The EU’s Multilevel Parliamentary (Battle)Field: Inter-parliamentary Cooperation and Conflict in Foreign and Security Policy

References

• Allen, D. (1998). ‘Who Speaks for Europe?’ in J. Peterson and H.A. Sjursen (eds.), Common Foreign Policy for Europe? Competing Visions of CFSP, London: Routledge, 41–58.
   Google Scholar
• Barbé, E., and A. Herranz-Surrallés (2008). ‘The Power and Practice of the European Parliament in European Security Policies’, in D. Peters, W. Wagner, and N. Deitelhoff (eds.), The Parliamentary Control of European Security Policy. Oslo: ARENA Centre for European Studies, 77–107.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1989). ‘Social Space and Symbolic Power’, Sociological Theory, 7:1, 14–25.10.2307/202060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brok, E., and R. Gualtieri (2010). ‘Draft Decision on Organisation of the Parliamentary Scrutiny of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP)’, 18.11.2010.
   Google Scholar
• Brok, E., and M. Selmayr (2008). ‘‘‘Der Vertrag Der Parlamente’ Als Gefahr für Die Demokratie?’, Zu Den Offensichtlich unbegründeten Verfassungsklagen Gegen Den Vertrag Von Lissabon’, Integration, 3, 217–34.
   Google Scholar
• Caballero-Bourdot, C. (2011). ‘Interparliamentary Scrutiny of the CFSP: Avenues for the future’, Occasional Paper 94. Paris: EUISS.
   Google Scholar
• Conference of the Speakers of the Parliaments of the EU (2011).‘Topic: Parliamentary Scrutiny of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP). Presidency Proposal’, Brussels, 4–5 April 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Cooper, I. (2012). ‘Virtual Third Chamber” for the European Union? National Parliaments after the Treaty of Lisbon’, West European Politics, 35:3, 441–65.10.1080/01402382.2012.665735
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crum, B., and J.E. Fossum (2009). ‘The Multilevel Parliamentary Field: A Framework for Theorizing Representative Democracy in the EU’, European Political Science Review, 1:02, 249–71.10.1017/S1755773909000186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deutscher Bundestag (2011). ‘Antrag Der Fraktionen Der CDU/CSU Und FDP. Eirichtung Einer Interparlamentarischer Konferez Zur Gemeisamen Aussen- Und Sicherheitspolitik Bzw. Gemeinsamen Sicherheits-Und Verteidigungspolitik Der Europäischen Union’, Drucksache 17/5903, 25.05.2011.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2010). ‘Communication on the Procedures for the Scrutiny of Europol’s Activities by the European Parliament, Together with National Parliaments, COM(2010) 776 final 17.12.2010.
   Google Scholar
• European Parliament (2011). ‘Report on Budgetary and Financial Management Section I – European Parliament Financial Year 2011’, Official Journal of the European Union, C164, 9.6.2012.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, H., and A. Héritier (2007). ‘Introduction: Contested Competences in the European Union’, West European Politics, 30:2, 227–43.10.1080/01402380701238741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Federal Parliament of Belgium (2001a). Parliamentary Conference on (ESDP) and Related Parliamentary Scrutiny, Hemicycle of the Senate Brussels, 2/3.7.2001.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Parliament of Belgium (2001b). Follow-up Conference on the Parliamentary Dimension of the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP), Hemicycle of the Senate Brussels, 6/7.11.2001.
   Google Scholar
• Foreign Ministers of Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Italy, Germany, Luxembourg, the Netherlands, Poland, Spain, and Spain (2012). ‘Final Report of the Future of Europe Group’, Warsaw, 17.09.2012.
   Google Scholar
• Glencross, A. (2008). ‘Federalism, Confederalism, and Sovereignty Claims: Understanding the Democracy Game in the European Union’, in R. Adler-Nissen and Th. Gammeltoft-Hansen (eds.), Sovereignty Games. New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 105–28.
   Google Scholar
• Herranz-Surrallés, A. (2011). The Contested ‘parliamentarisation’ of EU Foreign and Security Policy: The Role of the European Parliament following the Introduction of the Treaty of Lisbon’, PRIF Report 104. Frankfurt am Main: Peace Research Institute Frankfurt.
   Google Scholar
• Hix, S. (2002). ‘Constitutional Agenda-Setting through Discretion in Rule Interpretation: Why the European Parliament Won at Amsterdam’, British Journal of Political Science, 32, 259–80.10.1017/S0007123402000108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• House of Commons Foreign Affairs Committee (2011). ‘Future Interparliamentary Scrutiny of EU Foreign, Defence and Security Policy. Report, Together with Formal Minutes, and Written Evidence’, 12.01.2011
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, P. (2009). ‘Pierre Bourdieu’, in J. Edkins and N. Vaughan-Williams (eds.), Critical Theorists and International Relations. London: Routledge, 81–101.
   Google Scholar
• Kiiver, Ph. (2006). The National Parliaments in the European Union: A Critical View on EU Constitution-Building. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
   Google Scholar
• Kiiver, Ph. (2009). ‘European Treaty Reform and the National Parliaments: Towards a New Assessment of Parliament-Friendly Treaty Provisions’, in J. Wouters, L. Verhey, and Ph. Kiiver (eds.), European Constitutionalism beyond Lisbon. Intersentia: Antwerp/Oxford, 131–46.
   Google Scholar
• Kraft-Kasack, C. (2008). ‘Transnational Parliamentary Assemblies: A Remedy for the Democratic Deficit of International Governance?’ West European Politics, 31:3, 534–57.10.1080/01402380801939818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, C. (2011). ‘The Political Theory and Practice of Parliamentary Participation in the Common Security and Defence Policy’, Journal of European Public Policy, 18:8, 1133–50.10.1080/13501763.2011.615202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marschall S. (2008). ‘Transnational Parliamentary Assemblies and European Security policy’, in D. Peters, W. Wagner, and N. Deitelhoff (eds.). The Parliamentary Control of European Security Policy. Oslo: ARENA Centre for European Studies, 109–32.
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, A., D. Kietz, and Ch Völkel (2005). ‘Interinstitutional Agreements in the CFSP: Parliamentarization through the Back Door?’ European Foreign Affairs Review, 10, 175–95.
   Google Scholar
• Mérand, F., S.C. Hofmann, and B. Irondelle (2011). ‘Governance and State Power: A Network Analysis of European Security’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 49:1, 121–47.10.1111/jcms.2011.49.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miklin, E., and B. Crum (2011). ‘Inter-Parliamentary Contacts of Members of the European Parliament. Report of a Survey’, RECON Online Working Paper No. 2011/08, Oslo: ARENA Centre for European Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Monar, J. (1994). ‘Interinstitutional Agreements: The Phenomenon and Its New Dynamics after Maastricht’, Common Market Law Review, 31:4, 693–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monar, J. (1997). ‘The Finances of the Union’s Intergovernmental Pillar. Tortuous Experiments with the Community Budget’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 35:1, 57–78.10.1111/jcms.1997.35.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neunreither, K. (1994). ‘The Democratic Deficit of the European Union: Towards Closer Cooperation between the European Parliament and the National Parliaments’, Government and Opposition, 29:3, 299–314.10.1111/goop.1994.29.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neunreither, K. (2005). ‘The European Parliament and National Parliaments: Conflict or Cooperation?’ The Journal of Legislative Studies, 11:3-4, 466–89.10.1080/13572330500273802
   Google Scholar
• Peters, D., W. Wagner and N. Deitelhoff (2010). ‘Parliaments and European Security Policy: Mapping the Parliamentary Field’, European Integration Online Papers, 14:1 (http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2010-005a.htm).
   Google Scholar
• Puetter, U. (2012). ‘The New Intergovernmentalism in EU Governance’, in H. Zimmermann and A. Dür (eds.), Key Controversies in European Integration. Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke, 56–62.
   Google Scholar
• Raube, K. (2012). ‘The European External Action Service and the European Parliament’, The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 7:1, 65–80.10.1163/187119112X614657
   Google Scholar
• Raunio, T. (2000). ‘‘Losing Independence or Finally Gaining Recognition?’ Contacts between MEPs and National Parties’, Party Politics, 6:2, 211–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raunio, T. (2009). ‘National Parliaments and European Integration: What We Know and Agenda for Future Research’, Journal of Legislative Studies, 11:3–4, 221–23.
   Google Scholar
• Rittberger, B. (2003). ‘The Creation and Empowerment of the European Parliament’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 41:2, 203–25.10.1111/jcms.2003.41.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittberger, B. (2006). ‘‘No Integration without Representation!’, European Integration, Parliamentary Democracy, and Two Forgotten Communities’, Journal of European Public Policy, 13:8, 1211–1229.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimmelfennig, F. (2010). ‘The Normative Origins of Democracy in the European Union: Toward a Transformationalist Theory of Democratization’, European Political Science Review, 2:02, 211–233.10.1017/S1755773910000068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sénat (2010). ‘Rapport Sur Le Suivi Parlementaire De La Politique De sécurité Et De défense Commune’, Session Ordinaire 2009-2010, No. 387, 07.04.2010.
   Google Scholar
• Stie, A.E. (2010). ‘Decision-Making Void of Democratic Qualities? an Evaluation of the EU’s Second Pillar Decision-Making Procedure’, European Integration Online Papers, 14 (http://eiop.or.at/eiop/index.php/eiop/article/view/2010_011a).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thym, D. (2006). ‘beyond Parliament’s Reach?’ The Role of the European Parliament in the CFSP’, European Foreign Affairs Review, 11, 109–27.
   Google Scholar
• Tsakatika, M. (2007). ‘A Parliamentary Dimension for EU Soft Governance’, Journal of European Integration, 29:5, 549–64.10.1080/07036330701694873
   Google Scholar
• Vanhoonacker S., H. Dijkstra, and H. Maurer (2010). ‘Understanding the Role of Bureaucracy in the European Security and Defence Policy: The State of the Art’, European Integration Online Papers, 14, (http://eiop.or.at/eiop/texte/2010-004a.htm).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, W. (2002). ‘The Subnational Foundations of the European Parliament’, Journal of International Relations and Development, 5:1, 24–36.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, W. (2006). ‘The Democratic Control of Military Power Europe1’, Journal of European Public Policy, 13:2, 200–16.10.1080/13501760500451626
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, W. (2013). ‘Who’s Coming? Attendance Patterns in the Parliamentary Assemblies of NATO and WEU’, in B. Crum and J.E. Fossum (eds.), Practices of Inter-Parliamentary Coordination in International Politics. Colchester: ECPR Press, 195–211.
   Google Scholar
• Walker N. (2010). ‘Surface and Depth: The EU’s Resilient Sovereignty Question’, University of Edinburgh, School of Law Working Paper Series, No. 2010/10.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, H. (2000). ‘The Institutional Setting: Five Variations on a Theme’, in W. Wallace and H. Wallace (eds.), Policy-Making in the European Union, 4th ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• WEU Assembly (2000). ‘Special Session of the Assembly and the Standing Committee’, Lisbon, 21.03.2000.
   Google Scholar
• WEU Assembly (2001). ‘Address by Mr Van Aartsen’’, Official Reports of Debates, 47th Session, Third sitting, 19.07.2001.
   Google Scholar
• WEU Assembly (2010). ‘Debates of the 58th Plenary Session (First Sitting)’ 15.6.2010.
   Google Scholar
• Wouters, J., and K. Raube (2012). ‘Seeking CSDP Accountability through Interparliamentary Scrutiny’, The International Spectator, 47:4, 149–63.10.1080/03932729.2012.733219
   Google Scholar
• Zanon, F. (2010). ‘EU Foreign Policy Cooperation: A Challenge for National Parliaments?’ European Foreign Affairs Review, 15, 19–38.
   Google Scholar