References
- Boothroyd A. Developments in speech audiometry. Br J Audiol 1968;2:3–10.
- Byrne D, Dillon H. The National Acoustics Labora-tories' new procedure for selecting the gain and frequency response of a hearing aid. Ear Hear 1986; 7:257–65.
- Byrne D, Dillon H, Tran K, Arlinger S, Wilbraham K, Cox R, et al. An international comparison of long-term average speech spectra. J Acoust Soc Am 1994;96: 2108–20.
- Byrne D, Parkinson A, Newall P. Hearing aid gain and frequency response requirements for the severely/ profoundly hearing impaired. Br J Audiol 1990;11: 40–9.
- Carhart R, Jerger JF. Preferred method for clinical determination of pure-tone thresholds. J Speech Hear Dis 1959;24:330–45.
- Cox RM, Alexander GC. Prediction of hearing aid benefit: the role of preferred listening levels. Ear Hear 1994;15:22–9.
- Elberling C, Ludvigsen C, Keidser G. The design and testing of a noise reduction algorithm based on spectral subtraction. Scand Audiol 1993;Suppl 38:39–49.
- Glasberg BR, Moore BCJ. Psychoacoustic abilities of subjects with unilateral and bilateral cochlear impair-ments and their relationship to the ability to understand speech. Scand Audiol 1989;Suppl 32:1–25.
- Hawkins DB, Walden BE, Montgomery A, Prosek RA. Description and validation of an LDL procedure designed to select 55PL90. Ear Hear 1987;8:162–9.
- Hoffman MW, Trine TD, Buckley KM, Van Tasell DJ. Robust adaptive microphone array processing for hearing aids: Realistic speech enhancement. J Acoust Soc Am 1994;96:759–70.
- Levitt H. Transformed up-down methods in psycho-acoustics. J Acoust Soc Am 1971;49:467–77.
- Lewis HD, Benignus VA, Muller KE, Malott CM, Barton CN. Babble and random-noise masking of speech in high and low context cue conditions. J Speech Hear Res 1988;31:108–14.
- Ludvigsen C, Elberling C, Keidser G. Evaluation of a noise reduction method - comparison between ob-served scores and scores predicted from STE Scand Audiol 1993;Suppl 38:50–5.
- Lyregaard PE. On the practical validity of POGO. Hearing Instr 1986;37:13–6.
- McCandless GA, Lyregaard PE. Prescription of gain/ output (POGO) for hearing aids. Hearing Instruments 1983;34:16–21.
- McDermott HJ. A programmable sound processor for advanced hearing aid research. IEEE Trans Rehab Eng 1998;6:53–9.
- McDermott HJ, Dean MR, Dillon H. Control of hearing aid saturated sound pressure level by frequency-shaped output compression limiting. Scand Audiol 1999;28: 27–38.
- McDermott HJ, Vandali AE, van Hoesel RJM, McKay CM, Harrison JM, Cohen LT. A portable program-mable digital sound processor for cochlear implant research. IEEE Trans Rehab Eng 1993;1:94–100.
- Moore BCJ, Glasberg BR. Comparisons of frequency selectivity in simultaneous and forward masking for subjects with unilateral cochlear impairments. J Acoust Soc Am 1986;80:93–107.
- Nabelek AK, Tucker FM, Letowski TR. Toleration of background noises: Relationship with patterns of hearing aid use by elderly persons. J Speech Hear Res 1991;34:679–85.
- Parkinson A, Byrne D, Newall P. Aided speech sensation levels received by severely hearing impaired listeners. Aust J Audiol 1989;11:27–36.
- Punch IL, Robb R, Shovels All. Aided listener preferences in laboratory versus real-world environ-ments. Ear Hear 1994;15:50–61.
- Soede W, Bilsen FA, Berkhout AJ. Assessment of directional microphone array for hearing impaired listeners. J Acoust Soc Am 1993;94:799–808.
- Walden BE, Schuchman GI, Sedge RK. The reliability and validity of the comfort level method of setting hearing aid gain. J Speech Hear Dis 1977;42:455–61.