2,546
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Collaborative leadership in EMU governance: a matter of cognitive proximity

&

References

  • Ansell, Chris, and Alison Gash (2007). ‘Collaborative Governance in Theory and Practice’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 18:4, 543–71.
  • Archer, David, and Alex Cameron (2013). Collaborative Leadership: Building Relationships, Handling Conflict and Sharing Control. New York: Routledge.
  • Avolio, Bruce J., Fred O. Walumbwa, and Todd J. Weber (2009). ‘Leadership: Current Theories, Research, and Future Directions’, Annual Review of Psychology, 60:1, 421–49.
  • Axelrod, Robert, ed. (1976). Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Bastian, Mathieu, Sebastien Heymann, and Mathieu Jacomy (2009). ‘Gephi: An Open Source Software for Exploring and Manipulating Networks’. International AAAI Conference on Weblogs and Social Media.
  • Bligh, Michelle (2017). ‘Leadership and Trust’, in Joan Marques and Satinder Dhiman (eds.), Leadership Today: Practices for Personal and Professional Performance. New York: Springer, 21–42.
  • Burns, James MacGregor (2010 [1978]). Leadership. New York: HarperCollins.
  • Chrislip, David D., and Carl E. Larson (1994). Collaborative Leadership: How Citizens and Civic Leaders Can Make A Difference. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Cramme, Olaf (2011). ‘In Search of Leadership’, in Loukas Tsoukalis and Janis A. Emmanouilidis (eds.), The Delphic Oracle on Europe: Is There a Future for the European Union? Oxford: Oxford University Press, 30–49.
  • Dinan, Desmond (2004). Europe Recast: A History of European Union. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Dinan, Desmond (2011). ‘Governance and Institutions: Implementing the Lisbon Treaty in the Shadow of the Euro Crisis’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 49:1, 103–21.
  • Dinan, Desmond (2016). ‘Governance and Institutions: A More Political Commission’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 54:1, 101–16.
  • Dullien, Sebastian, and Ulrike Guérot (2012). ‘The Long Shadow of Ordoliberalism: Germany’s Approach to the Euro Crisis’, ECFR Policy Brief, 49, 16.
  • Dyson, Kenneth (1999). ‘The Franco-German Relationship and Economic and Monetary Union: Using Europe to “Bind Leviathan”’, West European Politics, 22:1, 25–44.
  • Endo, Ken (1999). The Presidency of the European Commission Under Jacques Delors: The Politics of Shared Leadership. Oxford: Macmillan Press.
  • Fabbrini, Sergio, and Uwe Puetter (2016). ‘Integration without Supranationalisation: Studying the Lead Roles of the European Council and the Council in Post-Lisbon EU Politics’, Journal of European Integration, 38:5, 481–95.
  • Fletcher, Joyce K., and Katrin Käufer (2003). ‘Shared Leadership: Paradox and Possibility’, in Craig L. Pearce and Jay A. Conger (eds.), Shared Leadership: Reframing the Hows and Whys of Leadership. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, 22–47.
  • Germond, Carine (2013). ‘Dynamic Franco-German Duos: Giscard-Schmidt and Mitterrand-Kohl’, in Erik Jones, Anand Menon, and Stephen Weatherill (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of the European Union. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 14.
  • Gwet, Kilem L. (2014). Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability: The Definitive Guide to Measuring The Extent of Agreement Among Raters. Gaithersburg: Advanced Analytics.
  • Haas, Ernst B. (1958). The Uniting of Europe: Political, Social, and Economic Forces, 1950-1957. Standford: Stanford University Press.
  • Haas, Peter M. (1992). ‘Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination’, International Organization, 46:1, 1–35.
  • Krotz, Ulrich (2010). ‘Regularized Intergovernmentalism: France-Germany and beyond (1963 –2009)’, Foreign Policy Analysis, 6:2, 147–85.
  • Maestas, Cherie (2018). ‘Expert Surveys as a Measurement Tool: Challenges and New Frontiers’, in Lonna Rae Atkeson and R. Michael Alvarez (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Polling and Survey Methods. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 583–607.
  • Marfleet, B. Gregory (2000). ‘The Operational Code of John F. Kennedy during the Cuban Missile Crisis: A Comparison of Public and Private Rhetoric’, Political Psychology, 21:3, 545–58.
  • Moravcsik, Andrew (1999). ‘A New Statecraft? Supranational Entrepreneurs and International Cooperation’, International Organization, 53:2, 267–306.
  • Müller, Henriette (2019). Political Leadership and the European Commission Presidency. Oxford: Oxford University Press, forthcoming.
  • Müller, Henriette, and Femke A. W. J. Van Esch (2019). ‘The Contested Nature of Political Leadership in the European Union: Conceptual and Methodological Cross-Fertilisation’, West European Politics. doi:10.1080/01402382.2019.1678951
  • Müller, Henriette (2016). ‘Between Potential, Performance and Prospect: Revisiting the Political Leadership of the EU Commission President’, Politics and Governance, 4:2, 68–79.
  • Müller, Henriette (2017). ‘Setting Europe’s Agenda: The Commission Presidents and Political Leadership’, Journal of European Integration, 39:2, 129–42.
  • Nielsen, Bodil, and Sandrino Smeets (2018). ‘The Role of the EU Institutions in Establishing the Banking Union: Collaborative Leadership in the EMU Reform Process’, Journal of European Public Policy, 25:9, 1233–56.
  • O’Malley, Eoin (2007). ‘The Power of Prime Ministers: Results of an Expert Survey’, International Political Science Review, 28:1, 7–27.
  • Princen, Sebastiaan B. M., and Femke A. W. J. Van Esch (2016). ‘Paradigm Formation and Paradigm Change in the EU’s Stability and Growth Pact’, European Political Science Review, 8:3, 355–75.
  • Renshon, Jonathan (2008). ‘Stability and Change in Belief Systems: The Operational Code of George W. Bush’, Journal of Conflict Resolution, 52:6, 820–49.
  • Renshon, Jonathan (2009). ‘When Public Statements Reveal Private Beliefs: Assessing Operational Codes at a Distance’, Political Psychology, 30:4, 649–61.
  • Risse, Thomas (2015). ‘European Public Spheres, the Politicization of EU Affairs, and Its Consequences’, in Thomas Risse (ed.), European Public Spheres: Politics Is Back. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 141–64.
  • Sandholtz, Wayne, and John Zysman (1989). ‘1992: Recasting the European Bargain’, World Politics, 42:1, 95–128.
  • Schild, Joachim (2010). ‘Mission Impossible? The Potential for Franco–German Leadership in the Enlarged EU’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 48:5, 1367–90.
  • Schild, Joachim (2012). ‘Leadership in Hard Times: France, Germany and the Management of the Eurozone Crisis’, Paper Presented at the UACES Conference, 2–5 September, University of Passau.
  • Schoeller, Magnus G. (2018). ‘The Rise and Fall of Merkozy: Franco-German Bilateralism as a Negotiation Strategy in Eurozone Crisis Management’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 56:5, 1019–35.
  • Schoeller, Magnus G. (2019). ‘Tracing Leadership: The ECB’s “Whatever It Takes” and Germany in the Ukraine Crisis’, West European Politics. doi:10.1080/01402382.2019.1635801
  • Smeets, Sandrino, and Derek Beach (2019). ‘Political and Instrumental Leadership in Major EU Reforms: The Role and Influence of the EU Institutions in Setting up the Fiscal Compact’, Journal of European Public Policy, 1–19. doi:10.1080/13501763.2019.1572211
  • Swinkels, Marij (2019). ‘Beliefs of Political Leaders: Conditions for Change in the Eurozone Crisis’, West European Politics. doi:10.1080/01402382.2019.1635802
  • Tömmel, Ingeborg (2013). ‘The Presidents of the European Commission: Transactional or Transforming Leadership?’, Journal of Common Market Studies, 51:4, 789–805.
  • Tömmel, Ingeborg (2014). The European Union: What it is and How it Works. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Tömmel, Ingeborg (2019). ‘Political Leadership in Times of Crisis: The Commission Presidency of Jean-Claude Juncker’, West European Politics. doi:10.1080/01402382.2019.1646507
  • ‘t Hart Paul (2014). Understanding Public Leadership. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  • Van Esch, Femke A. W. J. (2007). ‘Mapping the Road to Maastricht. A Comparative Study of German and French Pivotal Decision Makers’ Preferences Concerning the Establishment of a European Monetary Union during the Early 1970s and Late 1980s’, unpublished PhD thesis, Radboud University Nijmegen, Faculty of Management Sciences.
  • Van Esch, Femke A. W. J. (2009). ‘The Rising of the Phoenix: Building the European Monetary System on a Meeting of Minds’, L’Europe en Formation, 3, 133–48.
  • Van Esch, Femke A. W. J. (2012). ‘Why Germany Wanted EMU: The Role of Helmut Kohl’s Belief System and the Fall of the Berlin Wall’, German Politics, 21:1, 34–52.
  • Van Esch, Femke A. W. J. (2014). ‘Exploring the Keynesian–Ordoliberal Divide: Flexibility and Convergence in French and German Leaders’ Economic Ideas during the Euro-Crisis’, Journal of Contemporary European Studies, 22:3, 288–302.
  • Van Esch, Femke A. W. J. (2017). ‘The Paradoxes of Legitimate EU Leadership: An Analysis of the Multi-Level Leadership of Angela Merkel and Alexis Tsipras during the Eurocrisis’, Journal of European Integration, 39:2, 223–37.
  • Van Esch, Femke A. W. J., L. Brand, M. C. Joosen, S. Steenman, J. F. A. Snellens, and E. M. Swinkels (2016). Cognitive Mapping Coding Manual. Deliverable 3.1 for the TRANSCRISIS Horizon2020 Project, available at: http://www.transcrisis.eu/publications. (accessed 20 April 2018).
  • Van Esch, Femke A. W. J., and Eelke de Jong (2019). ‘National Culture Trumps EU Socialization: The European Central Bankers’ Views of the Euro Crisis’, Journal of European Public Policy, 26:2, 169–87.
  • Verdun, Amy (1999). ‘The Role of the Delors Committee in the Creation of EMU: An Epistemic Community?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 6:2, 308–28.
  • Walter, Uta M., and Christopher G. Petr (2000). ‘A Template for Family-Centered Interagency Collaboration’, Families in Society: The Journal of Contemporary Human Services, 81:5, 494–503.
  • Webber, Douglas (1999). ‘Franco-German Bilateralism and Agricultural Politics in the European Union: The Neglected Level’, West European Politics, 22:1, 45–67.
  • Young, Brigitte (2012). ‘The German Debates on Eurozone Austerity Programs: The Economic Streit and the Power of Ordoliberalism’, Paper Presented at the EU after the Crisis Conference, 6–7 December, Weimar.
  • Young, Michael D., and Mark Schafer (1998). ‘Is There Method in Our Madness? Ways of Assessing Cognition in International Relations’, Mershon International Studies Review, 42:1, 63–96.