References
- Brillinger DR. A note on the estimation of evoked responses. Biological Cybernetics 1974;31:141–4.
- British Society of Audiology. Recommended procedure for uncomfortable loudness level. Br J Audiol 1987; 21:231.
- Cox R. A structured approach to hearing aid selection. Ear Hear 1985;6:226–39.
- Fairfield IF A study of the relationship between the auditory brainstem response and measures of loudness discomfort in a normally-hearing adult population. MSc Thesis, Manchester University, 1991.
- Hawkins DB. Overamplification: a well documented case report. J Speech Hear Dis 1982;47:382–4.
- Hawkins DB, Walden BE, Montgomery A, Prosek RA. Description and validation of an LDL procedure designed to select 55PL90. Ear Hear 1987;8:162–9.
- Hoormann J, Falkenstein M, Hohnsbein J, Blanke L. The human frequency following response (FFR): normal variability and relation to the click evoked brainstem response. Hear Res 1992;59:179–88.
- Kamm CA, Dirks DD, Mickey MR. Effects of sensorineural hearing loss on loudness discomfort level and most comfortable loudness judgements. J Speech Hear Res 1978;21:668–81.
- Kiessling J. Input-output function of the acoustic reflex and objective hearing aid evaluation. Audiol 1980; 19:480–94.
- Kiessling J. Hearing aid selection by brainstem audiometry. Scand Audiol 1982;11:269–75.
- Kinney CE. The further destruction of partially deaf-ened children by the use of powerful hearing aids. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1961;70:828–35.
- McCleod HL, Greenberg HJ. Relationship between loudness discomfort level and acoustic reflex threshold for normal and sensorineural hearing-impaired indivi-duals. J Speech Hear Res 1979;22:873–83.
- MacPherson BJ, Elfenbein IL, Schum RL, Bentler RA. Thresholds of discomfort in young children. Ear Hear 1991;12:184–90.
- Mardia KV Statistics of directional data. New York: Academic Press, 1972.
- Markides A. Best listening levels for children. J Br Assoc Teach Deaf 1980;4:190–7.
- Marsh JT, Brown WS, Smith JC. Far field recorded frequency following responses: correlates of low pitch auditory perception in humans. Electroencephalogra-phy and clinical neurophysiology 1975;38:113–19.
- Parker DJ, Matsebula D. The period evoked potential: a rapid technique for acquisition of phase-locked re-sponses to continuous pure tone stimulation. Br J Audiol 1992;26:335–8.
- Parker DJ, Matsebula D. The period evoked potential: objective response detection and 500 Hz thresholds in normally hearing subjects. Br J Audiol 1998;32:167–75.
- Parker DJ, O'Dwyer D. The 40 Hz modulation-follow-ing response: prediction of low-frequency uncomfor-table loudness level in normally hearing subjects. Audiology 1998;37:372–81.
- Serbetcioglu M An approach to the prediction of the loudness discomfort level using the frequency specific auditory brainstem response. MSc Thesis, Manchester University, 1991.
- Thornton ARD, Farrell G, McSporran EL. Clinical methods for the objective estimation of loudness discomfort level (LDL) using auditory brainstem response in patients. Scand Audiol 1989;18:225–30.
- Thornton ARD, Yardley YL, Farrell G. The objective estimation of loudness discomfort level using auditory brainstem evoked responses. Scand Audiol 1987; 16:219–25.
- Weaver EG, Bray CW. The nature of acoustic response: the relation between sound frequency and frequency of impulses in the auditory nerve. J Exp Psychol 1930; 13 :373–87.