References
- Absi-Halabi M, Beshara J, Qabazard H, Stanislaus A, editors. 1996. Catalysts in petroleum refining and petrochemical industries. Elsevier science.
- Al Bazzaz H, Kang JL, Chehadeh D, Bahzad D, Wong DSH, Jang SS. 2015. Robust predictions of catalyst deactivation of atmospheric residual desulfurization. Energy Fuels. 29(11):7089–7100. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b01841
- Al-Dahhan MH, Duduković MP. 1995. Catalyst wetting efficiency in trickle-bed reactors at high pressure. Chem Eng Sci. 50(15):2377–2389. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0009-2509(95)00092-J
- Alvarez A, Ancheyta J. 2008. Modeling residue hydroprocessing in a multi-fixed-bed reactor system. Appl Catal A. 351(2):148–158. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2008.09.010
- Ancheyta J, Rana MS, Furimsky E. 2005. Hydroprocessing of heavy petroleum feeds: tutorial. Catal Today. 109(1–4):3–15. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2005.08.025
- Ancheyta J. 2011. Modeling and simulation of catalytic reactors for petroleum refining. John Wiley & Sons.
- Ancheyta J. 2013. Modeling of processes and reactors for upgrading of heavy petroleum. CRC Press.
- Ancheyta J. 2016. Deactivation of heavy oil hydroprocessing catalysts: fundamentals and modeling. John Wiley & Sons.
- Bahzad D, Kam E. 2009. Atmospheric residues of Kuwait heavy crude upgrading: a pilot plant and model simulation study. Energy Fuels. 23(3):1683–1694. − doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/ef800963t
- Beaton WI, Bertolacini RJ. 1991. Resid hydroprocessing at Amoco. Catal Rev. 33(3–4):281–317. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01614949108020302
- Callejas MA, Martínez MT. 2002. Evaluation of kinetic and hydrodynamic models in the hydroprocessing of a trickle-bed reactor. Energy Fuels. 16(3):647–652. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/ef010203o
- Chehadeh D, Albazzaz H, Bahzad D. 2018. Predicted effects of heavy feeds on the deactivation of a commercial atmospheric residue desulfurization catalyst system. Energy Fuels. 32(4):5480–5488. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b04058
- Cui Q, Ma X, Nakano K, Nakabayashi K, Miyawaki J, Al-Mutairi A, Marafi AM, Park JI, Yoon SH, Mochida I. 2018. Hydrotreating reactivities of atmospheric residues and correlation with their composition and properties. Energy Fuels. 32(6):6726–6736. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b01150
- Dai F, Muhammad Y, Gong X, Li C, Li Z, Zhang S. 2014. Low-temperature and low-pressure fuel hydrodesulfurization by solid catalyst coupling with ionic liquids. Fuel. 134:74–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.05.027
- Ferreira C, Marques J, Tayakout M, Guibard I, Lemos F, Toulhoat H, Ribeiro FR. 2010. Modeling residue hydrotreating. Chem Eng Sci. 65(1):322–329. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ces.2009.06.062
- Ferreira C, Tayakout-Fayolle M, Guibard I, Lemos F. 2014. Hydrodesulfurization and hydrodemetallization of different origin vacuum residues: new modeling approach. Fuel. 129:267–277. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.03.056
- Furimsky E. 1998. Selection of catalysts and reactors for hydroprocessing. Appl Catal A. 171(2):177–206. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-860X(98)00086-6
- Gruia A. 2006. Recent advances in hydrocracking. In: Hsu CS, Robinson PR, editors. Practical advances in petroleum processing. New York: Springer. p. 219–255.
- Ishaq M, Sultan S, Ahmad I, Ullah H, Yaseen M, Amir A. 2017. Adsorptive desulfurization of model oil using untreated, acid activated and magnetite nanoparticle loaded bentonite as adsorbent. J Saudi Chem Soc. 21(2):143–151. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jscs.2015.02.003
- Kam E, Al-Shamali M, Juraidan M, Qabazard H. 2005. A hydroprocessing multicatalyst deactivation and reactor performance model − pilot-plant life test applications. Energy Fuels. 19(3):753–764. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/ef049843s
- Kim T, Ryu J, Kim MJ, Kim HJ, Shul YG, Jeon Y, Park JI. 2014. Characterization and analysis of vanadium and nickel species in atmospheric residues. Fuel. 117:783–791. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2013.10.001
- Kobayashi S, Kushiyama S, Aizawa R, Koinuma Y, Inoue K, Shimizu Y, Egi K. 1987a. Kinetic study on the hydrotreating of heavy oil. 2. Effect of catalyst pore size. Ind Eng Chem Res. 26(11):2245–2250. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/ie00071a013
- Kobayashi S, Kushiyama S, Aizawa R, Koinuma Y, Inoue K, Shimizu Y, Egi K. 1987b. Kinetic study on the hydrotreating of heavy oil. 1. Effect of catalyst pellet size in relation to pore size. Ind Eng Chem Res. 26(11):2241–2245. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/ie00071a012
- Marafi A, Almarri M, Stanislaus A. 2008. The usage of high metal feedstock for the determination of metal capacity of ARDS catalyst system by accelerated aging tests. Catal Today. 130(2–4):395–404. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2007.10.097
- Marafi A, Stanislaus A, Furimsky E. 2010. Kinetics and modeling of petroleum residues hydroprocessing. Catal Rev: Sci Eng. 52(2):204–324. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01614941003720167
- Marafi A. 2017. Impact of crude oil quality on downstream refining processes. In: 22nd World Petroleum Congress. Turkey: World Petroleum Congress.
- Martinez J, Ancheyta J. 2014. Modeling the kinetics of parallel thermal and catalytic hydrotreating of heavy oil. Fuel. 138:27–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2014.02.013
- Mitchell PCH. 1990. Hydrodemetallisation of crude petroleum: fundamental studies. Catal Today. 7(4):439–445. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0920-5861(90)80002-7
- Muhammad Y, Li C. 2011. Dibenzothiophene hydrodesulfurization using in situ generated hydrogen over Pd promoted alumina-based catalysts. Fuel Process Technol. 92(3):624–630. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuproc.2010.11.021
- Muhammad Y, Lu Y, Shen C, Li C. 2011. Dibenzothiophene hydrodesulfurization over Ru promoted alumina based catalysts using in situ generated hydrogen. Energy Convers Manage. 52(2):1364–1370. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2010.09.034
- Muhammad Y, Rahman AU, Rashid HU, Sahibzada M, Subhan S, Tong Z. 2019a. Hydrodesulfurization of dibenzothiophene using Pd-promoted Co–Mo/Al2O3 and Ni–Mo/Al2O3 catalysts coupled with ionic liquids at ambient operating conditions. RSC Adv. 9(18):10371–10385. doi:https://doi.org/10.1039/C9RA00095J
- Muhammad Y, Rashid HU, Subhan S, Rahman AU, Sahibzada M, Tong Z. 2019b. Boosting the hydrodesulfurization of dibenzothiophene efficiency of Mn decorated (Co/Ni)-Mo/Al2O3 catalysts at mild temperature and pressure by coupling with phosphonium based ionic liquids. Chem Eng J. 375:121957. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2019.121957
- Muhammad Y, Shoukat A, Rahman AU, Rashid HU, Ahmad W. 2018. Oxidative desulfurization of dibenzothiophene over Fe promoted Co–Mo/Al2O3 and Ni–Mo/Al2O3 catalysts using hydrogen peroxide and formic acid as oxidants. Chin J Chem Eng. 26(3):593–600. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cjche.2017.05.015
- Oyekunle LO, Ikpekri OB, Jaiyeola A. 2005. Modelling of hydrodesulfurization catalysts: II. Effects of catalyst pore structures on deactivation by metal deposits. Catal Today. 109(1–4):128–134. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2005.08.012
- Rana MS, Ancheyta J, Maity SK, Rayo P. 2005. Characteristics of Maya crude hydrodemetallization and hydrodesulfurization catalysts. Catal Today. 104(1):86–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2005.03.059
- Rodriguez E, Félix G, Ancheyta J, Trejo F. 2018. Modeling of hydrotreating catalyst deactivation for heavy oil hydrocarbons. Fuel. 225:118–133. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.02.085
- Rodríguez MA, Elizalde I, Ancheyta J. 2012. Modeling the performance of a bench-scale reactor sustaining HDS and HDM of heavy crude oil at moderate conditions. Fuel. 100:152–162. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2012.03.019
- Subhan S, Muhammad Y, Sahibzada M, Subhan F, Tong Z. 2019a. Studies on the selection of a catalyst–oxidant system for the energy-efficient desulfurization and denitrogenation of fuel oil at mild operating conditions. Energy Fuels. 33(9):8423–8439. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.9b01950
- Subhan S, Rahman AU, Yaseen M, Rashid HU, Ishaq M, Sahibzada M, Tong Z. 2019b. Ultra-fast and highly efficient catalytic oxidative desulfurization of dibenzothiophene at ambient temperature over low Mn loaded Co-Mo/Al2O3 and Ni-Mo/Al2O3 catalysts using NaClO as oxidant. Fuel. 237:793–805. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fuel.2018.10.067
- Tamm PW, Harnsberger HF, Bridge AG. 1981. Effects of feed metals on catalyst aging in hydroprocessing. Ind Eng Chem Proc Des Dev. 20(2):262–273. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/i200013a014
- Thiele EW. 1939. Relation between catalytic activity and size of particle. Ind Eng Chem. 31(7):916–920. doi:https://doi.org/10.1021/ie50355a027