Assessment of well trajectory effect on slug flow parameters using CFD tools

References

• Abdulkadir, M., Hernandez-Perez, V., Lo, S., Lowndes, I. S., and Azzopardi, B. J. (2013). Comparison of experimental and computational fluid dynamics studies of slug flow in a vertical 90° bend, J. Comput. Multiph. Flow., 5, 265–281.
   Google Scholar
• Al-Safran, E., Sarica, C., Zhang, H. Q., and Brill, J. (2005). Investigation of slug flow characteristics in the valley of a hilly-terrain pipeline, Int. J. Multiph. Flow., 31, 337–357.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araújo, J. D. P., Miranda, J. M., and Campos, J. B. L. M. (2013). Flow of two consecutive Taylor bubbles through a vertical column of stagnant liquid: A CFD study about the influence of the leading bubble on the hydrodynamics of the trailing one, Chem. Eng. Sci., 97, 16–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandara, T., Nguyen, N.-T., and Rosengarten, G. (2015). Slug flow heat transfer without phase change in microchannels: A review, Chem. Eng. Sci., 126, 283–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnea, D., and Taitel, Y. (1993). A model for slug length distribution in gas-liquid slug flow, Int. J. Multiph. Flow., 19, 829–838.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bratland, O. (2010). Pipe Flow 2: Multi-Phase Flow Assurance, Dr. Ove Bratland, Singapore.
   Google Scholar
• Brackbill, J. U., Kothe, D. B., and Zemach, C. (1992). A continuum method for modelling surface tension, J. Comput. Phys., 100, 335–354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brito, R., Pereyra, E., and Sarica, C. (2018). Well trajectory effect on slug flow development, J. Pet. Sci. Eng., 167, 366–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carneiro, J. N. E., Fonseca, R., Ortega, A. J., Chucuya, R. C., Nieckele, A. O., and Azevedo, L. F. A. (2011). Statistical characterization of the two phase slug flow in a horizontal pipe, J. Braz. Soc. Mech. Sci. Eng., 33, 251–258.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Díaz, M. J. C., González, D., Parra, A., Casanova, E., and Asuaje, M. (2013). Effect of gas-liquid two phase flow in the structural behavior of pipelines, in 8th International Conference on Multiphase Flow, pp. 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Godhavn, J. M., Fard, M. P., and Fuchs, P. H. (2005). New slug control strategies, tuning rules and experimental results, J. Process Control., 15, 547–557.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez-Perez, V., Abdulkadir, M., and Azzopardi, B. (2011). Grid generation issues in the CFD modelling of two-phase flow in a pipe, J. Comput. Multiph. Flow., 3, 13–26.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, A., Hirsch, T., and Pitz-Paal, R. (2016). Numerical investigation of severe slugging under conditions of a parabolic trough power plant with direct steam generation, Sol. Energy, 133, 567–585.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, D. F. B., Virués, C. J. J., and Sask, D. (2011). Investigation of liquid loading in tight gas horizontal wells with a transient multiphase flow simulator, in SPE the Canadian Unconvetional Resources Conference, November, pp. 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Nieckele, A. O., Carneiro, J. N. E., Chucuya, R. C., and Azevedo, J. H. P. (2013). Initiation and statistical evolution of horizontal slug flow with a two-fluid model, J. Fluids Eng., 135, 121302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norris, H. L. (2012). The use of a transient multiphase simulator to predict and suppress flow instabilities in a horizontal shale oil well, in SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Society of Petroleum Engineers, 158500.
   Google Scholar
• Pagano, D. J., Plucenio, A., and Traple, A. (2009). Slug-flow control in submarine oil-risers using SMC strategies, IFAC-Papers Online 7, 566–571.
   Google Scholar
• Peng, S., Davidson, L., and Holmberg, S. (1996). The two-equation turbulence k- ω model applied to recirculating ventilation flows, Rept, 96, 276–285.
   Google Scholar
• Ratkovich, N., Berube, P. R., and Nopens, I. (2011). Assessment of mass transfer coefficients in coalescing slug flow in vertical pipes and applications to tubular airlift membrane bioreactors, Chem. Eng. Sci., 66, 1254–1268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soto-Cortes, G., Torres, C., Pereyra, E., and Sarica, C. (2005) A novel signal processing for slug flow analysis (dissertation thesis). The University of Tulsa.
   Google Scholar
• Taitel, Y., Vierkandt, S., Shoham, O., and Brill, J. P. (1990). Severe slugging in a riser system: Experiments and modeling, Int. J. Multiph. Flow, 16, 57–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ujang, P. M., Lawrence, C. J., Hale, C. P., and Hewitt, G. F. (2006). Slug initiation and evolution in two-phase horizontal flow, Int. J. Multiph. Flow, 32, 527–552.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, X., Guo, L., and Zhang, X. (2006). Development of liquid slug length in gas-liquid slug flow along horizontal pipeline: Experiment and simulation, Chinese J. Chem. Eng, 14, 626–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y., Yan, C., Cao, X., Sun, L., Yan, C., and Tian, Q. (2014). Hydrodynamics of slug flow in a vertical narrow rectangular channel under laminar flow condition, Ann. Nucl. Energy, 73, 465–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wei, P., Zhang, K., Gao, W., Kong, L., and Field, R. (2013). CFD modeling of hydrodynamic characteristics of slug bubble flow in a flat sheet membrane bioreactor, J. Memb. Sci., 445, 15–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yasukawa, T., Ninomiya, W., Ooyachi, K., Aoki, N., and Mae, K. (2011). Enhanced production of ethyl pyruvate using gas-liquid slug flow in microchannel, Chem. Eng. J., 167, 527–530.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar