Experimental investigation and modeling of the viscosity of some water-based nanofluids

References

• Anoop K, Sundararajan T, Das S. K. 2009. Effect of particle size on the convective heat transfer in nanofluid in the developing region. Int J Heat Mass Transfer. 52(9–10):2189–2195. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.11.063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asadi A. 2018. A guideline towards easing the decision-making process in selecting an effective nanofluid as a heat transfer fluid. Energy Convers Manage. 175:1–10. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2018.08.101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asadi A, Alarifi I. M, Ali V, Nguyen H. M. 2019. An experimental investigation on the effects of ultrasonication time on stability and thermal conductivity of MWCNT-water nanofluid: finding the optimum ultrasonication time. Ultrason Sonochem. 58:104639. doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.104639
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asadi A, Asadi M, Rezaei M, Siahmargoi M, Asadi F. 2016. The effect of temperature and solid concentration on dynamic viscosity of MWCNT/MgO (20–80)–SAE50 hybrid nano-lubricant and proposing a new correlation: an experimental study. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer. 78:48–53. doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2016.08.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asadi A, Asadi M, Rezaniakolaei A, Rosendahl LA, Afrand M, Wongwises S. 2018. Heat transfer efficiency of Al2O3-MWCNT/thermal oil hybrid nanofluid as a cooling fluid in thermal and energy management applications: an experimental and theoretical investigation. Int J Heat Mass Transfer. 117:474–486. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2017.10.036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asadi A, Asadi M, Siahmargoi M, Asadi T, Andarati MG. 2017. The effect of surfactant and sonication time on the stability and thermal conductivity of water-based nanofluid containing Mg(OH)2 nanoparticles: an experimental investigation. Int J Heat Mass Transfer. 108:191–198. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2016.12.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asadi M, Asadi A. 2016. Dynamic viscosity of MWCNT/ZnO–engine oil hybrid nanofluid: an experimental investigation and new correlation in different temperatures and solid concentrations. Int Commun Heat Mass Transfer. 76:41–45. doi:10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2016.05.019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batchelor G. 1977. The effect of Brownian motion on the bulk stress in a suspension of spherical particles. J Fluid Mech. 83(1):97–117. doi:10.1017/S0022112077001062
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boschini F, Rulmont A, Cloots R, Moreno R. 2009. Rheological behaviour of BaZrO3 suspensions in non-aqueous media. Ceram Int. 35(3):1007–1013. doi:10.1016/j.ceramint.2008.04.012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brinkman H C. 1952. The Viscosity of Concentrated Suspensions and Solutions. J Chem Phys. 20(4):571. doi:10.1063/1.1700493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burdett JK, Hughbanks T, Miller GJ, Richardson JW, Smith JV. 1987. Structural-electronic relationships in inorganic solids: powder neutron diffraction studies of the rutile and anatase polymorphs of titanium dioxide at 15 and 295 K. J Am Chem Soc. 109(12):3639–3646. doi:10.1021/ja00246a021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandrasekar M, Suresh S, Bose AC. 2010. Experimental investigations and theoretical determination of thermal conductivity and viscosity of Al2O3/water nanofluid. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 34(2):210–216. doi:10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2009.10.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Ding Y, He Y, Tan C. 2007. Rheological behaviour of ethylene glycol based titania nanofluids. Chem Phys Lett. 444(4–6):333–337. doi:10.1016/j.cplett.2007.07.046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Ding Y, Tan C. 2007. Rheological behaviour of nanofluids. New J Phys. 9(10):367–367. doi:10.1088/1367-2630/9/10/367
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen H, Witharana S, Jin Y, Kim C, Ding Y. 2009. Predicting thermal conductivity of liquid suspensions of nanoparticles (nanofluids) based on rheology. Particuology. 7(2):151–157. doi:10.1016/j.partic.2009.01.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chevalier J, Tillement O, Ayela F. 2007. Rheological properties of nanofluids flowing through microchannels. Appl Phys Lett. 91(23):233103. doi:10.1063/1.2821117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi SU. 2009. Nanofluids: from vision to reality through research. J. Heat Transfer. 131:33106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corcione M. 2011. Empirical correlating equations for predicting the effective thermal conductivity and dynamic viscosity of nanofluids. Energy Convers Manage. 52(1):789–793. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2010.06.072
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duangthongsuk W, Wongwises S. 2009. Measurement of temperature-dependent thermal conductivity and viscosity of TiO2-water nanofluids. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 33(4):706–714.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Einstein A. 1906. Eine neue bestimmung der moleküldimensionen. Ann Phys. 324(2):289–306. doi:10.1002/andp.19063240204
   Google Scholar
• Esfe MH, Goodarzi M, Reiszadeh M, Afrand M. 2019. Evaluation of MWCNTs-ZnO/5W50 nanolubricant by design of an artificial neural network for predicting viscosity and its optimization. J Mol Liq. 277:921–931. doi:10.1016/j.molliq.2018.08.047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esfe MH, Reiszadeh M, Esfandeh S, Afrand M. 2018. Optimization of MWCNTs (10%)–Al2O3 (90%)/5W50 nanofluid viscosity using experimental data and artificial neural network. Physica A. 512:731–744. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2018.07.040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feret FR, Roy D, Boulanger C. 2000. Determination of alpha and beta alumina in ceramic alumina by X-ray diffraction. Spectrochim Acta, Part B. 55(7):1051–1061. doi:10.1016/S0584-8547(00)00225-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garg J, Poudel B, Chiesa M, Gordon JB, Ma JJ, Wang JB, Ren ZF, Kang YT, Ohtani H, Nanda J, et al. 2008. Enhanced thermal conductivity and viscosity of copper nanoparticles in ethylene glycol nanofluid. J Appl Phys. 103(7):74301. doi:10.1063/1.2902483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godson L, Raja B, Lal DM, Wongwises S. 2010. Experimental investigation on the thermal conductivity and viscosity of silver-deionized water nanofluid. Exp Heat Transfer. 23(4):317–332. doi:10.1080/08916150903564796
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• He Y, Jin Y, Chen H, Ding Y, Cang D, Lu H. 2007. Heat transfer and flow behaviour of aqueous suspensions of TiO2 nanoparticles (nanofluids) flowing upward through a vertical pipe. Int J Heat Mass Transfer. 50(11–12):2272–2281. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2006.10.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ishizawa N, Miyata T, Minato I, Marumo F, Iwai S. 1980. A structural investigation of α-Al2O3 at 2170 K. Acta Crystallogr B Struct Sci. 36(2):228–230. doi:10.1107/S0567740880002981
   Google Scholar
• Karimipour A, Esfe MH, Safaei MR, Semiromi DT, Jafari S, Kazi S. 2014. Mixed convection of copper–water nanofluid in a shallow inclined lid driven cavity using the lattice Boltzmann method. Physica A. 402:150–168. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2014.01.057
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khodadadi H, Toghraie D, Karimipour A. 2019. Effects of nanoparticles to present a statistical model for the viscosity of MgO-Water nanofluid. Powder Technol. 342:166–180. doi:10.1016/j.powtec.2018.09.076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ko GH, Heo K, Lee K, Kim DS, Kim C, Sohn Y, Choi M. 2007. An experimental study on the pressure drop of nanofluids containing carbon nanotubes in a horizontal tube. Int J Heat Mass Transfer. 50(23–24):4749–4753. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2007.03.029
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kole M, Dey T. 2011. Effect of aggregation on the viscosity of copper oxide–gear oil nanofluids. Int J Therm Sci. 50(9):1741–1747. doi:10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2011.03.027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulkarni DP, Das DK, Vajjha R. S. 2009. Application of nanofluids in heating buildings and reducing pollution. Appl Energy. 86(12):2566–2573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu W-Q, Fan Q-M. 2008. Study for the particle’s scale effect on some thermophysical properties of nanofluids by a simplified molecular dynamics method. Eng Anal Boundary Elem. 32(4):282–289. doi:10.1016/j.enganabound.2007.10.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahbubul I, Elcioglu EB, Saidur R, Amalina M. 2017. Optimization of ultrasonication period for better dispersion and stability of TiO2–water nanofluid. Ultrason Sonochem. 37:360–367. doi:10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.01.024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahbubul I, Saidur R, Amalina M. 2012. Latest developments on the viscosity of nanofluids. Int J Heat Mass Transfer. 55(4):874–885. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2011.10.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masoumi N, Sohrabi N, Behzadmehr A. 2009. A new model for calculating the effective viscosity of nanofluids. J Phys D: Appl Phys. 42(5):55501. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/42/5/055501
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maxwell J. 1873. Electricity and magnetism. Oxford, UK: Claredon Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murshed S, Leong K, Yang C. 2008. Investigations of thermal conductivity and viscosity of nanofluids. Int J Therm Sci. 47(5):560–568. doi:10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2007.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nafchi PM, Karimipour A, Afrand M. 2019. The evaluation on a new non-Newtonian hybrid mixture composed of TiO2/ZnO/EG to present a statistical approach of power law for its rheological and thermal properties. Physica A. 516:1–18. doi:10.1016/j.physa.2018.10.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namburu P, Kulkarni D, Dandekar A, Das D. 2007. Experimental investigation of viscosity and specific heat of silicon dioxide nanofluids. Micro Nano Lett. 2(3):67–71. doi:10.1049/mnl:20070037
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Namburu PK, Kulkarni DP, Misra D, Das DK. 2007. Viscosity of copper oxide nanoparticles dispersed in ethylene glycol and water mixture. Exp Therm Fluid Sci. 32(2):397–402. doi:10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2007.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen C, Desgranges F, Galanis N, Roy G, Maré T, Boucher S, Mintsa HA. 2008. Viscosity data for Al2O3–water nanofluid—hysteresis: is heat transfer enhancement using nanofluids reliable? Int J Therm Sci. 47(2):103–111. doi:10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2007.01.033
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nguyen C, Desgranges F, Roy G, Galanis N, Maré T, Boucher S, Mintsa HA. 2007. Temperature and particle-size dependent viscosity data for water-based nanofluids–hysteresis phenomenon. Int J Heat Fluid Flow. 28(6):1492–1506. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2007.02.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prasher R, Song D, Wang J, Phelan P. 2006. Measurements of nanofluid viscosity and its implications for thermal applications. Appl Phys Lett. 89(13):133108. doi:10.1063/1.2356113
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roscoe R. 1952. The viscosity of suspensions of rigid spheres. Br J Appl Phys. 3(8):267–269. doi:10.1088/0508-3443/3/8/306
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekhar YR, Sharma K. 2015. Study of viscosity and specific heat capacity characteristics of water-based Al2O3 nanofluids at low particle concentrations. J Exp Nanosci. 10(2):86–102. doi:10.1080/17458080.2013.796595
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas CU, Muthukumar M. 1991. Three‐body hydrodynamic effects on viscosity of suspensions of spheres. J Chem Phys. 94(7):5180–5189. doi:10.1063/1.460555
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timofeeva E. V, Gavrilov A. N, McCloskey J. M, Tolmachev Y. V, Sprunt S, Lopatina L. M, Selinger JV. 2007. Thermal conductivity and particle agglomeration in alumina nanofluids: experiment and theory. Phys Rev E. 76(6):61203. doi:10.1103/PhysRevE.76.061203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turgut A, Tavman I, Chirtoc M, Schuchmann H, Sauter C, Tavman S. 2009. Thermal conductivity and viscosity measurements of water-based TiO2 nanofluids. Int J Thermophys. 30(4):1213–1226. doi:10.1007/s10765-009-0594-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vakili-Nezhaad G, Dorany A. 2012. Effect of single-walled carbon nanotube on the viscosity of lubricants. Energy Procedia. 14:512–517. doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2011.12.967
   Google Scholar
• Vakilinejad A, Aroon MA, Al-Abri M, Bahmanyar H, Myint MTZ, Vakili-Nezhaad GR. 2018. Experimental and theoretical investigation of thermal conductivity of some water-based nanofluids. Chem Eng Commun. 205:610–623.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vand V. 1948. Viscosity of solutions and suspensions. I. Theory. J Phys Chem. 52(2):277–299. doi:10.1021/j150458a001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner W, Kretzschmar HJ. 2008. International steam tables-properties of water and steam based on the industrial formulation IAPWS-IF97. Berlin: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Wang X, Xu X, Choi SUS. 1999. Thermal conductivity of nanoparticle-fluid mixture. J Thermophys Heat Transfer. 13(4):474–480. doi:10.2514/2.6486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang Y, Zhang ZG, Grulke EA, Anderson WB, Wu G. 2005. Heat transfer properties of nanoparticle-in-fluid dispersions (nanofluids) in laminar flow. Int J Heat Mass Transfer. 48(6):1107–1116. doi:10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2004.09.038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang Y, Yang M, Portney NG, Cui D, Budak G, Ozbay E, Ozkan M, Ozkan CS. 2008. Zeta potential: a surface electrical characteristic to probe the interaction of nanoparticles with normal and cancer human breast epithelial cells. Biomed Microdevices. 10(2):321–328. doi:10.1007/s10544-007-9139-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhu H, Li C, Wu D, Zhang C, Yin Y. 2010. Preparation, characterization, viscosity and thermal conductivity of CaCO3 aqueous nanofluids. Sci China Technol Sci. 53(2):360–368. doi:10.1007/s11431-010-0032-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar