The effects of gain versus loss framing and issue involvement on publics’ responses to nuclear energy messages in South Korea

References

• Apanovitch, A. M., McCarthy, D., & Salovey, P. (2003). Using message framing to motivate HIV testing among low-income, ethnic minority women. Health Psychology, 22, 60–67. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.22.1.60
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaton, A. A., Funk, D. C., Ridinger, L., & Jordan, J. (2011). Sport involvement: A conceptual and empirical analysis. Sport Management Review, 14(2), 126–140. doi: 10.1016/j.smr.2010.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley, J. (2012). Does fairness matter in the context of anger about nuclear energy decision making? Risk Analysis, 32, 25–38. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01664.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Besley, J. C., & Oh, S.-H. (2014). The impact of accident attention, ideology and environmentalism on American attitudes toward nuclear energy. Risk Analysis, 34(5), 949–964. doi: 10.1111/risa.12151
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, L. G., & Keller, P. A. (1995). When to accentuate the negative: The effects of perceived efficacy and message framing on intentions to perform a health-related behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 32, 192–204. doi: 10.2307/3152047
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, K. A., & Gaeth, G. J. (1997). Framing effects with differential impact: The role of attribute salience. Advances in Consumer Research, 24(1), 405–411.
   Google Scholar
• Brewer, P. (2001). Value words and lizard brains: Do citizens deliberate about appeals to their core values? Political Psychology, 22(1), 45–64. doi: 10.1111/0162-895X.00225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Choi, Y., & Lin, Y. (2007, May 23). Communicating risk: The effects of message appeal and individual difference on risk message processing. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Communication Association, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Choi, Y., & Lin, Y. (2009). Consumer responses to Mattel product recalls posted on online bulletin boards: Exploring two types of emotion. Journal of Public Relations Research, 21, 198–207. doi: 10.1080/10627260802557506
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, C. W. C., & Luk, C. L. (2006). Effects of comparative advertising in high-and low-cognitive elaboration conditions. Journal of Advertising, 35(2), 55–67. doi: 10.1080/00913367.2006.10639229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, M. D. (2005). Framing effects on public opinion about nanotechnology. Science Communication, 27, 221–239. doi: 10.1177/1075547005281473
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobb, M. D., & Kuklinksi, J. H. (1997). Changing minds: Political arguments and political persuasion. American Journal of Political Science, 41, 88–121. doi: 10.2307/2111710
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, D., & Cox, A. D. (2001). Communicating the consequences of early detection: The role of evidence and framing. Journal of Marketing Research, 65(3), 91–103.
   Google Scholar
• Detweiler, J. B., Bedell, B. T., Salovey, P., Pronin, E., & Rothman, A. J. (1999). Message framing and sunscreen use: Gain-framed messages motivate beach-goers. Health Psychology, 18, 189–196. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.18.2.189
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
   Google Scholar
• EvelandJr, W. P. (2001). The cognitive mediation model of learning from the news: Evidence from non-election, off-year election, and presidential election contexts. Communication Research, 28, 571–601. doi: 10.1177/009365001028005001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EvelandJr, W. P., Shah, D. V., & Kwak, N. (2003). Assessing causality in the cognitive mediation model: A panel study of motivations, information processing and learning during campaign 2000. Communication Research, 30, 359–386. doi: 10.1177/0093650203253369
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Funk, C., & Rainie, L. (2015). Public and scientists’ views on science and policy, January 29. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Gerend, M. A., & Cullen, M. (2008). Effects of message framing and temporal context on college student drinking behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(4), 1167–1173. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.02.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghuge, S. (2010). The role of personal relevance and mood on the persuasive impact of gain and loss frames in advertising messages about a vaccine against alcohol addiction (Master’s thesis, Iowa State University). ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database. (UMI No. 1512315).
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, M., & Truelove, H. B. (2011). Energy choices and risk beliefs: Is it just global warming and fear of a nuclear power plant accident? Risk Analysis, 31, 819–831. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01535.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groot, J. I. M., Steg, L., & Poortinga, W. (2013). Values, perceived risks and benefits, and acceptability of nuclear energy. Risk Analysis, 33(2), 307–317. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2012.01845.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Havitz, M. E., Kaczynski, A. T., & Mannell, R. C. (2013). Exploring relationships between physical activity, leisure involvement, self-efficacy, and motivation via participant segmentation. Leisure Sciences, 35(1), 45–62. doi: 10.1080/01490400.2013.739890
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hulme, M. (2008). The conquering of climate: Discourses of fear and their dissolution. The Geographical Journal, 174, 5–16. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-4959.2008.00266.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iwasaki, Y., & Havitz, M. E. (2004). Examining relationships between leisure involvement, psychological commitment and loyalty to a recreation agency. Journal of Leisure Research, 36(1), 45–72. doi: 10.1080/00222216.2004.11950010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, H., Silva, C., Nowlin, M., & deLozier, G. (2011). Reversing nuclear opposition: Evolving public acceptance of a permanent nuclear waste disposal facility. Risk Analysis, 31(4), 629–644. doi: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.2010.01543.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263–291. doi: 10.2307/1914185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keller, P. A., Lipkus, I. M., & Rimer, B. (2003). Affect, framing, and persuasion. Journal of Marketing Research, 40(1), 54–64. doi: 10.1509/jmkr.40.1.54.19133
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiene, S. M., Barta, W. D., Zelenski, J. M., & Cothran, D. L. (2005). Why are you bringing up condoms now? The effect of message content on framing effects of condom use messages. Health Psychology, 24, 321–326. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.24.3.321
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesler, C., Collins, B., & Miller, N. (1969). Attitude change. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kim, H. J. (2012). The effects of gender and gain versus loss frame on processing breast cancer screening messages. Communication Research, 39(3), 385–412. doi: 10.1177/0093650211427557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, H. J. (2014). The impacts of vicarious illness experience on response to gain- versus loss-framed breast cancer screening (BCS) messages. Health Communication, 29(9), 854–865. doi: 10.1080/10410236.2013.807903
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y., Kim, M., & Kim, W. (2013). Effect of the Fukushima nuclear disaster on global public acceptance of nuclear energy. Energy Policy, 61, 822–828. doi: 10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.107
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korea Power Exchange. (2018). 2017 Electricity market statistics. Retrieved from http://epsis.kpx.or.kr/epsisnew/selectEkifBoardList.do?menuId=090110&boardId=003110.
   Google Scholar
• Kühberger, A. (1998). The influence of framing on risky decisions: A meta-analysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 75(1), 23–55. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2781
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, R. (1985). Two explanations for negativity effects in political behavior. American Journal of Political Science, 29(1), 119–138. doi: 10.2307/2111215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, S., & Park, H. S. (2013). Effects of message framing and anchoring on reaching public consensus on the Korea–U.S. FTA issue. Communication Research, 40, 176–192. doi: 10.1177/0093650211406707
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y.-F., Bi, Y.-F., & Wang, H.-Y. (2010). The effects of emotions and task frames on risk preferences in self decision making and anticipating others’ decisions. Acta Psychologica Sinica, 42, 317–324. doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1041.2010.00317
   Google Scholar
• Loroz, P. S. (2007). The interaction of message frames and reference points in prosocial persuasive appeals. Psychology & Marketing, 24, 1001–1023. doi: 10.1002/mar.20193
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lu, H. (2016). The effects of emotional appeals and gain versus loss framing in communicating sea star wasting disease. Science Communication, 38(2), 143–169. doi: 10.1177/1075547015619173
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie, S. B., & Lutz, R. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the Ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of Marketing, 53, 48–65. doi: 10.2307/1251413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maheswaran, D., & Meyers-Levy, J. (1990). The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 361–367. doi: 10.2307/3172593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Major, L. H. (2011). The mediating role of emotions in the relationship between frames and attribution of responsibility for health problems. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 88, 502–522. doi: 10.1177/107769901108800303
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McElroy, T., & Seta, J. J. (2003). Framing effects: An analytic-holistic perspective. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39, 610–617. doi: 10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00036-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McQueen, A., Vernon, S. W., Meissner, H. I., & Rakowski, W. (2008). Risk perceptions and worry about cancer: Does gender make a difference? Journal of Health Communication, 13, 56–79. doi: 10.1080/10810730701807076
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyerowitz, B. E., & Chaiken, S. (1987). The effect of message framing on breast self-examination attitudes, intentions, and behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52, 500–510. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.52.3.500
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyers-Levy, J., & Maheswaran, D. (2004). Exploring message framing outcomes when systematic, heuristic or both types of processing occur. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1&2), 159–166. doi: 10.1207/s15327663jcp1401&2_18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Millar, M. G., & Millar, K. U. (2000). Promoting safe driving behaviors: The influence of message framing and issue involvement. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30(4), 853–866. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02827.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morton, T. A., Rabinovich, A., Marshall, D., & Bretschneider, P. (2011). The future that may (or may not) come: How framing changes responses to uncertainty in climate change communications. Global Environmental Change, 21, 103–109. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullin, B. J., Hardy, S., & Sutton, W. A. (2014). Sport marketing. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. E., & Oxley, Z. M. (1999). Issue framing effects on belief importance and opinion. The Journal of Politics, 61(4), 1040–1067. doi: 10.2307/2647553
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. E., Oxley, Z. M., & Clawson, R. (1997). Toward a psychology of framing effects. Political Behavior, 19(3), 221–246. doi: 10.1023/A:1024834831093
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, S. J., & Goldsmith, D. E. (2001). The development of a scale to measure perceived corporate credibility. Journal of Business Research, 52, 235–247. doi: 10.1016/S0148-2963(99)00104-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obermiller, C. (1995). The baby is sick/the baby is well: A test of environmental communication appeals. Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 55–70. doi: 10.1080/00913367.1995.10673476
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2006). Chapter 1: The advantages of compliance or the disadvantages of noncompliance? A meta-analytic review of the relative persuasive effectiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages. Communication Yearbook, 30, 1–43. doi: 10.1207/s15567419cy3001_1
   Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2007). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed loss-framed messages for encouraging disease prevention behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Health Communication, 12, 623–644. doi: 10.1080/10810730701615198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Keefe, D. J., & Jensen, J. D. (2009). The relative persuasiveness of gain-framed and loss-framed messages for encouraging disease detection behaviors: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Communication, 59, 296–316. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2009.01417.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1979). Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 1915–1926. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.37.10.1915
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer: Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Priester, J. R., & Brinol, P. (2002). Mass media attitude change: Implications of the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In J. Byant & D. Zillmann (Eds.), Media effects: Advances in theory and research (pp. 155–199). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1999). The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. In S. Chaiken, & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 41–72). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Priester, J. R., & Petty, R. E. (2003). The influence of spokesperson trustworthiness on message elaboration, attitude strength, and advertising effectiveness. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13, 408–421. doi: 10.1207/S15327663JCP1304_08
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Puto, C. P. (1987). The framing of buying decisions. Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 301–315. doi: 10.1086/209115
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rivers, S. E., Salovey, P., Pizarro, D. A., Pizarro, J., & Schneider, T. R. (2005). Message framing and pap test utilization among women attending a community health clinic. Journal of Health Psychology, 10(1), 65–77. doi: 10.1177/1359105305048556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robberson, M. R., & Rogers, R. W. (1988). Beyond fear appeals: Negative and positive persuasive appeals to health and self-esteem. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 18, 277–287. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.1988.tb00017.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roh, S., McComas, K. A., Rickard, L. N., & Decker, D. J. (2015). How motivated reasoning and temporal frames may polarize opinions about wildlife disease risk. Science Communication, 37(3), 340–370. doi: 10.1177/1075547015575181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenberg-Kima, R. B., Baylor, A. L., Plant, E. A., & Doerr, C. E. (2008). Interface agents as social models for female students: The effects of agent visual presence and appearance on female students’ attitudes and beliefs. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 2741–2756. doi: 10.1016/j.chb.2008.03.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RossJr, W. T. (1991). Performance against quota and the call selection decision. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 296–306. doi: 10.2307/3172865
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, A. J., Bartels, R. D., Wlaschin, J., & Salovey, P. (2006). The strategic use of gain- and loss-framed messages to promote healthy behavior: How theory can inform practice. Journal of Communication, 56(s1), S202–S220. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00290.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rothman, A. J., Salovey, P., Antone, C., Keough, K., & Martin, C. (1993). The influence of message framing on intentions to perform health behaviors. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 408–433. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1993.1019
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, T. R., Salovey, P., Apanovitch, A. M., Pizarro, J., McCarthy, D., & Zullo, J. (2001). The effects of message framing and ethnic targeting on mammography use among low-income women. Health Psychology, 20, 256–266. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.20.4.256
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2004). Risk as analysis and risk as feelings: Some thoughts about affect, reason, risk, and rationality. Risk Analysis, 24(2), 311–322. doi: 10.1111/j.0272-4332.2004.00433.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, G. E., & Wortzel, L. L. H. (1997). Prior knowledge and the effect of suggested frames of reference in advertising. Psychology & Marketing, 14(2), 121–143. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1520-6793(199703)14:2<121::AID-MAR2>3.0.CO;2-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spence, A., & Pidgeon, N. (2010). Framing and communicating climate change: The effects of distance and outcome frame manipulations. Global Environmental Change, 20, 656–667. doi: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsujikawa, N., Tsuchida, S., & Shiotani, T. (2016). Changes in the factors influencing public acceptance of nuclear power generation in Japan since the 2011 fukushima daiichi nuclear disaster. Risk Analysis, 36(1), 98–113. doi: 10.1111/risa.12447
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umphrey, L. R. (2003). The effects of message framing and message processing on testicular self-examination attitudes and perceived susceptibility. Communication Research Reports, 20, 97–105. doi: 10.1080/08824090309388805
   Google Scholar
• von Neumann, J., & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, C., Lee, Y., & Wang, Y. (2014). Measuring the social value of nuclear energy using public involvement in public management. International Journal of Business & Public Administration, 11(2), 23–36.
   Google Scholar
• White, M., Buehner, S. P., & Haye, A. (2003). Trust in risky messages: The role of prior attitudes. Risk Analysis, 23(4), 717–726. doi: 10.1111/1539-6924.00350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witte, C. L., Grünhagen, M., & Gentry, J. W. (2008). An empirical investigation of framing effects in negotiations: A study of single-family home sales. Psychology & Marketing, 25(5), 465–484. doi: 10.1002/mar.20220
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1994). The personal involvement inventory: Reduction, revision, and application to advertising. Journal of Advertising, 23(4), 59–70. doi: 10.1080/00913367.1943.10673459
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar