Speech perception after multichannel cochlear implantation in Finnish-speaking postlingually deafened adults

References

• Archbold S. Implementing a paediatric cochlear implant programme: theory and practice. In: McCormick P, Archbold S, Sheppard S, eds. Cochlear implants for young children. London: Whurr, 1994; 25–59.
   Google Scholar
• Archbold S, Lutman ME, Nikolopoulos T. Categories of auditory performance: inter-user reliability. Br J Audiol 1998; 32: 7–12.
   Google Scholar
• British Journal of Audiology recommendation. Descriptors for pure tone audiograms, technical note. Br J Audiol 1988; 22: 123.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen NL, Waltzman SB, Fisher SG. A prospective randomized study of cochlear implants. N Engl J Med 1993; 328: 233–7.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Cohen NL, Waltzman SB, Roland JT et al. Results of speech processor upgrade in a population of veterans affairs cochlear implant recipients. Am J Otol 1997; 18: 462–5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Geier L, Fisher L, Barker M, Opie J. The effect of long-term deafness on speech recognition in postlingually deafened adult Clarion® cochlear implant users. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999; 108: 80–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helms J, Muller J, Schön Jet al. Evaluation of performance with the COMBI40 cochlear implant in adults: a multicentric clinical study. ORL 1997; 59: 23–35.
   Google Scholar
• Holden LK, Skinner MW, Holden TA. Speech recognition with the Mpeak and Speak speech-coding strategies of the Nucleus cochlear implant. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1997; 116: 163–7.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson F. Suomen kielen äänne- ja muotorakenne. Helsinki: Werner Söderström, 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Kiefer J, Muller J, Pfenningdorff Th et al. Speech understanding in quiet and in noise with the CIS speech coding strategy (Med-El Combi 40) compared to the Multipeak and Spectral peak strategies (Nucleus). ORL 1996; 58: 127–35.
   Google Scholar
• Kiefer J, von Ilberg C, Reimer B et al. Results of cochlear implantation in patients with severe to profound hearing loss — implications for patient selection. Audiol 1998; 37: 382–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludvigsen C. Construction and evaluation of an audio-visual test (the Helen-test). In: Birk Nielsen H, Kampp E, eds. Scandinavian audiology supplement 4, Visual and audio-visual perception of speech. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell 1974; 67–82.
   Google Scholar
• Ludvigsen C. Operation Helen. Auditive, visual and audio-visual perception of speech. Ludvigsen C., ed. Copen-hagen: Stougaard Jensen, 1981.
   Google Scholar
• Lonka E. Aikuinen huonokuuloinen ja huulioluvun oppi-minen — huuliolukumenetelmän seurantatutkimus. Li-senciate study in Logopedics, University of Helsinki, 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Määttä TK, Sorri MJ, Huttunen KH, Välimaa TT, Muhli AA. On the construction of a Finnish audiometric sentence test. Scand Audiol. in press.
   Google Scholar
• Palva T. Finnish speech audiometry: methods and clinical applications. Academic dissertation, University of Turku, 1952.
   Google Scholar
• Shallop JK, Arndt PL, Tumacliff KA. Expanded indications for cochlear implantation: perceptual results in seven adults with residual hearing. J Speech Lang Path 1992; 16: 141–8.
   Google Scholar
• Suomi K. Fonologian perusteita. Publications of the Department of Finnish, Saami and Logopedics 1996; 4.
   Google Scholar
• Vainio M. Phoneme frequencies in Finnish text and speech. In: Iivonen A, Klippi A, eds. Studies in Logopedics and Phonetics 5. Publications of the Department of Pho-netics, University of Helsinki, Series B: Phonetics, Logopedics and Speech Communication 6 (1996), 181–94.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk JE, Olphen AF, Langereis MC, Mens LHM, Brokx JPL, Smoorenburg GF. Predictors of cochlear implant performance. Audiol 1999; 38: 109–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whitford LA, Seligman PM, Everingham LE et al. Evaluation of the Nucleus Spectra 22 processor and new speech processing strategy (Speak) in postlinguis-tically deafened adults. Acta Otolaryngol 1995; 115: 629–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar