Government Selection and Executive Powers: Constitutional Design in Parliamentary Democracies

References

• Agamben, Giorgio (2005). State of Exception. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.1215/9780822386735
   Google Scholar
• Ahmed, Amel (2013). Democracy and the Politics of Electoral System Choice. Engineering Electoral Dominance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Amat, Francesc, and Albert Falcó-Gimeno (2014). ‘When the Median Legislator Matters: Redistribution and the Investiture’, paper presented at the ECPR Joint Sessions, April 10–15, Salamanca, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• André, Audrey, Sam Depauw, and Kris Deschouwer (2015, forthcoming). ‘Changing Investiture Rules in Belgium’, in Bjørn Erik Rasch, Shane Martin, and José Antonio Cheibub (eds.), Parliaments and Government Formation: Unpacking Investiture Rules. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bäck, Hanna, and Patrick Dumont (2008). ‘Making the First Move. A Two-stage Analysis of the Role of Formateurs in Parliamentary Government Formation’, Public Choice, 135, 353–373.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bagehot, Walter (1873). The English Constitution. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, Torbjörn, Wolfgang C. Müller, Kaare Strøm, and Magnus Blomgren (2003). ‘Democratic Delegation and Accountability: Cross-national Patterns’, in Kaare Strøm, Wolfgang C. Müller and Torbjörn Bergman (eds.), Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 109–220.10.1093/019829784X.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Blackburn, Robert, Andrew Kennon, Michael Wheeler-Booth, John A.G. Griffith, and Michael Ryle (2003). Griffith and Ryle on Parliament: Functions, Practice and Procedures. London: Sweet & Maxwell.
   Google Scholar
• Blondel, Jean (1990). Comparative Government: An Introduction. New York, NY: Phillip Allen.
   Google Scholar
• Brouard, Sylvain (2011). ‘France: Systematic Institutional Advantage of Government in Lawmaking’, in Bjørn Erik Rasch, and George Tsebelis (eds.), The Role of Governments in Legislative Agenda Setting. London: Routledge, 38–52.
   Google Scholar
• Cabinet Office (2011). Cabinet Manual: A Guide to Laws, Conventions and Rules on the Operation of Government. London: Cabinet Office.
   Google Scholar
• Carey, John M., and Matthew Soberg Shugart, eds. (1998). Executive Decree Authority. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cheibub, José Antonio, Zachary Elkins, and Tom Ginsburg (2011). ‘Latin American Presidentialism in Comparative and Historical Perspective’, Texas Law Review, 89, 1707–1739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheibub, José Antonio, Zachary Elkins, and Tom Ginsburg (2014). ‘Beyond Presidentialism and Parliamentarism’, British Journal of Political Science, 44:3, 515–544.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheibub, José Antonio, Shane Martin, and Bjørn Erik Rasch (2015). ‘Investiture Rules and Formation of Minority Governments in Parliamentary Democracies’, Unpublished paper, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Chiva, Cristina (2015, forthcoming). ‘Strong Investiture Rules and Minority Governments in Romania’, in Bjørn Erik Rasch, Shane Martin, and José Antonio Cheibub (eds.), Parliaments and Government Formation: Unpacking Investiture Rules. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cotta, Maurizio, and Luca Verzichelli (2007). Political Institutions in Italy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• De Winter, Lieven, and Patrick Dumont (2000). ‘Parliamentary Party Groups in Belgium: Subjects of Partitocratic Dominion’, in Knut Heidar and Ruud Koole (eds.), Behind Closed Doors: Parliamentary Party Groups in European Democracies. London: Routledge, 106–129.
   Google Scholar
• Diermeier, Daniel, Hülya Eraslan, and Antonio Merlo (2002). ‘Coalition Governments and Constitutional Design’, European Economic Review, 46:4–5, 893–907.10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00223-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diermeier, Daniel, and Timothy J. Feddersen (1998). ‘Cohesion in Legislatures and the Vote of Confidence Procedure’, American Political Science Review, 92, 611–621.10.2307/2585484
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Döring, Herbert (1995). ‘Time as a Scarce Resourse: Government Control of the Agenda’, in Herbert Döring (ed.), Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. Frankfurt: Campus, 223–246.
   Google Scholar
• Druckman, James N., Lanny W. Martin, and Michael F. Thies (2005). ‘Influence without Confidence: Upper Chambers and Government Formation’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 30:4, 529–548.10.3162/036298005X201662
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, James N., and Michael F. Thies (2002). ‘The Importance of Concurrence: The Impact of Bicameralism on Government Formation and Duration’, American Journal of Political Science, 46, 760–771.10.2307/3088432
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elster, Jon (1995). ‘Forces and Mechanisms in the Constitution-making Process’, Duke Law Journal, 45:2, 364–396.10.2307/1372906
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elster, Jon (1996). ‘The Role of Institutional Interest in East European Constitution-making. Explaining Legislative Dominance’, East European Constitutional Review, 5, 63–65.
   Google Scholar
• Elster, Jon (2012). ‘The Optimal Design of a Constituent Assembly’, in Hélène Landemore and Jon Elster (eds.), Collective Wisdom. Principles and Mechanisms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 148–172.10.1017/CBO9780511846427
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher, Michael, Michael Laver, and Peter Mair (2006). Representative Government in Modern Europe. Institutions, Parties, and Government. 4th edition. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Ganghof, Steffen, and Christian Stecker (2015, forthcoming). ‘Investiture Rules in Germany: Stacking the Deck against Minority Governments’, in Bjørn Erik Rasch, Shane Martin, and José Antonio Cheibub (eds.), Parliaments and Government Formation: Unpacking Investiture Rules. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hallerberg, Mark, and Patrik Marier (2004). ‘Executive Authority, the Personal Vote, and Budget Discipline in Latin American and Caribbean Countries’, American Journal of Political Science, 48:3, 571–587.10.1111/ajps.2004.48.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, William B. (2001). ‘Making Policy Stick: Why the Government Gets What It Wants in Multiparty Parliaments’, American Journal of Political Science, 45, 780–798.10.2307/2669324
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, William B., and Diana M. Branduse (2014). ‘The Politics of Bicameralism’, in Shane Martin, Thomas Saalfeld and Kaare W. Strøm (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 332–351.
   Google Scholar
• Horváth, Péter (2015, forthcoming). ‘A Rule for All Seasons? Investiture and Government Formation in Hungary’, in Bjørn Erik Rasch, Shane Martin and José Antonio Cheibub (eds.), Parliaments and Government Formation: Unpacking Investiture Rules. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, John D. (1992). ‘Restrictive Legislative Procedures in France and the United States’, American Political Science Review, 86:3, 675–687.10.2307/1964130
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, John. D (1996a). ‘The Vote of Confidence in Parliamentary Democracies’, American Political Science Review, 90, 269–282.10.2307/2082884
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, John D. (1996b). Rationalizing Parliament. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511896446
   Google Scholar
• Huber, John D., and Charles R. Shipan (2000). ‘The Costs of Control: Legislators, Agencies, and Transaction Costs’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 25, 25–52.10.2307/440392
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jennings, Sir Ivor (1984). The Queen’s Government. Westport: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kelso, Alexandra (2015, forthcoming). ‘Parliament and Government Formation in the United Kingdom: A Hidden Vote of Investiture?’ in Bjørn Erik Rasch, Shane Martin and José Antonio Cheibub (eds.), Parliaments and Government Formation: Unpacking Investiture Rules. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kiewiet, D. Roderick, and Mathew D. McCubbins (1991). The Logic of Delegation. Congressional Parties and the Appropriation Process. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laffont, Jean-Jacques, and David Martimort (2009). The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-agent Model. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lauvaux, Philippe (1988). Parlementarisme Rationalisé et Stabilité du Pouvoir Exécutif [Rationalized Parliamentarism and the Stability of Executive Power]. Bruxelles: Bruylant.
   Google Scholar
• Laver, Michael, and Kenneth A. Shepsle, eds. (1994). Cabinet Ministers and Parliamentary Government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lupia, Arthur (2003). ‘Delegation and Its Perils’, in Kaare Strøm, Wolfgang C. Müller, and Torbjörn Bergman (eds.), Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 33–54.10.1093/019829784X.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Marshall, Monty G., and Keith Jaggers (2004). POLITY IV PROJECT: Political Regime Characteristics and Transitions, 1800–2004. Arlington, VA: Center for Global Policy, School of Public Policy, George Mason University.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Shane (2015, forthcoming). ‘Government Formation in Ireland: Learning to Live without a Majority Party’, in Bjørn Erik Rasch, Shane Martin, and José Antonio Cheibub (eds.), Parliaments and Government Formation: Unpacking Investiture Rules. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Shane, and Olivier Rozenberg, eds. (2012). The Roles and Function of Parliamentary Questions. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Lanny W., and George Vanberg (2011). Parliaments and Coalitions: The Role of Legislative Institutions in Multiparty Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199607884.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Lanny W., and Georg Vanberg (2014). ‘Legislative Institutions and Coalition Government’, in Shane Martin, Thomas Saalfeld, and Kaare W. Strøm (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 436–454.10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199653010.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Mattson, Ingvar, and Kaare Strøm (1995). ‘Parliamentary Committees’, in Herbert Döring (ed.), Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. Frankfurt: Campus, 249–307.
   Google Scholar
• McLean, Ian (2012). ‘England Does Not Love Coalitions’: The Most Misused Political Quotation in the Book’, Government and Opposition, 47, 3–20.10.1111/j.1477-7053.2011.01352.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, Wolfgang C., Torbjörn Bergman, and Kaare Strøm (2003). ‘Parliamentary Democracy: Promise and Problems’, in Kaare Strøm, Wolfgang C. Müller, and Torbjörn Bergman (eds.), Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 3–32.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Wolfgang C., and Thomas M. Meyer (2010). ‘Mutual Veto? How Coalitions Work’, in Thomas König, George Tsebelis, and Marc Debus (eds.), Reform Prosesses and Policy Change. Veto Players and Decision-making in Modern Democracies. New York, NY: Springer, 99–124.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Wolfgang C., and Kaare Strøm, eds. (2000). Coalition Governments in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nguyên-Duy, Iris (2015, forthcoming). ‘France: Excluding Parliament from Government Formation’ in Bjørn Erik Rasch, Shane Martin, and José Antonio Cheibub (eds.), Parliaments and Government Formation: Unpacking Investiture Rules. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Przeworski, Adam, Tamar Asadurian, and Anjali Thomas Bohlken (2012). ‘The Origins of Parliamentary Responsibility’, in Tom Ginsburg (ed.), Comparative Constitutional Design. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 101–137.10.1017/CBO9781139105712
   Google Scholar
• Rasch, Bjørn Erik (2014). ‘Institutional Foundations of Legislative Agenda-setting’, in Shane Martin, Thomas Saalfeld, and Kaare W. Strøm (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 455–480.
   Google Scholar
• Rasch, Bjørn Erik, Shane Martin, and José Antonio Cheibub, eds. (2015). Parliaments and Government Formation: Unpacking Investiture Rules. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rasch, Bjørn Erik, and George Tsebelis, eds. (2011). The Role of Governments in Legislative Agenda Setting. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Romer, Thomas, and Howard Rosenthal (1978). ‘Political Resource Allocation, Controlled Agendas, and the Status Quo’, Public Choice, 33:4, 27–43.10.1007/BF03187594
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russo, Federico (2015, forthcoming). ‘Government Formation in Italy: The Challenge of Bicameral Investiture in Bjørn Erik Rasch, Shane Martin and José Antonio Cheibub (eds.), Parliaments and Government Formation: Unpacking Investiture Rules. Oxford: Oxford University Press
   Google Scholar
• Saalfeld, Thomas (2000). ‘Members of Parliament and Governments in Western Europe: Agency Relations and Problems of Oversight’, European Journal of Political Research, 37:3, 353–376.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saiegh, Sebastian (2011). Ruling by Statute: How Uncertainty and Vote-buying Shape Lawmaking. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511842276
   Google Scholar
• Sieberer, Ulrich (2015, forthcoming). ‘Hire or Fire? The Link between Investiture and Removal in Parliamentary Democracies’, in Bjørn Erik Rasch, Shane Martin, and José Antonio Cheibub (eds.), Parliaments and Government Formation: Unpacking Investiture Rules. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strøm, Kaare (1995). ‘Parliamentary Government and Legislative Organization’, in Herbert Döring (ed.), Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. Frankfurt: Campus, 51–82.
   Google Scholar
• Strøm, Kaare, Wolfgang C. Müller, and Torbjörn Bergman eds. (2003). Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strøm, Kaare, Wolfgang C. Müller, and Daniel Markham Smith (2010). ‘Parliamentary Control of Coalition Governments’, Annual Review of Political Science, 13, 517–535.10.1146/annurev.polisci.10.071105.104340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanchev, Evgeni (1993). ‘Parliamentarism Rationalized’, East European Constitutional Review, 2, 33–35.
   Google Scholar
• Thies, Michael F. (2001). ‘Keeping Tabs on Partners: The Logic of Delegation in Coalition Governments’, American Journal of Political Science, 45:3, 580–598.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, George (2002). Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, George, and Jeannette Money (1997). Bicameralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511609350
   Google Scholar
• Von Beyme, Klaus (2014). Die parlamentarische Demokratie. Entstehung und Funktionsweise 1789–1999 [Parliamentary Democracy: Formation and Functioning, 1789–1999]. Wiesbaden: Springer, 4. auflage.
   Google Scholar
• Wehner, Joachim (2010). Legislatures and the Budget Process: The Myth of Fiscal Control. London: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1057/9780230281578
   Google Scholar
• Williams, Laron K. (2011). ‘Unsuccessful Success?’ Failed No-confidence Motions, Competence Signals, and Electoral Support’, Comparative Political Studies, 44, 1474–1499.
   Google Scholar
• Witte, Els, Jan Craeybeckx, and Alain Meynen (2000). The Political History of Belgium from the 1830 Onwards. Brussels: VUB University Press.
   Google Scholar