A War of Words Over Abortion: The Legal-Framing Contest Over the Undue Burden Standard

References

• Americans United for Life (AUL). 2015. “5th Circuit Protects Women’s Health with Ruling Holding Texas Abortionists to Real Medical Standards.” Accessed March 12, 2021. https://aul.org/2015/06/09/5th-circuit-protects-womens-health-with-ruling-holding-texas-abortionists-to-real-medical-standards/
   Google Scholar
• Armitage, Hannah. 2010. “Political Language, Uses and Abuses: How the Term ‘Partial Birth’ Changed the Abortion Debate in the United States.” Australasian Journal of American Studies 29 (1):15–35.
   Google Scholar
• Austin, Nichole, and Sam Harper. 2018. “Assessing the Impact of TRAP Laws on Abortion and Women’s Health in the USA: A Systematic Review.” BMJ Sexual & Reproductive Health 44 (2):128–34. doi: 10.1136/bmjsrh-2017-101866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benshoof, Janet. 1993. “The Pennsylvania Abortion Case.” Touro Law Review 9 (2):217–49.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Benshoof, Janet. 2014. “Oral History of Janet Benshoof.” ABA Senior Lawyers Division, Women Trailblazers in the Law July 28 (Session 6).
   Google Scholar
• Boutcher, Steven A, and Holly J. McCammon. 2019. “Social Movements and Litigation.” In The Wiley Blackwell Companion to Social Movements, 2nd edition, edited by David Snow, Sarah Soule, Hanspeter Kriesi, and Holly McCammon, 306–21. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Brown-Nagin, Tomiko. 2005. “Elites, Social Movements, and the Law: The Case of Affirmative Action.” Columbia Law Review 105 (5):1436–528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cahill, Courtney Megan. 2013. “Abortion and Disgust.” Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 48:409–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, Zoë. 2016. “The Big Lie at the Heart of the Texas Abortion Clinic Case.” Moyers on Democracy, March 2. Accessed March 12, 2021. https://billmoyers.com/story/%EF%BB%BFthe-big-lie-at-the-heart-of-the-texas-abortion-clinic-case/
   Google Scholar
• Corley, Pamela C. 2008. “The Supreme Court and Opinion Content: The Influence of Parties’ Briefs.” Political Research Quarterly 61 (3):468–78. doi: 10.1177/1065912907306474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings, Scott L. 2017. “Law and Social Movements: An Interdisciplinary Analysis.” In Handbook of Social Movements across Disciplines, 2nd edition, edited by Conny Roggeband and Bert Klandermans, 233–70. Cham, Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Dadlez, E. M., and William L. Andrews. 2010. “Post-Abortion Syndrome: Creating an Affliction.” Bioethics 24 (9):445–52. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8519.2009.01739.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, Martha F. 2011. “Law, Issue Frames, and Social Movements: Three Case Studies.” University of Pennsylvania Journal of Law and Social Change 14 (4):363–78.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, Megan K. 2017. “D&E Abortion Bans: The Implications of Banning the Most Common Second-Trimester Procedure.” Guttmacher Institute, Feb. 21.
   Google Scholar
• Esacove, Anne W. 2004. “Dialogic Framing: The Framing/Counterframing of ‘Partial-Birth’ Abortion.” Sociological Inquiry 74 (1):70–101. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-682X.2004.00080.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskridge, William N. 2002. “Some Effects of Identity-Based Social Movements on Constitutional Law in the Twentieth Century.” Michigan Law Review 100 (8):2062–407. doi: 10.2307/1290434.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferree, Myra Marx. 2003. “Resonance and Radicalism: Feminist Framing in the Abortion Debates of the United States and Germany.” American Journal of Sociology 109 (2):304–44. doi: 10.1086/378343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fessenden, Ford. 2016. “How the Supreme Court’s Decision Will Affect Access to Abortion.” New York Times, June 27. Accessed March 12, 2021. https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2016/02/29/us/why-the-abortion-clinics-have-closed.html
   Google Scholar
• Garrow, David J. 2021. “Has Roe v. Wade Met Its Match?” Wall Street Journal, July 30, A15.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman, Erving. 1974. Frame Analysis: An Essay on the Organization of Experience. Boston: Northeastern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenhouse, Linda. 2016. “The Facts about Abortion Rights.” New York Times, Feb. 28, SR1.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, Daniel, Sarah Baum, Liza Fuentes, Kari White, Kristine Hopkins, Amanda Stevenson, and Joseph E. Potter. 2014. “Change in Abortion Services after Implementation of a Restrictive Law in Texas.” Contraception 90 (5):496–501. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.07.006.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, Summer Sherburne, Marco Ghiani, Sam Harper, Christopher Baum, and Jay Kaufman. 2020. “Impact of State-Level Changes in Maternal Mortality: A Population-Based, Quasi-Experimental Study.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 58 (2):165–74. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2019.09.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedley, Mark, and Sara A. Clark. 2007. “The Microlevel Discourse of Social Movement Framing: Debating Antiwar Protests in a University Listserv.” Sociological Focus 40 (1):26–47. doi: 10.1080/00380237.2007.10571297.
   Google Scholar
• Hickle, Jessica E. 2021. “Case Sensitive: Lawyers and the Formation of Legal Arguments in Tanzania.” Law & Social Inquiry. Accessed December 16, 2021. doi: 10.1017/lsi.2021.40.
   Google Scholar
• Jerman, Jenna, Lori Frohwirth, Megan L. Kavanaugh, and Nakeisha Blades. 2017. “Barriers to Abortion Care and Their Consequences for Patients Traveling for Services: Qualitative Findings from Two States.” Perspectives on Sexual and Reproductive Health 49 (2):95–102. doi: 10.1363/psrh.12024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendis, Becca. 2019. “Faute de Mieux: Recognizing and Accepting Whole Woman’s Health for Its Strengths and Weaknesses.” Case Western Reserve Law Review 69 (4):1007–56.
   Google Scholar
• Khazan, Olga. 2015. “Planning the End of Abortion. The Atlantic, July 16. Accessed April 1, 2021. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/07/what-pro-life-activists-really-want/398297/
   Google Scholar
• Koopmans, Ruud, and Paul Statham. 1999. “Ethnic and Civic Conceptions of Nationhood and the Differential Success of the Extreme Right in Germany and Italy.” In How Social Movements Matter, edited by Marco Giugni, Doug McAdam, and Charles Tilly, 225–51. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, Anna-Maria. 2006. “Social Movement Strategies and the Participatory Potential of Litigation.” In Cause Lawyers and Social Movements, edited by Austin Sarat and Stuart Scheingold, 164–81. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCaffrey, Dawn, and Jennifer Keys. 2000. “Competitive Framing Processes in the Abortion Debate: Polarization-Vilification, Frame Saving, and Frame Debunking.” The Sociological Quarterly 41 (1):41–61. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2000.tb02365.x.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCammon, Holly J, and Cathryn Beeson-Lynch. 2021. “Fighting Words: Pro-Choice Cause Lawyering, Legal-Framing Innovations, and Hostile Political-Legal Contexts.” Law & Social Inquiry 46 (3):599–634. doi: 10.1017/lsi.2020.33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCammon, Holly J., Minyoung Moon, Brittany N. Hearne, and Megan Robinson. 2020. “The Supreme Court as an Arena for Activism: Feminist Cause Lawyering’s Influence on Judicial Decision Making.” Mobilization: An International Quarterly 25 (2):221–44. doi: 10.17813/1086-671X-25-2-221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, Kevin T. 1995. “Repeat Players in the Supreme Court: The Role of Experienced Lawyers in Litigation Success.” The Journal of Politics 57 (1):187–96. doi: 10.2307/2960277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moyer, Laura P. 2022. “She Blinded Me with Science’: The Use of Science Frames in Abortion Litigation before the Supreme Court.” Justice System Journal 43 (2):153–73. doi: 10.1080/0098261X.2021.1927266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulk, Lauren. 2013. “What is an ‘Undue Burden’? The Casey Standard as Applied to Informed Consent Provisions.” UCLA Women’s Law Journal 20 (1):71–109.
   Google Scholar
• Pedriana, Nicholas. 2006. “From Protective to Equal Treatment: Legal Framing Processes and Transformation of the Women’s Movement in the 1960s.” American Journal of Sociology 111 (6):1718–61. doi: 10.1086/499911.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedriana, Nicholas. 2008. “Intimate Equality: The Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender Movement’s Legal Framing of Sodomy Laws in the Lawrence v. Texas Case.” In Queer Mobilizations: LGBT Activists Confront the Law, edited by Scott Barclay, Mary Bernstein, and Anna-Maria Marshall, 52–75. New York: New York University Press
   Google Scholar
• Pellow, David N., and Hollie Nyseth Brehm. 2015. “From the New Ecological Paradigm to Total Liberation: The Emergence of a Social Movement Frame.” The Sociological Quarterly 56 (1):185–212. doi: 10.1111/tsq.12084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redden, Molly, and Nadja Popovich. 2016. “How the Supreme Court Could Rule on Texas’s Restrictive Abortion Law.” The Guardian, June 3. Accessed December 18, 2021. https://www.theguardian.com/world/ng-interactive/2016/jun/03/texas-abortion-supreme-court-interactive
   Google Scholar
• Reitman, Janet. 2014. “The Stealth War on Abortion.” Rolling Stone, Jan. 15. Accessed March 31, 2021. https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-news/the-stealth-war-on-abortion-102195/
   Google Scholar
• Richards, Mark J., and Herbert M. Kritzer. 2002. “Jurisprudential Regimes in Supreme Court Decision Making.” American Political Science Review 96 (2):305–20. doi: 10.1017/S0003055402000187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg, Debra. 2003. “Chipping Away at Roe.” Newsweek 141 (11):40–1.
   Google Scholar
• Schoenherr, Jessica A, and Ryan C. Black. 2019. “The Use of Precedent in U.S. Supreme Court Litigant Briefs.” In Research Handbook on Law and Courts, edited by Susan Sterett and Lee Demetrius Walker, 114–29. Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Siegel, Reva B. 2008. “The Right’s Reasons: Constitutional Conflict and the Spread of Woman-Protective Antiabortion Argument.” Duke Law Journal 57 (6):1641–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snow, David A., E. Burke Rochford, Jr., Steven K. Worden, and Robert D. Benford. 1986. “Frame Alignment Processes, Micromobilization, and Movement Participation.” American Sociological Review 51 (4):464–81. doi: 10.2307/2095581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinberg, Marc W. 1999. “The Talk and Back Talk of Collective Action: A Dialogic Analysis of Repertoires of Discourse among Nineteenth-Century English Cotton Spinners.” American Journal of Sociology 105 (3):736–80. doi: 10.1086/210359.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, Anselm, and Juliet Corbin. 1998. Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Washington Post. 2000. “‘Partial Birth’ Abortion: Lt. Gov. Dave Maurstad.” Live Online, April 13. Accessed January 20, 2021. https://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/liveonline/00/politics/freemedia042500_maurstad.htm
   Google Scholar
• Wedeking, Justin. 2010. “Supreme Court Litigants and Strategic Framing.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (3):617–31. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00450.x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wines, Michael. 2022. “Next Front Line in the Abortion Wars: State Supreme Courts.” New York Times, July 6. Accessed September 7, 2022. https://www.nytimes.com/2022/07/06/us/abortion-state-supreme-courts.html
   Google Scholar
• Winter, Meaghan. 2016. “Roe v. Wade Was Lost in 1992.” Slate, March 27. Accessed February 3, 2021. http://www.slate.com/articles/double_x/cover_story/2016/03/how_the_undue_burden_concept_eroded_roe_v_wade.html
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, Mary. 2010. “Framing Change: Cause Lawyering, Constitutional Decisions, and Social Change.” Marquette Law Review 94:263–310.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, Mary. 2017a. “Facing Facts: The New Era of Abortion Conflict after Whole Woman’s Health.” Wake Forest Law Review 52:1231–85.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, Mary. 2017b. “Liberty and the Politics of Balance: The Undue-Burden Test after Casey/Hellerstedt.” Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review 52:421–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, Mary. 2020. Abortion and the Law in America: Roe v. Wade to the Present. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ziegler, Mary. 2022. “Where the Anti-Abortion Movement Is Heading.” National Public Radio Fresh Air. Interviewed by Terry Gross. Accessed September 7, 2022. https://www.npr.org/2022/06/21/1106374567/where-the-anti-abortion-movement-is-heading
   Google Scholar