Contestation and co-optation: why secrecy in EU external relations varies

References

• Abazi, Vigjilenza, and Maarten Hillebrandt (2015). ‘The Legal Limits to Confidential Negotiations: Recent Case Law Developments in Council Transparency: Access Info Europe and In’t Veld’, Common Market Law Review, 52:3, 826–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bieber, Roland (2002). ‘Democratic Control of International Relations of the European Union’, in Enzo Cannizzaro (ed.), The European Union as an Actor in International Relations. The Hague: Kluwer Law International, 105–116.
   Google Scholar
• Bjurulf, Bo, and Olle Elgström (2004). ‘Negotiating Transparency: The Role of Institutions’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 42:2, 249–69.10.1111/jcms.2004.42.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Born, Hans, and Marina Caparini, eds. (2007). Democratic Control of Intelligence Services. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Born, Hans, and Heiner Hänggi (2005). ‘The Use of Force under International Auspices: Strengthening Parliamentary Accountability’, DCAF Policy Paper no. 7. Geneva: Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces.
   Google Scholar
• Bornemann, Lukas, Sarah Denzel, and Enrico Nadbath (2016) ‘The 2014 Interinstitutional Agreement: Why Did the Council Open Its Fortress of Classified Information?’, PACO Working Papers, WP01. https://ghum.kuleuven.be/ggs/projects/paco/research#workingpapers
   Google Scholar
• Bourbeau, Philippe (2014). ‘Moving Forward Together: Logics of Securitisation Process’, Milllennium: Journal of International Studies, 43:1, 187–206.10.1177/0305829814541504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colaresi, Michael (2014). Democracy Declassified. The Secrecy Dilemma in National Security. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199389773.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, Richard (2012). ‘The Evolving Roles of the European Parliament and of National Parliaments’, in A. Biondi, P. Eeckhout, and S. Ripley (eds.), EU Law after Lisbon. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 249–62.
   Google Scholar
• Corbett, Richard, Francis Jacobs, and Michael Shackelton (2007). The European Parliament, 7th ed. London: John Harper Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Coremans, Evelyn (2017). ‘From Access to Documents to Consumption of Information: The European Commission Transparency Policy for the TTIP Negotiations’, Politics and Governance, 5:3, 29–39.10.17645/pag.v5i3.1022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtin, Deidre (2014). ‘Overseeing Secrets in the EU: A Demcratic Perspective’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 52:3, 684–700.10.1111/jcms.2014.52.issue-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Devuyst, Youri (2014). ‘The European Parliament and International Trade Agreements: Practice after the Lisbon Treaty’, in Inge Govaere, Erwan Lannon, Peter van Elsuwege and Stanislas Adam (eds.), The European Union in the World. Leiden: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, 171–89.
   Google Scholar
• Elsea, Jennifer (2017). ‘The Protection of Classified Information: The Legal Framework’, Congressional Research Service, May 18.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksen, Erik Oddvar (1999). ‘Towards a Logic of Justification. on the Possibility of Post-National Solidarity’, in Egeberg, Morten, and Per Lægreid (eds.), Organizing Political Institutions. Essays for Johan P. Olsen. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press, 215–44.
   Google Scholar
• EU Observer (2010). Secret Documents Was like ‘Bad Le Carre Novel’, MEP Says, 18/11/2010.
   Google Scholar
• Farrell, Henry, and Adrienne Héritier (2003). ‘Institutions under Codecision: Continuous Constitution-Building in Europe’, Governance, 16:4, 577–600.10.1111/gove.2003.16.issue-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farrell, Henry, and Adrienne Héritier (2007). ‘Introduction: Contested Competences in the European Union’, West European Politics, 30:2, 227–43.10.1080/01402380701238741
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, Thomas M., and Edward Weisband, eds. (1974). Secrecy and Foreign Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goetz, Klaus, and Berthold Rittberger (2018). ‘Secrecy and European Politics’, West European Politics.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heliskoski, Joni, and Leino, Päivi (2006). ‘Darkness at the Break of Noon: The Case Law on Regulation No. 1049/2001 on Access to Documents’, Common Market Law Review, 43:3, 735–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill, Christopher (2003). The Changing Politics of Foreign Policy. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Hillebrandt, Maarten (2017). Living Transparency: The Development of Access to Documents in the Council of the EU and Its Democratic Implications, PhD-thesis, University of Amsterdam.
   Google Scholar
• Hillebrandt, Maarten, Deidre Curtin, and Albert Meijer (2014). ‘Transparency in the EU Council of Ministers: An Institutional Analysis’, European Law Journal, 20:1, 1–20.10.1111/eulj.2014.20.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hix, Simon (2002). ‘Constitutional Agenda-Setting through Discretion in Rule Interpretation: Why the European Parliament Won at Amsterdam’, British Journal of Political Science, 32, 259–80.10.1017/S0007123402000108
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hix, Simon, and Bjørn Høyland (2014). ‘Political Behaviour in the European Parliament’, in Shane Martin, Thomas Saalfeld, and Kaare Strøm (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 591–608.
   Google Scholar
• Hood, Christopher, and David Heald (2006). Transparency: The Key to Better Governance?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.5871/bacad/9780197263839.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• House of Lords (2001). ‘Access to Documents: The Council Decision of 14 August 2000’, Select Committee on Eurpean Union, Eight Report, 06/02/2001.
   Google Scholar
• Huysmans, J. (2014). Security Unbound. Enacting Democratic Limits. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jancic, Davor (2017). ‘TTIP and Legislative–Executive Relations in EU Trade Policy’, West European Politics, 40:1, 202–21.10.1080/01402382.2016.1240407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson, Loch K. (ed.) (2007). Handbook of Intelligence Studies. Abingdon: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Jørgensen, Oluf (2014). Access to Information in the Nordic Countries. Gothenburg: Nordicom.
   Google Scholar
• Jupille, Joseph, James A. Caparoso, and Jeffrey T. Checkel (2013). ‘Integrating Institutions: Rationalism, Constructivism, and the Study of the European Union’, Comparative Political Studies, 36:7, 7–40.
   Google Scholar
• Kibbe, Jennifer (2010). ‘Congressional Oversight of Intelligence: Is the Solution Part of the Problem?’, Intelligence and National Security, 25:1, 24–49.10.1080/02684521003588104
   Google Scholar
• Kucik, Jeffrey, and Krzysztof J. Pelc (2015). ‘Measuring the Cost of Privacy: A Look at the Distributional Effects of Private Bargaining’, British Journal of Political Science, 46:4, 861–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de fine Licht, Jenny, Daniel Naurin, Peter Esaiasson, and Mikael Gilljam (2014). ‘When Does Transparency Generate Legitimacy? Experimenting on a Context-Bound Relationship’, Governance, 27:1, 111–34.10.1111/gove.2014.27.issue-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagassé, Philippe, and Stephen M. Saidemann (2017). ‘Public Critic or Secretive Monitor: Party Objectives and Legislative Oversight of the Military in Canada’, West European Politics, 40:1, 119–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lester, Genevieve (2015). When Should State Secrets Stay Secret? Accountability, Democratic Governance, and Intelligence. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maurer, A. (2015). ‘Comparative Study on Access to Documents (and Confidentiality Rules) in International Negotiations’, Study for the European Parliament, PE 549.033.
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, Johan P. (2009). ‘Change and Continuity: An Institutional Approach to Institutions of Democratic Government’, European Political Science Review, 1:1, 3–32.10.1017/S1755773909000022
   Google Scholar
• Olsen, Johan P. (2010). Governing through Institution Building. Institutional Theory and Recent Experiments in Democratic Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199593934.001.0001
   Google Scholar
• Ostermann, Falk (2017). ‘France’s Reluctant Parliamentarisation of Military Deployments: The 2008 Constitutional Reform in Practice’, West European Politics, 40:1, 101–18.10.1080/01402382.2016.1244751
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, Dirk, and Wolfgang Wagner (2014). ‘Executive Privilege or Parliamentary Proviso? Exploring the Sources of Parliamentary War Powers’, Armed Forces and Society, 40:2, 310–31.10.1177/0095327X12472878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pozen, David (2010). ‘Deep Secrecy’, Stanford Law Review, 62:2, 257–339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raube, Kolja (2012). ‘The European External Action Service and the European Parliament’, The Hague Journal of Diplomacy, 7:1, 65–80.10.1163/187119112X614657
   Google Scholar
• Raunio, T. (2014). ‘Legislature and Foreign Policy’, in Shane Martin, Thomas Saalfeld, and Kaare Strøm (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Legislative Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 543–66.
   Google Scholar
• Raunio, Tapio, and Wolfgang Wagner (2017). ‘Towards Parliamentarization of Foreign and Security Policy?’, West European Politics, 40:1, 1–19.10.1080/01402382.2016.1240411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reichard, Martin (2006). The EU-NATO Relationship: A Legal and Political Perspective. Aldershot: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Rittberger, Berthold (2012). ‘Institutionalizing Representative Democracy in the European Union: The Case of the European Parliament’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 50:4, 18–37.10.1111/jcms.2012.50.issue-s1
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, Alasdair (2006). Blacked out. Government Secrecy in the Information Age, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9781139165518
   Google Scholar
• Rosén, Guri (2015). ‘EU Confidential: The European Parliament’s Involvement in EU Security and Defence Policy’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 53:2, 383–98.10.1111/jcms.2015.53.issue-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosén, Guri (2017). ‘The Impact of Norms on Political Decision-making: How to Account for the European Parliament’s Empowerment in EU External Trade Policy’, Journal of European Public Policy, 24:10, 1450–70.10.1080/13501763.2016.1227357
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosén, Guri, and Anne Elizabeth Stie (2017). ‘Not Worth the Net Worth? The Democratic Dilemmas of Privileged Access to Information’, Politics and Governance, 5:3, 51–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rubin, Irene (2007). ‘The Great Unraveling: Federal Budgeting, 1998-2006’, Public Administration Review, 67:4, 608–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheppele, Kim (1988). Legal Secrets: Equality and Efficiency in the Common Law. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sjursen, H. (2011). ‘The EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy: The Quest for Democracy’, Journal of European Public Policy, 11:8, 1069–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasavage, David (2004). ‘‘Open-Door or Closed-Door? Transparency in Domestic and International Bargaining’, International Organization, 58:4, 667–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallberg, Jonas (2006). Leadership and Negotiation in the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511492075
   Google Scholar
• Tappert, Malin (2003). ‘European Parliament Resigned to Limited Oversight of ESDP?’, European Security Review, 16: February. Brussels: ISIS Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson, Dennis F. (1999). ‘Democratic Secrecy’, Political Science Quarterly, 114:2, 181–93.10.2307/2657736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wills, Aidan, and Mathias Vermeulen (2011). ‘Parliamentary Oversight of Security and Intelligence Agencies in the European Union’, Study for the European Parliament, PE 453.207.
   Google Scholar