Science in Policy-Making: Neutral Experts or Strategic Policy-Makers?

References

• Amara, Nabil, Mathieu Ouimet, and RÉjean Landry (2004). ‘New Evidence on Instrumental, Conceptual, and Symbolic Utilization of University Research in Government Agencies’, Science Communications, 26:1, 75–106.10.1177/1075547004267491
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner, Frank R., and Bryan D. Jones (1993). Agendas and Instability in American Politics. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Beniston, Martin (2004). Climatic Change and Its Impacts. An Overview Focusing on Switzerland. Dordecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.10.1007/1-4020-2346-4
   Google Scholar
• Boaz, Annette, and Carol Hayden (2002). ‘Pro-active Evaluators: Enabling Research to Be Useful, Usable and Used’, Evaluation, 8, 440–453. DOI:10.1177/13563890260620630.10.1177/13563890260620630
   Google Scholar
• Borgatti, Stephen P., Martin G. Everett, and Linton C. Freeman (2002). Ucinet for Windows: Software for Social Network Analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdeaux, Carolyn (2008). ‘Politics Versus Professionalism: The Effect of Institutional Structure on Democratic Decision Making in a Contested Policy Arena’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18:3, 349–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dilling, Lisa, and Maria Carmen Lemos (2011). ‘Creating Usable Science: Opportunities and Constraints for Climate Knowledge Use and their Implications for Science Policy’, Global Environmental Change, 21, 680–89.10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FOEN (2009). Pärke Von Nationaler Bedeutung: Produktelabel. Richtlinie Zur Verleihung Und Verwendung Des Produktelabels [Parks of National Importance: Product-Label. Guidelines for the Use of Park-Labels]. Bern: Federal Office for the Environment.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, Linton C. (1978/79). ‘Centrality in Social Networks’, Social Networks, 1, 215–39.10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frey, Kathrin (2012). Evidenzbasierte Politikformulierung in Der Schweiz. Gesetzesrevisionen Im Vergleich [Evidence-Based Policy Formulation in Swiss Legislative Revisions – A Comparison]. Baden-Baden: Modernes Regieren – Schriften Zu Einer Neuen Regierungslehre, Nomos.10.5771/9783845243320
   Google Scholar
• Gschwend, Muriel (2013). ‘Die Stadt Zürich Auf Dem Weg Zur 2000-Watt-Gesellschaft Und Die Rolle Der Wissenschaft [The City of Zurich on the Path towards 2000-Watt Society – The Role of Science]’, Master Thesis, Berne: University of Berne.
   Google Scholar
• Hanneman, Robert A., and Mark Riddle (2005). Introduction to Social Network Methods. Riverside: University of California, Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• Henry, Adam Douglas (2011). ‘Ideology, Power, and the Structure of Policy Networks’, The Policy Studies Journal, 39:3, 361–83.10.1111/psj.2011.39.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hertin, Julia, Klaus Jacob, Udo Pesch, and Carolina Pacchi (2009). ‘The Production and Use of Knowledge in Regulatory Impact Assessment – An Empirical Analysis’, Forest Policy and Economics, 11:5–6, 413–21.10.1016/j.forpol.2009.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, Karin (2008). Les Mécanismes De Décision: Le Cas De La Politique Climatique Suisse [Decision-Making Mechanisms: Swiss Climate Politics]. Zürich: Politikanalysen, Rüegger Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Ingold, Karin (2011). ‘Network Structures within Policy Processes: Coalitions, Power, and Brokerage in Swiss Climate Policy’, The Policy Studies Journal, 39:3, 435–59.10.1111/psj.2011.39.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, Karin (2014). ‘How Involved are They Really? A Comparative Network Analysis of the Institutional Drivers of Local Actor Inclusion’, Land Use Policy. Online available since March 5th. DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2014.01.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, Karin, and Jörg Balsiger (2013). ‘Sustainability Principles Put into Practice: Case Studies of Network Analysis in Swiss Climate Change Adaptation’, Regional Environmental Change. Online available since December 30th. DOI:10.1007/s10113-013-0575-7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, Karin, and Frédéric Varone (2011). ‘Treating Policy Brokers Seriously: Evidence from the Climate Policy’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingold, Karin, Jörg Balsiger, and Christian Hirschi (2010). ‘Climate Change in Mountain Regions: How Local Communities Adapt to Extreme Events’, Local Environment, 15:7, 651–61.10.1080/13549839.2010.498811
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenkins-Smith, Hank C. (1990). Democratic Politics and Policy Analysis. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
   Google Scholar
• Kingdon, John W. (1995). Agendas, Alternatives, and Public Policies. New York: Harper Collins College Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Knill, Christoph, and Jale Tosun (2012). Public Policy: A New Introduction. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Knoke, David, Franz U. Pappi, Jeffry Broadbent, and Yutaka Tsujinaka (1996). Comparing Policy Networks. Labour Politics in the U.S., Germany and Japan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139174497
   Google Scholar
• Kübler, Daniel (2001). ‘Understanding Policy Change with the Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Application to Swiss Drug Policy’, Journal of European Public Policy, 8:4, 623–41.10.1080/13501760110064429
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leifeld, Philip (2013). ‘Reconceptualizing Major Policy Change in the Advocacy Coalition Framework. A Discourse Network Analysis of German Pension Politics’, The Policy Studies Journal, 41:1, 169–98.10.1111/psj.12007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leschine, Thomas M., Kent A. Lind, and Rishi Sharma (2003). ‘Beliefs, Values, and Technical Assessment in Environmental Management: Contaminated Sediments in Puget Sound’, Coastal Management Journal, 31:1, 1–24.10.1080/08920750390168273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levidow, Les, and Susan Carr (2007). ‘Europeanising Advisory Expertise: The Role of “Independent, Objective and Transparent” Scientific Advice in Agri-Biotech Regulation’, Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 25:6, 880–95.10.1068/c05123
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Litfin, Karen T. (2000). ‘Advocacy Coalitions along the Domestic-Foreign Frontier: Globalization and Canadian Climate Change Policy’, The Policy Studies Journal, 28:1, 236–52.10.1111/psj.2000.28.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lundin, Martin, and PerOla Öberg (2013). Expert Knowledge Use and Deliberation in Local Policy Making. Policy Sciences. DOI:10.1007/s11077-013-9182-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Montpetit, Éric (2011). ‘Scientific Credibility, Disagreement, and Error Costs in 17 Biotechnology Policy Subsystems’, Policy Studies Journal, 39, 513–533. DOI:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00419.x.10.1111/psj.2011.39.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nicholson-Crotty, Sean (2005). ‘Bureaucratic Competition in the Policy Process’, The Policy Studies Journal, 33:3, 341–61.10.1111/psj.2005.33.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nutley, Sandra (2003). ‘Bridging the Policy/ Research Divide. Reflections and Lessons from the UK’, in Facing the Future: Engaging Stakeholders and Citizens in Developing Public Policy. Canberra, Australia: National Institute of Governance Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Nutley, Sandra, Walter Isabelle, and N. Bland (2002). ‘The Institutional Arrangements for Connecting Evidence and Policy: The Case of Drug Misuse’, Public Policy and Administration, 17:3, 76–94.10.1177/095207670201700306
   Google Scholar
• Putnam, Robert (1976). The Comparative Study of Political Elites. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall. Radaelli, M. Claudio (2005). ‘Diffusion without Convergence: How Political Context Shapes the Adoption of Regulatory Impact Assessment’, Journal of European Public Policy, 12:5, 924–43.
   Google Scholar
• Rissi, Christof, and Fritz Sager (2012). ‘Types of Knowledge Utilization of Regulatory Impact Assessments: Evidence from Swiss Policymaking’, Regulation & Governance. DOI:10.1111/rego.12002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, Paul A. (1988). ‘An Advocacy Coalition Framework of Policy Change and the Role of Policy-Oriented Learning Therein’, Policy Sciences, 21:2–3, 129–68.10.1007/BF00136406
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sabatier, Paul A., and Hank C. Jenkins-Smith (1993). Policy Change and Learning: An Advocacy Coalition Approach. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, Paul A., and Hank C. Jenkins-Smith (1999). ‘The Advocacy Coalition Framework: An Assessment’, in Paul Sabatier (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 117–68.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatier, Paul A., and Christopher M. Weible (2007). ‘The Advocacy Coalition Framework: Innovations and Clarifications’, in Paul Sabatier (ed.), Theories of the Policy Process, 2nd ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press, 189–220.
   Google Scholar
• Sanderson, Ian (2001). ‘Performance Management, Evaluation and Learning in Modern Local Government’, Public Administration, 79:2, 297–313.10.1111/padm.2001.79.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderson, Ian (2002). ‘Evaluation, Policy Learning and Evidence-Based Policy Making’, Public Administration, 80, 1–22.10.1111/padm.2002.80.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanderson, Ian, and E. Breen (2003). ‘Enhancing Evidence-Based Policy Making through Research Partnership’. Paper Presented at the 4th International Conference on Evidence-Based Policy and Indicator Systems, Church House, London, July 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Sarewitz, Daniel R., and Roger A. Pielke Jr. (2007). ‘The Neglected Heart of Science Policy: Reconciling Supply of and Demand for Science’, Environmental Science & Policy, 10, 5–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlager, Edella (1995). ‘Policy Making and Collective Action: Defining Coalitions within the Advocacy Coalition Framework’, Policy Sciences, 28, 242–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turnpenny, John, Mans Nilsson, Duncan Russel, Andrew Jordan, Julia Hertin, and Björn Nykvist (2008). ‘Why is Integrating Policy Assessment So Hard? A Comparative Analysis of the Institutional Capacities and Constraints’, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51:6, 759–75.10.1080/09640560802423541
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weible, Christopher M. (2011). ‘Political-Administrative Relations in Collaborative Environmental Management’, International Journal of Public Administration, 34:7, 424–35.10.1080/01900692.2011.569916
   Google Scholar
• Weible, Christopher M., and Paul A. Sabatier (2005). ‘Comparing Policy Networks: Marine Protected Areas in California’, The Policy Studies Journal, 33:2, 181–201.10.1111/psj.2005.33.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weible, Christopher M., Paul A. Sabatier, and Kelly McQueen (2009). ‘Themes and Variations: Taking Stock of the Advocacy Coalition Framework’, The Policy Studies Journal, 37:1, 121–40.10.1111/psj.2009.37.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weible, Christopher M., Paul A. Sabatier, and Andrew Pattison (2010). ‘Harnessing Expert-Based Information for Learning and the Sustainable Management of Complex Socio-Ecological Systems’, Environmental Science & Policy, 13, 522–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, Carol (1979). ‘The Many Meanings of Research Utilization’, Public Administration Review, 39:5, 426–31.10.2307/3109916
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, Carol, Erin Murphy-Graham, and Sarah Birkeland (2005). ‘An Alternate Route to Policy Influence. How Evaluations Affect D.A.R.E’, American Journal of Evaluation, 26:1, 12–30.10.1177/1098214004273337
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wood, Dan, and Arnold Vedlitz (2007). ‘Issue Definition, Information Processing, and the Politics of Global Warming’, American Journal of Political Science, 51:3, 552–568.10.1111/ajps.2007.51.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zafonte, Matthew, and Paul A. Sabatier (1998). ‘Shared Beliefs and Imposed Interdependencies as Determinants of Ally Networks in Overlapping Subsystems’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 10:4, 473–505.10.1177/0951692898010004005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zafonte, Matthew, and Paul A. Sabatier (2004). ‘Short-Term Versus Long-Term Coalitions in the Policy Process: Automotive Pollution Control, 1963–1989’, The Policy Studies Journal, 32:1, 75–107.10.1111/psj.2004.32.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar