Psychoanalysis and evaluation: a stratified model focused on the uniqueness of the case

References

• Abbass, A., Hancock, J., Henderson, J., & Kisely, S. (2006). Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapies for common mental disorders. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (4), article n° CD004687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbass, A., Kisely, S., & Kroenke, K. (2009). Short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy for somatic disorders: Systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, 78, 265–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bachelard, G. (1938/2002). The formation of the scientific mind. Manchester: Clinamen Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baruch, C., Gibeault, A., & Loukomskaïa, M. (2005). Évaluation de psychothérapies psychanalytiques: Une étude pilote. Cliniques méditerranéennes, 71, 259–267.
   Google Scholar
• Benamouzig, D. (2005). La santé au miroir de l’économie. Une histoire de l’économie de la santé en France. Paris: PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Benish, S., Imel, Z., & Wampold, B. (2008). The relative efficacy of bona fide psycho- therapies for treating post-traumatic stress disorder: A meta-analysis of direct comparisons. Clinical Psychology Review, 28(5), 746–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg, M., & Timmermans, S. (2003). The gold standard: The challenge of evidence-based medicine and standardization in health. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Blanc, A. (2015). Psychodrame psychanalytique et jeu transitionnel. Évaluation du processus thérapeutique et des effets associés auprès d’enfants en âge de latence et d’adolescents suivis en centre-médico-psychologique(PhD dissertation). Paris.
   Google Scholar
• Blanc, A. (2018). Evaluation, psychothérapies et psychanalyse: Réflexions et perspectives éthiques, épistémologiques et scientifiques. In Analysis, 2(2), 163–170.
   Google Scholar
• Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (1999). Le nouvel esprit du capitalisme. Paris: Gallimard.
   Google Scholar
• Brun, A., Roussillon, R., & Attigui, P. (2016). Évaluation clinique des psychothérapies psychanalytiques. Dispositifs individuels, groupaux et institutionnels. Paris: Dunod.
   Google Scholar
• Bucci, W. (1997). Psychoanalysis and cognitive science: A multiple code theory. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, T., & Stiles, W. (2015). Some problems with randomized controlled trials and some viable alternatives. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy, 23(1), 87–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cella, M., Stahl, M., Endresen, R., & Chalder, T. (2011). Therapist effects in routine psychotherapy practice: An account from chronic fatigue syndrome. Psychotherapy Research, 21, 168–178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chambless, D., & Hollon, D. (1998). Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(1), 7–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Champion, F. (2008). Psychothérapie et société. Paris: Armand Colin.
   Google Scholar
• Chiesa, M. (2005). Can psychoanalytic research integrate and improve knowledge for clinical practice? The Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 28(1), 31–39.
   Google Scholar
• Coriat, I. (1917). Some statistical results of the psychoanalytical treatment of the psychoneuroses. Psychoanalytic Review, 4, 209–216.
   Google Scholar
• Cottraux, J. (2017). Les psychothérapies cognitives et comportementales. Issy-les-Moulineaux: Elsevier Masson.
   Google Scholar
• Crits-Cristoph, P., & Barber, J. (2000). Long-term psychotherapy. In R. Snyder & R. Ingram (Eds.), Handbook of psychological change: Psychotherapy processes & practices for the twenty-first century (pp. 455–473). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, H., Kächele, H., & Thomä, H. (1988). Psychoanalytic process research strategies. Berlin/Heidelberg/NewYork/London/Paris/Tokyo: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, H., & Teller, V. (1994). The characteristics, identification, and applications of frames. Psychotherapy Research, 4(3–4), 253–276.
   Google Scholar
• Danziger, K. (1990). Constructing the subject: Historical origins of psychological research. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Maat, S., De Jonghe, F., Schoevers, R., & Dekker, J. (2009). The effectiveness of long-term psychoanalytic therapy: A systematic review of empirical studies. Harvard Review of Psychiatry, 17(1), 1–23.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeLeon, P. (1988). Public policy and public service. American Psychologist, 43, 309–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desrosières, A. (2008). Pour une sociologie historique de la quantification. L’argument statistique I. Paris: Presses de l’École des mines.
   Google Scholar
• Doury, M. (1997). Le débat immobile. L’argumentation dans le débat médiatique sur les parasciences. Paris: Kimé.
   Google Scholar
• Fischman, G., et al (Ed.). (2009). L’évaluation de la psychothérapie et de la psychanalyse. Fondements et enjeux. Paris: Masson.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, D. (1999). The case for pragmatic psychology. New York, NY: New York University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fishman, D. (2000). Transcending the efficacy versus effectiveness research debate: Proposal for a new electronic “Journal of Pragmatic Case Studies”. Prevention and Treatment, 3, art. 8.
   Google Scholar
• Fonagy, P. (2015). The effectiveness of psychodynamic psychotherapies: An update. World Psychiatry, 14(2), 137–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1909). Notes upon a case of obsessional neurosis. Standard Edition, 10, 153–249.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1909[1908]). Analysis of a phobia in a five-year-old boy. Standard Edition, 10, 3–149.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S. (1918[1914]). From the history of on infantile neurosis. Standard Edition, 17, 1–124.
   Google Scholar
• Freud, S., & Breuer, J. (1895). Studies on hysteria. Standard Edition, 2, 1–335.
   Google Scholar
• Garfield, S. (1992). Major issues in psychotherapy research. In D. Freedheim (Ed.), History of psychotherapy. A century of change (pp. 335–359). Washington: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Ginzburg, C. (1989). Clues: Roots of an evidential paradigm. In C. Ginzburg (Ed.), Clues, myths and the historical method (pp. 96–125). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B., & Strauss, A. (1967/2010). La découverte de la théorie ancrée: Stratégies pour la recherche qualitative. Paris: Armand Colin.
   Google Scholar
• Haaga, D., & Stiles, W. (2000). Randomized clinical trials in psychotherapy research: Methodology, design, and evaluation. In C. Snyder & R. Ingram (Eds.), Handbook of psychological change: Psychotherapy processes & practices for the twenty-first century (pp. 14–39). New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Haliday, H., & Naudin, D. (2019). Comment qualifier l’impact des réformes de santé sur la qualité de vie au travail des soignants? Leçons de l’implémentation de la tarification à l’activité et de l’informatisation des services de soins dans les hôpitaux français. Éthique et Santé, 16(2), 51–58.
   Google Scholar
• Horwitz, L., Gabbard, G., Allen, J., Frieswyk, S., Colson, D., Newsom, G. & Coyne, L. (1996). Borderline personality disorder: Tailoring the therapy to the patient. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Press.
   Google Scholar
• Imel, Z, Wampold, B, Miller, S, & Fleming, R. (2008). Distinctions without a difference: Direct comparisons of psychotherapies for alcohol use disorders. Psychology Of Addictive Behaviors N°, 22(4), 533–543.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, E. (1985). Manual for the psychotherapy process Q-sort. Unpublished manuscript, University of California, Berkeley.
   Google Scholar
• Kächele, H. (1988). Clinical and scientific aspects of the Ulm process model of psychoanalysis. International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 69(1988), 65–73.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kächele, H., Albani, C., Buchheim, A., Hölzer, M., Hohage, R., Mergenthaler, E., … Thomä, H. (2006). The german specimen case, Amalia X: Empirical studies. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 87, 809–826.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kächele, H., Levy, R., & Ablon, S. (2012). Psychodynamic psychotherapy research: Evidence-based practice and practice-based evidence. New York: Humana Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kantrowitz, J., Katz, A., & Paolitto, F. (1990a). Follow up of psychoanalysis five to ten years after termination: I. Stability of change. Journal of the American Psycho-Analytic Association, 38, 471–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantrowitz, J., Katz, A., & Paolitto, F. (1990b). Follow up of psychoanalysis five to ten years after termination: II. Development of the self-analytic function. Journal of the American Psycho-Analytic Association, 38, 637–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantrowitz, J., Katz, A., & Paolitto, F. (1990c). Follow up of psychoanalysis five to ten years after termination: III. The relation between the resolution of the transference and the patient-analyst match. Journal of the American Psycho-Analytic Association, 38, 655–678.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. (1997). A model for developing effective treatments: Progression and interplay of theory, research, and practice. Journal of Clinical Child Psychiatry, 26(2), 114–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. (2001). Progression of therapy research and clinical application of treatment require better understanding of the change process. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 8(2), 143–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazdin, A. (2014). Research design in clinical psychology. Harlow: Pearson.
   Google Scholar
• Keefe, J., McCarthy, K., Dinger, U., Zilcha-Mano, S., & Barber, J. (2014). A meta-analytic review of psychodynamic therapies for anxiety disorders. Clinical Psychology Review, 34(4), 309–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D.-G., Wampold, B., & Bolt, D. (2006). Therapist effects in psychotherapy: A random-effects modelling of the national institute of mental health treatment of depression collaborative research program data. Psychotherapy Research, 16, 182–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kivlighan, D., Goldberg, S., Abbas, M., Pace, B., Yulish, N., Thomas, J., & Wampold, B. (2015). The enduring effects of psychodynamic treatments vis-à-vis alternative treatments: A multilevel longitudinal meta-analysis. Clinical Psychology Review, 40, 1–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klerman, G. (1983). The efficacy of psychotherapy as the basis for public policy. American Psychologist, 38, 929–934.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krupnick, J., Sotski, S., Simmens, S., Elkin, I., & Moyer, J. (1996). The role of the therapeutic alliance in psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy outcome: Findings in the national institute of mental health treatment of depression collaborative research program. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 64, 532–539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lacan, J. (1975). Intervention de Jacques Lacan. Séance du vendredi 2 novembre. Lettres de l’école freudienne, 15, 79–80.
   Google Scholar
• Lascoumes, P., & Le Galès, P. (2004). Gouverner par les instruments. Paris: Presses de Sciences Po.
   Google Scholar
• Latour, B. (1993). Le topofil de Boa Vista ou la référence scientifique. Montage photo-philosophique. Raison Pratique, 4, 187–216.
   Google Scholar
• Lazar, S., & Yeoman, F. (2014). Guest editors’ introduction. Psychodynamic Psychiatry, 42, 347–352.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Leichsenring, F., & Leibing, E. (2003). The effectiveness of psychodynamic therapy and cognitive behavioral therapy in the treatment of personality disorders: A meta- analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 1223–1232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leichsenring, F., Leweke, F., Klein, S., & Steinert, C. (2015). The empirical status of psychodynamic psychotherapy. An update: Bambi’s alive and kicking. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics N°, 84(3), 129–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leichsenring, F., & Rabung, S. (2011). Long-term psychodynamic psychotherapy in complex mental disorders: Update of a meta-analysis. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 199(1), 15–22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuzinger-Bohleber, M., Hautzinger, M., Fiedler, G., Keller, W., Bahrke, U., Kallenbach, L., … Beutel, M. (2019b). Outcome of psychoanalytic and cognitive-behavioural long-term therapy with chronically depressed patients: A controlled trial with preferential and randomized allocation. The Canadian Journal of Psychiatry/La Revue Canadienne de Psychiatrie, 64(1), 47–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuzinger-Bohleber, M., Kächele, H. (Eds.). (2015). An open door review of outcome and process studies in psychoanalysis (Third ed.). Londres: International Psychoanalytical Association.
   Google Scholar
• Leuzinger-Bohleber, M., Kaufhold, J., Kallenbach, L., Negele, A., Ernst, M., Keller, W., … Beutel, M. (2019a). How to measure sustained psychic transformations in long-term treatments of chronically depressed patients: Symptomatic and structural changes in the LAC depression study of the outcome of cognitive-behavioural and psychoanalytic long-term treatments. The International Journal of Psycho-Analysis, 100(1), 99–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leuzinger-Bohleber, M., & Target, M. (2002). Outcomes of psychoanalytic treatment: Perspectives for therapists and researchers. Philadelphia, PA: Whurr Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Luborsky, L., & Crits-Christoph, P. (1990). Understanding transference. New York: Basic Books.
   Google Scholar
• Luborsky, L., Singer, B., & Luborsky, L. (1975). Comparative studies of psychotherapies: Is it true that everyone has won and all must have prizes? Archives of General Psychiatry, 32, 995–1008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, H. (1999). La médecine des preuves. Histoire et anthropologie des essais cliniques (1900–1990). Paris: Les Empêcheurs de penser en rond.
   Google Scholar
• Melander, H., Ahlqvist-rastad, J., Meijer, G., & Beerman, B. (2003). Evidence b(i)ased medicine – Selective reporting from studies sponsored by pharmaceutical industry: Review of studies in new drug applications. British Medical Journal, 326, 1171–1176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellor-Clark, J., Cross, S., Macdonald, J., & Skjulsvik, T. (2014). Leading horses to water: Lessons from a decade of helping psychological therapy services use routine outcome measurement to improve practice. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 43(3), 279–285.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, F., & Howard, K. (1986). Therapeutic effort, treatment outcome, and national health policy. American Psychologist, 41, 181–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norcross, J., Beutler, L., & Levant, R. (2005). Evidence based practices in mental health: Debate and dialogue on the fundamental questions. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Oremland, J., Blacker, K., & Norman, H. (1975). Incompleteness in “Successful” psychoanalyses: A follow-up study. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 23(4), 819–844.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, G. (1967). Strategy of outcome research in psychotherapy. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 31(2), 109–118.
   Google Scholar
• Pestre, D. (2010). Introduction aux science studies. Paris: La Découverte.
   Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, A. (1959). A procedure for evaluating the results of psychoanalysis: A preliminary report. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 7, 418–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, A. (1961). Follow-up study of a satisfactory analysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 9, 698–718.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeffer, A. (1963). The meaning of the analyst after analysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 11, 229–244.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pomata, G. (2013). The recipe and the case: Epistemic genres and the dynamics of cognitive practices. In K. von Greyerz, S. Flubacher, & P. Senn (Eds.), Wissenschaftsgeschichte und Geschichte des Wissens im Dialog. Connecting science and knowledge (pp. 131–154). Göttingen: V&R Unipress.
   Google Scholar
• Schjelderup, H. (1955). Lasting effects of psychoanalytic treatment. Psychiatry, 18(2), 109–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schjelderup, H. (1956). Personality-changing processes of psychoanalytic treatment. Nordisk Psykologi, 8(1–2), 47–64.
   Google Scholar
• Schlessinger, N., & Robbins, F. (1974). Assessment and follow-up in psychoanalysis. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 22, 542–567.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seshia, S., & Young, G. (2013a). The evidence-based medicine paradigm: Where are we 20 years later? Part 1. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 40, 465–474.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Seshia, S., & Young, G. (2013b). The evidence-based medicine paradigm: Where are we 20 years later? Part 2. Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences, 40, 475–481.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith, M., Glass, G., & Miller, T. (1980). The benefits of psychotherapy. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stänicke, E, Strømme, H, Killingmo, B, & Gullestad, S. E. (2015). Analytic change: Assessing ways of being in a psychoanalytic follow up interview. The International Journal of Psychoanalysis N°, 96(3), 797–815.
   Google Scholar
• Steinert, C., Munder, T., Rabung, S., Hoyer, J., & Leichsenring, F. (2017). Psychodynamic therapy: As efficacious as other empirically supported treatments? A meta-analysis testing equivalence of outcomes. American Journal of Psychiatry, 174(10), 943–953.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strupp, H. (1986). Psychotherapy: Research, practice, and public policy (How to avoid dead ends). American Psychologist, 41, 120–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suarez-Labat, H. (2014). Les investigations projectives et cognitives: Des éclairages pluriels sur les états autistiques et leurs destins. In M.-D. Amy (Ed.), Autismes et psychanalyses. Évolution des pratiques, recherches et articulations (pp. 321–346). Paris: Erès.
   Google Scholar
• Thurin, J.-M. (2017). De l’évaluation des psychothérapies à la recherche en psychothérapie et en psychanalyse. Research in Psychoanalysis, 23, 55a–68a.
   Google Scholar
• Thurin, M., Lapeyronnie-Robine, B., & Thurin, J.-M. (2006). Mise en place et premiers résultats d’une recherche naturaliste en réseau répondant aux critères actuels de qualité méthodologique. Bulletin de Psychologie, 486, 591–603.
   Google Scholar
• Tournay, V. (Ed) (2007). La gouvernance des 1370 innovations médicales. Paris: PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Town, J., Diener, M., Abbass, A., Leichsenring, F., Driessen, E., & Rabung, S. (2012). A meta-analysis of psychodynamic psychotherapy outcomes: Evaluating the effects of research-specific procedures. Psychotherapy, 49(3), 276–290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visentini, G. (2015). Pourquoi la psychanalyse est une science. Freud épistémologue. Paris: PUF.
   Google Scholar
• Visentini, G. (2017). La scientificité ouverte. « Controverses poppériennes » sur la méthode. In Analysis, 2, 82–89.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, R. (1968). The psychotherapy research project of the menninger foundation: A semi-final view. In J. Schlien (Ed.), Research in psychotherapy (Vol. 3, pp. 584–605). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, R. (1986). Forty-two lives in treatment. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, R. (1991). Proposal to the ludwig foundation for a collaborative multi-site program of psychoanalytic therapy research. Unpublished Report.
   Google Scholar
• Wallerstein, R. (2001). The generations of psychotherapy research. An overview. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 18(2), 243–267.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wampold, B., & Imel, Z. (2015). The great psychotherapy debate: The evidence for what makes psychotherapy work. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Wampold, B., Minami, T., Tierney, S., Baskin, T., & Bhati, K. (2002). A meta-(re)analysis of the effects of cognitive therapy versus “other therapies” for depression. Journal of Affective Disorders, 68, 159–165.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, J. (1986). Theory and clinical observations. In J. Weiss & H. Sampson (Eds.), The psychoanalytic process: Theory, clinical observation, and empirical research (pp. 3–138). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zepf, S. (2008). Naturalistic studies of psychoanalytic treatments: Some epistemological and methodological remarks. The Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review, 31(1), 50–60.
   Google Scholar
• Zigante, F., Borghine, A., & Golse, B. (2009). Narrativité des enfants en psychothérapie analytique: évaluation du changement. La psychiatrie de l’enfant, 52, 5–43.
   Google Scholar