Clawing Back Lost Powers? Parliamentary Scrutiny of the Transposition of EU Social Policy Directives in the Netherlands

References

• Andeweg, Rudy, and Lia Nijzink (1995). ‘Beyond the Two-Body Image: Relations between Ministers and MPs’, in Herbergt Döring (ed.), Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. Frankfurt: Campus/New York: St Martin’s Press, 152–178.
   Google Scholar
• Auel, Katrin (2006). ‘Europeanization of the German Bundestag – Institutional Reforms and Informal Adaptation’, German Politics, 15:3, 249–268.10.1080/09644000600877701
   Google Scholar
• Auel, Katrin (2007). ‘Democratic Accountability and National Parliaments: Redefining the Impact of Parliamentary Scrutiny in EU Affairs’, European Law Journal, 13:4, 487–504.10.1111/eulj.2007.13.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Auel, Katrin, Tapio Raunio, eds. (2012). ‘National Parliaments, Electorates and EU Affairs’, IHS-Vienna Political Science Series, 129, available at http://www.ihs.ac.at/publications/pol/pw_129.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Benz, Arthur (2005). ‘Conclusion: Linking Research on Europeanisation and National Parliaments’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 11:3–4, 508–521.10.1080/13572330500273927
   Google Scholar
• Bursens, Peter (2002). ‘Why Denmark and Sweden Have Different Implementation Records: On Transposition Laggards and Leaders in the EU’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 25:2, 173–195.10.1111/scps.2002.25.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clauwaert, Stefan (2010). ‘Towards a Revised Parental Leave Framework Agreement/Directive’, Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 16: 431–435.
   Google Scholar
• De la Porte, Caroline, and David Natali (2014). ‘Altered Europeanisation of Pension Reform in the Context of the Great Recession: Denmark and Italy Compared’, West European Politics, 37:4, 732–749.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Ruiter, Rik (2011). ‘The National Parliamentary Arena and Methods of Open Coordination: Explaining the Frequency of OMC-Related Executive-Legislative Interactions’, Journal of Contemporary European Research, 7:1, 101–119.
   Google Scholar
• De Ruiter, Rik (2013). ‘Under the Radar? National Parliaments and the Ordinary Legislative Procedure in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy, 20:8, 1196–1212.10.1080/13501763.2012.760328
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Wilde, Pieter, and Michael Zürn (2012). ‘Can the Politicization of European Integration Be Reversed?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 50:1, 137–153.10.1111/jcms.2012.50.issue-s1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutch Lower Chamber (2011). Bovenop Europa: Evaluatie Van De Versterkte EU-Ondersteuning Van De Tweede Kamer 2007–2011 [Evaluation of Strengthened EU-Support of the Lower Chamber 2007–2011]. The Hague: Lower Chamber.
   Google Scholar
• Ersson, S. (2012) ‘Electoral Volatility in Europe: Assessments and Potential Explanations for Estimate Differences’, Paper presented at the 2012 Elections, Public Opinion and Parties (EPOP) Conference, Oxford University, September 7–9, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Falkner, Gerda, Miriam Hartlapp, Simone Leiber, and Oliver Treib (2004). ‘Non-Compliance with EU Directives in the Member States: Opposition through the Backdoor?’, West European Politics, 27: 452–473.10.1080/0140238042000228095
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finke, Daniel, and Tanja Dannwolf (2013). ‘Domestic Scrutiny of European Union Politics: Between Whistle Blowing and Opposition Control’, European Journal of Political Research, 52: 715–746.10.1111/ejpr.2013.52.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flexnieuws.nl (2013) ‘Uitzendbeperkingnen in Caos in Strijd Met Uitzendrichtlijn’, Available at http://www.flexnieuws.nl/2013/07/31/uitzendbeperkingen-in-caos-in-strijd-met-uitzendrichtlijn/
   Google Scholar
• Franchino, Fabio, and Bjørn Høyland (2009). ‘Legislative Involvement in Parliamentary Systems: Opportunities, Conflict, and Institutional Constraints’, American Political Science Review, 103:4, 607–621.10.1017/S0003055409990177
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goetz, Klaus H., and Jan-Hinrik Meyer-Sahling (2008). ‘The Europeanization of National Political Systems: Parliaments and Executives’, Living Reviews in European Governance, 3:2, 1–30.
   Google Scholar
• Grapperhaus, Ferdinand (2010). ‘A Twist of the Equality Logic: The Directive on Working Conditions for Temporary Agency Workers and Dutch Law’, European Labor Law Journal, 1:3, 406–413.
   Google Scholar
• Hegeland, Hans and Christine Neuhold (2002). ‘Parliamentary Participation in EU Affairs in Austria, Finland and Sweden: Newcomers with Different Approaches’, European Integration Online Papers (EIoP), 6:10, 1–18.
   Google Scholar
• Holzhacker, Ronald (2002). ‘National Parliamentary Scrutiny over EU Issues: The Goals and Methods of Governing and Opposition Parties’, European Union Politics, 3:4, 459–479.10.1177/1465116502003004004
   Google Scholar
• Holzhacker, Ronald (2007). ‘Parliamentary Scrutiny’, in Paolo Graziano and Maarten Vink (eds.), Europeanization: New Research Agendas. Palgrave Macmillan: Basingstoke, 141–153.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks (2008). ‘A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science, 39, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laulom, Sylvaine, Emmanuelle Mazuyer, Christophe Teissier, Claude E. Triomphe, and Pascale Vielle (2012). ‘How Has the Crisis Affected Social Legislation in Europe?’, ETUI Policy Brief on European Economic, Employment and Social Policy, 2012:2, 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, Peter (2008). ‘Electoral Volatility and the Dutch Party System: A Comparative Perspective’, Acta Politica, 43, 235–253.10.1057/ap.2008.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Lanny, and Georg Vanberg (2004). ‘Policing the Bargain: Coalition Government and Parliamentary Scrutiny’, American Journal of Political Science, 48:1, 13–27.10.1111/ajps.2004.48.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinsen, Dorte (2007). ‘The Europeanization of Gender Equality – Who Controls the Scope of Non-Discrimination?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 14:4, 544–562.10.1080/13501760701314359
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moser, Peter, Gerald Schneider, and Gerbhard Kirchgässner, eds. (2000). Decision Rules in the European Union: A Rational Choice Perspective. New York, NY: St. Martin’s Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pollak, Johannes, and Peter Slominski (2003). ‘Influencing EU Politics? The Case of the Austrian Parliament’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 41:4, 707–729.10.1111/jcms.2003.41.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raunio, Tapio (2005). ‘Holding Governments Accountable in European Affairs: Explaining Cross-National Variation’, Journal of Legislative Studies, 11:3–4, 319–342.10.1080/13572330500348307
   Google Scholar
• Raunio, Tapio (2009). ‘National Parliaments and European Integration: What We Know and Agenda for Future Research’, Journal of Legislative Studies, 15:4, 317–334.10.1080/13572330903302430
   Google Scholar
• Serricchio, Fabio, Myrto Tsakatika, and Lucia Quaglia (2013). ‘Euroscepticism and the Global Financial Crisis’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 51:1, 51–64.10.1111/jcms.2013.51.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sieberer, Ulrich (2011). ‘The Institutional Power of Western European Parliaments: A Multidimensional Analysis’, West European Politics, 34:4, 731–754.10.1080/01402382.2011.572389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spendzharova, Aneta, and Esther Versluis (2013). ‘Issue Salience in the European Policy Process: What Impact on Transposition?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 20:10, 1499–1516.10.1080/13501763.2013.781802
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sprungk, Carina (2013). ‘Legislative Transposition of Directives: Exploring the Other Role of National Parliaments in the European Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 51:2, 298–315.10.1111/jcms.2013.51.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strøm, Kaare (1990). ‘A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties’, American Journal of Political Science, 34:2, 565–598.10.2307/2111461
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strøm, Kaare, and Wolfgang C. Müller (1999). ‘Political Parties and Hard Choices’, in Wolfgang C. Müller and Kaare Strøm (eds.), Policy, Office, or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Tholen, Berry, and Ellen Mastenbroek (2014). ‘Guardians of the Law or Loyal Administrators? Towards a Refined Administrative Ethos for Legislative Drafters’, Administrative Theory & Praxis, 35:4, 487–506.
   Google Scholar
• Vasev, Nikolay, and Karsten Vrangbæk (2014). ‘Transposition and National-Level Resources: Introducing the Cross-Border Healthcare Directive in Eastern Europe’, West European Politics, 37:4, 693–710.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vollaard, Hans, and Dorte Sindbjerg Martinsen (2014). ‘Bounded Rationality in Transposition Processes: The Case of the European Patients’ Rights Directive’, West European Politics, 37:4, 711–731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winzen, Thomas (2010). ‘Political Integration and National Parliaments in Europe’, Living Reviews in Democracy, available at http://democracy.livingreviews.org/index.php/lrd/article/view/lrd-2010-5/31
   Google Scholar
• Winzen, Thomas (2012). ‘National Parliamentary Control of European Union Affairs: A Cross-National and Longitudinal Comparison’, West European Politics, 35:3, 37–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar