Party politics, institutions, and identity: the dynamics of regional venue shopping in the EU

References

• Bache, Ian, Stephen George, and R. A. W. Rhodes (1996). ‘The European Union, Cohesion Policy, and Subnational Authorities in the United Kingdom’, in Liesbet Hooghe (ed.), Cohesion Policy and European Integration: Building Multi-Level Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 754–319.
   Google Scholar
• Bauer, Michael W. (2006). ‘The German Länder and the European Constitutional Treaty — Heading for a Differentiated Theory of Regional Elite Support for European Integration’, Regional & Federal Studies, 16:1, 21–41.10.1080/13597560500526152
   Google Scholar
• Beyers, Jan, and Peter Bursens (2013). ‘How Europe Shapes the Nature of the Belgian Federation: Differentiated EU Impact Triggers Both Co-Operation and Decentralization’, Regional & Federal Studies, 23:3, 271–291.10.1080/13597566.2013.773898
   Google Scholar
• Beyers, Jan, and Tom Donas (2014). ‘Inter-Regional Networks in Brussels: Analyzing the Information Exchanges among Regional Offices’, European Union Politics, 15:4, 547–571.10.1177/1465116514536269
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beyers, Jan, Tom Donas, and Bert Fraussen (2015). ‘‘No Place like Home? Explaining Venue Selection of Regional Offices in Brussels’, Journal of European Public Policy, 22:5, 589–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolleyer, Nicole, and Evelyn Bytzek (2009). ‘Government Congruence and Intergovernmental Relations in Federal Systems’, Regional & Federal Studies, 19:3, 371–397.10.1080/13597560902957484
   Google Scholar
• Bolleyer, Nicole, Wilfried Swenden, and Nicola McEwen (2014). ‘Constitutional Dynamics and Partisan Conflict: A Comparative Assessment of Multi-Level Systems in Europe’, Comparative European Politics, 12:4-5, 531–555.10.1057/cep.2014.12
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bomberg, Elizabeth, and John Peterson (1998). ‘European Union Decision Making: The Role of Sub-National Authorities’, Political Studies, 46:2, 219–235.10.1111/1467-9248.00137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, Tanja (2002). States and Regions in the European Union: Institutional Adaptation in Germany and Spain. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bourne, Angela (2003). ‘The Impact of European Integration on Regional Power’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 41:4, 597–620.10.1111/jcms.2003.41.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brigevich, Anna (2012). ‘Pairing up or Pairing down? Exploring Regional Identity Combinations in the EU’, Council for European Studies Conference, Boston, 42.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, Adam W. (2013). ‘Regional Authority, Transnational Lobbying and the Allocation of Structural Funds in the European Union’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 51:5, 815–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Däubler, Thomas, Jochen Müller, and Christian Stecker (2017). ‘Assessing Democratic Representation in Multi-level Democracies’, West European Politics, doi:10.1080/01402382.2017.1409498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donas, Tom, and Jan Beyers (2013). ‘How Regions Assemble in Brussels: The Organizational Form of Territorial Representation in the European Union’, Publius: The Journal of Federalism, 43:4, 527–550.10.1093/publius/pjs042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Donas, Tom, Bert Fraussen, and Jan Beyers (2014). ‘It’s Not All about the Money: Explaining Varying Policy Portfolios of Regional Representations in Brussels’, Interest Groups & Advocacy, 3:1, 79–98.10.1057/iga.2013.15
   Google Scholar
• Dür, Andreas, and Gemma Mateo (2014). ‘The Europeanization of Interest Groups: Group Type, Resources and Policy Area’, European Union Politics, 15:4, 572–594.10.1177/1465116514532556
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwood, Justin (2011). ‘Actors of the Common Interest? The Brussels Offices of the Regions’, Journal of European Integration, 33:4, 437–451.10.1080/07036337.2011.579749
   Google Scholar
• Hepburn, Eve, ed. (2010a). New Challenges for Stateless Nationalist and Regionalist Parties. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hepburn, Eve (2010b). Using Europe: Territorial Party Strategies in a Multi-Level System. Manchester, NH: Manchester University Press.10.7228/manchester/9780719081385.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Hocking, Brian (1997). ‘Regionalism: An International Relations Perspective’, in Michael Keating and John Loughlin (eds.), The Political Economy of Regionalism. London: Frank Cass, 90–111.
   Google Scholar
• Högenauer, Anna-Lena (2014a). ‘‘All by Themselves? Legislative Regions and the Use of Unmediated Access to the European Level’, European Political Science Review, 6:03, 451–475.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Högenauer, Anna-Lena (2014b). ‘The Limits of Territorial Interest Representation in the European Union’, Territory, Politics, Governance, 3:2, 147–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet (1995). ‘Subnational Mobilization in the European Union’, West European Politics, 18:3, 175–198.10.1080/01402389508425097
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks (1996). ‘“Europe with the Regions”: Channels of Regional Representation in the European Union’, Publius, 26:1, 73–92.10.1093/oxfordjournals.pubjof.a029841
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, Gary Marks, and Arjan Schakel (2008). ‘Operationalizing Regional Authority: A Coding Scheme for 42 Countries, 1950-2006’, Regional & Federal Studies, 18:2-3, 123–142.10.1080/13597560801979480
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, Gary Marks, and Arjan H. Schakel (2010). The Rise of Regional Authority: A Comparative Study of 42 democracies. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jeffery, Charlie (2000). ‘Sub-National Mobilization and European Integration: Does It Make Any Difference?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 38:1, 1–23.10.1111/jcms.2000.38.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffery, Charlie (2007). ‘A Regional Rescue of the Nation-State: Changing Regional Perspectives on Europe’, Europa Institute Mitchell Working Paper Series:5, 1–16.
   Google Scholar
• Keating, Michael (2004). ‘Regions and the Convention on the Future of Europe’, South European Society and Politics, 9:1, 192–207.10.1080/13608740410001681479
   Google Scholar
• Keating, Michael (2013). Rescaling the European State: The Making of Territory and the Rise of the Meso. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199691562.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Keating, Michael, Liesbet Hooghe, and Michaël Tatham (2015). ‘Bypassing the Nation-State? Regions and the EU Policy Process’, in Jeremy Richardson and Sonia Mazey (eds.), European Union: Power and Policy-Making, 4th ed. Abingdon: Routledge, 445–466.
   Google Scholar
• Kemmerling, Achim, and Thilo Bodenstein (2006). ‘Partisan Politics in Regional Redistribution: Do Parties Affect the Distribution of EU Structural Funds across Regions?’, European Union Politics, 7:3, 373–392.10.1177/1465116506066264
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüver, Heike (2011). ‘The Contextual Nature of Lobbying: Explaining Lobbying Success in the European Union’, European Union Politics, 12:4, 483–506.10.1177/1465116511413163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• López, Facundo A. Santiago, and Michaël Tatham (2017). ‘Regionalisation with Europeanisation? The Rescaling of Interest Groups in Multi-Level Systems’, Journal of European Public Policy, OnlineFirst.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, Peter (2004). ‘Euro-Commentary: Regions and the Convention on the Future of Europe: A Dialogue with the Deaf?’, European Urban and Regional Studies, 11:2, 170–177.10.1177/0969776404041423
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mabellini, Stefania (2005). ‘Observations and Final Proposals’, in Instituto di Studi sui Sistemi Regionali Federali e sulle Autonomie (ed.), Procedures for Local and Regional Authority Participation in European Policy Making in the Member States. Luxembourg: Committee of the Regions, 281–296.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, Gary (1996). ‘Exploring and Explaining Variation in EU Cohesion Policy’, in Liesbet Hooghe (ed.), Cohesion Policy and European Integration: Building Multi-Level Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 388–422.
   Google Scholar
• Marks, Gary, François Nielsen, Leonard Ray, and Jane Salk (1996). ‘Competencies, Cracks, and Conflicts: Regional Mobilization in the European Union’, Comparative Political Studies, 29:2, 164–192.10.1177/0010414096029002002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marks, Gary, Richard Haesly, and Heather Mbaye (2002). ‘What Do Subnational Offices Think They Are Doing in Brussels?’, Regional and Federal Studies, 12:3, 1–23.10.1080/714004755
   Google Scholar
• Moore, Carolyn (2008). ‘Beyond Conditionality? Regions from the New EU Member States and Their Activities in Brussels’, Comparative European Politics, 6:2, 212–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neshkova, Milena I. (2014). ‘Salience and Complexity in Supranational Policymaking: The Case of Subnational Interests’, Governance, 27:1, 9–36.10.1111/gove.2014.27.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noferini, Andrea (2012). ‘The Participation of Subnational Governments in the Council of the EU: Some Evidence from Spain’, Regional and Federal Studies, 22:4, 361–385.10.1080/13597566.2012.677138
   Google Scholar
• Pollack, Mark (1995). ‘Regional Actors in an Intergovernmental Play: The Making and Implementation of EC Structural Policy’, in Carolyn Rhodes and Sonia Mazey (eds.), The State of the European Union. London: Longman, 361–390.
   Google Scholar
• Schakel, Arjan H., and Emanuele Massetti (2017). ‘A World of Difference: The Sources of Regional Government Composition and Alternation’, West European Politics, doi: 10.1080/01402382.2017.1400237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatham, Michaël (2008). ‘Going Solo: Direct Regional Representation in the European Union’, Regional and Federal Studies, 18:5, 493–515.10.1080/13597560802351523
   Google Scholar
• Tatham, Michaël (2010). ‘‘with or without You? Revisiting Territorial State-Bypassing in EU Interest Representation’, Journal of European Public Policy, 17:1, 76–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatham, Michaël (2011). ‘Devolution and EU Policy-Shaping: Bridging the Gap between Multi-Level Governance and Liberal Intergovernmentalism’, European Political Science Review, 3:01, 53–81.10.1017/S1755773910000329
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatham, Michaël (2013). ‘Paradiplomats against the State: Explaining Conflict in State and Sub-State Interest Representation in Brussels’, Comparative Political Studies, 46:1, 63–94.10.1177/0010414012453031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatham, Michaël (2015). ‘Regional Voices in the European Union: Subnational Influence in Multilevel Politics’, International Studies Quarterly, 59:2, 387–400.10.1111/isqu.2015.59.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatham, Michaël (2016). With, without, or against the State? How European Regions Play the Brussels Game. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198758624.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Tatham, Michaël (2017). ‘Networkers, Fund-Hunters, Intermediaries, or Policy Players? The Activities of Regions in Brussels’, West European Politics, 40:5, 1088–1108.10.1080/01402382.2017.1303246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatham, Michaël, and Michael W. Bauer (2014). ‘Competence Ring-Fencing from below? The Drivers of Regional Demands for Control over Upwards Dispersion’, Journal of European Public Policy, 21:9, 1367–1385.10.1080/13501763.2014.923017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tatham, Michaël, and Mads Thau (2014). ‘The More the Merrier: Accounting for Regional Paradiplomats in Brussels’, European Union Politics, 15:2, 255–276.10.1177/1465116513512539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tosun, Jale, and Ulrich Hartung (2017). ‘Decentralising Competences in Multi-level Systems: Insights From the Regulation of Genetically Modified Organisms’, West European Politics, doi: 10.1080/01402382.2017.1395253.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Hecke, Matti, Peter Bursens, and Jan Beyers (2016). ‘‘You’ll Never Lobby Alone. Explaining the Participation of Sub-National Authorities in the European Commission’s Open Consultations’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 54:6, 1433–1448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar