchen and Steven Levitsky. 2004. “Informal Institutions and Comparative Politics: A Research Agenda.” Perspectives on Politics 2(4): 725–40. doi: 10.1017/S1537592704040472.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, Gregory, Seth Hill, and Gabriel Lenz (2012) “Sources of Bias in Retrospective Decision Making: Experimental Evidence on Voters’ Limitations in Controlling Incumbents.” American Political Science Review 106(4): 720–41. doi: 10.1017/S0003055412000391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liptak, Adam. 2018, October 2. “Bar Association Questioned Kavanaugh’s Temperament and Honesty in 2006.” New York Times, section A, page 20.
   Google Scholar
• Livitsky, Steven and Daniel Ziblatt. 2018. How Democracies Die. New York, NY: Crown.
   Google Scholar
• Marbury v. Madison, 5 U.S. 137 (1803).
   Google Scholar
• Marien, Sofie and Hannah Werner. 2018. “Fair Treatment, Fair Play? The Relationship Between Fair Treatment Perceptions, Political Trust and Compliant and Cooperative Attitudes Cross-Nationally.” European Journal of Political Research 58(1): 72–95. doi: 10.1111/1475-6765.12271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinek, Wendy L., Mark Kemper, and Steven R. Van Winkle. 2002. “To Advise and Consent: The Senate and Lower Federal Court Nominations, 1977–1998.” Journal of Politics 64(2): 337–61. doi: 10.1111/1468-2508.00129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquette Law School, Marquette Law School National Poll, Questions 25 & 26, 31119462.00025, SSRS, (Cornell University, Ithaca, NY: Roper Center for Public Opinion Research, 2022), Dataset.
   Google Scholar
• Mutz, Diana C. 2015. In-Your-Face Politics: The Consequences of Uncivil Media. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Milbank, Dana. 2018 September 28. “Brett Kavanaugh, disrobed.” The Washington Post.
   Google Scholar
• Mullinix, Kevin J., Thomas J. Leeper, James N. Druckman, and Jeremy Freese. 2015. “The Generalizability of Survey Experiments.” Journal of Experimental Political Science 2(2): 109–38. doi: 10.1017/XPS.2015.19.
   Google Scholar
• Reuters. 2018 September 28. “More than 20 million viewers watched Kavanaugh hearing on TV.” NBC News.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Jr., John G. 2005. Confirmation Hearing on the Nomination of John G. Roberts, Jr. to be Chief Justice of the United States, 109th Congress.
   Google Scholar
• Ronayne, Kathleen. 2018 September 28. “Kennedy warns of dangers to democracy, won’t talk Kavanaugh.” AP News.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, Timothy J. 2012. “What Makes Us Click? Demonstrating Incentives for Angry Discourse with Digital-Age Field Experiments.” Journal of Politics 74(4): 1138–52. doi: 10.1017/S0022381612000540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, Maya. 2017. “How Political Signals Affect Public Support for Judicial Nominations: Evidence from a Conjoint Experiment.” Political Research Quarterly 70(2): 374–93. doi: 10.1177/1065912917695229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolberg, Sheryl Gay. 2003, September 12. “Threats and Responses: Washington Talk; An Order of Fries, Please, But Do Hold the French.” New York Times, section A, page 1.
   Google Scholar
• Trinkner, Rick, and Tom R. Tyler. 1993. “Legal Socialization: Coercion versus Consent in an Era of Mistrust.” Annual Review of Law and Social Science 12: 417–39. doi: 10.1146/annurev-lawsocsci-110615-085141.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, Tom R. Why People Obey the Law. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tyler, Tom R., and Kenneth Rasinkski. 1991. “Procedural Justice, Institutional Legitimacy, and the Acceptance of Unpopular U.S. Supreme Court Decisions: A Reply to Gibson.” Law & Society Review 25(3): 621–30. doi: 10.2307/3053729.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tushnet, Mark. 2004. “Constitutional Hardball.” John Marshall Law Review 37: 523–53.
   Google Scholar
• Zaller, John R. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinions. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar