161
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

The role of English Wikipedia in mediating East Asian historical disputes: the case of Balhae

, &
Pages 399-418 | Received 10 Aug 2023, Accepted 04 Apr 2024, Published online: 22 Apr 2024

References

  • Avieson, B. (2022). Two Wikipedias in Bhutan: Problems and solutions for knowledge equity in the digital age. Asian Journal of Communication, 32(5), 399–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2021.1937248
  • Barton, M. D. (2005). The future of rational-critical debate in online public spheres. Computers and Composition, 22(2), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compcom.2005.02.002
  • Bender, E. M., Morgan, J. T., Oxley, M., Zachry, M., Hutchinson, B., Marin, A., Zhang, B., & Ostendorf, M. (2011). Annotating social acts: Authority claims and alignment moves in Wikipedia talk pages. In Proceedings of the Workshop on Language in Social Media (LSM 2011), 48–57.
  • Bilić, P. (2015). Searching for a centre that holds’ in the network society: Social construction of knowledge on, and with, English Wikipedia. New Media & Society, 17(8), 1258–1276. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444814522953
  • Bryant, S. L., Forte, A., & Bruckman, A. (2005). Becoming wikipedian: Transformation of participation in a collaborative online encyclopedia. In Proceedings of the 2005 ACM International Conference on Supporting Group Work, 1–10.
  • Bubendorff, S., Rizza, C., & Prieur, C. (2021). Construction and dissemination of information veracity on French social media during crises: Comparison of Twitter and Wikipedia. Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management, 29(2), 204–216. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5973.12351
  • Callahan, E. S., & Herring, S. C. (2011). Cultural bias in Wikipedia content on famous persons. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 62(10), 1899–1915. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21577
  • Chase, T. (2011). Nationalism and the Net: Online discussion of Goguryeo history in China and South Korea. China Information, 25(1), 61–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/0920203X10394111
  • Chung, J. (2008). Comparing online activities in China and South Korea: The internet and the political regime. Asian Survey, 48(5), 727–751. https://doi.org/10.1525/AS.2008.48.5.727
  • Crossley, P. K. (2016). Bohai/parhae identity and the coherence of Dan Gur under the Kitan/Liao empire. International Journal of Korean History, 21(1), 11–45. https://doi.org/10.22372/ijkh.2016.21.1.11
  • De Groot, J. (2009). Consuming history: Historians and heritage in contemporary popular culture. Routledge.
  • Ferron, M., & Massa, P. (2011). Wikirevolutions: Wikipedia as a lens for studying the real-time formation of collective memories of revolutions. International Journal of Communication, 5, 20.
  • Ferschke, O., Gurevych, I., & Chebotar, Y. (2012). Behind the article: Recognizing dialog acts in Wikipedia talk pages. In Proceedings of the 13th Conference of the European Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 777–786.
  • Firer-Blaess, S. (2011). Wikipedia: Example for a future electronic democracy?: Decision, discipline and discourse in the collaborative encyclopaedia. Studies in Social and Political Thought, 19, 131–154.
  • Ford, H., Graham, M., & Meyer, E. (2015). Fact factories: Wikipedia and the power to represent [doctoral dissertation]. University of Oxford.
  • Fuchs, C.. (2015). Culture and economy in the Age of social media. Routledge.
  • Fuchs, C. (2019). Nationalism on the internet: Critical theory and ideology in the Age of social media and fake news. Routledge.
  • Giles, D., Stommel, W., Paulus, T., Lester, J., & Reed, D. (2015). Microanalysis of online data: The methodological development of “digital CA”. Discourse, Context & Media, 7, 45–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2014.12.002
  • Goldspink, C. (2010). Normative behaviour in Wikipedia. Information, Communication & Society, 13(5), 652–673. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691180903214523
  • Góngora-Goloubintseff, J. G. (2020). The Falklands/Malvinas War taken to the Wikipedia realm: A multimodal discourse analysis of cross-lingual violations of the neutral point of view. Palgrave Communications, 6(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-020-0435-2
  • Gredel, E. (2017). Digital discourse analysis and Wikipedia: Bridging the Gap between foucauldian discourse analysis and digital conversation analysis. Journal of Pragmatics, 115, 99–114. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2017.02.010
  • Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action: Vol 1, reason and the rationalization of society (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Beacon Press.
  • Habermas, J. (1987). The theory of communicative action: Vol. 2, Lifeworld and System (T. McCarthy, Trans.). Beacon Press.
  • Hale, S. A. (2014). Multilinguals and Wikipedia editing. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM Conference on Web Science, 99–108. https://doi.org/10.1145/2615569.2615684
  • Hansen, S., Berente, N., & Lyytinen, K. (2009). Wikipedia, Critical Social Theory, and the Possibility of Rational Discourse. The Information Society, 25(1), 38–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972240802587562
  • Hara, N., Shachaf, P., & Hew, K. F. (2010). Cross-cultural analysis of the wikipedia community. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 61(10), 2097–2108. https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.21373
  • Hube, C. (2017). Bias in Wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on World Wide Web Companion, 717–721.
  • Hundt, D., & He, B. (2015). Reconciliation and the Goguryeo/Gāogōulì Disputes between China and South Korea. In M. Kim (Ed.), Routledge Handbook of Memory and Reconciliation in East Asia (pp. 227–239). Routledge.
  • Hwang, S., & Shaw, A. (2022). Rules and rule-making in the five largest Wikipedias. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 16, 347–357. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v16i1.19297
  • Jemielniak, D. (2014). Common knowledge?: An ethnography of Wikipedia. Stanford University Press.
  • Jirschitzka, J., Kimmerle, J., Halatchliyski, I., Hancke, J., Meurers, D., & Cress, U. (2017). A productive clash of perspectives? The interplay between articles’ and authors’ perspectives and their impact on Wikipedia edits in a controversial domain. PLoS One, 12(6), e0178985. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178985
  • Jones, H. (2018). Wikipedia as a disruptive translation environment: An analysis of the Istanbul/İstanbul controversy. Tradumàtica Tecnologies de la Traducció, 16(16), 104–113. https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/tradumatica.208
  • Kaprans, M. (2016). Framing the Ukrainian insurgent army and the Latvian legion: Transnational history-writing on Wikipedia. Disputed memory: Emotions and memory politics in central, eastern and south-Eastern Europe, Berlin: De Gruyter, 249–272.
  • Ke, X. (2022). South Korea’s intangible cultural heritage claims and China’s ontological security. International Journal of Cultural Policy, 28(4), 476–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/10286632.2021.1981887
  • Kim, A. (2016). Understanding the origin of the bohai state in the democratic people’s Republic of Korea. Asian Ethnicity, 17(2), 248–257. https://doi.org/10.1080/14631369.2015.1095634
  • König, R. (2013). Wikipedia: between lay participation and elite knowledge representation. Information, Communication & Society, 16(2), 160–177. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2012.734319
  • Kopf, S. (2022). Participation and deliberative discourse on social media – Wikipedia talk pages as transnational public spheres? Critical Discourse Studies, 19(2), 196–211. https://doi.org/10.1080/17405904.2020.1822896
  • Kumar, S. (2017). A river by any other name: Ganga/Ganges and the postcolonial politics of knowledge on Wikipedia. Information, Communication & Society, 20(6), 809–824. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1293709
  • Lee, J., & Yu, S. (2015). Cognition difference on online public opinion dissonance between Korean and Chinese Netizens: Its causes, functions and solutions. Indian Journal of Science and Technology, 8(26), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.17485/ijst/2015/v8i27/73132
  • Leshnick, A. (2022). Deletion discussions on hebrew Wikipedia: Negotiating global and local ideologies. New Media & Society, 1–17.
  • Liao, H. T. (2009). Conflict and consensus in the Chinese version of Wikipedia. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine, 28(2), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2009.932799
  • Makhortykh, M. (2017). War memories and online encyclopedias: Framing 30 June 1941 in Wikipedia. Journal of Educational Media, Memory, and Society, 9(2), 40–68. https://doi.org/10.3167/jemms.2017.090203
  • Manfra, M., Friedman, A., Hammond, T., & Lee, J. (2009). Peering behind the curtain: Digital history, historiography, and secondary social studies methods. In Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference, 3908–3916. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).
  • Massa, P., & Scrinzi, F. (2012). Manypedia: Comparing language points of view of Wikipedia communities. In Proceedings of the Eighth Annual International Symposium on Wikis and Open Collaboration, 1–9.
  • Matei, S. A., & Dobrescu, C. (2011). Wikipedia’s “neutral point of view”: Settling conflict through ambiguity. The Information Society, 27(1), 40–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2011.534368
  • Oeberst, A., von der Beck, I., Matschke, C., Ihme, T. A., & Cress, U. (2020). Collectively biased representations of the past: Ingroup Bias in Wikipedia articles about intergroup conflicts. British Journal of Social Psychology, 59(4), 791–818. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjso.12356
  • Pentzold, C. (2011). Imagining the Wikipedia community: What do Wikipedia authors mean when they write about their ‘community’? New Media & Society, 13(5), 704–721. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444810378364
  • Phillips, M. G. (2016). Wikipedia and history: A worthwhile partnership in the digital Era? Rethinking History, 20(4), 523–543. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642529.2015.1091566
  • Reagle, J. M. (2010). Good faith collaboration: The culture of wikipedia. MIT Press.
  • Reckel, J. (2015). A New history of parhae trans. by John Duncan. Journal of Korean Studies, 20(2), 481–485. https://doi.org/10.1353/jks.2015.0014
  • Rogers, R., & Sendijarevic, E. (2012). Neutral or national point of view? A comparison of Srebrenica Articles across Wikipedia’s Language versions’, paper presented at Wikipedia academy, Berlin, Germany, June 29–July 1, 2012.
  • Rosenzweig, R. (2006). Can history be open source? Wikipedia and the future of the past. Journal of American History, 93(1), 117–146. https://doi.org/10.2307/4486062
  • Samoilenko, A., Lemmerich, F., Weller, K., Zens, M., & Strohmaier, M. (2017). Analysing timelines of national histories across Wikipedia editions: A comparative computational approach. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 11(1), 210–219. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v11i1.14881
  • Schäfer, M. S. (2015). Digital public sphere. The International Encyclopedia of Political Communication, 15, 1–7.
  • Schneider, F. (2018). Mediated massacre: Digital nationalism and history discourse on China’s Web. The Journal of Asian Studies, 77(2), 429–452. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0021911817001346
  • Schneider, F. (2022). Emergent nationalism in China’s sociotechnical networks: How technological affordance and complexity amplify digital nationalism. Nations and Nationalism, 28(1), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1111/nana.12779
  • Schneider, J., Passant, A., & Breslin, J. G. (2010). A content analysis: How Wikipedia talk pages Are used. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference of Web Science, 1–7.
  • Shirky, C. (2009). Here comes everybody: How change happens when people come together. Penguin UK.
  • Sloane, J. D. (2014). Mapping a stateless nation: “Bohai” identity in the twelfth to fourteenth centuries. Journal of Song-Yuan Studies, 44(1), 365–403. https://doi.org/10.1353/sys.2014.0003
  • Song, K. (1990). Several questions in studies of the history of palhae. Korea Journal, 30(6), 4–20.
  • Tkacz, N. (2014). Wikipedia and the Politics of Openness. University of Chicago Press.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.