Who gets what and why? Committee assignments in the German Bundestag

References

• Adler, E. S., and J. S. Lapinski (1997). ‘Demand-Side Theory and Congressional Committee Composition: A Constituency Characteristics Approach’, American Journal of Political Science, 41:3, 895–918.10.2307/2111679
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alemán, E. (2015). ‘Legislative Organization and Outcomes’, in R. Gandhi, Jennifer Ruiz- Rufino (eds.), Routledge Handbook of Comparative Political Institutions. Oxon: Routledge, 145–61.
   Google Scholar
• Bäck, H., M. Debus, and P. Dumont (2011). ‘Who Gets What in Coalition Governments? Predictors of Portfolio Allocation in Parliamentary Democracies’, European Journal of Political Research, 50:4, 441–78.10.1111/ejpr.2011.50.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bates, D., M. Maechler, B. Bolker, and S. Walker (2015). ‘Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using LME4’, Journal of Statistical Software, arXiv, 1406.
   Google Scholar
• Benoit, K., K. Watanabe, P. Nulty, A. Obeng, H. Wang, B. Lauderdale, and W. Lowe (n.d.). ‘Quanteda: Quantitative Analysis of Textual Data’, R Package Version: 0.9.9-60, available at https://quanteda.io
   Google Scholar
• Bernauer, J., and T. Bräuninger (2009). ‘Intra-Party Preference Heterogeneity and Faction Membership in the 15th German Bundestag: A Computational Text Analysis of Parliamentary Speeches’, German Politics, 18:3, 385–402.10.1080/09644000903055823
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brambor, T., W. R. Clark, and M. Golder (2005). ‘Understanding Interaction Models: Improving Empirical Analyses’, Political Analysis, 13, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Browne, W. J., H. Goldstein, and J. Rasbash (2001). ‘Multiple Membership Multiple Classification (MMMC) Models’, Statistical Modelling, 1:2, 103–24.10.1177/1471082X0100100202
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bundestag (1994). Amtliches Handbuch des Deutschen Bundestages 12. Wahlperiode. Rheinbreitbach: Neue Darmstädter Verlagsanstalt.
   Google Scholar
• Bundestag (1998). Amtliches Handbuch des Deutschen Bundestages 13. Wahlperiode. 6th ed. Rheinbreitbach: Neue Darmstädter Verlagsanstalt.
   Google Scholar
• Bundestag (2002). Amtliches Handbuch des Deutschen Bundestages 14. Wahlperiode. 6th ed. Rheinbreitbach: Neue Darmstädter Verlagsanstalt.
   Google Scholar
• Bundestag (2015). ‘Bundestag Web Archive’, available at http://webarchiv.bundestag.de/ (accessed 6 February 2015).
   Google Scholar
• Ciftci, S., W. Forrest, and Y. Tekin (2008). ‘Committee Assignments in a Nascent Party System: The Case of the Turkish Grand National Assembly’, International Political Science Review, 29:3, 303–24.10.1177/0192512107088389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, G. W., and M. D. McCubbins (1993). Legislative Leviathan: Party Government in the House. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Damgaard, E. (1995). ‘How Parties Control Committee Members’, in H. Döring (ed.), Parliaments and Majority Rule in Western Europe. Mannheim: Mannheim Centre for European Social Research, 113–41.
   Google Scholar
• Elmer, C., and C. Hebel (2015). ‘Nebeneinkünfte: Das sind die Top-Verdiener im Bundestag’, Spiegel Online, available at https://www.spiegel.de/politik/deutschland/bundestag-so-viele-nebeneinkuenfte-haben-die-abgeordneten-a-1045916.html
   Google Scholar
• Fernandes, J. M. (2016). ‘Intra-Party Delegation in the Portuguese Legislature: Assigning Committee Chairs and Party Coordination Positions’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 22:1, 108–28.10.1080/13572334.2015.1134903
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fujimura, N. (2012). ‘Electoral Incentives, Party Discipline, and Legislative Organization: Manipulating Legislative Committees to Win Elections and Maintain Party Unity’, European Political Science Review, 4:2, 147–75.10.1017/S1755773911000166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilligan, T. W., and K. Krehbiel (1990). ‘Organization of Informative Committees by a Rational Legislature’, American Journal of Political Science, 34:2, 531–64.10.2307/2111460
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gschwend, T., and T. Zittel (2016). ‘Who Brings Home the Pork? Parties and The Role of Localness in Committee Assignments in Mixed-Member Proportional Systems’, Party Politics, doi: 10.1177/1354068816678884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamm, K. E., R. D. Hedlund, and S. S. Post (2011). ‘Committee Specialization in US State Legislatures During the 20th Century: Do Legislatures Tap The Talents of Their Members?’, State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 11:3, 299–324.10.1177/1532440011413082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. E. (2010). ‘Committee Assignment Politics in the Danish Folketing’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 33:4, 381–401.10.1111/j.1467-9477.2010.00256.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. E. (2011). ‘A Random Process? Committee Assignments in Dáil Éireann’, Irish Political Studies, 26:3, 345–60.10.1080/07907184.2011.593738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hansen, M. E. (2016). ‘Distributing Party and Committee Posts: A Parliamentary Theory of Distribution’, Paper presented at the 3rd General Conference of the ECPR Standing Group on Parliaments: “Parliaments in Challenging Times”, Munich, June 30 to July 2 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Heidar, K., and R. Koole, eds. (2000). Parliamentary Party Groups in European Democracies. Political Parties Behind Closed Doors. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Holzapfel,K. J. (1993). Kürschners Volkshandbuch Deutscher Bundestag 12. Wahlperiode. 69th ed. Rheinbreitbach: Neue Darmstädter Verlagsanstalt.
   Google Scholar
• Holzapfel, K. J. (1995). Kürschners Volkshandbuch Deutscher Bundestag 13. Wahlperiode. 75th ed. Rheinbreitbach: Neue Darmstädter Verlagsanstalt.
   Google Scholar
• Holzapfel, K. J. (1999). Kürschners Volkshandbuch Deutscher Bundestag 14. Wahlperiode. 87th ed. Rheinbreitbach: Neue Darmstädter Verlagsanstalt.
   Google Scholar
• Holzapfel, K. J. (2004). Kürschners Volkshandbuch Deutscher Bundestag 15. Wahlperiode. 100th ed. Rheinbreitbach: Neue Darmstädter Verlagsanstalt.
   Google Scholar
• Holzapfel, K. J. (2009). Kürschners Volkshandbuch Deutscher Bundestag 16. Wahlperiode. 112nd ed. Rheinbreitbach: Neue Darmstädter Verlagsanstalt.
   Google Scholar
• Holzapfel, K. J. (2012). Kürschners Volkshandbuch Deutscher Bundestag 17. Wahlperiode. 126th ed. Rheinbreitbach: Neue Darmstädter Verlagsanstalt.
   Google Scholar
• Holzapfel, K. J. (2013). Kürschners Volkshandbuch Deutscher Bundestag 18. Wahlperiode. 130th ed. Rheinbreitbach: Neue Darmstädter Verlagsanstalt.
   Google Scholar
• Imai, K., G. King, and O. Lau (2009). ‘Zelig: Everyone’s Statistical Software’, available at https://gking.harvard.edu/zelig
   Google Scholar
• Kanthak, K. (2009). ‘US State Legislative Committee Assignments and Encouragement of Party Loyalty: An Exploratory Analysis’, State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 9:3, 284–303.10.1177/153244000900900302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, D.-H., and G. Loewenberg (2005). ‘The Role of Parliamentary Committees in Coalition Governments – Keeping Tabs on Coalition Partners in the German Bundestag’, Comparative Political Studies, 38:9, 1104–29.10.1177/0010414005276307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krehbiel, K. (1990). ‘Are Congressional Committees Composed of Preference Outliers?’, American Political Science Review, 84:1, 149–63.10.2307/1963634
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laundy, P. (1989). Parliaments in The Modern World. Aldershot: Dartmouth Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Laver, M., and K. Benoit (2002). ‘Locating TDs in Policy Spaces: The Computational Text Analysis of Dáil Speeches’, Irish Political Studies, 17:1, 59–73.10.1080/714003143
   Google Scholar
• Laver, M., K. Benoit, and J. Garry (2003). ‘Extracting Policy Positions From Political Texts Using Words As Data’, American Political Science Review, 97:2, 311–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longley, L. D., and R. H. Davidson (1998). ‘Parliamentary Committees: Changing Perspectives On Changing Institutions’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 4:1, 1–20.10.1080/13572339808420537
   Google Scholar
• Martin, S. (2011). ‘Parliamentary Questions, the Behaviour of Legislators, and the Function of Legislatures: An Introduction’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 17:3, 259–70.10.1080/13572334.2011.595120
   Google Scholar
• McElroy, G. (2006). ‘Committee Representation in the European Parliament’, European Union Politics, 7:1, 5–29.10.1177/1465116506060910
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mickler, T. A. (2013). ‘Standing Committee Assignments in the German Bundestag – Who Gets What in Within-Party Negotiations?’, German Politics, 22:4, 421–40.10.1080/09644008.2013.832215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mickler, T. (2017a). ‘Not So Random After All? – Revisiting Committee Assignments in Dáil Éireann’, Irish Political Studies, doi: 10.1080/07907184.2017.1325361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mickler, T. A. (2017b). ‘Inferring Ideological Positions From Speeches - An Analysis of the Tweede Kamer’, Paper presented at the 2017 Politicologenetmaal Conference, Leiden, 1–2 June.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, W. C. (2000). ‘Political Parties in Parliamentary Democracies: Making Delegation and Accountability Work’, European Journal of Political Research, 37:3, 309–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, W. C., and U. Sieberer (2014). ‘Procedure and Rules in Legislatures’, in S. Martin, T. Saalfeld and K. W. Strøm (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 311–31.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, G. (1974). ‘Assessing the Congressional Committee System: Contributions from a Comparative Perspective’, The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 411:1, 120–32.10.1177/000271627441100111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Overby, L. M., and T. A. Kazee (2000). ‘Outlying Committees in the Statehouse: An Examination of the Prevalence of Committee Outliers in State Legislatures’, The Journal of Politics, 62:3, 701–28.10.1111/0022-3816.00030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proksch, S.-O., and J. B. Slapin (2014). The Politics of Parliamentary Debates: Parties, Rebels, and Representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rahman, T. (2008). Parliamentary Control and Government Accountability in South Asia: A Comparative Analysis of Bangladesh, India and Sri Lanka. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Raymond, C., and J. Holt (2014). ‘Due North? Do American Theories of Legislative Committees Apply to Canada?’ The Journal of Legislative Studies, 20:2, 174–92.10.1080/13572334.2013.846546
   Google Scholar
• Saalfeld, T. (2000). ‘Bureaucratisation, Coordination and Competition: Parliamentary Party Groups in The German Bundestag’, in K. Heidar and R. Koole (eds.), Parliamentary Party Groups in European Democracies: Political Parties Behind Closed Doors. London: Routledge, 23–38.
   Google Scholar
• Saalfeld, T. (2005). ‘Germany: Stability and Strategy in a Mixed-Member Proportional System’, in M. Gallagher and P. Mitchell (eds.), The Politics of Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 209–30.
   Google Scholar
• Saalfeld, T., and K. Strøm (2014). ‘Political Parties and Legislators’, in S. Martin, T. Saalfeld and K. Strøm (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 371–97.
   Google Scholar
• Scharkow, M. (2013). ‘Thematic Content Analysis Using Supervised Machine Learning: An Empirical Evaluation Using German Online News’, Quality & Quantity, 47:2, 761–773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaw, M. (1979). ‘Conclusion’, in J. D. Lees and M. Shaw (eds.), Committees in Legislatures: A Comparative Analysis. Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 361–434.
   Google Scholar
• Shepsle, K. A. (1978). The Giant Jigsaw Puzzle: Democratic Committee Assignments in The Modern House. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stratmann, T., and M. Baur (2002). ‘Plurality Rule, Proportional Representation, and the German Bundestag: How Incentives to Pork-Barrel Differ across Electoral Systems’, American Journal of Political Science, 46:3, 506–14.10.2307/3088395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strøm, K. (1998). ‘Parliamentary Committees in European Democracies’, The Journal of Legislative Studies, 4:1, 21–59.10.1080/13572339808420538
   Google Scholar
• Volkens, A., P. Lehmann, N. Merz, S. Regel, A. Werner, and H. Schultze (2014). The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2014b, available at https://manifestoproject.wzb.eu/
   Google Scholar
• Whitaker, R. (2005). ‘National Parties in the European Parliament: An Influence in The Committee System?’, European Union Politics, 6:1, 5–28.10.1177/1465116505049606
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yordanova, N. (2009). ‘The Rationale Behind Committee Assignment in the European Parliament: Distributive, Informational and Partisan Perspectives’, European Union Politics, 10:2, 253–80.10.1177/1465116509103377
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zittel, T., and T. Gschwend (2007). ‘Individualisierte Wahlkämpfe im Wahlkreis. Eine Analyse am Beispiel des Bundestagswahlkampfes von 2005’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 48, 293–321.10.1007/s11615-007-0048-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar