Are All the References Mentioned in Academic Papers? A Quantitative Analysis of the Nonmentioned Phenomenon

References

• Baldi, S. (1998). Normative versus social constructivist processes in the allocation of citations: A network-analytic model. American Sociological Review, 63(6), 829–846. https://doi.org/10.2307/2657504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergstrom, C. T., West, J. D., & Wiseman, M. A. (2008). The Eigenfactor metrics. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 28(45), 11433–11434. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0003-08.2008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bi, Y., Deng, K., & Cheng, J. (2017). A keyword-based method for measuring sentence similarity. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM on Web Science Conference (pp. 571–575). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Bornmann, L., & Williams, R. (2017). Can the journal impact factor be used as a criterion for the selection of junior researchers? A large-scale empirical study based on ResearcherID data. Journal of Informetrics, 11(3), 788–799. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buda, A., & Jarynowski, A. (2010). Life-time of correlations and its applications (Vol. 1). Wydawnictwo Niezalezne.
   Google Scholar
• Camacho‐Miñano, M. D. M., & Núñez‐Nickel, M. (2009). The multilayered nature of reference selection. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 60(4), 754–777.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chubin, D. E., & Moitra, S. D. (1975). Content analysis of references: Adjunct or alternative to citation counting? Social Studies of Science, 5(4), 423–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/030631277500500403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ding, Y., Liu, X., Guo, C., & Cronin, B. (2013). The distribution of references across texts: Some implications for citation analysis. Journal of Informetrics, 7(3), 583–592. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drake, D. C., Maritz, B., Jacobs, S. M., Crous, C. J., Engelbrecht, A., Etale, A., Fourie, M. J., Furniss, D. G., Scott, S. L., Parusnath, S., & Tye, D. R. (2013). The propagation and dispersal of misinformation in ecology: Is there a relationship between citation accuracy and journal impact factor? Hydrobiologia, 702(1), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10750-012-1392-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gali, N., Mariescu-Istodor, R., Hostettler, D., & Fränti, P. (2019). Framework for syntactic string similarity measures. Expert Systems with Applications, 129, 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2019.03.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garfield, E., & Merton, R. K. (1979). Citation indexing: Its theory and application in science, technology, and humanities (Vol. 8). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, E., & Sher, I. H. (1963). New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing. American Documentation, 14(3), 195–201. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140304
   Google Scholar
• Ghosh, J. S., & Neufeld, M. L. (1974). Uncitedness of articles in the Journal of the American Chemical Society. Information Storage and Retrieval, 10(11–12), 365–369. https://doi.org/10.1016/0020-0271(74)90043-6
   Google Scholar
• Gipp, B., & Beel, J. (2009). Citation Proximity Analysis (CPA)—A new approach for identifying related work based on co-citation analysis. In Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics (ISSI’09) (pp. 571–575). International Society for Scientometrics and Informetrics.
   Google Scholar
• González-Pereira, B., Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2010). A new approach to the metric of journals’ scientific prestige: The SJR indicator. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 379–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heneberg, P. (2016). From excessive journal self-cites to citation stacking: Analysis of journal self-citation kinetics in search for journals, which boost their scientometric indicators. PLOS One, 11(4), e0153730. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0153730
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herlach, G. (1978). Can retrieval of information from citation indexes be simplified? Multiple mentions of a reference as a characteristic of the link between cited and citing article. Journal of the Association for Information Science & Technology, 29(6), 308–310.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, J. E. (2005). An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(46), 16569–16572. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0507655102
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hou, W. R., Li, M., & Niu, D. K. (2011). Counting citations in texts rather than reference lists to improve the accuracy of assessing scientific contribution: Citation frequency of individual articles in other papers more fairly measures their scientific contribution than mere presence in reference lists. BioEssays: News and Reviews in Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, 33(10), 724–727. https://doi.org/10.1002/bies.201100067
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Z., Chen, C., & Liu, Z. (2013). Where are citations located in the body of scientific articles? A study of the distributions of citation locations. Journal of Informetrics, 7(4), 887–896. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.08.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, Z., Lin, G., Sun, T., & Hou, H. (2017). Understanding multiply mentioned references. Journal of Informetrics, 11(4), 948–958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2017.08.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeh, G., & Widom, J. (2002 SimRank: A measure of structural-context similarity. In Proceedings of the ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (pp. 538–543). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Journal Citation Reports (2017). https://clarivate.com/products/journal-citation-reports.
   Google Scholar
• Kaplan, N. (1965). The norms of citation behavior: Prolegomena to the footnote. American Documentation, 16(3), 179–184. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090160305
   Google Scholar
• Kessler, M. M. (1963). Bibliographic coupling between scientific papers. American Documentation, 14(1), 10–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.5090140103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocher, M., & Savoy, J. (2017). Distance measures in author profiling. Information Processing & Management, 53(5), 1103–1119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leydesdorff, L. (1998). Theories of citation? Scientometrics, 43(1), 5–25. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02458391
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manning, C. D., Schütze, H., & Raghavan, P. (2008). Introduction to information retrieval. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moed, H. F. (2010). Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 265–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.01.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neaves, W. (2012). The roots of research misconduct. Nature, 488(7409), 121–122. https://doi.org/10.1038/nj7409-121a
   Google Scholar
• Neuberger, J., & Counsell, C. (2002). Impact factors: Uses and abuses. European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, 14(3), 209–211. https://doi.org/10.1097/00042737-200203000-00001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pak, C., Yu, G., & Wang, W. (2018). A study on the citation situation within the citing paper: Citation distribution of references according to mention frequency. Scientometrics, 114(3), 905–918. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2627-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, K., Hong, J. S., & Kim, W. (2020). A methodology combining cosine similarity with classifier for text classification. Applied Artificial Intelligence, 34(5), 396–411. https://doi.org/10.1080/08839514.2020.1723868
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priem, J., & Hemminger, B. H. (2010). Scientometrics 2.0: Toward new metrics of scholarly impact on the social Web. First Monday, 15(7). Retrieved from https://journals.uic.edu/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2874/2570
   Google Scholar
• Priem, J., Parra, C., Piwowar, H., Groth, P., & Waagmeester, A. (2012). Uncovering impacts: A case study in using altmetrics tools. In Second International Conference on the Future of Scholarly Communication and Scientific Publishing. http://jasonpriem.org/self-archived/altmetrics/sepublica/cameraready.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ristanti, P. Y., Wibawa, A. P., & Pujianto, U. (2019). Cosine similarity for title and abstract of economic journal classification [Paper presentation]. 2019 5th International Conference on Science in Information Technology (ICSITech) (pp. 123–127). IEEE.
   Google Scholar
• Small, H. (1973). Co‐citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 24(4), 265–269. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.4630240406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, R., & Safer, M. A. (2008). Author‐rated importance of cited references in biology and psychology publications. Journal of Documentation, 64(2), 246–272. https://doi.org/10.1108/00220410810858047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teixeira, M. C., Thomaz, S. M., Michelan, T. S., Mormul, R. P., Meurer, T., Fasolli, J. V. B., & Silveira, M. J. (2013). Incorrect citations give unfair credit to review authors in ecology journals. PLOS One, 8(12), e81871. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0081871
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tort, A. B., Targino, Z. H., & Amaral, O. B. (2012). Rising publication delays inflate journal impact factors. PLOS One, 7(12), e53374. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voos, H., & Dagaev, K. S. (1976). Are all citations equal? Or, Did we op. cit. your idem? Journal of Academic Librarianship, 1(6), 19–21.
   Google Scholar
• Waltman, L. (2016). A review of the literature on citation impact indicators. Journal of Informetrics, 10(2), 365–391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2016.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., van Leeuwen, T. N., & Visser, M. S. (2013). Some modifications to the SNIP journal impact indicator. Journal of Informetrics, 7(2), 272–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2012.11.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wan, X., & Liu, F. (2014). WL-index: Leveraging citation mention number to quantify an individual’s scientific impact. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(12), 2509–2517. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23151
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, H. D. (1990). Author co-citation analysis: Overview and defense. Scholarly Communication and Bibliometrics, 84, 106.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhite, A. W., & Fong, E. A. (2012). Scientific publications. Coercive citation in academic publishing. Science (New York, N.Y..), 335(6068), 542–543. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1212540
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, T., Yu, G., Song, Y., & Wang, M. Y. (2018). Toward the more effective identification of journals with anomalous self-citation. Malaysian Journal of Library & Information Science, 23(2), 25–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, T., Yu, G., & Wang, M. Y. (2014). Classification method for detecting coercive self-citation in journals. Journal of Informetrics, 8(1), 123–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2013.11.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, D., Cappello, A., & Johnston, L. (2017). Functions of uni-and multi-citations: Implications for weighted citation analysis. Journal of Data and Information Science, 2(1), 51–69. https://doi.org/10.1515/jdis-2017-0003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, P., Han, J., & Sun, Y. (2009). P-Rank: A comprehensive structural similarity measure over information networks. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (pp. 233–238). ACM.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu, X., Turney, P., Lemire, D., & Vellino, A. (2015). Measuring academic influence: Not all citations are equal. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 66(2), 408–427. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23179
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar