Advanced search
Publication Cover
Scandinavian Audiology Volume 30, 2001 - Issue 2
Journal homepage
29
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Objective detection of transiently evoked otoacoustic emissions

Ekkehard Stürzebecher ENT Clinic, Medical Faculty of the Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main
,
Mario Cebulla ENT Clinic, Medical Faculty of the Johann Wolfgang Goethe-University Frankfurt am Main
&
K.- D. Wernecke Institute of Medical Biometry, Medical Faculty (Charite) of the Humboldt University Berlin, Germany
Pages 78-88 | Published online: 12 Oct 2009

  • Aidan D, Lestang P, Avan P, Bonfils P. Characteristics of transient-evoked otoacoustic emissions (TEOAE) in neonates. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1997; 117: 25–30.
  • Bershad NJ, Rockmore AJ. On estimating signal-to-noise ratio using the sample correlation coefficient. IEEE Trans Inform Theory January 1974; 112–3.
  • Bray P, Kemp D. An advanced cochlear echo technique suitable for infant screening. Br J Audiol 1987; 21: 191–204.
  • Cebulla M, Stiirzebecher E, Wemecke KD. Objective detection of auditory evoked potentials — comparison of several statistical tests in the frequency domain by means of Monte Carlo simulations. Scand Audiol 1996; 25: 201–6.
  • Cebulla M, Stiirzebecher E, Wemecke KD. Objective detection of auditory brainstem potentials — comparison of statistical tests in the time and frequency domains. Scand Audiol 2000a; 29: 44–51.
  • Cebulla M, Stürzebecher E, Wemecke KD. Untersuchung verschiedener SNR-Schätzer fur den Nachweis von biologischen Reizantworten im Rauschen. Z Audiol 2000b; 39: 14–22.
  • Don M, Elberling C, Waring M. Objective detection of averaged auditory brainstem responses. Scand Audiol 1984; 13: 219–28.
  • Doyle KJ, Fujikama S, Rogers P, Newman E. Comparison of newborn hearing screening by transient otoacoustic emissions and auditory brainstem response using ALGO-2. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1998; 43: 207–11.
  • Elberling C, Don M. Quality estimation of averaged auditory brainstem responses. Scand Audiol 1984; 13: 187–97.
  • European Consensus Statement on Neonatal Hearing Screening. European Consensus Development Confer-ence on Neonatal Hearing Screening. Milan, 15–16 May 1998.
  • Friedman M. The use of ranks to avoid the assumption of normality implicit in the analysis of variance. J Am Stat Assoc 1937; 32: 675–701.
  • Giebel A. 1998. Personal communication.
  • Hartung J. Statistik. Miinchen: Oldenburg Verlag GmbH, 1995.
  • Kemp D, Bray PJ, Alexander L, Brown AM. Acoustic emission cochleography — practical aspects. Scand Audiol 1986; Suppl 25: 71–82.
  • Liitkenheiner B. Theoretical considerations on the detection of evoked responses by means of the Rayleigh test. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1991; Suppl 491: 52–60.
  • Mardia KV. Statistics of directional data. London and New York: Academic Press, 1972.
  • Maxon AB, White KR, Vohr BR, Behrens TR. Using transient evoked otoacoustic emissions for neonatal hearing screening. Br J Audiol 1993; 27: 149–53.
  • Neely ST, Norton SJ, Gorga MP, Jestaedt W. Latency of auditory brain-stem responses and otoacoustic emissions using tone-burst stimuli. J Acoust Soc 1988; 83: 652–6.
  • NIH Consensus statement. Early identification of hearing impairment in infants and young children. Public Health Service NIH Institutes. Office of Medical Applications of Research. 1993; 11: 1–24.
  • Mehl AL, Thomson V. Newborn hearing screening: the great omission. Pediatrics 1998; 101: E4.
  • Sachs L. Angewandte Statistik. Berlin, Heidelberg, New York: Springer-Verlag 1992.
  • Schimmel H. The ± reference: accuracy of estimated mean components in average response studies. Science 1967; 157: 92–3.
  • Stürzebecher E, Cebulla M, Baag M, Tine R. Verfahren zur automatischen Hörschwellenbestimmung, insbesondere bei Neugeborenen und Kleinkindem. Patent application PCT/DE96/02453, 1996.
  • Stiirzebecher E, Cebulla M. Objective detection of auditory evoked potentials — comparison of several statistical tests in the frequency domain on the basis of near-threshold ABR data. Scand Audiol 1997; 26: 6–14.
  • Stiirzebecher E, Cebulla M, Wemecke KD. Objective response detection in the frequency domain: comparison of several q-sample tests. Audiol Neurootol 1999; 4: 2–11.
  • Tognola G, Grandori F, Ravazzani P. Time-frequency distributions of click-evoked otoacoustic emissions. Hear Res 1997; 106: 112–22.
  • Watkin PM. Neonatal otoacoustic emission screening and the identification of deafness. Arch Dis Child 1996; 74: F16—F25.
  • Wemecke K-D. Angewandte Statistik far die Praxis. Bonn: Addison-Wesley, 1995.
  • Wong PKH, Bickford RG. Brain stem auditory evoked potentials: the use of noise estimate. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1980; 50: 25–34.
  • Zoth P. Automatisiertes Hörscreening basierend auf otoakustischen Emissionen mit mathematisch exakt definierten Wahrscheinlichkeitskriterien. Patent applica-tion DE 4441127 A1,1994.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.