Political leadership in times of crisis: the Commission presidency of Jean-Claude Juncker

References

• Barber, James David (1992). The Presidential Character: Predicting Performance in the White House. 4th ed. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bickerton, Christopher (2012). European Integration: From Nation-States to Member States. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bickerton, Christopher, Dermot Hodson, and Uwe Puetter (2015). ‘The New Intergovernmentalism: European Integration in the Post-Maastricht Era’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 53:4, 703–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blondel, Jean (1987). Political Leadership: Towards a General Analysis. London: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Bulmer, Simon (2014). ‘Germany and the Eurozone Crisis: Between Hegemony and Domestic Politics’, West European Politics, 37:6, 1244–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürgin, Alexander (2018). ‘Intra- and Inter-Institutional Leadership of the Commission President: An Assessment of Juncker’s Organizational Reforms’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 56:4, 837–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns, James MacGregor (1978). Leadership. New York: Harper & Row.
   Google Scholar
• Chalmers, Damian, Markus Jachtenfuchs, and Christian Joerges, eds. (2016). The End of the Eurocrats’ Dream. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, Thomas (2016). ‘After the Spitzenkandidaten: Fundamental Change in the EU’s Political System?’, West European Politics, 39:5, 992–1010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cini, Michelle (2008). ‘Political Leadership in the European Commission: The Santer and Prodi Commissions, 1995–2005’, in Jack Hayward (ed.), Leaderless Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 113–30.
   Google Scholar
• Dinan, Desmond (2016). ‘Governance and Institutions: A More Political Commission’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 54, 101–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eckert, Sandra (2018). ‘The European Commission as a Negotiator: Evidence from the Disintegration Talks with the United Kingdom and Switzerland’, in Jörn Ege, Michael Bauer, and Stefan Becker (eds.), The European Commission in Turbulent Times: Assessing Organizational Change and Policy Impact. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 159–80.
   Google Scholar
• Elgie, Robert (1995). Political Leadership in Liberal Democracies. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Endo, Ken (1999). The Presidency of the European Commission under Jacques Delors: The Politics of Shared Leadership. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2015a). State of the European Union 2015, by Jean-Claude Juncker. 9 September 2015.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2015b). ‘Completing Europe’s Economic and Monetary Union’. Report by Jean-Claude Juncker in close cooperation with Donald Tusk, Jeroen Dijsselbloem, Mario Draghi, and Martin Schulz.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2017a). Relocation: EU Solidarity between Member States. Available at https://ec.europa.eu/home-affairs/sites/homeaffairs/files/what-we-do/policies/european-agenda-migration/20171114_relocation_eu_solidarity_between_member_states_en.pdf. (accessed 30 April 2019).
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2017b). ‘Reflection Paper on the Future of EU Finances’. Brussels COM(2017)358 of 28 June 2017.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2017c). ‘State of the Union 2017: Roadmap for a More United, Stronger and More Democratic Union’. Brussels.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2017d). ‘White Paper on the Future of Europe: Reflections and Scenarios for the EU27 by 2025’. Brussels COM(2017)2025 of 1 March 2017.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2018a). ‘A Modern Budget for a Union that Protects, Empowers and Defends’. The Multiannual Financial Framework for 2021-2027. Brussels 2.5.2018 COM(2018) 321 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2018b). ‘A New, Modern Multiannual Financial Framework for a European Union That Delivers Efficiently on Its Priorities Post 2020’. Brussels 14.2.2018 COM(2018) 98 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2018c). ‘Proposal for a Council Decision on the System of Own Resources of the European Union’. Brussels 2.5.2018 COM(2018) 321 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Commission (2018d). ‘Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and the Council on the Protection of the Union’s Budget in Case of Generalised Deficiencies as Regards the Rule of Law in the Member States’. Brussels 02.05.2018, COM(2018)324 final.
   Google Scholar
• European Council (2018). Conclusions. CO EUR 22 CONCL 7, Brussels 14 December 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Featherstone, Kevin (2016). ‘Conditionality, Democracy and Institutional Weakness: The Euro-Crisis Trilemma’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 54, 48–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helms, Ludger (2016). ‘Introduction: Leadership Questions in Transnational European Governance’, European Political Science, 16:1, 1–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodson, Dermot (2016). ‘Eurozone Governance: From the Greek Drama of 2015 to the Five Presidents’ Report’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 54, 150–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbeth, and Gary Marks (2009). ‘A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science, 39:1, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivan, Paul (2017). The Juncker Commission Past Mid-Term: Does the New Setup Work? Brussels: European Policy Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Juncker, Jean-Claude (2014). ‘A New Start for Europe: My Agenda for Jobs, Growth, Fairness and Democratic Change’. Opening Statement to the European Parliament Plenary Session, Strasbourg, 15 July 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Kassim, Hussein (2016). ‘What’s New? A First Appraisal of the Juncker Commission’, European Political Science, 16:1, 1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kassim, Hussein, John, Peterson, Michael W. Bauer, Sara Connolly, Liesbet Hooghe, Renaud Dehousse, and Andrew Thomson (2013). The European Commission of the Twenty-first Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kassim, Hussein, Sara Connolly, Renaud Dehousse, Olivier Rozenberg, and Selma Bendjaballah (2017). ‘Managing the House: The Presidency, Agenda Control and Policy Activism in the European Commission’, Journal of European Public Policy, 24:5, 653–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majone, Giandomenico (2016). ‘The Limits of Collective Action and Collective Leadership’, in Damian Chalmers, Markus Jachtenfuchs, and Christian Joerges (eds.), The End of the Eurocrats’ Dream. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 218–40.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, Eugene F. (1980). ‘What Does “Political” Mean?’, The Review of Politics, 42:1, 56–72.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Henriette (2016). ‘Between Potential, Performance and Prospect: Revisiting the Political Leadership of the EU Commission President’, Politics and Governance, 4:2, 68–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, Henriette (2017). ‘Setting Europe’s Agenda: The Commission Presidents and Political Leadership’, Journal of European Integration, 39:2, 129–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, Henriette (2019). Political Leadership and the EU Commission Presidency. Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Henriette, and Femke van Esch (2019). ‘The Contested Nature of Political Leadership in the European Union: Conceptual and Methodological Cross-Fertilisation’, West European Politics.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nugent, Neill (2001). The European Commission. Basingstoke/Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Nugent, Neill, and Mark Rhinard (2019). ‘The ‘Political’ Roles of the European Commission’, Journal of European Integration, 41:2, 203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nye, Joseph S. (2008). The Powers to Lead. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, John (2015). ‘The Commission and the New Intergovernmentalism: Calm within the Storm?’, in Christopher Bickerton, Dermot Hodson, and Uwe Puetter (eds.), The New Intergovernmentalism: States and Supranational Actors in the Post-Maastricht Era. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 185–207.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, John (2017). ‘Juncker’s Political European Commission and an EU in Crisis’, JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, 55:2, 349–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson, John (2018). ‘The EU Commission and Brexit: New Institutional Leadership?’ Paper prepared for the ECPR Standing Group on the EU, Paris 13-15 June 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Puetter, Uwe (2014). The European Council and the Council: New Intergovernmentalism and Institutional Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Russack, Sophia (2017). ‘How Is Juncker’s ‘Last Chance Commission’ Faring at Mid-Term?’, European Policy Analysis, 4. SIEPS (Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies).
   Google Scholar
• Sanjurjo Hanck, Pedro L. (2018). ‘A Purposeful Opportunist? The Juncker Commission and EMU Reform’. Bruges Political Research Papers, 72/2018.
   Google Scholar
• Schild, Joachim, and Ulrich Krotz (2013). Shaping Europe: France, Germany and Embedded Bilateralism from the Elysée Treaty to Twenty-First Century Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tömmel, Ingeborg (2013). ‘The Presidents of the European Commission: Transactional or Transforming Leaders?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 51:4, 789–805.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tömmel, Ingeborg (2017). ‘The Standing President of the European Council: Intergovernmental or Supranational Leadership?’, Journal of European Integration, 39:2, 175–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tömmel, Ingeborg (2018). ‘Political Leadership in Turbulent Times – The Commission Presidency of Jean Claude Juncker’, in Jörn Ege, Michael Bauer, and Stefan Becker (eds.), The European Commission in Turbulent Times: Assessing Organizational Change and Policy Impact. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 133–57.
   Google Scholar