Ideology, Parties and Social Politics in Europe

References

• Armingeon, Klaus, and Giuliano Bonoli, eds. (2006). The Politics of Postindustrial Welfare States. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Bale, Tim (2012). The Conservatives since 1945: The Drivers of Party Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beech, Matt (2006). The Political Philosophy of New Labour. London: Tauris Academic Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Béland, Daniel, and Robert H. Cox, eds. (2011). Ideas and Politics in Social Science Research. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergh, Andreas, and Gissur O. Erlingsson (2009). ‘Liberalizing without Retrenchment: Understanding the Consensus on Swedish Welfare State Reforms’, Scandinavin Political Studies, 32:1, 71–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blond, Phillip (2010). Red Tory. London: Faber and Faber.
   Google Scholar
• Bone, John D. (2012), ‘The Neoliberal Phoenix: The Big Society or Business as Usual?’, Sociological Research Online, 17:2, 16, available at http://www.socresonline.org.uk/17/2/16.html
   Google Scholar
• Cranston, Maurice, and Peter Mair, eds. (1980). Ideology and Politics. Bruxelles: Bruylant.
   Google Scholar
• EC – European Commission (2005). Communication from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. A Concerted Strategy for Modernising Social Protection [COM(1999) 347 final].
   Google Scholar
• Ferrera, Maurizio (1993). EC Citizens and Social Protection. Brussels: European Commission, available at http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_068_en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ferrera, Maurizio (2005). The Boundaries of Welfare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrera, Maurizio (2006). ‘Friends, Not Foes: European Integration and National Welfare States’, in Anthony Giddens, Patrick Diamond and Roger Liddle (eds.), Global Europe, Social Europe. Cambridge: Polity Press, 257–78.
   Google Scholar
• Ferrera, Maurizio (2008). ‘The European Welfare State: Golden Achievements, Silver Prospects’, West European Politics, 31:1–2, 81–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferrera, Maurizio, and Martin Rhodes (2001). Recasting European Welfare States. London: Frank Cass.
   Google Scholar
• Freeden, Michael (1996). Ideologies and Political Theory: A Conceptual Approach. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Freeden, Michael (2008). ‘European Liberalisms’, European Journal of Political Theory, 7:1, 9–30.
   Google Scholar
• Freeden, Michael (2012). ‘Ideology and Political Theory’, Journal of Political Ideology, 11, 3–22.
   Google Scholar
• Glossner, Christian L., and David Gregosz, eds. (2009). 60 Years of Social Market Economy Formation. Development and Perspectives of a Peacemaking Formula. Berlin: Konrad Adenauer Stiftung.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, David (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Häusermann, Silja (2010). The Politics of Welfare State Reform in Continental Europe: Modernization in Hard times. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Heclo, H. (1974). Modern Social Politics in Sweden and Britain. New Haven, CT: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hemerijck, Anton (2012). Changing Welfare States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huo, Jingjing (2009). Third Way Reforms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Katz, Richard S., and Peter Mair, eds. (1994). How Parties Organize. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Van Kersbergen, Kees, and Anton Hemerijck (2004). ‘Christian Democracy, Social Democracy and the Continental “Welfare without Work” Syndrome’, Social Policy Review, 16, 167–86.
   Google Scholar
• Kildal, Nanna, and Stein Kuhnle, eds. (2005). The Normative Foundations of the Welfare State: The Nordic Experience. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kvist, Jon, Johan Fritzell, Bjorn Hvinden, and Oll Kangas, eds. (2012). Changing Social Equality: The Nordic Welfare Model in the 21st Century. Bristol: Policy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kymlicka, Will (2011). Contemporary Political Philosophy: An Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laborde, Cécile (2002). ‘The Reception of John Rawls in Europe’, European Journal of Political Theory, 1:1, 33–46.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, Christian A., and Jorgen Goul Andersen (2009). ‘How New Economic Ideas Changed Integration and Globalization’, Social Policy and Administration, 34:1, 44–63.
   Google Scholar
• Le Pen, Marine (2011). Projet Pour La France, available at http://www.marinelepen2012.fr/le-projet/ (accessed November).
   Google Scholar
• Leibfried, Stephan (2005). ‘Social Policy: Left to Judges and Markets?’, in Helen Wallace, William Wallace and Mark A. Pollack (eds.), Policy-Making in the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 250–78.
   Google Scholar
• Lindbom, Anders (2008). ‘The Swedish Conservative Party and the Welfare State’, Government and Opposition, 43:4, 539–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magnette, Paul (2009). ‘The Fragility of Liberal Europe’, European Political Science, 8, 190–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mair, Peter (2007). ‘Left-Right Orientations’, in Russell J. Dalton and Hans-Dieter Klingemann (eds.), The Oxford Handbook on Political Behaviour. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 206–22.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, Peter (2009). Representative Vs. Responsible Government. Cologne, MPIfG 09/08.
   Google Scholar
• March, Luke (2011). Radical Left Parties in Europe. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martí, José Luis, and Philip Pettit (2010). A Political Philosophy in Public Life: Civic Republicanism in Zapatero’s Spain. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McElroy, G., and K. Benoit. (2012). ‘Policy Positioning in the European Parliament’, European Union Politics, 13:1, 150–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merkel, W. (2007). ‘Social Democracy in Power. Explaining the Capacity to Reform’, Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Politikwissenschaft/Comparative Governance and Politics, 1:1, 125–45.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas (2007). Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudge, Stephanie Lee (2008). ‘What is Neo-Liberalism?’, Socio-Economic Review, 6, 703–31.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Jan-Werner (2009). ‘The Triumph of What (If Anything)? Rethinking Political Ideologies and Political Institutions in XX Century Europe’, Journal of Political Ideologies, 14, 211–26.
   Google Scholar
• Nanou, K. (2013). ‘Different Origins, Same Proposals? The Impact of the EU on the Policy Directions of Party Families’, West European Politics, 36:1, 248–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD (2011). Divided We Stand: Why Inequality Keeps Rising. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Parfit, Derek (1984). Equality or Priority? The Lindley Lecture. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pettit, P. (1997). Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Pierson, Paul, ed. (2001). The New Politics of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rawls, John (1971). A Theory of Justice. 1st. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rhodes, M. (2013). ‘Labour Markets, Welfare States and the Contemporary Dilemmas of European Social Democracy’, in M. Keating and D. McKrone (eds.), The Crisis of Social Democracy in Europe. Edimburgh: Edimburgh University Press, 152–67.
   Google Scholar
• Roy, Ravi K., Arthur T. Denzau, and Thomas D. Willet, eds. (2006). Neoliberalism. National and Regional Experiments with Global Ideas. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rueda, David (2007). Social Democracy inside out. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sabel, Charles, and Jonathan Zeitlin, eds. (2010). Experimentalist Governance in the European Union: Towards a New Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scharpf, Fritz W. (2009). ‘Europe’s Neo-Liberal Bias’, in Anton Hemerijck, Ben Knapen and Ellen Van Doorne (eds.), Aftershocks. Economic Crisis and Institutional Choice. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 228–34.
   Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Vivien (2008). ‘Discursive Institutionalism: The Explanatory Power of Ideas and Discourse’, Annual Review of Political Science, 11, 303–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, Manfred G. (2010). ‘Parties’, in Francis G. Castles, Stephan Leibfried, Jane Lewis, Herbert Obinger and Christopher Pierson (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 211–26.
   Google Scholar
• Seeleib-Kaiser, Martin, Silke Van Dyk, and Martin Roggenkamp (2008). Party Politics and Social Welfare. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
   Google Scholar
• Sevilla, Jordi (2002). De Nuevo Socialismo. Madrid: Editorial Crítica.
   Google Scholar
• Steger, Manfred B., and Ravi K. Roy (2010). Neoliberalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stjerno, Steinar (2005). Solidarity in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, Diane, and Andrew Denham, eds. (2004). Think Tank Traditions. Policy Research and the Politics of Ideas. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Gary W. (2007). Ideology and Welfare. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor-Gooby, Peter, ed. (2001). Welfare States under Pressure. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Tilton, Timothy A. (1990). The Political Theory of Swedish Social Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenbroucke, Frank (2012). ‘Europe: The Social Challenge. Defining the Union’s Social Objective is a Necessity rather than a Luxury’, OSE Opinion Paper No. 11, July.
   Google Scholar