Amalia X: dialogical sequence analysis as a method in theory-based single case research in psychoanalysis

References

• Albani, C., Blaser, G., Jacobs, U., Jones, E., Thomä, H., & Kächele, H. (2002). Amalia X’s psychoanalytic therapy in the light of Jones’s psychotherapy process Q-sort. In M. Leuzinger-Bohleber & M. Target 4 Eds., Outcomes of psychoanalytic treatments, perspectives for therapists and researchers (pp. 294–302). London/Philadelphia: Whurr Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Bahtin, M. (1984). Speech genres and other essays. Austin: University of Texas press.
   Google Scholar
• Bahtin, M. (1991). Dostojevskin poetiikan ongelmia. Helsinki: Orient Express.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, L. S. Structural analysis of social behavior, Psychological Review, 81, 392–425.
   Google Scholar
• Benjamin, L. S. (2003). Interpersonal diagnosis and treatment of personality disorders (2nd ed.). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Buchholz, M., Spiekermann, J., & Kächele, H. (2015). Rhythm and blues—Amalie’s 152nd session: From psychoanalysis to conversation and metaphor analysis—And back again. L, 96(3), 877–910.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, H., Kächele, H., & Thoma, H. (1988). Psychoanalytic process research strategies. Berlin/Heidelberg/New York/London/Paris/Tokyo: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott, R. (2010). Psychotherapy change process research: Realizing the promise. Psychotherapy Research, 20(2), 123–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott, R. (2011). Systematic case study research: A practice-oriented introduction to building an evidence base for counselling and psychotherapy. Counselling and Psychotherapy Research, 11(1), 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1894). Die abwehr-Neuropsychosen. Gesammelte Werke, 1, 59–74.
   Google Scholar
• Gabbard, G. O., & Westen, D. (2003). Rethinking therapeutic action. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 84, 823–842.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Mill Valley, CA: Sociology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, L. (1986). Change process research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 54, 419.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holloway, I. (1997). Basic concepts for qualitative research. London: Blackwell Science.
   Google Scholar
• Honkasalo, M. (2008). Etnografia terveyden, sairauden ja terveydenhuollon tutkimuksessa. Sosiaalilääketieteellinen aikakausilehti, 45, 4–17.
   Google Scholar
• Ikonen, P. (2002). Psykoanalyyttisiä tutkielmia. Helsinki: Nuorisopsykoterapiasäätiö.
   Google Scholar
• Ikonen, P. (2004). Psykoanalyyttisiä tutkielmia II. Helsinki: Nuorisopsykoterapiasäätiö.
   Google Scholar
• Iljenkov, E. (1960). The dialectics of the abstract and the concrete in Marx’s Capital. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Jimenez, J., Pokorny, D., & Kächele, H. (2006). The psychoanalytic loss-separation model (LSM): Evolution of the reaction to breaks in the psychoanalytic process as an indicator of change. International Journal Psychotherapy, 10, 22–34.
   Google Scholar
• Kächele, H., Mergenthaler, E., & Hölzer, M. (1999). The analyst’s vocabulary. In P. Fonagy, M. Cooper, R. Wallerstein (Eds.), Psychoanalysis on the move: The work of Joseph Sandler (pp. 217–229). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kächele, H., Schachter, J., & Thomä, H. (2009). From psychoanalytic narrative to empirical single case research. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Kächele, H., Albani, C., Buchheim, A., Hölzer, M., Hohage, R., Mergenthaler, E., ... Thoma, H. (2006). Amalia X—The german specimen case. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 2006(87), 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Kivikkokangas, S. (2017). The manifestation and change of shame in psychotherapy (Häpeän ilmentyminen ja muutos psykoterapiassa). Licenciate thesis: University of Jyväskylä.
   Google Scholar
• Kivikkokangas, S., Leiman, M., & Enckell, H. (manuscript in preparation). The development of self-observation as a precondition for self-analytic capacity—The case of Amalia X.
   Google Scholar
• Kivikkokangas, S., & Manninen, P. (2017). How does future of psychotherapy look like in 25 years? (Miltä psykoterapian tulevaisuus näyttää 25 vuoden päästä?). Psykoterapia, 36(3), 227–236.
   Google Scholar
• Krause, M. (2011). Statistical significance testing and clinical trials. Psychotherapy, 48(3), 217–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, M. (2011). Solving problems with randomized clinical trials is not enough to improve psychotherapy outcome: Comments on Krause. Psychotherapy, 48(3), 229–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiman, M. (1997). Procedures as dialogical sequences: A revised version of the fundamental concept in cognitive analytic therapy. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 70, 193–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiman, M. (2002). Toward semiotic dialogism. Theory and Psychology, 12, 221–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiman, M. (2004). Dialogical sequence analysis. In Hermans & Dimaggio (Eds.), The dialogical self in psychotherapy (pp. 255–269). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Leiman, M. (2006). What does the first exchange tell? Dialogical sequence analysis and assimilation in very brief therapy. Psychotherapy Research, 16(4), 408–421.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiman, M. (2011). Mikhail Bakhtin’s contribution to psychotherapy research. Culture and Psychology, 17(4), 441–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leiman, M. (2012). Dialogical sequence analysis as a method to study psychotherapeutic discourse. International Journal of Dialogical Science, 6, 123–147.
   Google Scholar
• Leiman, M. (2018). Personal communication Helsinki, Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Leiman, M., & Stiles, W. B. (2001). Dialogical sequence analysis and the zone of proximal development as conceptual enhancements to the assimilation model: The case of jan revisited. Psychotherapy Research, 11, 311–330.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levy, R., Ablon, J., & Kächele, H. (2012). Psychodynamic process research. London: Humana Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Luborsky, L., & Crits-Christoph, P. (2003). Understanding transference. 2nd Ed. Washington, DC, American psychological association. In A. E. Bergin & S. L. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change. New York: Wiley. 408–438
   Google Scholar
• Luborsky, L., & Spence, D. (1971). Quantitative research on psychoanalytic therapy. In A. Bergin & S. Garfield (Eds.), Handbook on psychotherapy and behaviour change (2nd ed., pp. 408–438). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
   Google Scholar
• McLeod, J. (2010). Case study research in counseling and psychotherapy. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Peräkylä, A., Antaki, C., Vehviläinen, S., & Leudar, I. (2008). Conversation analysis and psychotherapy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reenkola, T. (1996). Freudin metapsykologia ja psykoanalyyttinen tiedonmuodostus. In E. Roos, V. Manninen, & J. VäLimäKi (toim.) (Eds.), Kohti piilotajuntaa. Psykoanalyyttisia tutkielmia (pp. 77–120). Helsinki: Yliopistopaino.
   Google Scholar
• Ryle, G. (1949). The concept of mind. London: Hutchinson.
   Google Scholar
• Sidnell, J. (2012). Basic conversation analytic methods. In J. Sidnell & T. Stivers (Eds.), Handbook of conversation analysis (pp. 77–101). London: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Stiles, W. B., Shapiro, D. A., & Elliott, R. (1986). Are all psychotherapies equivalent? American Psychologist, 41(2), 165–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tähkä, V. (1993). Mind and its treatment. Madison: International universities press.
   Google Scholar
• Thoma, H., & Kächele, H. (1994). Psychoanalytic practice. Vol. 2: Clinical studies. New Jersey: Jason Aronson Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Thoma, H., & Kächele, H. (1994a). Psychoanalytic practice. Vol. 1: Principles. New Jersey: Jason Aronson Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Thoma, H., & Kächele, H. (2007). Comparative psychoanalysis on the basis of a new form of treatment report: The case Amalia X. Psychoanal Inquiry, 27, 650–689.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thoma, H., Mergenthaler, E., & Kächele, H. (1982). The Topic-Index method for systematic processdescription. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Tikkanen, S. (2015). The development of empathic stance. University of Eastern Finland. Doctoral thesis.
   Google Scholar
• Valkonen, H. (2018). The dynamics of self-observation in patients with borderline personality disorder (BPD) diagnosis (Doctoral dissertation). University of Eastern Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind in society. The development of higher psychological processes. Campbridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, R., & Sampson, H. (1971). Issues in research in the psychoanalytic process. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 52, 11–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wampold, B. (2015). How important are the common factors in psychotherapy: An update. World Psychiatry : Official Journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 14(3), 270–277.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zonzi, A., Barkham, M., Hardy, G. E., Llewelyn, S. P., Stiles, W. B., & Leiman, M. (2014). Zone of proximal development as an ability to play in psychotherapy with adults. Psychology & Psychotherapy, 87, 447–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar