Ploidy variation and karyotype analysis in Hemerocallis spp. (Xanthorrhoeaceae) and implications on daylily breeding

References

• Arano H 1963. Cytological studies in subfamily Carduoideae (Compositae) of Japan IX. Botanical Magazine 76: 32–39.
   Google Scholar
• Balao F, Herrera J, Talavera S 2011. Phenotypic consequences of polyploidy and genome size at the micro evolutionary scale: A multivariate morphological approach. New Phytologist 192: 256–65. 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2011.03787.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen X 1980. Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae 14. Beijing, Science Press. Pp. 52–62. ( in Chinese)
   Google Scholar
• Hiroyuki S, Keiko M, Shigefumi T, Yukiko A, Masaru N 2003. Ploidy estimation in Hemerocallis species and cultivars by flow cytometry. Scientia Horticulturae 97: 185–192. 10.1016/S0304-4238(02)00150-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang QC, Qin GY 2008. Research of geminating chromosome sets in Gramineous plants. Beijing, Atomic Energy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kong H 1998. A study on karyotype of Hemerocallis fulva var.oppositibracteata. Guihaia 18: 368–370.
   Google Scholar
• Kong H, Wang CR 1993. A study on karyotype of Hemerocallis in Gansu. Guihaia 13: 247–251.
   Google Scholar
• Levan A, Fredga K, Sanderg AA 1964. Nomenclacture for centromeric position on chromosomes. Hereditas 52: 197–200.
   Google Scholar
• Li MX, Chen RY 1985. On the standards of plant karyotyping. Journal of Wuhan Botanical Research 4: 297–302.
   Google Scholar
• Li ZW, Pinkham L, Campbell NF, Espinosa AC, Conev R 2009. Development of triploid daylily (Hemerocallis) germplasm by embryo rescue. Euphytica 169: 313–318. 10.1007/s10681-009-9958-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li J, Zhang SA 1995. Comparative studies on karyotype of twenty two wild and horticultural species in Hemerocallis. Journal of Shanghai Agricultural College 13: 208–217.
   Google Scholar
• Masterson J 1994. Stomatal size in fossil plants: evidence for polyploidy in majority of angiosperms. Science 264: 421–424. 10.1126/science.264.5157.421
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuoka M 1971. Spontaneous occurrence of triploid Hemerocallis in Japan. Japanese Journal of Breeding 21: 275–284. 10.1270/jsbbs1951.21.275
   Google Scholar
• Mayfield D, Chen ZJ, Pires JC 2011. Epigenetic regulation of flowering time in polyploids. Current Opinion in Plant Biology 14: 174–178. 10.1016/j.pbi.2011.03.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plodeck J 2002. The origin of the daylily cultivar traits. Hemerocallis Letter 8: 22–28.
   Google Scholar
• Sakhanokho HF, Cheatham CL, Pounder Jr CT 2004. Evaluation of techniques to induce polyploid daylilies. Southern Nursery Association Proceedings 49: 591–594.
   Google Scholar
• Singsit C, Veilleux RE 1991. Chloroplast density in guard cells of leaves of anther derived potato plants grown in vitro and in vito. HortScience 26: 592–594.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Song P, Wang ZA, Wang ZN 1989. The relationship between chromosomal ploidy and stomatal apparatus character in leaves of Gossypium L. Journal of Zhejiang Agricultural University 15: 39–44.
   Google Scholar
• Stebbins GL 1971. Chromosomal evolution in higher plants. London, Edward Aronld. Pp. 85–104.
   Google Scholar
• Tomkins JP, Wood TC, Barnes LS, Westman A, Wing RA 2001. Evaluation of genetic variation in the daylily (Hemerocallis spp.) using AFLP markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 102: 489–496. 10.1007/s001220051672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang Z, Wang J, Chang G, Chen C. 2009. Chromosome number and karyotype analysis of five varieties of Hemerocallis hybrida Hort. Journal of Tangshan Teachers College 31: 72–74.
   Google Scholar
• Wang X, Wang H, Wang J, Sun R, Wu J, Liu S et al. 2011. The genome of the mesopolyploid crop species Brassica rapa. Nature Genetics 43: 1035–1039. 10.1038/ng.919
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu JH, Ferguson AR, Murray BG, Jia Y, Datson PM, Zhang J 2012. Induced polyploidy dramatically increases the size and alters the shape of fruit in Actinidia chinensis. Annals of Botany 109: 169–179. 10.1093/aob/mcr256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yan CG, Cao RF, Li ZD, Zheng SX, Cui GX 2003. Studies on morphological characters, yield and quality traits of different ploidy materials of ramie. Scientia Agricultura Sinica 36: 628–632.
   Google Scholar
• Zhao LN, Pan CL, Zang GG, Luo SY, Sun HL 1994. A comparative study on the fiber shape and quality between tetraploid and diploid ramie. China's Fiber Crops 16: 74–77.
   Google Scholar
• Zhu QL 1979. Induced single sex spores of maize and its characters. Journal of Northwest Agricultural College 4: 45–57.
   Google Scholar