Loudness perception and late auditory evoked potentials in adult cochlear implant users

References

• Abbas PJ, Brown CJ. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response: growth of response with current level. Hear Res 1991a;51:123–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbas PJ, Brown CJ. Electrically evoked auditory brainstem response: refractory properties and strength-duration. Hear Res 1991b;51:139–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbas PJ, Brown CJ, Shallop, JK, et al. Summary of results using the nucleus CI24M implant to record the electrically evoked compound action potential. Ear Hear 1999;20:45–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allum JHJ, Shallop JK, Hotz M, Pfaltz CR. Character-istics of electrically evoked "auditory" brainstem responses. Scand Audiol 1990;19:263–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arlinger SD. Ni latencies of the slow auditory evoked potential. Audiology 1976;35:370–5.
   Google Scholar
• Brown CJ, Lopez, SM, Hughes, ML, Abbas PJ. Rela-tionship between EABR thresholds and levels used to program the clarion speech processor. Am Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999;108:50–7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown CJ, Hughes ML, Luk B, Abbas PJ, Wolaver A, Gervais J. The relationship between EAP and EABR thresholds and levels used to program the nucleus 24 speech processor: data from adults. Ear Hear 2000; 21:151–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler RA, Keidel WD, Spreng M. An investigation of the human cortical Evoked potential under conditions of monaural and binaural stimulation. Acta Otolaryngol 1969;68:317–26.
   Google Scholar
• Firszt JB, Chambers RD, Rotz LA, Novak MA. Electrically evoked potentials recorded in adult and pediatric clarion implant users. Am Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1999;108:58–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenen PAP, Makhdoum M, van den Brin JL, Stollman MHP, Snik AFM, van den Broek, P. The relation between electric auditory brain stem and cognitive responses and speech perception in cochlear implant users. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1996;116: 785–90.
   Google Scholar
• Hohmann V, Kollmeier B. Weiterentwicklung und klinischer Einsatz der Hörfeldskalierung. Audiol Acoust 1995;34:48–59.
   Google Scholar
• Hoth S. Measuring late electrically evoked potentials of the auditory system in cochlear implant patients. HNO 1998;46:739–47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kileny PR, Kemnik JL. Use of electrophysiologic measures in the management of children with cochlear implants: brain stem, middle latency, and cognitive (P300) response. Am J Otol suppl, 1991;12:37–42.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kileny PR, Zwolan TA, Boerst A, Telian SA. Electrically evoked auditory potentials: current clinical applications in children with cochlear implants. Am J Otol 1997;18:90–2.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kraus N, Micco AG, Koch DB, et al. The mismatch negativity cortical evoked potential elicited by speech in cochlear implant users. Hear Res 1993;65:118–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason S. Keynote lecture: objective measures. Am J Otol 1997;18:84–7.
   Google Scholar
• Pelizzone M, Kasper A, Montandon P. Electrically evoked responses in cochlear implant patients. Audiol-ogy 1989;28:230–8.
   Google Scholar
• Ponton CW, Don M, Waring MD, Eggermont JJ, Masuda A. Regional dipole source analysis of evoked potentials to acoustic and cochlear implant stimulation. In: Hochmair-Desoyer IJ, Hochmair ES, eds. Advances in cochlear implants. Wien: Manz, 1994: 3–12.
   Google Scholar
• Ponton CW, Don M, Eggermont JJ, Waring MD, Masuda A. Maturation of human cortical auditory function: differences between normal-hearing children and children with cochlear implants. Ear Hear 1996;17: 430–7.
   Google Scholar
• Ponton CW, Eggermont JJ, Kwong B, Don M. Maturation of human central auditory system activity: evidence from multi-channel evoked potentials. Clin Neurophysiol 2000;111:220–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiinweiler R, Wöbbelt P, Tolloczko R, Rose C. Classification of passive auditory event-related poten-tials using discriminant feature maps. Audiol Neurootol 2000;5:69–82.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephan K, Welzl-Muller K, Stiglbrunner H. Stapedius reflex threshold in cochlear implant patients. Audiology 1988;27:227–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van den Borne, B, Snik AFM, Mens LHM, Brokx JPL, Van den Broek P. Stapedius reflex measurements during surgery for cochlear implantation in children. Am J Otol 1996;17:554–8.
   Google Scholar
• Wable J, van den Abbeele T, Gallégo S, Frachet B. Mismatch negativity: a tool for the assessment of stimuli discrimination in cochlear implant subjects. Clin Neurophysiol 2000;111:743–53.
   Google Scholar
• Zwicker E, Fastl H. Psychoacoustics. Berlin: Springer, 1999.
   Google Scholar