It takes two: how Eurosceptic public opinion and party divisions influence party positions

References

• Adams, James, and Zeynep Somer-Topcu (2009). ‘Moderate Now, Win Votes Later: The Electoral Consequences of Parties’ Policy Shifts in 25 Postwar Democracies’, Journal of Politics, 71:2, 678–692.10.1017/S0022381609090537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, James, Michael Clark, Lawrence Ezrow, and Garrett Glasgow (2004). ‘Understanding Change and Stability in Party Ideologies: Do Parties Respond to Public Opinion or to past Election Results?’, British Journal of Political Science, 34:4, 589–610.10.1017/S0007123404000201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, James, Michael Clark, Lawrence Ezrow, and Garrett Glasgow (2006). ‘Are Niche Parties Fundamentally Different than Mainstream Parties? The Causes and the Electoral Consequences of Western European Parties’ Policy Shifts, 1976–1998’, American Journal of Political Science, 50:3, 513–529.10.1111/ajps.2006.50.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, James, Andrea B. Haupt, and Heather Stoll (2009). ‘What Moves Parties? The Role of Public Opinion and Global Economic Conditions in Western Europe’, Comparative Political Studies, 42:5, 611–639.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adams, James, Lawrence Ezrow, and Zeynep Somer-Topcu (2011). ‘Is Anybody Listening? Evidence That Voters Do Not Respond to European Parties’ Policy Statements during Elections’, American Journal of Political Science, 55:2, 370–382.10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00489.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnold, Christine, Eliyahu V. Sapir, and Catherine de Vries (2012). ‘Parties’ Positions on European Integration: Issue Congruence, Ideology or Context?’, West European Politics, 35:6, 1341–1362.10.1080/01402382.2012.713749
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäck, Hanna (2008). ‘Intra-Party Politics and Coalition Formation: Evidence from Swedish Local Government’, Party Politics, 14:1, 71–89.10.1177/1354068807081818
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bakker, Ryan, Catherine de Vries, Erica Edwards, Liesbet Hooghe, Seth Jolly, Gary Marks, Jonathan Polk, et al. (2015). ‘Measuring Party Positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File, 1999–2010’, Party Politics, 21:1, 143–152.10.1177/1354068812462931
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berry, William D., Matt Golder, and Daniel Milton (2012). ‘Improving Test of Theories Positing Interaction’, Journal of Politics, 74:3, 653–671.10.1017/S0022381612000199
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brambor, Thomas, William Roberts Clark, and Matt Golder (2006). ‘Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses’, Political Analysis, 14:1, 63–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun, Daniela, Slava Mikhaylov, and Herman Schmitt (2010). European Parliament Election Study 2009, Manifesto Study. Cologne: GESIS Data Archive.
   Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian (1994). ‘A New Spatial Theory of Party Competition: Uncertainty, Ideology and Policy Equilibria Viewed Comparatively and Temporarily’, British Journal of Political Science, 24:4, 443–468.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian, Lawrence Ezrow, and Michael D. McDonald (2010). ‘Ideology, Party Factionalism and Policy Change: An Integrated Dynamic Theory’, British Journal of Political Science, 40:4, 781–804.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceron, Andrea (2016). ‘Inter-Factional Conflicts and Government Formation: Do Party Leaders Sort out Ideological Heterogeneity?’, Party Politics, 22:6, 797–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbett, Richard (2014). ‘‘European Elections Are Second-Order Elections’: Is Received Wisdom Changing?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 52:6, 1194–1198.10.1111/jcms.2014.52.issue-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert A. (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell (1985). ‘Political Parties and Political Representation’, Comparative Political Studies, 18:3, 267–299.10.1177/0010414085018003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell J., David M. Farrell, and Ian McAllister (2011). Political Parties and Democratic Linkage: How Parties Organize Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:osobl/9780199599356.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Downs, Anthony (1957). An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York, NY: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, Erica (2007). ‘United We Stand? Examining Dissent within Political Parties on Issues of European Integration’, presented at the 10th Biennial EUSA Conference, Montreal, Quebec, May 17–19.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards, Erica (2009). ‘Products of Their past? Cleavages and Intra-Party Dissent over European Integration’. Institut für Höhere Studien (IHS) Political Science Series 118.
   Google Scholar
• Egmond, Marcel van, Wouter van der Brug, Sara Hobolt, Mark Franklin, and Eliyahu V. Sapir (2013). European Parliament Election Study 200, Vote Study. Cologne: GESIS Data Archive.
   Google Scholar
• van der Eijk, Cees, Erik Oppenhuis, and Herman Schmitt (1993). European Election Study 1989 (EES 1989). Cologne: GESIS Data Archive.10.3998/mpub.13603
   Google Scholar
• van der Eijk, Cees, Mark Franklin, Klaus Schoenback, Hermann Schmitt, Holli Semetko, Wouter van der Brug, Soren Holmberg, et al. (1999). European Election Studies. Hamburg: IPSOS.
   Google Scholar
• European Election Study (2009). European Parliament Election Study 2009. Cologne: Manifesto Study Data, Advance Release.
   Google Scholar
• Ezrow, Lawrence, and Timothy Hellwig (2014). ‘Responding to Voters or Responding to Markets? Political Parties and Public Opinion in an Era of Globalization’, International Studies Quarterly, 58:4, 816–827.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezrow, Lawrence, Catherine E. de Vries, Marco R. Steenbergen, and Erica E. Edwards (2011). ‘Mean Voter Representation and Partisan Constituency Representation: Do Parties Respond to the Mean Voter Position or to Their Supporters?’, Party Politics, 17:3, 275–301.10.1177/1354068810372100
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Føllesdal, Andreas, and Simon Hix (2006). ‘Where There is a Democratic Deficit in the EU: A Response to Majone and Moravcsik’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 44:3, 533–562.10.1111/jcms.2006.44.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, Jane (2011). ‘A Test of Core-Voters Theories: The British Conservatives, 1997–2005’, British Journal of Political Science, 41:4, 735–764.10.1017/S0007123411000111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, Zachary (2016). ‘Competing on the Issues: How Experience in Government and Economic Conditions Influence the Scope of Parties’ Policy Messages’, Party Politics, 22:6, 809–822.10.1177/1354068814567026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, Zachary, and Matthias Haber (2015). ‘The Consequences of Appearing Divided: An Analysis of Party Evaluations and Vote Choice’, Electoral Studies, 37, 15–27.10.1016/j.electstud.2014.11.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, Zachary, and Matthias Haber (2016). ‘Leadership Competition and Disagreement at Party National Congresses’, British Journal of Political Science, 46:3, 611–632.10.1017/S0007123414000283
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmel, Robert, and Kenneth Janda (1994). ‘An Integrated Theory of Party Goals and Party Change’, Journal of Theoretical Politics, 6:3, 259–287.10.1177/0951692894006003001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmel, Robert, and Alexander C. Tan (2003). ‘Party Actors and Party Change: Does Factional Dominance Matter?’, European Journal of Political Research, 42:3, 409–424.10.1111/ejpr.2003.42.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Heck, Sjoerd (2016). ‘Appealing Broadly or Narrowing down? The Impact of Government Experience and Party Organization on the Scope of Parties’ Issue Agendas’, Party Politics. doi:10.1177/1354068816657374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellwig, Timothy (2012). ‘Constructing Accountability: Party Position-Taking and Economic Voting’, Comparative Political Studies, 45:1, 92–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, Sara B. (2014). ‘A Vote for the President? The Role of the Spitzenkandidaten in the 2014 European Parliament Elections’, Journal of European Public Policy, 21:10, 1528–1540.10.1080/13501763.2014.941148
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, Sara B., and Robert Klemmensen (2008). ‘Government Responsiveness and Political Competition in Comparative Perspective’, Comparative Political Studies, 41:3, 309–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks (2009). ‘A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science, 39:1, 1–23.10.1017/S0007123408000409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, Gary Marks, and Carole J. Wilson (2002). ‘Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration?’, Comparative Political Studies, 35:8, 965–989.10.1177/001041402236310
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirchheimer, Otto (1966). ‘The Transformation of the West European Party Systems’, in Joseph LaPalombara and Martin Weiner (eds.), Political Parties and Political Development. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 177–200.
   Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert (1988). ‘Organization and Strategy of Belgian and West German Ecology Parties: A New Dynamic of Party Politics in Western Europe?’, Comparative Politics, 20, 127–154.10.2307/421663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Andrea Volkens, Judith L. Bara, Ian Budge, and Michael D. McDonald (2006). Mapping Policy Preferences II: Estimates for Parties, Electors, and Governments in Eastern Europe, European Union, and OECD, 1990–2003. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klüver, Heike, and Jae-Jae Spoon (2016). ‘Who Responds? Voters, Parties, and Issue Attention’, British Journal of Political Science, 46:3, 633–654.10.1017/S0007123414000313
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, Michael (2005). ‘Policy and the Dynamics of Political Competition’, American Political Science Review, 99:2, 263–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lawson, Kay (1980). ‘Political Parties and Linkage’, in Kay Lawson (ed.), Political Parties and Linkage: A Comparative Perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 3–24.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, Ron (2012). ‘Intra-Party Democracy and Party Responsiveness’, West European Politics, 35:6, 1295–1319.10.1080/01402382.2012.713747
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luebbert, Gregory M. (1986). Comparative Democracy: Policymaking and Governing Coalitions in Europe and Israel. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, Gary, Carole J. Wilson, and Leonard Ray (2002). ‘National Parties and European Integration’, American Journal of Political Science, 46:3, 585–594.10.2307/3088401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, Gary, Liesbet Hooghe, Moira Nelson, and Erica Edwards (2006). ‘Party Competition and European Integration in the East and West: Different Structure’ Same Causality’, Comparative Political Studies, 39:2, 155–175.10.1177/0010414005281932
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, Gary, and Norman Schofield (2003). ‘Activists and Partisan Realignment in the United States’, American Political Science Review, 97:2, 245–260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plümper, Thomas, Vera E. Troeger, and Phillip Manow (2005). ‘Panel Data Analysis in Comparative Politics: Linking Method to Theory’, European Journal of Political Research, 44:2, 327–354.10.1111/ejpr.2005.44.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Preston, Carolyn C., and Andrew M. Colman (2000). ‘Optimal Number of Response Categories in Rating Scales: Reliability, Validity, Discriminating Power, and Respondent Preferences’, Acta Psychologica, 104:1, 1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Przeworski, Adam, and John Sprague (1986). Paper Stones: A History of Electoral Socialism. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ray, Leonard (1999). ‘Measuring Party Orientations toward European Integration: Results from an Expert Survey’, European Journal of Political Research, 36:2, 283–306.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ray, Leonard (2003). ‘When Parties Matter: The Conditional Influence of Party Positions on Voters Opinions about European Integration’, Journal of Politics, 65:4, 978–994.10.1111/1468-2508.t01-1-00121
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reif, Karlheinz (1984). ‘National Election Cycles and European Elections, 1979 and 1984’, Electoral Studies, 3:3, 244–255.10.1016/0261-3794(84)90005-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reif, Karlheinz, and Hermann Schmitt (1980). ‘Nine Second-Order National Elections: A Conceptual Framework for the Analysis of European Election Results’, European Journal for Political Research, 8:1, 3–44.10.1111/ejpr.1980.8.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmitt, Hermann, and Andreas M. Wüst (2012). Euromanifestos Project (EMP) 1979–2004. Cologne: GESIS Data Archive.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, Hermann, Cees van der Eijk, Evi Scholz, and Michael Klein (1997). European Election Study 1994 (EES 1994). Cologne: GESIS Data Archive.
   Google Scholar
• Schmitt, Hermann, Stefano Bartolini, Wouter van der Brug, Cees van der Eijk, Mark Franklin, Dieter Fuchs, Gabor Toka, et al. (2009). European Election Study 2004, 2nd ed. Cologne: GESIS Data Archive.
   Google Scholar
• Schumacher, Gijs, Catherine E. de Vries, and Barbara Vis (2013). ‘Why Do Parties Change Position? Party Organization and Environmental Incentives’, Journal of Politics, 75:2, 464–477.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Somer-Topcu, Zeynep (2015). ‘Everything to Everyone: The Electoral Consequences of the Broad-Appeal Strategy in Europe’, American Journal of Political Science, 59:4, 841–854.10.1111/ajps.12165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spoon, Jae-Jae, and Heike Klüver (2014). ‘Do Parties Respond? How Electoral Context Influences Party Responsiveness’, Electoral Studies, 35, 48–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenbergen, Marco, and Gary Marks (2007). ‘Evaluating Expert Judgments’, European Journal of Political Research, 46:3, 347–366.10.1111/ejpr.2007.46.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steenbergen, Marco R., and David J. Scott (2004). ‘Contesting Europe? The Salience of European Integration as a Party Issue’, in Gary Marks and Marco G. Steenbergen (eds.), European Integration and Political Conflict. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 165–191.10.1017/CBO9780511492013
   Google Scholar
• Steenbergen, Marco R., Erica E. Edwards, and Catherine E. de Vries (2007). ‘‘Who’s Cueing Whom? Mass-Elite Linkages and the Future of European Integration’, European Union Politics, 8:1, 13–35.10.1177/1465116507073284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strøm, Kaare, and Wolfgang C. Müller (1999). ‘Political Parties and Hard Choices’, in Wolfgang C. Müller and Kaare Strøm (eds.), Policy, Office or Votes? How Political Parties in Western Europe Make Hard Decisions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1–35.10.1017/CBO9780511625695
   Google Scholar
• Taggart, Paul (1998). ‘A Touchstone of Dissent: Euroskepticism in Contemporary Western European Party Systems’, European Journal of Political Research, 33:3, 363–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Treib, Oliver (2014). ‘The Voter Says No, but Nobody Listens: Causes and Consequences of the Eurosceptic Vote in the 204 European Elections’, Journal of European Public Policy, 21:10, 1541–1554.10.1080/13501763.2014.941534
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vavreck, Lynn (2009). The Message Matters: The Economy and Presidential Campaigns. Princeton: Princeton University Press.10.1515/9781400830480
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, Markus, and Thomas Meyer (2014). ‘Which Issues Do Parties Emphasise? Salience Strategies and Party Organization in Multiparty Systems’, West European Politics, 37:5, 1019–1045.10.1080/01402382.2014.911483
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, Stefaan, Jonas Lefevere, and Anke Tresch (2012). ‘The Associative Dimension of Issue Ownership’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 76, 771–782.10.1093/poq/nfs023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van de Wardt, Marc (2014). ‘Putting the Damper on: Do Parties De-Emphasize Issues in Response to Internal Divisions among Party Supporters?’, Party Politics, 20:3, 330–340.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Christopher, and Jae-Jae Spoon (2015). ‘Differentiated Party Response: The Effect of Euroskeptic Public Opinion on Party Position’, European Union Politics, 16:2, 176–193.10.1177/1465116514564702
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, Laron K., Katsunori Seki, and Guy D. Whitten (2016). ‘You’ve Got Some Explaining to Do: The Influence of Economic Conditions and Spatial Competition on Party Strategy’, Political Science Research and Methods, 4:1, 47–63.10.1017/psrm.2015.13
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank (2016). GDP per Capita (Current US$), available at http://databank.worldbank.org/data/reports.aspx?source=2&series=NY.GDP.PCAP.CD&country=
   Google Scholar