The Value of South and Southeast Asian Studies Journal Rankings

Notes

• Thomas E., Nisonger, Evaluation of Library Collections, Access, and Electronic Resources: A Literature Guide and Annotated Bibliography (Westport, Connecticut: Libraries Unlimited, 2003): 207.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas E., Nisonger, Evaluation of Library Collections, Access, and Electronic Resources: A Literature Guide and Annotated Bibliography (Westport, Connecticut: Libraries Unlimited, 2003): 207.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson ISI Web of Knowledge, “JCR Social Science Edition 2003: Area Studies Journal Summary List,” http://isi6.isiknowledge.com.dbgw.lis.curtin.edu.au/portal.cgi (accessed February 20, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Bob, McKercher, ““A Case for Ranking Tourism Journals”,” Tourism Management 26, 5 (2005): 649–661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bob, McKercher, ““A Case for Ranking Tourism Journals”,” Tourism Management 26, 5 (2005): 649–661–650.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donald L., Harman & Keith V., Lucas, ““Establishing Journal Eminence in Music Education Research”,” Journal of Research in Music Education 46, no. 3 (1998): 405–413 For example, see.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Efraim, Turban, Duanning, Zhou & Jian, Ma, ““A Group Decision Support Approach to Evaluating Journals”,” Information and Management 42, 1 (2004): 31–44 One exception is.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chris, Ryan, ““The Ranking and Rating of Academics and Journals in Tourism Research”,” Tourism Management 26, 5 (2005): 657–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert B., Archibald & David H., Finifter, ““Biases in Citations-Based Ranking of Journals”,” Scholarly Publishing 18, 2 (1987): 131–138.
   Google Scholar
• Janet B., Bavelas, ““The Social Psychology of Citations”,” Canadian Psychological Review 19, 2 (1978): 158–163.
   Google Scholar
• Gyula, Vastag & Frank, Montabon, ““Journal Characteristics, Rankings, and Social Acculturation in Operations Management”,” Omega 30, 2 (2002): 119–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I. Lucrezia, Herman, ““Receptivity to Foreign Literature: A Comparison of UK and US Citing Behavior in Librarianship and Information Science”,” Library and Information Science 13, 1 (1991): 37–47.
   Google Scholar
• Robert, CostanzaDavid, SternBrendan, FisherLining, HeChunbo, Ma, ““Influential Publications in Ecological Economics: A Citation Analysis”,” Ecological Economics 50, 3–4 (2004): 261–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert, CostanzaDavid, SternBrendan, FisherLining, HeChunbo, Ma, ““Influential Publications in Ecological Economics: A Citation Analysis”,” Ecological Economics 50, 3–4 (2004): 261–292 262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jan, Dul & Waldemar, Karwowski, ““An Assessment System for Rating Scientific Journals in the Field of Ergonomics and Human Factors”,” Applied Ergonomics 35, 3 (2004): 301–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J. Robert, Vokurka, ““The Relative Importance of Journals Used in Operations Management Research: A Citation Analysis”,” Journal of Operations Management 14, 4 (1996): 344–355.
   Google Scholar
• Markus J., Milne, ““Toward the End of Academic Freedom, Diversity Judgement, and Accountability: A Critique of Cassar and Holmes (1999) Journal Yardsticks”,” Accounting, Accountability, and Performance 6, 11 (2000): 99–116.
   Google Scholar
• Rita, Hull & Gail B., Wright, ““Faculty Perceptions of Journal Quality: An Update”,” Accounting Horizons 4, 1 (1990): 77–98.
   Google Scholar
• Robert K., Coe & Irwin, Weinstock, ““Evaluating the Management Journals: A Second Look”,” Academy of Management Journal 27, 3 (1984): 660–666.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kathleen E., Joswick & Jeanne Koekkoek, Stierman, ““Perceptions vs Use: Comparing Faculty Evaluations of Journal Titles with Faculty and Student Usage”,” Journal of Academic Librarianship 21, 6 (1995): 454–458.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kathleen E., Joswick & Jeanne Koekkoek, Stierman, ““Perceptions vs Use: Comparing Faculty Evaluations of Journal Titles with Faculty and Student Usage”,” Journal of Academic Librarianship 21, 6 (1995): 454–458 457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawrence D., Brown & Ronald J., Huefner, ““The Familiarity with and Perceived Quality of Accounting Journals: Views of Senior Accounting Faculty in Leading US MBA Programs”,” Contemporary Accounting Research 11, 1 (1994): 223–250.
   Google Scholar
• Vasilis, Theoharakis & Andrew, Hirst, ““Perceptual Differences of Marketing Journals: A Worldwide Perspective”,” Marketing Letters 13, 4 (2002): 389–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank L., DuBois & David, Reeb, ““Ranking the International Business Journals”,” Journal of International Business Studies 31, 4 (2000): 689–704.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AccessAsia Global Consortium, “AccessAsia Specialist Database,” http://www.accessasia.org/database/quick (accessed 8 April, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Asia Society, “AsiaExperts Database,” http://www.asiasource.org/experts/ax-mp-01.cfm (accessed 8 April, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Columbia University Library, “International Directory of South Asia Scholars,” http://www.columbia.edu/cu/lweb/indiv/area/idsas (accessed 8 April, 2005).
   Google Scholar
• Janet, Ilieva, Steve, Baron & Nigel M., Healey, ““Online Surveys in Marketing Research: Pros and Cons”,” International Journal of Market Research 44, 3 (2002): 361–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janet, Ilieva, Steve, Baron & Nigel M., Healey, ““Online Surveys in Marketing Research: Pros and Cons”,” International Journal of Market Research 44, 3 (2002): 361–382.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alan, Lowe & Joanne, Locke, ““Perceptions of Journal Quality and Research Paradigm: Results of a Web-Based Survey of British Accounting Academics”,” Accounting, Organizations and Society 30, 1 (2005): 81–98 For example, see.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robert, Green, ““Faculty Rank, Effort, and Success: A Study of Publication in Professional Journals”,” Journal of Social Work Education 34, 3 (1998): 415–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• John P., Forrester & Sheilah S., Watson, ““An Assessment of Public Administration Journals: The Perspective of Editors and Editorial Board Members”,” Public Administration Review 54, 5 (1994): 474–482.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michael J., Polonsky, ““Journal Rankings: Does One Size Fit All?”,” Australasian Marketing Journal 12, 2 (2004): 64–66.
   Google Scholar