Use of melt blown polypropylene nanofiber templates to obtain homogenous pore channels in glycidyl methacrylate/ethyl dimethacrylate-based monoliths

References

• Acquah C, Danquah MK, Moy CKS, Anwar M, Ongkudon CM. 2017. Parametric investigation of polymethacrylate monolith synthesis and stability via thermogravimetric characterisation. Asia Pacfic J Chem Eng. 12:352–364. doi:10.1002/apj.2077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agyei D, Ongkudon CM, Wei CY, Chan AS, Danquah MK. 2016. Bioprocess challenges to the isolation and purification of bioactive peptides. Food Bioprod Process. 98:244–256. doi:10.1016/j.fbp.2016.02.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alenezi H, Cam M.E, Edirisinghe M. 2019. Experimental and theoretical investigation of the fluid behavior during polymeric fiber formation with and without pressure. Appl Phys Rev. 6: 041401-0-13. doi:10.1063/1.5110965.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bono A, Anisuzzaman SM, Ding OW. 2014. Effect of process conditions on the gel viscosity and gel strength of semi-refined carrageenan (SRC) produced from seaweed (Kappaphycus alvarezii). J King Saud Univ Eng Sci. 26:3–9. doi:10.1016/j.jksues.2012.06.001
   Google Scholar
• Chan YW, Kansil T, Ongkudon CM. 2017. Analytical and preparative polymethacrylate monolith fabrication: effect of porogen content and column size on pore morphology. Colloid Polym Sci. 295:2373–2382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drabek J, Zatloukal M. 2019. Meltblown technology for production of polymeric microfibers/nanofibers: a review. Phys Fluids. 31(9):091301. doi:10.1063/1.5116336
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellison CJ, Phatak A, Giles DW, Macosko CW, Bates FS. 2007. Melt blown nanofibers: fiber diameter distributions and onset of fiber breakup. Polymer (Guildf). 48(11):3306–3316. doi:10.1016/j.polymer.2007.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groarke RJ, Brabazon D. 2016. Methacrylate polymer monoliths for separation applications. J Mater. 9:1–33. doi:10.3390/ma9060446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gumba RE, Saallah S, Misson M, Ongkudon CM, Anton A. 2016. Green biodiesel production: a review on feedstock, catalyst, monolithic reactor, and supercritical fluid technology. Biofuel Res J. 3(3):431–447. doi:10.18331/BRJ2016.3.3.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamidipour M, Larachi F. 2010. Effect of channel size and flow modulation on filtration in monolith reactors with cocurrent gas-suspension downflow. Sep Purif Technol. 73(2):327–338. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2010.04.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassan MA, Yeom BY, Wilkie A, Pourdeyhimi B, Khan SA. 2013. Fabrication of nanofiber meltblown membranes and their filtration properties. J Membr Sci. 427:336–344. doi:10.1016/j.memsci.2012.09.050
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heseltine PL, Ahmed J, Edirisinghe M. 2018. Developments in pressurized gyration for the mass production of polymeric fibers. Macromol Mater Eng. 303(9):1800218. doi:10.1002/mame.201800218
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiao X, Shen S, Shi T. 2015. One-pot preparation of a novel monolith for high performance liquid chromatography applications. J Chromatogr B. 1007:100–109. doi:10.1016/j.jchromb.2015.10.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamin Z, Bono A, Leong LY. 2017. Simulation and optimization of the utilization of triethylene glycol in a natural gas dehydration process. Chem Prod Process Model. 12:1–9. doi:10.1515/cppm-2017-0017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee Y, Wadsworth LC. 1990. Structure and filtration properties of melt blown polypropylene webs. Polym Eng Sci. 30(22):1413–1419. doi:10.1002/pen.760302202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lou H, Li W, Li C, Wang X. 2013. Systematic investigation on parameters of solution blown micro/nanofibers using response surface methodology based on box-Behnken design. J Appl Polym Sci. 130(2):1383–1391. doi:10.1002/app.39317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahalingam S, Edirisinghe M. 2013. Forming of polymer nanofibers by a pressurised gyration process. Macromol Rapid Commun. 34(14):1134–1139. doi:10.1002/marc.201300339
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misson M, Dai S, Jin B, Chen B.H, Zhang H. 2016. Manipulation of nanofiber-based β-galactosidase nanoenvironment for enhancement of galacto-oligosaccharide production. J Biotechnol. 222:56–64. doi:10.1016/j.jbiotec.2016.02.014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayak R. 2017. Polypropylene nanofibers: melt electrospinning versus meltblowing. Springer International Publishing AG: Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Nayak R, Kyratzis IL, Truong YB, Padhye R, Arnold L. 2014. Structural and mechanical properties of polypropylene nanofibres fabricated by meltblowing. J Text Inst. 106(6):629–640. doi:10.1080/00405000.2014.933512
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nayak R, Kyratzis IL, Truong YB, Padhye R, Arnold L, Peeters G, Nichols L, O’Shea M. 2012. Fabrication and characterisation of nanofibres by meltblowing and melt electrospinning. Adv Mater Res. 472–475:1294–1299. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.472-475.1294
   Google Scholar
• Raimi-Abraham BT, Mahalingam S, Edirisinghe M, Craig DQM. 2014. Generation of poly(N-vinylpyrrolidone) nanofibres using pressurised gyration. Mater Sci Eng C. 39:168–176. doi:10.1016/j.msec.2014.02.016
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouquerol J, Avnir D, Fairbridge CW, Everett DH, Haynes JH, Pernicone N, Ramsay JDF, Sing KSW, Unger KK. 1994. Recommendations for the characterization of porous solids. Pure Appl Chem. 66(8):1739–1758. doi:10.1351/pac199466081739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarbatly R, Krishnaiah D, Kamin Z. 2016. A review of polymer nanofibres by electrospinning and their application in oil-water separation for cleaning up marine oil spills. Mar Pollut Bull. 106(1-2):8–16. doi:10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.03.037
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svec F. 2010. Porous polymer monoliths: amazingly wide variety of techniques enabling their preparation. J Chromatogr A. 1217(6):902–924. doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2009.09.073
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan DH, Zhou C, Ellison CJ, Kumar S, Macosko CW, Bates FS. 2010. Meltblown fibers: influence of viscosity and elasticity on diameter distribution. J Nonnewton Fluid Mech. 165(15-16):892–900. doi:10.1016/j.jnnfm.2010.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uppal R, Bhat G, Eash C, Akato K. 2013. Meltblown nanofiber media for enhanced quality factor. Fibers Polym. 14(4):660–668. doi:10.1007/s12221-013-0660-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xin Y, Xiong Q, Bai Q, Miyamoto M, Li C, Shen Y, Uyama H. 2017. A hierarchically porous cellulose monolith: a template-free fabricated, morphology-tunable, and easily functionalizable platform. Carbohydr Polym. 157:429–437. doi:10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.10.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang D, Sun C, Wadsworth LC. 2001. Modeling the mono- and bicomponent fiber meltblown process with surface response methodology. Text Res J. 71(4):301–308. doi:10.1177/004051750107100404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar