Multimodal social semiotic analysis of Delhi rape conviction news in 2013 in CNN IBN websiteFootnote^*

* CNN IBN was an Indian English-language news television, which is currently known as CNN News18. Earlier, CNN provided international news to the channel while Indian Broadcasting Network (IBN) contributed local Indian news reports. In 2014, Reliance Industries, India, acquired the Network 18 and the channel has been rebranded as CNN-News 18.

References

• Adami, E. (2015). What’s in a click? A social semiotic framework for the multimodal analysis of website interactivity. Visual Communication, 14(2), 133–153. doi: 10.1177/1470357214565583
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barthes, R. (1970). S/Z ( R. Miller, Trans.). New York: Hill and Wang.
   Google Scholar
• Bianco, J. S. (n.d.). Affective | reading | affect. Retrieved from http://www.spikenlilli.com/academic/Cross-Media_Movement/ARA/AffectiveReadingAffect_9-30.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1998). On television and journalism. London: Pluto.
   Google Scholar
• Budd, M., Craig, S., & Steinman, C. M. (1999). Consuming environments: Television and commercial culture. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cope, B., & Kalantzis, M. (2000). Multiliteracies: The beginning of an idea. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 3–8). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Djonov, E. (2005). Analysing the organisation of information in websites: From hypermedia design to systemic functional hypermedia discourse analysis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). The University of New South Wales, Sydney.
   Google Scholar
• Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse: Textual analysis for social research. London: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fowler, R. (1991). Language in the news. Discourse and ideology in the British press. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1973). The functional basis of language. In B. B. Bernstein (Ed.), Class, codes and control: Applied studies towards a sociology of language (pp. 343–366). London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An introduction to functional grammar (2nd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K. (2007). Language and education. London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (1999). Construing experience through meaning: A language-based approach to cognition. London: Cassell.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. M. I. M. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Edward Arnold.
   Google Scholar
• Hull, G. A., & Nelson, M. E. (2005). Locating the semiotic power of multimodality. Written Communication, 22(2), 224–261. doi: 10.1177/0741088304274170
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. (2005). Multimodality, “reading”, and “writing” for the 21st century. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 26(3), 315–331.
   Google Scholar
• Joseph, A. (2008). Rape and the media. In S. Bhattacharjee (Ed.), A unique crime: Understanding rape in India (pp. 260–285). Kolkata: Doyel.
   Google Scholar
• Jungblut, M., & Zakareviciute, I. (2018). Do pictures tell a different story? A multimodal frame analysis of the 2014 Israel-Gaza conflict. Journalism Practice. doi: 10.1080/17512786.2017.1412804
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knox, J. (2007). Visual-verbal communication on online newspaper home pages. Visual Communication, 6(1), 19–53. doi: 10.1177/1470357207071464
   Google Scholar
• Kok, K. C. A. (2004). Multisemiotic mediation in hypertext. In K. L. O’Halloran (Ed.), Multimodal discourse analysis: Systemic-functional perspectives (pp. 131–159). London: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. R. (2000). Text as the punctuation of semiosis: Pulling at some of the threads. In U. H. Meinhof & J. M. Smith (Eds.), Intertextuality and the media: From genre to everyday life (pp. 132–154). Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. R. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. R., & van Leeuwen, T. (1996). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lapsia, T. P. (2015). Impact of the “Nirbhaya” rape case: Isolated phenomenon or social change? Honors Scholar Theses. Retrieved from https://opencommons.uconn.edu/srhonors_theses/453/
   Google Scholar
• Lemke, J. L. (2002). Travels in hypermodality. Visual Communication, 1(3), 299–325. doi: 10.1177/147035720200100303
   Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (1995). The autonomy of affect. Cultural Critique, 31, 83–109. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/1354446.pdf doi: 10.2307/1354446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Massumi, B. (2002). Parables for the virtual: Movement, affect, sensation. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Midathada, P. (2015). Indian media framings of rape and sexual violence in the aftermath of the 2012 Delhi gang rape (Senior honors thesis). Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/20844338/Indian_Media_Framings_of_Rape_and_Sexual_Violence_in_the_Aftermath_of_the_2012_Delhi_Gang_Rape
   Google Scholar
• The New London Group. (2000). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. In B. Cope & M. Kalantzis (Eds.), Multiliteracies: Literacy learning and the design of social futures (pp. 9–38). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Papacharissi, Z. (2015). Toward new journalism (s) affective news, hybridity, and liminal spaces. Journalism Studies, 16(1), 27–40. doi: 10.1080/1461670X.2014.890328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurstun, J. (2000). Screenreading: Challenges of the new literacies. Technology, Education and Society, 1, 39–55.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T. A. (1993). Principles of critical discourse analysis. Discourse & Society, 4(2), 249–283. doi: 10.1177/0957926593004002006
   Google Scholar