Valorization of palm oil via cross-metathesis reaction using 1-octene

References

• Ahmad FBH, Hamdan S, Yarmo MA, Alimunir A. 1995. Co-metathesis reaction of crude palm oil and ethene. J Am Oil Chem Soc. 72(6):757–758. doi:10.1007/BF02635669
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alto P. 2011. Synthesis of Terminal alkenes from internal alkenes via olefin metathesis. United States Patent San. 2(12).
   Google Scholar
• Bhuiyan TI, Arudra P, Hossain MM, Akhtar MN, Aitani AM, Abudawoud RH, Al-Khattaf SS. 2014. Kinetics modelling of 2-butene metathesis over tungsten oxide containing mesoporous silica catalyst. Can J Chem Eng. 92(7):1271–1282. doi:10.1002/cjce.21976
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischmeister C, Dixneuf PH, Nelson DJ, Manzini S, Urbina-Blanco CA, Nolan SP, Sinclair F, Alkattan M, Prunet J, Shaver MP, et al. 2020. Decomposition of ruthenium olefin metathesis catalyst. Chem Soc Rev. 47(2):1–56. doi:10.3390/catal10080887
   Google Scholar
• Ho TTT, Jacobs T, Meier MAR. 2009. A design-of-experiments approach for the optimization and understanding of the cross-metathesis reaction of methyl ricinoleate with methyl acrylate. ChemSusChem. 2(8):749–754. doi:10.1002/cssc.200900091.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang W, Huang R, Li P, Feng S, Zhou G, Yu C, Zhou H, Xu C, Xu Q. 2016. Metathesis and isomerization of n-butene and ethylene over WO3/SiO2 and MgO catalysts: thermodynamic and experimental analysis. Appl Catal A. 517:227–235. doi:10.1016/j.apcata.2016.03.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jordaan M, van Helden P, van Sittert CGCE, Vosloo HCM. 2006. Experimental and DFT investigation of the 1-octene metathesis reaction mechanism with the Grubbs 1 precatalyst. J Mol Catal A: Chem. 254(1-2):145–154. doi:10.1016/j.molcata.2006.03.022
   Google Scholar
• Lafaye K, Bosset C, Nicolas L, Guérinot A, Cossy J. 2015. Beyond catalyst deactivation: cross-metathesis involving olefins containing N-heteroaromatics. Beilstein J Org Chem. 11:2223–2241. doi:10.3762/bjoc.11.241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maechling S, Zaja M, Blechert S. 2005. Unexpected results of a turnover number (TON) study utilising ruthenium-based olefin metathesis catalysts. Adv Synth Catal. 347(10):1413–1422. doi:10.1002/adsc.200505053
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazoyer E, Szeto KC, Merle N, Norsic S, Boyron O, Basset JM, Taoufik M, Nicholas CP. 2013. Study of ethylene/2-butene cross-metathesis over W-H/Al2O 3 for propylene production: effect of the temperature and reactant ratios on the productivity and deactivation. J Catal. 301:1–7. doi:10.1016/j.jcat.2013.01.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieres PD, Trasarti AF, Apesteguía CR. 2020. Valorisation of plant oil derivatives via metathesis reactions: study of the cross-metathesis of methyl oleate with cinnamaldehyde. Mol Catal. 481:100612.
   Google Scholar
• Nieres PD, Zelin J, Trasarti AF, Apesteguía CR. 2016. Heterogeneous catalysis for valorisation of vegetable oils: via metathesis reactions: ethenolysis of methyl oleate. Catal Sci Technol. 6(17):6561–6568. doi:10.1039/C6CY01214K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordin NAM, Yamin BM, Yarmo MA, Pardan K, Alimuniar AB. 1991. Metathesis of palm oil. J Mol Catal. 65(1–2):163–172. doi:10.1016/0304-5102(91)85092-G
   Google Scholar
• Patel J, Mujcinovic S, Jackson WR, Robinson AJ, Serelis AK, Such C. 2006. High conversion and productive catalyst turnovers in cross-metathesis reactions of natural oils with 2-butene. Green Chem. 8(5):450–454. doi:10.1039/b600956e
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips JH. 2020. Latest industrial uses of olefin metathesis. In: Thomas J. Colacot, Carin C.C. Johansson Seechurn, editors. Organometallic chemistry in industry. Pasadena, CA: Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA. p. 259–282. doi:10.1002/9783527819201.ch10
   Google Scholar
• Pillai PKS, Li S, Bouzidi L, Narine SS. 2016. Metathesized palm oil polyol for the preparation of improved bio-based rigid and flexible polyurethane foams. Ind Crops Prod. 83:568–576. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2015.12.068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmid TE, Bantreil X, Citadelle CA, Slawin AMZ, Cazin CSJ. 2011. Phosphites as ligands in ruthenium-benzylidene catalysts for olefin metathesis. Chem Commun (Camb). 47(25):7060–7062. doi:10.1039/c1cc10825e.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sert E, Atalay FS. 2012. Determination of adsorption and kinetic parameters for transesterification of methyl acetate with hexanol catalyzed by ion exchange resin. Ind Eng Chem Res. 51(18):6350–6355. doi:10.1021/ie300350r
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair F, Alkattan M, Prunet J, Shaver MP. 2017. Olefin cross metathesis and ring-closing metathesis in polymer chemistry. Polym Chem. 8(22):3385–3398. doi:10.1039/C7PY00340D
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumathi S, Chai SP, Mohamed AR. 2008. Utilization of oil palm as a source of renewable energy in Malaysia. Renewable Sustainable Energy Rev. 12(9):2404–2421. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2007.06.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thangavel M, Chin SY. 2020. Cross metathesis of plant oil: a mini review on reaction condition and catalysis. IOP Conf Ser: Mater Sci Eng. 991(1):012073. doi:10.1088/1757-899X/991/1/012073
   Google Scholar
• Trasarti AF, González EJ, Nieres PD, Apesteguía CR. 2020. Plant oil valorization by cross-metathesis reactions: synthesis of fine chemicals from methyl oleate. Latin Am Appl Res. 50(2):139–144. doi:10.52292/j.laar.2020.477
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Der Gryp P, Marx S, Vosloo HCM. 2012. Experimental and reaction kinetic investigation of 1-octene metathesis reaction with Hoveyda-Grubbs first generation precatalyst. Int J Chem Reactor Eng. 10(1). doi:10.1515/1542-6580.2771
   Google Scholar
• Yelchuri V, Srikanth K, Prasad RBN, Karuna MSL. 2019. Olefin metathesis of fatty acids and vegetable oils. J Chem Sci. 131(5):1–16. doi:10.1007/s12039-019-1615-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zlatanić A, Lava C, Zhang W, Petrović ZS. 2004. Effect of structure on properties of polyols and polyurethanes based on different vegetable oils. J Polym Sci B Polym Phys. 42(5):809–819. doi:10.1002/polb.10737
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar