Leaking, leak prevention, and decoupling in public administrations: the case of the European Commission

References

• Abazi, Vigjilenca (2015). ‘Secrecy and Oversight in the European Union: The Law and Practice of Classified Information’, unpublished doctoral thesis, University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Alaimo, Kara (2016). ‘Which Government Officials Leak Unauthorized Information to the Press in Washington?’, Journal of Public Affairs, 16:1, 7–15.10.1002/pa.v16.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bauer, Michael W., Christoph Knill, and Steffen Eckhard, eds. (2017). International Bureaucracy. Challenges and Lessons for Public Administration Research. London: Palgrave.
   Google Scholar
• Boswell, Christina (2008). ‘Evasion, Reinterpretation and Decoupling: European Commission Responses to the ‘External Dimension’ of Immigration and Asylum’, West European Politics, 31:3, 491–512.10.1080/01402380801939784
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovens, Mark A. P., Henk Geveke, and Jouke de Vries (1995). ‘Open Public Administration in the Netherlands: The Politics of Leaking’, International Review of Administrative Science, 61:1, 17–40.10.1177/002085239506100103
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brevini, Benedetta, Arne Hintz, and Patrick McCurdy, eds. (2013) Beyond WikiLeaks. Implications for the Future of Communications, Journalism and Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Brunsson, Nils (1986). ‘Organizing for Inconsistencies: On Organizational Conflict, Depression and Hypocrisy as Substitutes for Action’, Scandinavian Journal of Management Studies, 2:3–4, 165–85.
   Google Scholar
• Brunsson, Nils (2006). The Organization of Hypocrisy. Talk, Decisions and Actions in Organizations, 2nd ed. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget AS.
   Google Scholar
• Christoph, James B. (1993). ‘The Effects of Britons in Brussels: The European Community and the Culture of Whitehall’, Governance, 6:4, 518–37.10.1111/gove.1993.6.issue-4
   Google Scholar
• Cini, Michelle (2008). ‘European Commission Reform and the Origins of the European Transparency Initiative’, Journal of European Public Policy, 15:5, 743–60.10.1080/13501760802133245
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corporate Europe Observatory (2014). Leaked Draft Commission Work Programme 2015. 15 December 2014, available at https://corporateeurope.org/power-lobbies/2014/12/leaked-draft-commission-work-programme-2015 (accessed 21 September 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Curtin, Deirdre (2014). ‘Overseeing Secrets in the EU: A Democratic Perspective’, JCMS, 52:3, 684–700.
   Google Scholar
• Egeberg, Morten (2012). ‘Experiments in Supranational Institution-Building: The European Commission as a Laboratory’, Journal of European Public Policy, 19:6, 939–50.10.1080/13501763.2012.681456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• EU Staff Regulations (1962). ‘Regulation No 31 (EEC), 11 (EAEC) Laying down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Economic Community and the European Atomic Energy Community; OJ 1385/62. 14.6.62.
   Google Scholar
• EU Staff Regulations (2017). Consolidated Version of EU Staff Regulation (1962), Document 01962R0031-20170101, 1.1.2017.
   Google Scholar
• EurActiv (2016). ‘EU’s “Anti-Leaks Strategy” Leaked’, by Jorge Valero on 27 Sep 2016 (Updated on 28 Sep 2016), available at http://www.euractiv.com/section/trade-society/news/eus-anti-leaks-strategy-leaked/ (accessed 21 September 2017).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2010a). ‘Minutes of the 1919th Meeting of the Commission’, 26 May 2010. PV(2010)1919.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2010b). ‘Minutes of the 1935th Meeting of the Commission’, 9 November 2010. PV(2010)1935.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2012a). Email Sent by Catherine Day (SG) to Paola Testori Coggi (SANCO) under the Subject Line “Tobacco Products Directive”, 23 September 2012; Ares(2013)295261, available at https://www.asktheeu.org/en/request/393/response/1190/attach/5/Pauling%202013%201016%20annex.pdf (accessed 21 September 2017).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2012b). ‘Minutes of the 1990th Meeting of the Commission’, 14 February 2012. PV(2012)1990.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2014). ‘Minutes of the 2110th Meeting of the Commission’, 16 December 2014. PV(2014)2110.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2015a). ‘Minutes of the 2111th Meeting of the Commission’, 13 January 2015. PV(2015)2111.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2015b). ‘Commission Decision (EU, Euratom) 2015/443 of 13 March 2015 on Security in the Commission’, OJ L 72, 17.3.2015.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2015c). ‘Commission Decision (EU, Euratom) 2015/444 of 13 March 2015 on the Security Rules for Protecting EU Classified Information’, OJ L 72, 17.3.2015.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2016). ‘Meeting of Directors-General, Thursday 10 March 2016’, SEC(2016)142, 10.3.2016.
   Google Scholar
• European Union (2001). ‘Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2001 regarding Public Access to European Parliament, Council and Commission Documents’, OJ L 145, 31.5.2001.
   Google Scholar
• Fenster, Mark (2014). ‘The Implausibility of Secrecy’, 65 Hastings L.J. 309, available at http://scholarship.law.ufl.edu/facultypub/347 (accessed 21 September 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, Kathryn (2006). ‘Covert Disclosures - Unauthorized Leaking, Public Officials and the Public Sphere’, Journalism Studies, 7:2, 256–73.10.1080/14616700500533577
   Google Scholar
• Flynn, Kathryn (2011). ‘The Practice and Politics of Leaking’, Social Alternatives, 30:1, 24–28.
   Google Scholar
• Galloway, David (2014). ‘Classifying Secrets in the EU’, JCMS, 52:3, 668–83.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, Klaus H., and Ronny Patz (2016). ‘Pressured Budgets and the European Commission: Towards a More Centralized EU Budget Administration?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 23:7, 1038–56.10.1080/13501763.2016.1162835
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grønbech-Jensen, Carsten (1998). ‘The Scandinavian Tradition of Open Government and the European Union: Problems of Compatibility?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 5:1, 185–99.10.1080/13501768880000091
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartlapp, Miriam, Julia Metz, and Christian Rauh (2013). ‘Linking Agenda Setting to Coordination Structures: Bureaucratic Politics inside the European Commission’, Journal of European Integration, 35:4, 425–41.10.1080/07036337.2012.703663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Herrman, John (2017). ‘The Media’s Risky Love Affair with Leaks’, New York Times Magazine, 6 February 2017, available at https://www.nytimes.com/2017/02/06/magazine/the-medias-risky-love-affair-with-leaks.html (accessed 21 September 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Herrmann, Christoph (2015). ‘Transleakancy’, in Christoph Herrmann, Bruno Simma, and Rudolf Streinz (eds.), Trade Policy between Law, Diplomacy and Scholarship. Liber Amicorum in Memoriam of Horst G. Krenzler, Cham, Heidelberg, New York, Dordrecht, London: Springer, 39–46.10.1007/978-3-319-15690-3
   Google Scholar
• Hillebrandt, Maarten, and Stéphanie Novak (2016). ‘“Integration without Transparency”? Reliance on the Space to Think in the European Council and Council’, Journal of European Integration, 38:5, 527–40.10.1080/07036337.2016.1178249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, Christopher (2010). ‘Accountability and Transparency: Siamese Twins, Matching Parts, Awkward Couple?’, West European Politics, 33:5, 989–1009.10.1080/01402382.2010.486122
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustedt, Thurid, and Markus Seyfried (2016). ‘Co-ordination across Internal Organizational Boundaries: How the EU Commission Co-ordinates Climate Policies’, Journal of European Public Policy, 23:6, 888–905.10.1080/13501763.2015.1074605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustedt, Thurid, and Markus Seyfried (2017). ‘Inside the EU Commission: Evidence on the Perceived Relevance of the Secretariat General in Climate Policy-Making’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, doi:10.1111/jcms.12605.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IDOC (2009). ‘Activity Report of the Investigation and Disciplinary Office of the Commission (IDOC). 2009’, European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• IDOC (2011). ‘Activity Report of the Investigation and Disciplinary Office of the Commission (IDOC). 2011’, European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• IDOC (2015). ‘Activity Report of the Investigation and Disciplinary Office of the Commission (IDOC). 2015’, European Commission.
   Google Scholar
• de Jong, Jurgen, and Michiel de Vries, (2007). ‘Towards Unlimited Transparency? Morals and Facts concerning Leaking to the Press by Public Officials in the Netherlands’, Public Administration and Development, 27:3, 215–25.10.1002/(ISSN)1099-162X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassim, Hussein, John Peterson, Michael B. Bauer, Sara Connolly, Renaud Dehousse, Liesbet Hooghe, and Andrew Thompson (2013). The European Commission of the Twenty-First Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199599523.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Kassim, Hussein, Sarah Connolly, Renaud Dehousse, Oliver Rozenberg, and Selma Bendjaballah (2017). ‘Managing the House: The Presidency, Agenda Control and Policy Activism in the European Commission’, Journal of European Public Policy, 24:5, 653–74.10.1080/13501763.2016.1154590
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moodie, John R. (2016). ‘Resistant to Change? The European Commission and Expert Group Reform’, West European Politics, 39:2, 229–56.10.1080/01402382.2015.1041824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nastase, Andreea (2017). Public Ethics at the European Commission, Politics, Reform and Individual Views. London and New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nastase, Andreea (2014). ‘Catering to Organizational Needs in Ethics Management: The Case of the European Commission’, International Journal of Public Administration, 37:2, 93–105.10.1080/01900692.2013.836668
   Google Scholar
• New York Times (2017). ‘Leak Investigations Triple under Trump, Sessions Says’, NYT of 4 August 2017, by Charlie Savage and Eileen Sullivan, available at https://www.nytimes.com/2017/08/04/us/politics/jeff-sessions-trump-leaks-attorney-general.html (accessed 21 September 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Patz, Ronny (2014). ‘Information Flows in the Context of EU Policy-Making: Affiliation Networks and the Post-2012 Reform of the EU’s Common Fisheries Policy’, Doctoral Thesis, available at https://publishup.uni-potsdam.de/frontdoor/index/index/docId/6824.
   Google Scholar
• Patz, Ronny (2016). ‘‘Just the TTIP of the Iceberg? Dynamics and Effects of Information Leaks in EU Politics’, European Journal of Risk Regulation, 7:2, 242–46.10.1017/S1867299X00005614
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patz, Ronny (2017). ‘Bureaucratic Politics and the Prevention of Leaks in the European Commission’, SocArXiv, 28 Feb. 2017, https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/F59Z4.
   Google Scholar
• Perera, Mark, Louis Hancisse, Amanda McMenamin, and Ronny Patz (2014). The European Union Integrity System. Brussel: Transparency International EU Office, available at https://transparency.eu/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/EU_Integrity_System_Report.pdf (accessed 21 September 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Politico Europe (2017). ‘POLITICO Brussels Influence: Brexit Means Business – Biofuel Battles – Fleishman Overhaul’, 7 April 2017, available at http://www.politico.eu/newsletter/politico-brussels-influence/politico-brussels-influence-brexit-means-business-biofuel-battles-fleishman-overhaul/ (accessed 21 September 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Pozen, David E. (2013). ‘The Leaky Leviathan: Why the Government Condemns and Condones Unlawful Disclosures of Information’, Harvard Law Review, 127:2, 512–635.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prémon, Karine (2010). ‘L’incidence Des Fuites Non-Autorisées Sur La Politique étrangère Des États-Unis. Stratégie D’influence Bureaucratique Ou Coup D’épée Dans L’eau?’, Doctoral Thesis, Université du Québec à Montreal, March 2010, available at http://www.archipel.uqam.ca/2877/1/D1904.pdf (accessed 21 September 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Prémon, Karine (2012). Les Secrets De La Maison-Blanche: L’impact Des Fuites D’informations Confidentielles Sur La Politique étrangère Des États-Unis. Montreal: Presses de l’Université de Québec.
   Google Scholar
• Reich, Zvi (2008). ‘The Anatomy of Leaks, Tracing the Path of Unauthorised Disclosure in the Israeli Press’, Journalism, 9:5, 555–81.10.1177/1464884908094159
   Google Scholar
• Reich, Zvi, and Aviv Barnoy (2016). ‘The Anatomy of Leaking in the Age of Megaleaks’, Digital Journalism, 4:7, 886–98.10.1080/21670811.2016.1168706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittberger, Berthold, and Klaus H. Goetz (2017). ‘Secrecy in Europe’, West European Politics.
   Google Scholar
• Rosén, Guri (2015). ‘EU Confidential: The European Parliament’s Involvement in EU Security and Defence Policy’, JCMS, 53:2, 383–98.
   Google Scholar
• Spörer-Wagner, Doreen, and Frank Marcinkowski (2010). ‘Is Talk Always Silver and Silence Golden?’, Javnost – The Public, 17:2, 5–26.10.1080/13183222.2010.11009028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willard Report (1982). ‘Report of the Interdepartmental Group on Unauthorized Disclosures of Classified Information’, March 31, 1982, available at https://fas.org/sgp/library/willard.pdf (accessed 21 September 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Wille, Anchrit (2013). The Normalization of the European Commission: Politics and Bureaucracy in the EU Executive. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199665693.001.0001
   Google Scholar