3,142
Views
26
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

‘Panda engagement’ in China’s digital public diplomacy

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 118-140 | Received 07 May 2019, Accepted 16 Jan 2020, Published online: 07 Feb 2020

References

  • Adams, A., & McCorkindale, T. (2013). Dialogue and transparency: A content analysis of how the 2012 presidential candidates used twitter. Public Relations Review, 39(4), 357–359. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2013.07.016
  • Breese, E. B. (2016). When marketers and academics share a research platform: The story of Crimson Hexagon. Journal of Applied Social Science, 10(1), 3–7. doi: 10.1177/1936724415569953
  • Chan-Olmsted, S., & Wolter, L.-C. (2017). Toward a multidimensional framework of media engagement: Conceptualizing consumer experience and connection with media content in a digital environment. Emma conference 2017. Retrieved from https://www.media-management.eu/ocs/index.php/emma/emma2017/paper/view/585
  • Chandler, D., & Munday, R. (2011). A dictionary of media and communication (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Chen, F. (2015). Practical research on the diplomatic activities of Chinese media in the new media age. In Q. Zhao & W. Lei (Eds.), Blue book of public diplomacy: Annual report of China’s public diplomacy development (2015) (pp. 237–249). Beijing: Social Sciences Academic Press.
  • Chen, Y. R. (2018). Consumer engagement in social media in China. In K. A. Johnston & M. Taylor (Eds.), The handbook of communication engagement (pp. 475–490). Medford, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Chen, X., & Liu, X. (2015). Hexin jiazhiguan chuanbo de guojia gonggong guanxi zhanlüe gouxiang [Strategic conception of national public relations for spreading Chinese core values]. Modern Communication, 6(227), 25–31.
  • Chung, H., & Zhao, X. (2004). Effects of perceived interactivity on web site preference and memory : role of personal motivation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10, 1.
  • Cooke, M., & Lawrence, B. B. (Eds.). (2005). Muslim networks from Hajj to hip hop. Chapel Hill, CA: University of North Carolina Press.
  • Cooren, F. (2012). Communication theory at the center : Ventriloquism and the communicative constitution of reality. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 1–20. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01622.x
  • Coyle, J. R., & Thorson, E. (2001). The effects of progressive levels of interactivity and vividness in web marketing sites. Journal of Advertising, 30(3), 65–77. doi: 10.1080/00913367.2001.10673646
  • Crimson Hexagon. (2018). Social account monitor: Twitter. Retrieved from https://help.crimsonhexagon.com/hc/en-us/articles/203627125-Social-Account-Monitor-Twitter
  • Cushing, N., & Markwell, K. (2009). Platypus diplomacy : Animal gifts in international relations. Journal of Australian Studies, 33(3), 255–271. doi: 10.1080/14443050903079664
  • Dagan Wood, S. (2014, September 15). The positive future of journalism. TEDx Talks. YouTube. Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zPy0xnymGR0
  • Djerejian, E. P. (2003). Changing minds, winning peace (Report of the Advisory Group on Public Diplomacy for the Arab and Muslim World). US State Department.
  • Duncombe, C. (2019). Digital diplomacy : Emotion and identity in the public realm. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 14, 102–116. doi: 10.1163/1871191X-14101016
  • Finn, J. D. (1989). Withdrawing from school. Review of Educational Research, 59(2), 117–142. doi: 10.3102/00346543059002117
  • Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59–109. doi: 10.3102/00346543074001059
  • Fredrickson, B. L. (1998). What good are positive emotions? Review of General Psychology, 2(3), 300–319. doi: 10.1037/1089-2680.2.3.300
  • Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology. The American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.56.3.218
  • Freelon, D. G. (2010). Recal: Intercoder reliability calculation as a web service. International Journal of Internet Science, 5(1), 20–33.
  • Gilboa, E. (2000). Mass communication and diplomacy: A theoretical framework. Communication Theory, 10(3), 275–309. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2885.2000.tb00193.x
  • Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (2009). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. New Brunswick: Aldine.
  • Gould, S. J. (1979). Mickey Mouse meets Konrad Lorenz. Natural History, 88(5), 30–36.
  • Gregory, B. (2008). Public diplomacy: Sunrise of an academic field. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616(1), 274–290. doi: 10.1177/0002716207311723
  • Hartig, F. (2013). Panda diplomacy: The cutest part of China’s public diplomacy. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 8(1), 49–78. doi: 10.1163/1871191X-12341245
  • Hauser, G. A. (2002). Introduction to rhetorical theory (2nd ed.). Prospect Heights, NY: Waveland Press.
  • Hayden, C. (2012). The rhetoric of soft power: Public diplomacy in global contexts. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
  • Hu, J. (2012). Firmly march on the path of socialism with Chinese characteristics and strive to complete the building of a moderately prosperous society in all respects (Report to the Eighteenth National Congress of the Communist Party of China on Nov 8, 2012). Beijing. Retrieved from http://language.chinadaily.com.cn/news/2012-11/19/content_15941774_12.htm
  • Huang, K. (2018, August 24). Xiang shijie zhanxian zhenshi liti quanmian de Zhongguo [Show the world a true, three-dimensional, and comprehensive China]. Xinhua News Agency. Retrieved from http://politics.people.com.cn/n1/2018/0824/c1001-30247603.html
  • Huang, Z. A., & Arifon, O. (2018). Chinese public diplomacy on Twitter: Creating a harmonious polyphony. Hermès La Revue, 81, 45–53.
  • Huang, Z. A., & Wang, R. (2019a). Building a network to “tell China stories well”: Chinese diplomatic communication strategies on Twitter. International Journal of Communication, 13, 2984–3007.
  • Huang, Z. A., & Wang, R. (2019b). The new “cat” of the Internet: China’s panda diplomacy on Twitter. In F. Frandsen, W. Johansen, R. Tench, & S. Romenti (Eds.), Big ideas in public relations research and practice (pp. 69–85). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing.
  • Johnston, K. A. (2018). Toward a theory of social engagement. In K. A. Johnston & M. Taylor (Eds.), The handbook of communication engagement (pp. 19–32). Medford, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Johnston, K. A., & Taylor, M. (2018). The handbook of communication engagement (1st ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell.
  • Jowett, G., & O’Donnell, V. (2012). Propaganda & persuasion (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Khatua, A., & Khatua, A. (2016, December). Leave or remain? Deciphering Brexit deliberations on Twitter. 2016 IEEE 16th international conference on data mining workshops (ICDMW) (pp. 428–433). IEEE.
  • Kim, K. E. (2015). Framing as a strategic persuasive message tactic. In D. Holtzhausen & A. Zerfass (Eds.), The routledge handbook of strategic communication (pp. 285–302). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Kurlantzick, J. (2007). Charm offensive: How China’s soft power is transforming the world. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  • Lai, H., & Lu, Y. (Eds.). (2012). China’s soft power and international relations (1st ed.). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Li, A. K. (2015). Towards a more proactive method: Regulating public opinion on Chinese microblogs under Xi’s new leadership. China Perspectives, 2015(4), 15–23. doi: 10.4000/chinaperspectives.6840
  • Li, M. (2009). Soft power: China’s emerging strategy in international politics. Plymouth: Lexington Books.
  • Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
  • Malone, G. D. (1985). Managing public diplomacy. The Washington Quarterly, 8(3), 199–213. doi: 10.1080/01636608509450301
  • Martin-Juchat, F. (2014). Le capitalisme affectif: Enjeux des pratiques de communication des organisations [Affective capitalism: Issues in the communication practices of organizations]. In S. P. Alemanno (Ed.), Communication organisationnelle, management et numérique [Organizational communication, management and digitalization] (pp. 59–68). Paris: L’Harmattan.
  • Mclntyre, K., & Gyldensted, C. (2017). Constructive journalism: Applying positive psychology techniques to news production. The Journal of Media Innovations, 4(2), 20–34. doi: 10.5617/jomi.v4i2.2403
  • Men, L. R., & Tsai, W.-H. S. (2012). How companies cultivate relationships with publics on social network sites: Evidence from China and the United States. Public Relations Review, 38(5), 723–730. doi: 10.1016/j.pubrev.2011.10.006
  • Meng, B. (2018). The politics of Chinese media: Consensus and contestation. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Nicholls, H. (2011). The way of the panda: The curious history of China’s political animal. New York, NY: Pegasus.
  • Nye, J. S. (2004). Soft power: The means to success in world politics (1st ed.). New York, NY: Public Affairs.
  • Pamment, J. (2015). Media influence, ontological transformation, and social change: Conceptual overlaps between development communication and public diplomacy. Communication Theory, 25(2), 188–207. doi: 10.1111/comt.12064
  • Pamment, J. (2016). Digital diplomacy as transmedia engagement: Aligning theories of participatory culture with international advocacy campaigns. New Media & Society, 18(9), 2046–2062. doi: 10.1177/1461444815577792
  • Qin, Y. (2011). Development of international relations theory in China: Progress through debates. International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, 11(2), 231–257. doi: 10.1093/irap/lcr003
  • RFI. (2017, December 4). Brigitte Macron baptise le bébé panda, symbole de l’amitié franco-chinoise [Brigitte Macron baptizes the baby panda, symbol of Franco-Chinese friendship]. Retrieved from http://www.rfi.fr/france/20171204-brigitte-macron-bapteme-bebe-panda-symbole-amitie-franco-chinoise
  • Roberts, M. E. (2018). Censored: Distraction and diversion inside China’s great firewall. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
  • Roselle, L., Miskimmon, A., & O’Loughlin, B. (2014). Strategic narrative: A new means to understand soft power. Media, War & Conflict, 7(1), 70–84. doi: 10.1177/1750635213516696
  • Schaller, G. B. (1994). The last panda. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
  • Sevin, E., & Ingenhoff, D. (2018). Public diplomacy on social media: Analyzing networks and content. International Journal of Communication, 12, 3633–3685.
  • Sherman, G. D., Haidt, J., & Coan, J. A. (2009). Viewing cute images increases behavioral carefulness. Emotion, 9(2), 282–286. doi: 10.1037/a0014904
  • Stemler, S. (2001). An overview of content analysis. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 7, 17.
  • Thibault, M., & Marino, G. (2018). Who run the world? Cats: Cat lovers, cat memes, and cat languages across the web. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law, 31(3), 473–490. doi: 10.1007/s11196-018-9559-8
  • Thussu, D. (2016). The scramble for Asian soft power in Africa. Les Enjeux de l’information et de La Communication [Information and Communication Issues], 2(17), 225–237. doi: 10.3917/enic.021.0225
  • van Ham, P. (2008). Power, public diplomacy, and the Pax Americana. In J. Melissen (Ed.), The New public diplomacy: Soft power in international relations (pp. 46–66). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Vlahos, M. (2009). Public diplomacy as loss of world authority. In N. Snow, & P. M. Taylor (Eds.), Routledge handbook of public diplomacy (pp. 24–38). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Xi, J. (2013, August 20). Xi Jinping: Yishixingtai gongzuo shidang de yixiang jiduan zhongyao de gongzuo [Xi Jinping: Ideological work is an extremely important task of the Party]. Xinhua News Agency. Retrieved from http://www.xinhuanet.com//politics/2013-08/20/c_117021464.htm
  • Xi, J. (2014, February 27). Xi Jinping zhuchi zhaokai zhongyang wangluo anquan he xinxi hua lingdao xiaozu diyici huiyi [Xi Jinping presided over the first meeting of the Central Network Security and Informatization Leading Group]. Xinhua. Retrieved from http://cpc.people.com.cn/n/2014/0227/c64094-24486402.html
  • Xi, J. (2017a, January 19). Xi Jinping chuxi “gongshang gongzhu renlei mingyungongtongti” gaojibie huiyi bing fabiao zhuzhiyanjiang [Xi Jinping attended the high-level meeting of “Community to build a community of human destiny” and delivered a keynote speech]. The State Council of the PRC. Retrieved from http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2017-01/19/content_5161087.htm#1
  • Xi, J. (2017b, December 28). Xi Jinping jiejian 2017 niandu zhuwai shijie gongzuo huiyi yuhui shijie bing fabiao zhongyao jianghua [Xi Jinping met with the 2017 diplomatic mission work meeting and the festival and delivered an important speech]. Xinhua. Retrieved from http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/leaders/2017-12/28/c_1122181743.htm
  • Xi, J. (2018, September 29). Xi Jinping attended the National Conference on Propaganda and Ideological Work and delivered an important speech. The State Council of the PRC. Retrieved from http://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2018-08/22/content_5315723.htm
  • Xing, Y. (2010). China’s panda diplomacy: The power of being cute. Los Angeles, CA: University of Southern California.
  • Yang, J. (2011). Nuli kaichuang zhongguo tese gonggong waijiao xinjumian [Strive to open up a new situation of public diplomacy with Chinese characteristics]. Qiushi Theory, 4. Retrieved from http://www.qstheory.cn/zxdk/2011/201104/201102/t20110214_67907.htm
  • Yang, H., & Xu, C. (2018). Research on iPanda channel international communication strategy. TV Research (China), 6, 82–85.
  • Yoo, M. (2010). Three case studies on China’s public diplomacy to the United States: Panda, Confucius institute and the first emperor of Qin. Public Diplomacy Quarterly (China), 2, 74–81.
  • Zaharna, R. S. (2014). Network purpose, network design: Dimensions of network and collaborative public diplomacy. In R. S. Zaharna, A. Arsenault, & A. Fisher (Eds.), Relational, networked and collaborative approaches to public diplomacy. The connective mind shift (pp. 211–248). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Zhang, Y., & Matingwina, S. (2016). Constructive journalism: A new journalistic paradigm of Chinese media in Africa. In X. Zhang, H. Wasserman, & W. Mano (Eds.), China’s media and soft power in Africa (pp. 93–105). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Zhang, X., Wasserman, H., & Mano, W. (Eds.). (2016). China’s media and soft power in Africa: Promotion and perceptions. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Zhao, K. (2019). The China model of public diplomacy and its future. The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 14(1–2), 169–181. doi: 10.1163/1871191X-14101033
  • Zhao, X., & Xiang, Y. (2019). Does China’s outward focused journalism engage a constructive approach? A qualitative content analysis of Xinhua News Agency’s English News. Asian Journal of Communication, 29(4), 346–362. doi: 10.1080/01292986.2019.1606263
  • Zheng, Y., & Zhang, C. (2012). “Soft power” and Chinese soft power. In H. Lai & Y. Lu (Eds.), China’s soft power and international relations (pp. 21–38). London: Routledge.
  • Zhou, Q. (2018). Chaoyue youxing jiangjie: Quanqiu chuanbo zhong de gonggong waijiao [Beyond visible border: Public diplomacy in global communication]. Beijing: Communication University of China Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.