How do inoculation messages work? A two-study mixed-method investigation into inoculation mechanisms

References

• Ajzen, I. (2006). Constructing a theory of planned behavior questionnaire. Retrieved from http://people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Banas, J. A., & Miller, G. (2013). Inducing resistance to conspiracy theory propaganda: Testing inoculation and metainoculation strategies. Human Communication Research, 39, 184–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banas, J. A., & Rains, S. A. (2010). A meta-analysis of research on inoculation theory. Communication Monographs, 77, 281–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barden, J., & Petty, R. E. (2008). The mere perception of elaboration creates attitude certainty: Exploring the thoughtfulness heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 489–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49, 116–131.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Feinstein, J. A., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 197–253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., & Kao, C. F. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48, 306–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cárdaba, M. A., Briñol, P., Horcajo, J., & Petty, R. E. (2014). Changing prejudiced attitudes by thinking about persuasive messages: Implications for resistance. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 44, 343–353.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752–766.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton, J. (2013). Inoculation theory. In J. P. Dillard & L. Shen (Eds.), The Sage handbook of persuasion: Developments in theory and practice (2nd ed., pp. 220–236). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Compton, J. (2020). Prophylactic versus therapeutic inoculation treatments for resistance to influence. Communication Theory, 30, 330–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton, J., Jackson, B., & Dimmock, J. A. (2016). Persuading others to avoid persuasion: Inoculation theory and resistant health attitudes. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton, J., & Pfau, M. (2004). Use of inoculation to foster resistance to credit card marketing targeting college students. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 32, 343–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton, J., & Pfau, M. (2008). Inoculating against pro-plagiarism justifications: Rational and affective strategies. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 36, 98–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton, J., & Pfau, M. (2009). Spreading inoculation: Inoculation, resistance to influence, and word-of-mouth communication. Communication Theory, 19, 9–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Compton, J. A., & Pfau, M. (2005). Inoculation theory of resistance to influence at maturity: Recent progress in theory development and application and suggestions for future research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 29, 97–146.
   Google Scholar
• Cornelis, E., Cauberghe, V., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2014). The inoculating effect of message sidedness on adolescents’ binge drinking intentions: The moderating role of issue involvement. Journal of Drug Issues, 44, 254–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2013). Strategies of qualitative inquiry (4th ed.). London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Dillingham, L. L., & Ivanov, B. (2017). Inoculation messages as a preemptive financial crisis communication strategy with inexperienced investors. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 45, 274–293.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisinga, R., Grotenhuis, M. T., & Pelzer, B. (2013). The reliability of a two-item scale: Pearson, Cronbach or Spearman-Brown? International Journal of Public Health, 58, 637–642.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Godbold, L. C., & Pfau, M. (2000). Conferring resistance to peer pressure among adolescents: Using inoculation theory to discourage alcohol use. Communication Research, 27, 411–437.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gollwitzer, P. M., & Schaal, B. (1998). Metacognition in action: The importance of implementation intentions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2, 124–136.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haugtvedt, C. P., & Petty, R. E. (1992). Personality and persuasion: Need for cognition moderates the persistence and resistance of attitude changes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 308–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H. F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanov, B. (2017). Inoculation theory applied in health and risk messaging. In R. Parrott (Ed.), Encyclopedia of health and risk message design and processing. New York, NY: Oxford University Press. https://oxfordre.com/communication/view/10.1093/acrefore/9780190228613.001.0001/acrefore-9780190228613-e-254
   Google Scholar
• Ivanov, B., Dillingham, L. L., Parker, K. A., Rains, S. A., Burchett, M., & Geegan, S. (2018). Sustainable attitudes: Protecting tourism with inoculation messages. Annals of Tourism Research, 73, 26–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivanov, B., Miller, C. H., Compton, J., Averbeck, J. M., Harrison, K. J., Sims, J. D., … Parker, J. L. (2012). Effects of postinoculation talk on resistance to influence. Journal of Communication, 62, 701–718.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, B., Compton, J., Whiddett, R., Anthony, D. R., & Dimmock, J. A. (2015). Preempting performance challenges: The effects of inoculation messaging on attacks to task self-efficacy. PLoS One, 10, e0124886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luszczynska, A., & Schwarzer, R. (2003). Planning and self-efficacy in the adoption and maintenance of breast self-examination: A longitudinal study on self-regulatory cognitions. Psychology and Health, 18, 93–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, A. M., & Miller, C. H. (2016). Potentially deceptive health nutrition–related advertising claims: The role of inoculation in conferring resistance. Health Education Journal, 75, 144–157.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, W. J. (1961a). The effectiveness of supportive and refutational defenses in immunizing and restoring beliefs against persuasion. Sociometry, 24, 184–197.
   Google Scholar
• McGuire, W. J. (1961b). Resistance to persuasion conferred by active and passive prior refutation of the same and alternative counterarguments. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 326–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGuire, W. J. (1964). Inducing resistance to persuasion: Some contemporary approaches. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 1) (pp. 191–229). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, K. A., Ivanov, B., & Compton, J. (2012). Inoculation’s efficacy with young adults’ risky behaviors: Can inoculation confer cross-protection over related but untreated issues? Health Communication, 27, 223–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, K. A., Rains, S. A., & Ivanov, B. (2016). Examining the “blanket of protection” conferred by inoculation: The effects of inoculation messages on the cross-protection of related attitudes. Communication Monographs, 83, 49–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19) (pp. 123–205). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., & Burgoon, M. (1988). Inoculation in political campaign communication. Human Communication Research, 15, 91–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., Holbert, R. L., Zubric, S. J., Pasha, N. H., & Lin, W. K. (2000). Role and influence of communication modality in the process of resistance to persuasion. Media Psychology, 2, 1–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., Ivanov, B., Houston, B., Haigh, M., Sims, J., Gilchrist, E., … Richert, N. (2005). Inoculation and mental processing: The instrumental role of associative networks in the process of resistance to counterattitudinal influence. Communication Monographs, 72, 414–441.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., Roskos-Ewoldsen, D., Wood, M., Yin, S., Cho, J., Lu, K. H., & Shen, L. (2003). Attitude accessibility as an alternative explanation for how inoculation confers resistance. Communication Monographs, 70, 39–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., Semmler, S. M., Deatrick, L., Mason, A., Nisbett, G., Lane, L., … Banas, J. (2009). Nuances about the role and impact of affect in inoculation. Communication Monographs, 76, 73–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., Szabo, A., Anderson, J., Morrill, J., Zubric, J., & Wan, H.-H. (2001). The role and impact of affect in the process of resistance to persuasion. Human Communication Research, 27, 216–252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfau, M., Tusing, K. J., Lee, W., Godbold, L. C., Koerner, A., Penaloza, L. J., … Yang, V. S.-H. (1997). Nuances in inoculation: The role of inoculation approach, ego-involvement, and message processing disposition in resistance. Communication Quarterly, 45, 461–481.
   Google Scholar
• Pope, C., Ziebland, S., & Mays, N. (2000). Qualitative research in health care: Analysing qualitative data. British Medical Journal, 320, 114–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadowski, C. J. (1993). An examination of the short need for cognition scale. The Journal of Psychology, 127, 451–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J. B., & Spreng, R. A. (1996). A proposed model of external consumer information search. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24, 246–256.
   Google Scholar
• Schwandt, T. A. (2003). Three epistemological stances for qualityative inquiry: Interpretivism, hermeneutics, and social constructionism. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), The landscape of qualitative research (2nd ed., pp. 292–331). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, J., & Firth, J. (2011). Qualitative data analysis: The framework approach. Nurse Researcher, 18(2), 52–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith, B., & McGannon, K. R. (2018). Developing rigor in qualitative research: Problems and opportunities within sport and exercise psychology. International Review of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 11, 101–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Szabo, E. A., & Pfau, M. (2002). Nuances in inoculation: Theory and applications. In J. P. Dillard & M. Pfau (Eds.), The persuasion handbook: Developments in theory and practice (pp. 233–258). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Wegener, D. T., Petty, R. E., Smoak, N. D., & Fabrigar, L. R. (2004). Multiple routes to resisting attitude change. In E. S. Knowles & J. A. Linn (Eds.), Resistance and persuasion (pp. 13–38). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Wieber, F., Thürmer, J. L., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2015). Promoting the translation of intentions into action by implementation intentions: Behavioral effects and physiological correlates. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 9, 395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigley, S., & Pfau, M. (2010). Arguing with emotion: A closer look at affect and the inoculation process. Communication Research Reports, 27, 217–229.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, N. C. (2016). “Vaccinations are safe and effective”: inoculating positive HPV vaccine attitudes against antivaccination attack messages. Communication Reports, 29, 127–138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar