176
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Convergence, commonality, and context in psychoanalytic supervision

ORCID Icon
Pages 3-19 | Received 11 Oct 2018, Accepted 20 May 2019, Published online: 31 May 2019

References

  • Bacal, H. A., & Carlton, L. (2011). The power of specificity in psychotherapy: When therapy works and when it doesn’t. Lanham, MD: Aronson.
  • Balint, M. (1948). On the psychoanalytic training system. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 29, 163–173.
  • Barrett, D. G. (2014). Creating a supervisory framework: Models, methods, and mastery. In A. G. Schmukler & P. G. Atkeson (Eds.), Teaching effective supervision of child and adolescent analysis (pp. 1–14). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Berman, E. (1997). Relational psychoanalysis: A historical background. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 51, 185–203.
  • Berman, E. (2000). Psychoanalytic supervision: The intersubjective development. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 18, 273–290.
  • Berman, E. (2004). Impossible training: A relational view of psychoanalytic education. Hillsdale, NJ: The Analytic Press.
  • Bernard, J. M., & Goodyear, R. K. (2014). Fundamentals of clinical supervision (5th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.
  • Birkhofer, C. (2017). Theoretical diversity and pluralism in psychoanalysis: Change, challenges, and benefits. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 34, 114–121.
  • Blomfield, O. H. D. (1985). Psychoanalytic supervision—An overview. International Review of Psychoanalysis, 12, 401–409.
  • Bresler, J., & Starr, K. E. (Eds.). (2015). Relational psychoanalysis and psychotherapy integration: An evolving synergy. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Breuer, J., & Freud, S. (1895/1955). Studies on hysteria. In J. Strachey (Ed.), Standard ed. of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 2, pp. 1–305). London, UK: Hogarth Press.
  • Brightman, B. K. (1984). Narcissistic issues in the training experience of the psychotherapist. International Journal of Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 10, 293–317.
  • Bromberg, P. M. (1984). The third ear. In L. Caligor, P. M. Bromberg, & J. D. Meltzer (Eds.), Clinical perspectives on the supervision of psychoanalysis and psychotherapy (pp. 29–44). New York, NY: Plenum Press.
  • Budge, S. L., & Wampold, B. E. (2015). The relationship: How it works. In O. C. G. Gelo, A. Pritz, & B. Rieken (Eds.), Psychotherapy research: Foundations, process, and outcomes (pp. 213–228). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
  • Buirski, P., & Haglund, P. (2001). Making sense together: The intersubjective approach to psychotherapy. Lanham, MD: Aronson.
  • Cabaniss, D. L. (2012). Teaching psychodynamics in the 21st century. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 60, 483–492.
  • Caruth, E. G. (1990). Interpersonal and intrapsychic complexities and vulnerabilities in the psychoanalytic supervisory process. In R. C. Lane (Ed.), Psychoanalytic approaches to supervision (pp. 181–193). New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel.
  • Casement, P. (1993). Towards autonomy: Some thoughts on psychoanalytic supervision. Journal of Clinical Psychoanalysis, 2, 389–403.
  • Chagoya, L., & Chagoya, C. (1994). The development of a psychotherapy supervisor. In S. G. Greben & R. Ruskin (Eds.), Clinical perspectives on psychotherapy supervision (pp. 189–209). Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
  • Choder-Goldman, J. (2015). The supervisory relationship: Bedrock of psychoanalysis. Psychological Perspectives, 12, 121–126.
  • Coburn, W. J. (1997). The vision in supervision: Transference-countertransference dynamics and disclosure in supervision relationships. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 61, 481–494.
  • Cook, H., & Buirski, P. (1990). Countertransference in psychoanalytic supervision: An heuristic model. Psychoanalysis & Psychotherapy, 8, 77–87.
  • Cwik, A. J. (2006). The art of the tincture: Analytical supervision. Journal of Analytical Psychology, 51, 209–225.
  • DeBell, D. (1981). Supervisory styles and positions. In R. S. Wallerstein (Ed.), Becoming a psychoanalyst: A study of psychoanalytic supervision (pp. 39–60). New York, NY: International Universities Press.
  • Dewald, P. A. (1969). Learning problems in psychoanalytic supervision: Diagnosis and management. Comprehensive Psychiatry, 10, 107–121.
  • Dewald, P. A. (1981). Aspects of the supervisory process. The Annual of Psychoanalysis, 9, 75–89.
  • Dewald, P. A. (1987). Learning process in psychoanalytic supervision: Complexities and challenges. Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
  • Dewald, P. A. (1997). The process of supervision in psychoanalysis. In C. E. Watkins Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 31–43). New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Dulsster, D., & Vanheule, S. (2019). On Lacan and supervision: A matter of super‐audition. British Journal of Psychotherapy, 35, 54–70.
  • Duncan, B. L., Miller, S. D., Wampold, B. E., & Hubble, M. A. (2010). The heart and soul of change: Delivering what works in therapy (2nd ed.) Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Eagle, G., & Long, C. (2014). Supervision of psychoanalytic/psychodynamic psychotherapy. In C. E. Watkins Jr. & D. L. Milne (Eds.), Wiley international handbook of clinical supervision (pp. 471–492). Oxford, United Kingdom: Wiley.
  • Ehrlich, L. T., Kulish, N. M., Fitzpatrick Hanly, M. A., Robinson, M., & Rothstein, A. (2017). Supervisory countertransferences and impingements in evaluating readiness for graduation: Always present, routinely under-recognized. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 98, 491–516.
  • Eitingon, M. (1923). Report on the Berlin psycho-analytical poliklinik. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 4, 254–269.
  • Eitingon, M. (1926). An address to the international training commission. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 7, 130–134.
  • Ellis, M. V., & Ladany, N. (1997). Inferences concerning supervisees and clients in clinical supervision: An integrative review. In C. E. Watkins Jr. (Ed.), Handbook of psychotherapy supervision (pp. 447–507). New York, NY: Wiley.
  • Emch, M. (1955). The social context of supervision. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 36, 298–306.
  • Fink, K. (2007). Supervision, transference, and countertransference. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 88, 1263–1273.
  • Fleming, J. (1953). The role of supervision in psychiatric training. Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic, 17, 157–159.
  • Fleming, J. (1967). Teaching the basic skills of psychotherapy. Archives of General Psychiatry, 16, 416–426.
  • Fleming, J., & Benedek, T. F. (1964). Supervision. A method of teaching psychoanalysis. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 33, 71–96.
  • Fleming, J., & Benedek, T. F. (1966). Psychoanalytic supervision: A method of clinical teaching. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton.
  • Fosshage, J. L. (1997). Towards a model of psychoanalytic supervision from a self-psychological/intersubjective perspective. In M. H. Rock (Ed.), Psychodynamic supervision (pp. 312–335). Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
  • Frawley-O’Dea, M. G. (2003). Supervision is a relationship too: A contemporary approach to psychoanalytic supervision. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 13, 355–366.
  • Frawley-O’Dea, M. G. (2015). Everything old is new again: Reactions on panel discussion of the supervisory relationship. Psychological Perspectives, 12, 172–178.
  • Frawley-O’Dea, M. G., & Sarnat, J. E. (2001). The supervisory relationship: A contemporary psychodynamic approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  • Freud, S. (1909/1955). Analysis of a phobia in a five-year-old boy. In J. Strachey (Ed.), Standard ed. of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 10, pp. 3–152). London, UK: Hogarth Press.
  • Freud, S. (1913/1959). Further recommendations in the technique of psycho-analysis. Collected papers (Vol. 2, pp. 342–365). London, UK: Hogarth Press.
  • Freud, S. (1914/1957). On the history of the psycho-analytic movement. In J. Strachey (Ed.), Standard ed. of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 14, pp. 3–66). London, UK: Hogarth Press.
  • Freud, S. (1937/1964). Analysis terminable and interminable. In J. Strachey (Ed.), Standard ed. of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 23, pp. 209–254). London, UK: Hogarth Press.
  • Gill, S. (1999). Narcissistic vulnerability in psychoanalytic psychotherapy supervisees: Ego ideals, self-exposure and narcissistic character defenses. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 8, 227–233.
  • Goldberg, F. H. (1990). Contemporary issues in and approaches to psychoanalytic supervision. In R. C. Lane (Ed.), Psychoanalytic approaches to supervision (pp. 34–42). New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel.
  • Goodyear, R. K., Borders, L. D., Chang, C. Y., Guiffrida, D. A., Hutman, H., Kemer, G., … White, E. (2016). Prioritizing questions and methods for an international and interdisciplinary supervision research agenda: Suggestions by eight scholars. The Clinical Supervisor, 35, 117–154.
  • Gordon, C., & Messner, E. (1982). Contract and alliance in psychotherapy supervision. In A. M. Jacobsen & D. X. Parmelee (Eds.), Psychoanalysis: Critical explorations in contemporary theory and practice (pp. 190–198). New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel.
  • Greenson, R. R. (1967). The technique and practice of psychoanalysis (Vol. 1). New York, NY: International Universities Press.
  • Greenson, R. R. (1971). The “real” relationship between patient and psychoanalyst. In M. Kanzer (Ed.), The unconscious today (pp. 213–232). New York, NY: International Universities Press.
  • Greenson, R. R., & Wexler, M. (1969). The non-transference relationship in the psychoanalytic situation. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 50, 27–39.
  • Grencavage, L. M., & Norcross, J. C. (1990). Where are the commonalities among the therapeutic common factors? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 21, 372–378.
  • Herron, W. G. (2015). Supervision. In D. O. Morris, R. A. Javier, & W. G. Herron (Eds.), Specialty competencies in psychoanalysis in psychology (pp. 137–149). New York, NY: Oxford.
  • Hess, A. K. (2008). Psychotherapy supervision: A conceptual review. In A. K. Hess, K. D. Hess, & T. H. Hess (Eds.), Psychotherapy supervision: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 3–22). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Hubback, J. (1995). Styles of supervision. In P. Kugler (Ed.), Jungian perspectives on clinical supervision (pp. 96–98). Einsiedeln, SUI: Daimon.
  • Hyman, M. (2008). Psychoanalytic supervision. In A. K. Hess, K. D. Hess, & T. H. Hess (Eds.), Psychotherapy supervision: Theory, research, and practice (2nd ed., pp. 97–113). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Isakower, O. (1992). The analyzing instrument in the teaching and conduct of the analytic process. Journal of Clinical Psychoanalysis, 1, 181–194. originally presented 1957.
  • Jacobs, D. (2007). Introduction. In L. E. Rubenstein (Ed.), Talking about supervision: 10 questions, 10 analysts, 100 answers (pp. 1–5). London, UK: International Psychoanalytical Association.
  • Jacobs, D., David, P., & Meyer, D. J. (1995). The supervisory encounter: A guide for teachers of psychodynamic psychotherapy and analysis. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Jarmon, H. (1990). The supervisory experience: An object relations perspective. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice, Training, 27, 195–201.
  • Jiménez, J. P. (2006). After pluralism: Towards a new, integrated psychoanalytic paradigm. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 87, 1487–1507.
  • Jiménez, J. P. (2008). Theoretical plurality and pluralism in psychoanalytic practice. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 89, 579–599.
  • Katz, S. M. (Ed.) (2013). Metaphor and fields: Common ground, common language, and the future of psychoanalysis. New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Kernberg, O. (2010). Psychoanalytic supervision: The supervisor’s tasks. The Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 79, 603–627.
  • Knight, Z. G. (2014). Some new thoughts about the real relationship in psychoanalytic supervision. In P. T. Fenton (Ed.), Psychoanalytic theory: Perspectives, techniques and social implications (pp. 207–224). New York, NY: Nova Science.
  • Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development (2nd ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
  • Kovacs, V. (1936). Training and control-analysis. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 17, 346–354.
  • Lambert, M. J. (2013). The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy. In M. J. Lambert (Ed.), Bergin and Garfield’s handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (6th ed., pp. 169–218). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Lane, R. C. (Ed.). (1990). Psychoanalytic approaches to supervision. New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel.
  • Langs, R. (1994). Doing supervision and being supervised. London, UK: Karnac.
  • Leader, D. (2010). Some thoughts on supervision. British Journal of Psychotherapy, 26, 228–241.
  • Levy, J., & Kindler, A. (1995). Epilogue. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 15, 268–273.
  • Lewis, W. C. (2001). Transference in analysis and in supervision. In S. Gill (Ed.), The supervisory alliance: Facilitating the psychotherapist’s learning experience (pp. 75–80). Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
  • Mathers, D. (Ed.). (2009). Vision and supervision: Jungian and post-Jungian perspectives. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Milne, D. L. (2006). Developing clinical supervision research through reasoned analogies with therapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 13, 215–222.
  • Moncayo, R. (2006). Lacanian perspectives on psychoanalytic supervision. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 23, 527–541.
  • Muslin, H., & Val, E. (1980). Supervision and self-esteem in psychiatric teaching. American Journal Of Psychotherapy, 34, 545–555. doi:10.1176/appi.psychotherapy.1980.34.4.545
  • Muslin, H. L., & Val, E. (1989). Supervision: A teaching-learning paradigm. In K. Field, B. J. Kohler, & G. Wool (Eds.), Learning and education: Psychoanalytic perspectives (pp. 159–179). Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
  • Norcross, J. C., & Goldfried, M. R. (Eds). (2019). Handbook of psychotherapy integration (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Basic Books.
  • Oberman, N. C. (1990). Supervision and the achievement of an analytic identity. In R. C. Lane (Ed.), Psychoanalytic approaches to supervision (pp. 194–206). New York, NY: Brunner/Mazel.
  • Ogden, T. H. (2005). On psychoanalytic supervision. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 86, 1265–1280.
  • Pomer, S. L. (1966). Max Eitingon: The organization of psychoanalytic training. In F. Alexander (Ed.), Psychoanalytic pioneers (pp. 51–62). London, UK: Transactions.
  • Reiner, P. A. (2014). Systemic psychodynamic supervision. In T. C. Todd & C. L. Storm (Eds.), The complete systemic supervisor: Context, philosophy, and pragmatics (2nd ed., pp. 166–185). Oxford, United Kingdom: Wiley.
  • Rock, M. H. (1997a). Effective supervision. In M. H. Rock (Ed.), Psychodynamic supervision (pp. 107–132). Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
  • Rock, M. H. (Ed.). (1997b). Psychodynamic supervision. Northvale, NJ: Aronson.
  • Rojas, A., Arbuckle, M., & Cabaniss, D. (2010). Don’t leave teaching to chance: Learning objectives for psychodynamic psychotherapy supervision. Academic Psychiatry, 34, 46–49.
  • Rubenstein, L. E. (2007). Talking about supervision. London, UK: Karnac.
  • Sarnat, J. (2006). Authority relations in psychodynamic supervision: A contemporary view. In R. Raubolt (Ed.), Power games: Influence, persuasion, and indoctrination in psychotherapy training (pp. 255–271). New York, NY: Other Press.
  • Sarnat, J. (2012). Supervising psychoanalytic psychotherapy: Present knowledge, pressing needs, future possibilities. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 42, 151–160.
  • Sarnat, J. (2016). Supervision essentials for psychodynamic psychotherapies. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Scharff, J. S. (Ed.). (2014). Clinical supervision of psychoanalytic psychotherapy. London, UK: Karnac.
  • Schlesinger, H. J. (1981). General principles of psychoanalytic supervision. In R. S. Wallerstein (Ed.), Becoming a psychoanalyst: A study of psychoanalytic supervision (pp. 29–38). New York, NY: International Universities Press.
  • Schlesinger, H. J. (1990). Supervision and the training analysis: Repetition or collaboration?. In M. Meisels & E. R. Shapiro (Eds.), Tradition and innovation in psychoanalytic education (pp. 134–140). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Schlesinger, H. J. (1995). Supervision for fun and profit: Or how to tell if the fun is profitable. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 15, 190–210.
  • Schmukler, A. G. (2014). Helping supervisors work with transferences and countertransferences in child and adolescent analysis. In A. G. Schmukler & P. G. Atkeson (Eds.), Teaching effective supervision of child and adolescent analysis (pp. 39–54). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Schmukler, A. G., & Atkeson, P. G. (Eds.). (2014). Teaching effective supervision of child and adolescent analysis (pp. 39–54). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.
  • Scortecci, M. A., Balestri, L., Borghi, L., & Bedogni, G. R. (1988). Supervision as a learning process. Rivista Di Psicoanalisi, 34, 748–794.
  • Searles, H. F. (1955). The informational value of the supervisor’s emotional experience. Psychiatry, 8, 135–146.
  • Shmukler, D. (2017). Supervision in psychoanalysis and psychotherapy: A case study and clinical guide. London, UK: Routledge.
  • Skolnikoff, A. Z. (1997). The supervisorial situation: Intrinsic and extrinsic factors influencing transference and countertransference themes. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 17, 90–107.
  • Sugg, C. (1995). Supervision. In M. Lionells, J. Fiscalini, C. Mann, & D. B. Stern (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal psychoanalysis (pp. 847–859). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Szecsödy, I. (1990). Supervision: A didactic or mutative situation. Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 4, 245–261.
  • Szecsödy, I. (1994). Supervision: A complex tool for psychoanalytic learning. Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 17, 119–129.
  • Szecsödy, I. (1997). (How) is learning possible in supervision? In B. Martindale, M. Morner, M. E. C. Rodriguez, & J. Vidit (Eds.), Supervision and its vicissitudes (pp. 101–116). London, UK: Karnac.
  • Szecsödy, I. (2008). Does anything go in psychoanalytic supervision? Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 28, 373–386.
  • Szecsödy, I. (2013). Supervision should be a mutual learning experience. The Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 36, 126–129.
  • Teitelbaum, S. H. (1990a). Aspects of the contract in psychotherapy supervision. Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, 8, 95–98.
  • Teitelbaum, S. H. (1990b). Supertransference: The role of the supervisor’s blind spots. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 7, 243–258.
  • Teitelbaum, S. H. (1995). The changing scene in psychoanalytic supervision. Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, 12, 183–192.
  • Teitelbaum, S. (1998). The impact of the supervisory style. Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, 15, 115–130.
  • Thorbeck, J. (1992). The development of the psychodynamic psychotherapist in supervision. Academic Psychiatry, 16, 72–82.
  • Ungar, V. R., & de Ahumada, L. B. (2001). Supervision: A container-contained approach. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 82, 71–81.
  • Vastardis, M., & Phillips, G. (2012). On psychoanalytic supervision: Avoiding omniscience, encouraging play. In A. Horne & M. Lonyado (Eds.), Winnicott’s children: Independent psychoanalytic approaches with children and adolescents (pp. 105–123). London, UK: Routledge.
  • Wallerstein, R. S. (Ed.). (1981). Becoming a psychoanalyst: A study of psychoanalytic supervision. New York, NY: International Universities Press.
  • Wallerstein, R. S. (1990). Psychoanalysis: The common ground. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 71, 3–20.
  • Wampold, B. E. (2015). How important are the common factors in psychotherapy? An update. World Psychiatry : Official Journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA), 14, 270–277.
  • Wampold, B. E. (2017). What should we practice? In T. Rousmaniere, R. K. Goodyear, S. D. Miller, & B. E. Wampold (Eds.), The cycle of excellence: Using deliberate practice to improve supervision and training (pp. 49–65). New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Wampold, B. E., & Imel, Z. E. (2015). The great psychotherapy debate: The evidence for what makes psychotherapy work (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
  • Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2011a). Celebrating psychoanalytic supervision: Considering a century of seminal contribution. The Psychoanalytic Review, 98, 401–418.
  • Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2011b). Toward a tripartite vision of supervision for psychoanalysis and psychoanalytic psychotherapies: Alliance, transference-countertransference configuration, and real relationship. The Psychoanalytic Review, 98, 557–590.
  • Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2012). Moments of real relationship in psychoanalytic supervision. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 72, 251–268.
  • Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2013a). The beginnings of psychoanalytic supervision: The crucial role of Max Eitingon. American Journal of Psychoanalysis, 73, 254–270.
  • Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2013b). The contemporary practice of effective psychoanalytic supervision. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 30, 300–328.
  • Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2013c). On psychoanalytic supervisor competencies, the persistent paradox without parallel in psychoanalytic education, and dreaming of an evidence-based psychoanalytic supervision. The Psychoanalytic Review, 100, 609–646.
  • Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2014a). The competent psychoanalytic supervisor: Some thoughts about supervision competences for accountable practice and training. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 23, 220–228.
  • Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2014b). On psychoanalytic supervision as signature pedagogy. The Psychoanalytic Review, 101, 175–195.
  • Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2014c). The supervisory alliance: A half century of theory, practice, and research in critical perspective. American Journal of Psychotherapy, 68, 19–55.
  • Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2015a). The evolving nature of psychoanalytic supervision: From pedagogical to andragogical perspective. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 24, 230–242.
  • Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2015b). The learning alliance in psychoanalytic supervision: A fifty-year retrospective and prospective. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 32, 451–481.
  • Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2015c). Toward a research-informed, evidence-based psychoanalytic supervision. Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 29, 5–19.
  • Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2016a). Listening, learning, and development in psychoanalytic supervision: A self psychology perspective. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 33, 437–471.
  • Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2016b). Listening to and sharing of self in psychoanalytic supervision: The supervisor’s self-perspective. The Psychoanalytic Review, 103, 565–579.
  • Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2016c). Psychoanalytic supervision in the new millennium: On pressing needs and impressing possibilities. International Forum of Psychoanalysis, 25, 50–67.
  • Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2016d). Self-psychology and psychoanalytic supervision: Some thoughts on a contextualized perspective. International Journal of Psychoanalytic Self-Psychology, 11, 276–292.
  • Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2016e). A unifying vision of psychotherapy supervision: Part I—Productive and unproductive supervision relationships. Journal of Unified Psychotherapy and Clinical Science, 4, 21–35.
  • Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2017a). How does psychotherapy supervision work: Contributions of connection, conception, allegiance, alignment, and action. Journal of Psychotherapy Integration, 27, 189–205.
  • Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2017b). How does supervision work? The contextual psychoanalytic supervision relationship model. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Division of Psychoanalysis, Washington, DC.
  • Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2017c). Psychoanalytic supervision as a nomological network of bindingcommonalities. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association, Division of Psychoanalysis, Washington, DC.
  • Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2017d). Reconsidering parallel process in psychotherapy supervision: On parsimony, rival hypotheses, and alternate explanations. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 34, 506–515.
  • Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2018a). Becoming a therapist. In A. MacDougall & L. Captari Eds., The birth (and growth) of a therapist/analyst: Exploring personal ghosts and guardians. Presentation given as part of panel at the Division 39 (Psychoanalysis) Spring Meeting. New Orleans, LA.
  • Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2018b). The supervisee’s internal supervisor representations: Their role in stimulating psychotherapist development. International Journal of Psychotherapy, 22(3), 63–73.
  • Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2018c). A unifying vision of psychotherapy supervision: Part III. Meta-values, meta-principles, and meta-roles of the contextual supervision relationship model. Journal of Unified Psychotherapy and Clinical Science, 5, 23–40.
  • Watkins, C. E., Jr., & Callahan, J. L. (2016). How does psychoanalytic supervision work? A brief communication. The Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 39, 46–50.
  • Watkins, C. E., Jr., & Hook, J. N. (2016). On a culturally humble psychoanalytic supervision perspective: Creating the cultural third. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 33, 487–517.
  • Watkins, C. E., Jr., Hook, J. N., Owen, J., DeBlaere, C., Davis, D. E., & Callahan, J. C. (in press). Creating and elaborating the Cultural Third: A doers-doing with perspective on psychoanalytic supervision. American Journal of Psychoanalysis.
  • Watkins, C. E., Jr., & Scaturo, D. J. (2014). Proposal for a common language, educationally informed model of psychoanalytic supervision. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 34, 619–633.
  • Weinstein, L. S., Winer, J. A., & Ornstein, E. (2009). Supervision and self-disclosure: Modes of supervisory interaction. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 57, 1379–1400.
  • Wolf, E. S. (1995). How to supervise without doing harm: Comments on psychoanalytic supervision. Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 15, 252–267.
  • Wrape, E. R., Callahan, J. L., Rieck, T., & Watkins, C. E., Jr. (2017). Attachment theory within clinical supervision: Application of the conceptual to the empirical. Psychoanalytic Psychotherapy, 31, 37–54.
  • Yerushalmi, H. (1994). A call for change of emphasis in psychodynamic supervision. Psychotherapy, 31, 137–145.
  • Yerushalmi, H. (2016). The supervisor as witness. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 33, 472–486.
  • Zachrisson, A. (2011). Dynamics of psychoanalytic supervision: A heuristic model. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 92, 943–961.
  • Zaslavsky, J., Nunes, M. L. T., & Eizirik, C. L. (2003). Supervisao psicanalitica: Revisao e uma proposta de sistematizacao [Psychoanalytical supervision: A review and a proposal for systematisation]. Review of Psychiatry RGS, 25, 297–309.
  • Zaslavsky, J., Nunes, M. L. T., & Eizirik, C. L. (2005). Approaching countertransference in psychoanalytical supervision: A qualitative investigation. International Journal of Psychoanalysis, 86, 1099–1131.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.