References
- Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. The Statistician 1983; 32: 307–17.
- Birch L, Elbrond 0, Kristiansen L. Impedance audiometric study of children. Comparison of Impedance Tympanoscope ZS 330 with Impedance Audiometer Z073A. Scand Audiol 1986; 15: 151–6.
- Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurements. Lancet 1986; i: 307–10.
- Creten WL, Van Camp KJ. Transient and quasi-static tympanometry. Scand Audiol 1974; 3: 39–42.
- Feldman RM, Fria TJ, Palfrey CC, Dellecker CM. Effects ofrate of air pressure change on tympanometry. Ear Hear 1984; 5:91-5. Gaihede M, Felding JU, Elbrond 0. The biomechanical characteristics of the middle ear system measured by a new method III. Comparison with tympanometric measurements. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 1995; 115: 522–7.
- Gaihede M. Tympanometric preconditioning of the tympanic membrane. Hear Res 1996; 102: 28–34.
- Gaihede M, Ovesen T. Precision of tympanometric measure-ments. J Speech Lang Hear Voice Res 1997; 40: 215-22. Ivarsson A, Tjernström 6, Bylander A, Bennrup S. High speed tympanometry and ipsilateral middle ear reflex measurements using a computerized impedance meter. A comparison with the results obtained by a conventional impedance meter. Scand Audiol 1983; 12: 157–63.
- Moller H, Tos M. Daily impedance audiometric screening of children. Validity of Impedance Tympanoscope Z S331 compared with Impedance Audiometer AZ7. Scand Audiol 1992; 21: 9–14.
- Wiley TL, Barrett KA. Test—retest reliability in tympanometry. J Speech Hear Res 1981; 34: 1197–206.