Judicial Europeanisation: The Case of Zambrano in Ireland

References

• Alter, Karen J. (1998). ‘Who Are the “Masters of the Treaty”?: European Governments and the European Court of Justice’, International Organization, 52:1, 121–147.10.1162/002081898550572
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blauberger, Michael (2013). ‘National Responses to European Court Jurisprudence’, West European Politics. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01402382.2013.830464.
   Google Scholar
• Carrubba, Clifford J., Matthew Gabel, and Charles Hankla (2008). ‘Judicial Behavior under Political Constraints: Evidence from the European Court of Justice’, American Political Science Review, 102:4, 453–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conant, Lisa (2002). Justice Contained. Law and Politics in the European Union. Ithaka/London: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Costello, Cathryn (2009). ‘Metock: Free Movement and ‘Normal Family Life’ in the Union’, Common Market Law Review, 46:2, 587–662.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davies, Gareth (2012). ‘Activism Relocated. The Self-Restraint of the European Court of Justice in Its National Context’, Journal of European Public Policy, 19:1, 76–91.10.1080/13501763.2012.632146
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Hart, Betty, Tineke Strik, and Henrike Pankratz (2012). Family Reunification. A Barrier or Facilitator of Integration? Country Report of the Netherlands. Brussels: European Commission, available at http://familyreunification.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/03/Dutch3.pdf (accessed 28 June 2013).
   Google Scholar
• De Somer, Marie (2012). ‘Enhanced Competences for the European Court of Justice: “Re-shuffling” the Dynamics of EU Migration Policy-Making?’, Migration Studies Unit Working Papers 12/01, London School of Economics and Political Science, London.
   Google Scholar
• Dyevre, Arthur (2010). ‘Unifying the Field of Comparative Judicial Politics: Towards a General Theory of Judicial Behaviour’, European Political Science Review, 2:2, 297–327.10.1017/S1755773910000044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernhout, Roel, and Ries Wever (2011). ‘Thematic Report 2010–2011. Follow-up of the Case Law of the Court of Justice of the European Union’, European Network on Free Movement of Workers within the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Gerring, John (2007). Case Study Research, Principles and Practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grossman, Andrew (2004). ‘Birthright Citizenship as Nationality of Convenience’, in Council of Europe (ed.), Proceedings of the Third Conference on Nationality. Council of Europe: Strasbourg, 109–121.
   Google Scholar
• Handoll, John (2012). Ireland: Country Report. Florence: EUDO Citizenship Observatory, European University Institute, available at http://eudo-citizenship.eu/docs/CountryReports/Ireland.pdf (accessed 28 February 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Honohan, Iseult (2010). The Theory and Politics of Ius Soli. Florence: EUDO Citizenship Observatory, European University Institute, available at http://eudo-citizenship.eu/docs/IusSoli.pdf (accessed 28 February 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Höpner, Martin, and Armin Schäfer (2010). ‘A New Phase of European Integration. Organised Capitalism in Post-Ricardian Europe’, West European Politics, 33:2, 344–368.10.1080/01402380903538997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mancini, Joanne M., and Graham Finlay (2008). ‘Citizenship Matters. Lessons from the Irish Citizenship Referendum’, American Quarterly, 60:3, 575–599.10.1353/aq.0.0034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinsen, Dorte S. (2011). ‘Judicial Policy-Making and Europeanization: The Proportionality of National Control and Administrative Discretion’, Journal of European Public Policy, 18:7, 944–961.10.1080/13501763.2011.599962
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martinsen, Dorte Sindbjerg, and Hans Vollaard (2014). ‘Implementing Social Europe in Times of Crises: Re-established Boundaries of Welfare?’, West European Politics, 37:4, 677–692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyikos, Stacy A. (2006). ‘Strategic Interaction among Courts within the Preliminary Reference Process – Stage 1: National Court Preemptive Opinions’, European Journal of Political Research, 45:4, 527–50.10.1111/ejpr.2006.45.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obermaier, Andreas J. (2008). ‘The National Judiciary – Sword of European Court of Justice Rulings: The Example of the Kohll/Decker Jurisprudence’, European Law Journal, 14:6, 735–752.10.1111/eulj.2008.14.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, Fritz W. (2002). ‘The European Social Model: Coping with the Challenges of Diversity’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 40:4, 645–670.10.1111/1468-5965.00392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scharpf, Fritz W. (2009). ‘Legitimacy in the Multilevel European Polity’, European Political Science Review, 1:2, 173–204.10.1017/S1755773909000204
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharpston, Eleanor (2010). Opinion of Advocate General Sharpston. Case C-34/09 Gerardo Ruiz Zambrano v Office national de l’emploi (ONEM). Luxembourg: European Court of Justice, available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/HTML/?isOldUri=true&uri=CELEX:62009CC0034 (accessed 30 May 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Sibley, Eleanor, Emma Fenelon, and Nuala Mole (2013). Family Reunification Requirements: A Barrier or Facilitator to Integration? United Kingdom Country Report. London: The AIRE Centre, available at http://www.airecentre.org/data/files/resources/14/AIRE-Centre_National-Report_Family-Reunification-Requirements_Jan-2013.pdf (accessed 12 March 2014).
   Google Scholar
• Thorp, Arabella (2009). Immigration: The Metock Case and Its Implications for UK Rules on Family Members of EEA Citizens. London: House of Commons Library, available at http://www.webcitation.org/6CUXVM0Ng (accessed 28 June 2013).
   Google Scholar
• Van den Brink, Martijn J. (2012). ‘EU Citizenship and EU Fundamental Rights. Taking EU Citizenship Rights Seriously?’, Legal Issues of Economic Integration, 39:2, 273–289.
   Google Scholar
• Wasserfallen, Fabio (2010). ‘The Judiciary as Legislator? How the European Court of Justice Shapes Policy-Making in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy, 17:8, 1128–1146.10.1080/13501763.2010.513559
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiler, Joseph H.H. (1981). ‘The Community System: The Dual Character of Supranationalism’, Yearbook of European Law, 1, 267–306.10.1093/yel/1.1.267
   Google Scholar
• Wiesbrock, Anja (2012). ‘Granting Citizenship-Related Rights to Third-Country Nationals: An Alternative to the Full Extension of European Union Citizenship?’, European Journal of Migration and Law, 14:1, 63–94.10.1163/157181612X628282
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wind, Marlene (2009). ‘Post-National Citizenship in Europe: The EU as a “Welfare Rights Generator”?’, The Columbia Journal of European Law, 15:2, 239–264.
   Google Scholar
• Wollenschläger, Ferdinand (2011). ‘A New Fundamental Freedom beyond Market Integration: Union Citizenship and Its Dynamics for Shifting the Economic Paradigm of European Integration’, European Law Journal, 17:1, 1–34.10.1111/eulj.2011.17.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar