Left-Authoritarians and Policy Representation in Western Europe: Electoral Choice across Ideological Dimensions

References

• American Political Science Association (APSA) (1950). ‘Towards a More Responsible Party System: A Report of the Committee on Political Parties’, American Political Science Review, 44:3, Part 2: Supplement.
   Google Scholar
• Arzheimer, Kai (2009). ‘Contextual Factors and the Extreme Right Vote in Western Europe, 1980–2002’, American Journal of Political Science, 53:2, 259–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansolabehere, Stephen, Jonathan Rodden, and James M. Snyder (2008). ‘The Strength of Issues: Using Multiple Measures to Gauge Preference Stability, Ideological Constraint, and Issue Voting’, American Political Science Review, 102:2, 215–232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumeister, Roy F., Ellen Bratslavsky, Catrin Finkenauer, and Kathleen D. Vohs (2001). ‘Bad is Stronger than Good’, Review of General Psychology, 5:4, 323–370.
   Google Scholar
• Belanger, Eric, and Bonnie Meguid (2008). ‘Issue Salience, Issue Ownership and Issue-based Vote Choice’, Electoral Studies, 27:3, 477–491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benoit, Kenneth, and Michael Laver (2012). ‘The Dimensionality of Political Space: Epistemological and Methodological Considerations’, European Union Politics, 13:2, 194–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bonninger, David S., Jon A. Krosnick, and Matthew K. Berent (1995). ‘The Origins of Attitude Importance: Self-interest, Social Identification and Value Relevance’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68:1, 61–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brader, Ted, Joshua A. Tucker, and Andrew Therriault (2013). ‘Cross Pressure Scores: An Individual-Level Measure of Cumulative Partisan Pressures Arising from Social Group Memberships’, Political Behavior. doi:10.1007/s11109-013-9222-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brambor, Thomas, William Clark, and Matt Golder (2006). ‘Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses’, Political Analysis, 14:1, 63–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derks, Anton (2004). ‘Are the Underprivileged Really that Economically “Leftist”? Attitudes towards Economic Redistribution and the Welfare State in Flanders’, European Journal of Political Research, 43:4, 509–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vries, De, and E. Catherine (2007). ‘Sleeping Giant: Fact or Fairytale? How European Integration Affects Vote Choice in National Elections’, European Union Politics, 8:3, 363–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, Anthony (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Finer, Samuel E. (1987). ‘Left and Right’, in Vernon Bogdanor (ed.), Blackwell’s Encyclopedia of Political Institutions. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Flanagan, Scott C. (1987). ‘Value Change in Industrial Societies’, American Political Science Review, 81:4, 1303–1319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagan, Scott C., and Aie-Rie Lee (2003). ‘The New Politics, Culture Wars and the Authoritarian-Libertarian Value Change in Advanced Industrial Democracies’, Comparative Political Studies, 36:3, 235–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, Jane, and Sara B. Hobolt (2008). ‘Owning the Issue Agenda: Party Strategies and Vote Choices in British Elections’, Electoral Studies, 27:3, 460–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastie, Reid, and Bernadette Park (1986). ‘The Relationship between Memory and Judgment Depends on Whether the Task is Memory-based or On-line’, Psychological Review, 93:3, 258–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heath, Anthony, Geoffrey Evans, and Jean Martin (1994). ‘The Measurement of Core Beliefs and Values: The Development of Balanced Socialist/Laissez Faire and Libertarian/Authoritarian Scales’, British Journal of Political Science, 24:1, 115–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, Gary Marks, and Carole J. Wilson (2002). ‘Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration?’, Comparative Political Studies, 35:8, 956–989.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, Ryan Bakker, Anna Brigevich, Catherine de Vries, Erica Edwards, Gary Marks, Jan Rovny, and Marco Steenbergen (2010). ‘Reliability and Validity of Measuring Party Positions: The Chapel Hill Expert Surveys of 2002 and 2006’, European Journal of Political Research, 49:5, 687–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphreys, Macarten, and Michael Laver (2010). ‘Spatial Models, Cognitive Metrics and Majority Rule Equilibria’, British Journal of Political Science, 40:1, 11–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inglehart, Ronalt (1977). The Silent Revolution: Changing Values and Political Styles among Western Publics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ivarsflaten, Elisabeth (2005). ‘The Vulnerable Populist Right Parties: No Economic Realignment Fuelling their Electoral Success’, European Journal of Political Research, 44:3, 465–492.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivarsflaten, Elisabeth (2008). ‘What Unites Right-Wing Populists in Western Europe? Re-examining Grievance Mobilization Models in Seven Successful Cases’, Comparative Political Studies, 41:3, 3–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, Shanto, and Donald R. Kinder (1987). News that Matters: Television and American Opinion. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Johns, Robert (2010). ‘Measuring Issue Salience in British Elections: Competing Interpretations of ‘Most Important Issue’, Political Research Quarterly, 63:1, 143–158.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, Gary, Michael Tomz, and Jason Wittenberg (2000). ‘Making the Most of Statistical Analyses: Improving Analysis and Interpretation’, American Journal of Political Science, 44:2, 347–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert (1994). The Transformation of Social Democracy. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, Hanspeter, Edgar Grande, Romain Lachat, Martin Dolezal, Simon Bornschier, and Timotheos Frey (2008). West European Politics in the Age of Globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krosnick, Jon A. (1988). ‘The Role of Attitude Importance in Social Evaluation: A Study of Policy Preferences, Presidential Candidate Evaluations, and Voting Behavior’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 55:2, 196–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick, Jon A. (1990). ‘Government Policy and Citizen Passion: A Study of Issue Publics in Contemporary America’, Political Behavior, 12:1, 59–92.
   Google Scholar
• Krosnick, Jon A., and Donald R. Kinder (1990). ‘Altering the Foundations of Support for the President through Priming’, American Political Science Review, 84:2, 497–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krosnick, Jon A., and Stanley Presser (2011). ‘Questionnaire Design’, in James D. Wright and Peter V. Marsden (eds.), Handbook of Survey Research. West Yorkshire: Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Lazarsfeld, Paul F., Bernard Berelson, and Hazel Gaudet (1960). The People’s Choice: How Voter Makes up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lefkofridi, Zoe, and Kenneth Horvath (2012). ‘Migration Issues and Representation in European Liberal Democracies’, Representation, 48:1, 29–46.
   Google Scholar
• Lipset, Seymour M. (1959). ‘Democracy and Working-Class Authoritarianism’, American Sociological Review, 24:4, 482–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipset, Seymour M. (1966). Political Man. London: Mercury Books.
   Google Scholar
• Lubbers, Marcel, Mérove Gijsberts, and Peer Scheepers (2002). ‘Extreme-Right Wing Voting in Western Europe’, European Journal of Political Research, 41:3, 345–378.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mansbridge, Jane (2009). ‘A “Selection Model” of Political Representation’, Journal of Political Philosophy, 7:4, 369–398.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, Gary, Liesbet Hooghe, Moira Nelson, and Erica Edwards (2006). ‘Party Competition and European Integration in the East and West: Different Structure, Same Causality’, Comparative Political Studies, 39:2, 155–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald, Michael D., Sylvia Mendes, and M. Kim (2006). ‘Cross-temporal and Cross-national Comparisons of Party Left-Right Positions’, Electoral Studies, 26:1, 62–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Joanne M., and Jon A. Krosnick (1996). ‘News Media Impact on the Ingredients of Presidential Evaluations: A Program of Research on the Priming Hypothesis’, in Diana Mutz and Paul Sniderman (eds.), Political Persuasion and Attitude Change. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 79–99.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa (2005). Radical Right: Voters and Parties in the Electoral Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oesch, Daniel (2008). ‘Explaining Workers’ Support for Right-wing Populist Parties in Western Europe: Evidence from Austria, Belgium, France, Norway and Switzerland’, International Political Science Review, 29:3, 349–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pardos-Prado, Sergi, and Elias Dinas (2010). ‘Systemic Polarisation and Spatial Voting’, European Journal of Political Research, 49:6, 759–786.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RePass, David E. (1971). ‘Issue Salience and Party Choice’, The American Political Science Review, 65:2, 389–400.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovny, Jan (2012). ‘Who Emphasizes and Who Blurs? Party Competition in Multiple Dimensions’, European Union Politics, 13:2, 269–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovny, Jan, and Gary Marks (2011). ‘Conceiving and Estimating Issue Dimensionality’, unpublished paper, Free University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Rozin, Paul, and Edward B. Royzman (2001). ‘Negativity Bias, Negativity Dominance, and Contagion’, Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5:4, 296–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydgren, Jens (2007). ‘The Sociology of the Radical Right’, Annual Review of Sociology, 33, 241–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydgren, Jens (2008). ‘Immigration Sceptics, Xenophobes or Racists?, Radical Right-wing Voting in Six West European Countries’, European Journal of Political Research, 47:6, 737–765.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheufele, Dietram A. (2000). ‘Agenda-setting, Priming, and Framing Revisited: Another Look at Cognitive Effects of Political Communication’, Mass Communication and Society, 3:2–3, 297–316.
   Google Scholar
• Scheufele, Dietram A., and David Tewksbury (2006). ‘Framing, Agenda Setting and Priming: The Evolution of Three Media Effects Models’, Journal of Communication, 57:1, 9–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, Herrmann, and Jacques A. Thomassen (1999). Political Representation and Legitimacy in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Singer, Matthew M. (2011). ‘Who Says “It’s the Economy”? Cross-National and Cross-Individual Variation in the Salience of Economic Performance’, Comparative Political Studies, 44:3, 284–312.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soroka, Stuart (2006). ‘Good News and Bad News: Asymmetric Responses to Economic Information’, The Journal of Politics, 68:2, 372–385.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenbergen, Marco, and Gary Marks (2007). ‘Evaluating Expert Surveys’, European Journal of Political Research, 46:3, 347–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomassen, Jacques A. (2012). ‘The Blind Corner of Representation’, Representation, 48:1, 13–27.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Brug, Wouter (2004). ‘Issue Ownership and Party Choice’, Electoral Studies, 23:2, 209–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Brug, Wouter, and Joost van Spanje (2009). ‘Immigration, Europe and the “New Socio-cultural Dimension”’, European Journal of Political Research, 48:3, 309–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Eijk, Cees, and Mark Franklin (1996). Choosing Europe? The European Electorate and National Politics in the Face of Union. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Eijk, Cees, Wouter van der Brug, Martin Kroh, and Mark Franklin (2006). ‘Rethinking the Dependent Variable in Voting Behavior: On the Measurement and Analysis of Electoral Utilities’, Electoral Studies, 25:3, 424–47.
   Google Scholar
• Van Egmond, Marcel, Wouter van der Brug, Sara Hobolt, Mark Franklin, and Eliyahu V. Sapir (2011). European Parliament Election Study 2009, Voter Study. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5055 Data file Version 1.0.0, doi:10.4232/1.10202.
   Google Scholar
• Weßels, Bernhard (2011). European Parliament Election Study 2009, Candidate Study. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5048 Data file Version 2.0.0, doi:10.4232/1.11323.
   Google Scholar
• Wlezien, Christopher (2005). ‘On the Salience of Political Issues: The Problem with Most Important Problem’, Electoral Studies, 24:4, 555–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaller, John R. (1992). The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zaller, John R., and Stanley Feldman (1992). ‘A Simple Theory of the Survey Response: Answering Questions versus Revealing Preferences’, American Journal of Political Science, 36:3, 579–616.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar