Effect of Operating Conditions on Discharge Characteristics of Petroleum Coke Powder from a Top-Discharge Blow Tank at High Pressure

References

• Barletta, D., Donsì, G., Ferrari, G., Poletto, M., and Russo, P. (2007). Solid flow rate prediction in silo discharge of aerated cohesive powders, AlChE J., 53, 2240–2253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bi, H. T., and Grace, J. R. (1996). Effects of pressure and temperature on flow regimes in gas-solid fluidization systems, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 74, 1025–1027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cai, L., Pan, X., Chen, X., and Zhao, C. (2012). Flow characteristics and stability of dense-phase pneumatic conveying of pulverized coal under high pressure, Exp. Therm Fluid Sci., 41, 149–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannavacciuolo, A., Barletta, D., Donsì, G., Ferrari, G., and Poletto, M. (2009). Arch-free flow in aerated silo discharge of cohesive powders, Powder Technol., 191, 272–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, X., Fan, C., Liang, C., Pu, W., Lu, P., and Zhao, C. (2007). Investigation on characteristics of pulverized coal dense-phase pneumatic conveying under high pressure, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 24, 499–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chi-Ying Wong, A. (2000). Characterisation of the flowability of glass beads by bulk densities ratio, Chem. Eng. Sci., 55, 3855–3859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chitester, D. C., Kornosky, R. M., Fan, L. S., and Danko, J. P. (1984). Characteristics of fluidization at high pressure, Chem. Eng. Sci., 39, 253–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crewdson, B. J., Ormond, A. L., and Nedderman, R. M. (1977). Air-impeded discharge of fine particles from a hopper, Powder Technol., 16, 197–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dong, W., Guo, X., Gong, X., Yong, X., Wu, Y., and Luo, C. (2011). Characteristic of top discharge blow tank conveying system and comparison with bottom discharge blow tank conveying system, CIESC J., 62, 1989–1997.
   Google Scholar
• Guiling, X., Xiaoping, C., Cai, L., Pan, X., and Changsui, Z. (2016). Experimental investigation on the flowability properties of cohesive carbonaceous powders, Part. Sci. Technol. doi:10.1080/02726351.2016.1154910.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, X., Lu, W., Lu, H., Cong, X., Xie, K., Liu, H., and Gong, X. (2013). Pressure drop prediction for horizontal dense-phase pneumatic conveying of pulverized coal associated with feeding to gasifier, Chem. Eng. Res. Des., 91, 2509–2514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Z., Chen, X., Liu, H., and Chen, H. (2014). Gravity discharge characteristics of biomass-coal blends in a hopper, Fuel, 125, 137–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He, C., Chen, X., Wang, J., Ni, H., Xu, Y., Zhou, H., Xiong, Y., and Shen, X. (2012). Conveying characteristics and resistance characteristics in dense phase pneumatic conveying of rice husk and blendings of rice husk and coal at high pressure, Powder Technol., 227, 51–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang, W., Gong, X., Guo, X., Dai, Z., Liu, H., Zheng, L., Zhao, J., and Xiong, Y. (2009). Discharge characteristics of cohesive fine coal from aerated hopper, Powder Technol., 194, 126–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, M. G., Mills, D., Mason, J. S. (1987). Comparison of the performance of top and bottom discharge blow tank systems, Bulk Solids Handling, 7, 701–706.
   Google Scholar
• Klinzing, G. E., Marcus, R. D., Rizk, F., and Leung, L. S. (1997). Pneumatic Conveying of Solids - A Theoretical and Practical Approach, Chapman & Hall, New York, pp. 8–10.
   Google Scholar
• Knowlton, T. M. (1998). Pressure and temperature effects in fluid-particle systems, Fluidization, Solids Handling, and Processing, William Andrew Publishing, Westwood, pp. 111–152.
   Google Scholar
• Kurz, H. P. (1975). The stability of material bridges in aerated silos, Powder Technol., 13, 57–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kus, F. T., Duchesne, M. A., Champagne, S., Hughes, R. W., Lu, D. Y., Macchi, A., and Mehrani, P. (2016). Pressurized pneumatic conveying of pulverized fuels for entrained flow gasification, Powder Technol., 287, 403–411.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, H., and Sun, G. (2008). Determination of Total Moisture in Coal, Chinese Standard Press, Beijing, China, pp. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Liang, C., Cai, J., Xu, G., Xu, P., Chen, X., and Zhao, C. (2012). Experimental investigation and stability analysis on dense-phase pneumatic conveying of coal and biomass at high pressure, Korean J. Chem. Eng., 30, 295–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Llop, M. F., and Jand, N. (2003). The influence of low pressure operation on fluidization quality, Chem. Eng. J., 95, 25–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, H., Guo, X., Cong, X., Liu, K., Sun, X., Xie, K., Gong, X., and Lu, J. (2012a). The discharge of pulverized coal from a pressurized aerated Hopper, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 51, 13839–13845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, H., Guo, X., Gong, X., Barletta, D., and Poletto, M. (2015). Prediction of solid discharge rates of pulverized coal from an aerated hopper, Powder Technol., 286, 645–653.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, H., Guo, X., Gong, X., Cong, X., and Dong, W. (2011a). Study on the fluidization and discharge characteristics of cohesive coals from an aerated hopper, Powder Technol., 207, 199–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, H., Guo, X., Gong, X., Cong, X., Liu, K., and Qi, H. (2012b). Effects of gas type and Hopper pressure on the discharge of pulverized coal, Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., 51, 3709–3714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, H., Guo, X., Gong, X., Cong, X., Liu, K., and Qi, H. (2012c). Experimental study on aerated discharge of pulverized coal, Chem. Eng. Sci., 71, 438–448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, H., Guo, X., Huang, W., Liu, K., and Gong, X. (2011b). Flow characteristics and pressure drop across the Laval nozzle in dense phase pneumatic conveying of the pulverized coal, Chem. Eng. Process., 50, 702–708.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, P., Han, D., Jiang, R., Chen, X., Zhao, C., and Zhang, G. (2013). Experimental study on flow patterns of high-pressure gas–solid flow and Hilbert–Huang transform based analysis, Exp. Therm Fluid Sci., 51, 174–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malekshahian, M., and Hill, J. M. (2013). Potassium catalyzed CO2 gasification of petroleum coke at elevated pressures, Fuel Process. Technol., 113, 34–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mills, D. (2001). The use of high pressure blow tanks for the pneumatic conveying of pelletised materials, Handbook of Powder Technology, Elsevier Science B.V., Amsterdam, the Netherlands, pp. 387–393.
   Google Scholar
• Ouwerkerk, C. E. D., Molenaar, H. J., and Frank, M. J. W. (1992). Aerated bunker discharge of fine dilating powders, Powder Technol., 72, 241–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piepers, H. W., Cottaar, E. J. E., Verkooijen, A. H. M., and Rietema, K. (1984). Effects of pressure and type of gas on particle-particle interaction and the consequences for gas-solid fluidization behaviour, Powder Technol., 37, 55–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ratnayake, C., Datta, B. K., Saasen, A., Bastesen, Y., and Melaaen, M. C. (2008). Prediction of pressure drop at the entry section from top discharge blow tank in a pneumatic conveying system, Part. Sci. Technol., 26, 451–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sidorenko, I., and Rhodes, M. J. (2004). Influence of pressure on fluidization properties, Powder Technol., 141, 137–154.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suri, A., and Horio, M. (2009). A novel cartridge type powder feeder, Powder Technol., 189, 497–507.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomita, Y., Jotaki, T., and Fukushima, K. (1980). Feed rate characteristics of a blow tank solids conveyor in transport of granular material, Powder Technol., 26, 29–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomita, Y., Jotaki, T., Makimoto, S., and Fukushima, K. (1982). Similarity of granular flow in a blow tank solids conveyor, Powder Technol., 32, 1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomita, Y., Jotaki, Y., Jotaki, T., and Tsukida, Y. (1978). Pneumatic transport of solids by a blow tank system, Bull. SME, 21, 1357–1363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uñac, R. O., Vidales, A. M., Benegas, O. A., and Ippolito, I. (2012). Experimental study of discharge rate fluctuations in a silo with different hopper geometries, Powder Technol., 225, 214–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waghorn, D. J., and Mason, J. S. (1976). The Effect of Aeration and Position of Inlet to Conveying Line on the Discharge Characteristics of a Blow Tank, Proc. of the 1st International Conference on Bulk Solids Storage, Handling and Flow, Powder Advisory Centre, London, U.K.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Y., Wu, S., Gu, J., and Gao, J. (2009). Differences in physical properties and CO2 gasification reactivity between coal char and petroleum coke, Process Saf. Environ. Prot., 87, 323–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, G., Chen, X., Liang, C., Xu, P., Cai, J., and Zhao, C. (2012). Effect of operating conditions and powder properties on pneumatic conveying characteristics of top discharge blow tank, Chem. Eng. Technol., 35, 1998–2006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu, G. L., Chen, X. P., Liang, C., Liu, D. Y., Xu, P., Cai, J. Y., Zhao, C. S. (2013). Conveying characteristics of pulverized coal in a top-discharge blow tank system, Chem. Eng. Technol., 36, 773–780.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yates, J. G. (1996). Effects of temperature and pressure on gas-solid fluidization, Chem. Eng. Sci., 51, 167–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhiping, Z., Yongjie, N., and Qinggang, L. (2007). Effect of pressure on minimum fluidization velocity, J. Therm. Sci., 16, 264–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhou, H., Xiong, Y., and Pei, Y. (2016). Effect of moisture content on dense-phase pneumatic conveying of pulverized lignite under high pressure, Powder Technol., 287, 355–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu, H., and Zhu, J. (2008). Characterization of fluidization behavior in the bottom region of CFB risers, Chem. Eng. J., 141, 169–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar