Fertiliser practice and yield losses in process potato crops grown in Canterbury, New Zealand

References

• Allison MF, Fowler JH, Allen EJ. 2001a. Responses of potato (Solanum tuberosum) to potassium fertilizers. Am J Agric Econ. 136:407–426.
   Google Scholar
• Allison MF, Fowler JH, Allen EJ. 2001b. Effects of soil- and foliar-applied phosphorus fertilizers on the potato (Solanum tuberosum) crop. J Agr Sci. 137:379–395.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey PL, Metherell AK. 2003. Rates of release of non-exchangeable potassium in New Zealand soils measured by a modified sodium tetraphenyl-boron method. N Z J Agric Res. 46:185–197. doi: 10.1080/00288233.2003.9513546
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooke GW. 1982. Fertilizing for maximum yield. 3rd ed. London: Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Craighead M, Martin R. 2003. Fertiliser responses in potatoes–an overview of past Ravensdown research. P Ag Soc NZ. 32:15–25.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman KL, Franz PR, de Jong RW. 1998. Effect of phosphorus on the yield, quality and petiolar phosphorus concentrations of potatoes (cvv. Russet Burbank and Kennebec) grown in the krasnozem and duplex soils of Victoria. Aust J Exptl Agric. 38:83–93.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson PD. 1985. Irrigation response of potatoes. In: Hill GD, Wratt GS, editors. Potato growing: a changing scene. 1st ed. Lincoln: Agronomy Society of New Zealand; p. 17–20.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson PD, Reid JB, Halse SK, Tregurtha CS, Martin RJ. 2001. Nutrient and water effects on grain production in wheat - a combined model approach. Agron New Zealand 31:45–52.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson PD, Stone PJ, Zyskowski RF, Sinton SM, Martin RJ. 2004. Implementation and testing of the Potato calculator, a decision support system for nitrogen and irrigation management. In: MacKerron DKL, Haverkort AJ, editors. Decision support systems in potato production: bringing models to practice. Wageningen: Wageningen Academic Publishers; p. 85–99.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson PD, Zyskowski RF, Sinton SM, Brown HE, Butler RC. 2006. The potato calculator: a tool for scheduling nitrogen fertilizer applications. Agron New Zealand 36:49–53.
   Google Scholar
• Jamieson PD, Zyskowski RF, Li FY, Semenov MA. 2008. Water and N uptake and responses in models of wheat, potatoes and maize. In: Ma L, Ahuja LR, Bruulsema TW, editors. Quantifying and understanding plant nitrogen uptake systems modeling. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; p. 127–146.
   Google Scholar
• Keeney DR, Bremner JM. 1966. Comparison and evaluation of laboratory methods of obtaining an index of soil nitrogen availability. Agron J. 58:498–503. doi: 10.2134/agronj1966.00021962005800050013x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keeney DR, Nelson DW. 1982. Nitrogen—inorganic forms. In: Page AL, editor. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties. Madison, WI: American Society of Agronomy, Soil Science Society of America; p. 643–698.
   Google Scholar
• Laboski CM, Kelling K. 2007. Influence of fertilizer management and soil fertility on tuber specific gravity: a review. Am J Potato Res. 84:283–290. doi: 10.1007/BF02986240
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee R, Cornforth IS, Edmeades DC, Watkinson JH. 1991. A comparative study of MAF (Ruakura) and DSIR Land Resources soil analysis results. N Z J Agric Res. 34:227–233. doi: 10.1080/00288233.1991.10423364
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohr RM, Tomasiewicz DJ. 2012. Effect of rate and timing of potassium chloride application on the yield and quality of potato (Solanum tuberosum L. ‘Russet Burbank’). Can J Plant Sci. 92:783–794. doi: 10.4141/cjps2011-195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plant & Food Research, Horticulture New Zealand. 2014. FreshFacts New Zealand Horticulture 2014 [Pamphlet]. Auckland: Plant & Food Research; Wellington: Horticulture New Zealand; [cited 2016 Jan 18]. Available from: http://www.freshfacts.co.nz/file/fresh-facts-2014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Reid JB. 2002. Yield response to nutrient supply across a wide range of conditions. 1. Model derivation. Field Crops Res. 77:161–171. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00088-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reid JB, Pearson AJ, Kale AJ. 2004a. The Tomato calculator —a case study of developing decision support software for New Zealand's process tomato growers. Acta Hort. 694:237–241.
   Google Scholar
• Reid JB, van der Weerden TJ, Willimot MW. 2004b. PARJIB_express: Providing an economic basis for fertiliser recommendations for root and tuber crops. Acta Hort. 670:143–150.
   Google Scholar
• Reid JB, Searle BP, Sinton SM. 2011. Does my potato crop need fertiliser? A modeling approach. Agron New Zealand 41:79–95.
   Google Scholar
• Reid JB, Stone PJ, Pearson AJ, Wilson DR. 2002. Yield response to nutrient supply across a wide range of conditions. 2. Analysis of maize yields. Field Crops Res. 77:173–189. doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(02)00087-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie JT 1972. Model for predicting evaporation from a row crop with incomplete cover. Water Resour Res. 8:1204–1213. doi: 10.1029/WR008i005p01204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Storey RMJ, Davies HV. 1992. Tuber quality. In: Harris PM, editor. The potato crop: the scientific basis for improvement. Volume 1. 2nd ed. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media BV; p. 507–569.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson DR, Reid JB, Zyskowski RF, Maley S, Pearson AJ, Armstrong SD, Catto WD, Stafford AD. 2006. Forecasting fertiliser requirements of forage brassica crops. Proc New Zeal Grassl Assoc. 68:205–210.
   Google Scholar
• Wood J. 1980. The mathematical expression of crop response to inputs. In: Physiological aspects of crop productivity: proceedings of the 15th Colloquium International Potash Institute held in Wageningen, The Netherlands. Worblaufen-Bern, Switzerland: International Potash Institute; p. 263–271.
   Google Scholar