References
- Blum, H. (2017). Training analysis and the psychoanalytic institute. In P. Zagermann (Ed.), The future of psychoanalysis - the debate about the training analyst system (pp. 35–52).
- Eizirik, C. (2017). Current aspects and callenges of analytic training. In P. Zagermann (Ed.), The future of psychoanalysis - the debate about the training analyst system (pp. 71–88).
- Hugo, P. (2017). The consequence report.
- Kernberg, O. (2016). Psychoanalytic education at the crossroads: Reformation, change and the future of psychoanalytic training. New Library of Psychoanalysis, Routledge.
- Kernberg, O., & Michels, R. (2017). Thoughts on the present and future of psychoanalytic education. In P. Zagermann (Ed.), The future of psychoanalysis - the debate about the training analyst system (pp. 141–160).
- Kirsner, D. (2017). The training analysis: Still a roadblock in psychoanalytic education. In P. Zagermann (Ed.), The future of psychoanalysis - the debate about the training analyst system (pp. 161–178).
- Piles, R. (2017). Still crazy after all these years. In P. Zagermann (Ed.), The future of psychoanalysis - the debate about the training analyst system (pp. 221–260).
- Sahlberg, B. (2018). Training analysis and training models. There´s more to it than yes or no.
- Schachter, J., Gorman, B., Pfäfflin, F., & Kächele, H. (2014). A questionnaire/interview comparison of satisfaction with training analysis to satisfaction with analysis by a nontraining analyst: Implications for training analysis. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 31, 357–374.
- Zagermann, P. (2017). How do we want to train? In P. Zagermann (Ed.) The future of psychoanalysis - The debate about the training analyst system (Introduction xxiii). London: Karnac Books.