The effect of candidate electoral experience on ballot placement in list proportional representation systems

References

• Bensel, Richard F. (2004). The American Ballot Box in the Mid-Nineteenth Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Box-Steffensmeier, Janet M., and Bradford S. Jones (2006). Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carson, Jamie L., and Jason M. Roberts (2005). ‘Strategic Politicians and US House Elections, 1874–1914’, The Journal of Politics, 67:2, 474–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceyhan, Sara (2018). ‘‘Who Runs at the Top of Party Lists? Determinants of Parties’ List Ranking in the 2013 German Bundestag Election’, German Politics, 27:1, 66–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiru, Mihail, and Marina Popescu (2017). ‘The Value of Legislative versus Electoral Experience and Gender in Explaining Candidate List Placement in Closed-List PR’, Problems of Post-Communism, 64:2, 65–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crisp, Brian F., Santiago Olivella, Michael Malecki, and Mindy Sher (2013). ‘Vote-Earning Strategies in Flexible List Systems: Seats at the Price of Unity’, Electoral Studies, 32:4, 658–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debus, Marc, and Rosa M. Navarrete (2018). ‘Do Regional Party Primaries Affect the Ideological Cohesion of Political Parties in Multilevel Systems? Evidence from Spain’, Party Politics, 1–13. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1177/1354068818812200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desposato, Scott W. (2006). ‘Parties for Rent? Ambition, Ideology, and Party Switching in Brazil’s Chamber of Deputies’, American Journal of Political Science, 50:1, 62–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher, Michael, and Michael Marsh (1988). Candidate Selection in Comparative Perspective: The Secret Garden of Politics. London: Sage Publications Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Green, Donald P., and Jonathan S. Krasno (1988). ‘Salvation for the Spendthrift Incumbent: Reestimating the Effects of Campaign Spending in House Elections’, American Journal of Political Science, 32:4, 884–907.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gherghina, Sergiu, and Mihail Chiru (2010). ‘Practice and Payment: Determinants of Candidate List Position in European Parliament Elections’, European Union Politics, 11:4, 533–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hazan, Reuven Y., and Gideon Rahat (2010). Democracy Within Parties: Candidate Selection Methods and Their Political Consequences. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hobolt, Sara B., and Bjørn Høyland (2011). ‘Selection and Sanctioning in European Parliamentary Elections’, British Journal of Political Science, 41:3, 477–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horiuchi, Yusaku, Matthew Laing, and Paul ‘t Hart (2015). ‘Hard Acts to Follow’, Party Politics, 21:3, 357–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, Gary C. (1989). ‘Strategic Politicians and the Dynamics of US House Elections, 1946–86’, American Political Science Review, 83:3, 773–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson, Gary C., and Samuel Kernell (1983). Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luhiste, Maarja (2015). ‘Party Gatekeepers’ Support for Viable Female Candidacy in PR-List Systems’, Politics & Gender, 11:1, 89–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddens, Bart, Jef Smulders, and Wouter Wolfs (2019). De prijs van politiek: over de portefeuille van de partijen. Leuven: Lannoo Campus.
   Google Scholar
• Matland, Richard E., and Donley T. Studlar (2004). ‘Determinants of Legislative Turnover: A Cross-National Analysis’, British Journal of Political Science, 34:1, 87–108.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meserve, Stephen A., Daniel Pemstein, and William T. Bernhard (2020). ‘Gender, Incumbency and Party List Nominations’, British Journal of Political Science, 50:1, 1–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadeau, R., and N. Nevitte (2013). ‘Leader Effects and the Impact of Leader Characteristics in Nine Countries’, in Kees Aarts, André Blais, and Hermann Schmitt (eds.), Political Leaders and Democratic Elections. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 127–46.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa (2004). Electoral Engineering: Voting Rules and Political Behavior. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, Diana Z. (2015). ‘Rising to the Top: Gender, Political Performance, and Party Leadership in Parliamentary Democracies’, American Journal of Political Science, 59:4, 1022–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Brien, Diana Z., and Yael Shomer (2013). ‘A Cross‐National Analysis of Party Switching’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 38:1, 111–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pilet, Jean-Benoit, and Bram Wauters (2014). ‘The Selection of Party Leaders in Belgium’, in Jean-Benoit Pilet and William Cross (eds.), The Selection of Political Party Leaders in Contemporary Parliamentary Democracies: A Comparative Study. London: Routledge, 30–46.
   Google Scholar
• Plutzer, Eric, and John F. Zipp (1996). ‘Identity Politics, Partisanship, and Voting for Women Candidates’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 60:1, 30–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Put, Gert-Jan, and Bart Maddens (2013). ‘The Selection of Candidates for Eligible Positions on PR Lists: The Belgian/Flemish Federal Elections 1999-2010’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 23:1, 49–65.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels, David (2001). ‘Incumbents and Challengers on a Level Playing Field: Assessing the Impact of Campaign Finance in Brazil’, The Journal of Politics, 63:2, 569–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandri, Giulia, Antonella Seddone and Fulvio Venturino (eds.) (2015). Party Primaries in Comparative Perspective. Surrey: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Shugart, Matthew S., Melody E. Valdini, and Kati Suominen (2005). ‘Looking for Locals: Voter Information Demands and Personal Vote‐Earning Attributes of Legislators under Proportional Representation’, American Journal of Political Science, 49:2, 437–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stockemer, Daniel, and Aksel Sundström (2018). ‘Age Representation in Parliaments: Can Institutions Pave the Way for the Young?’, European Political Science Review, 10:3, 467–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone, Walter J., L. Sandy Maisel, and Cherie D. Maestas (2004). ‘Quality Counts: Extending the Strategic Politician Model of Incumbent Deterrence’, American Journal of Political Science, 48:3, 479–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tavits, Margit (2009). ‘The Making of Mavericks: Local Loyalties and Party Defection’, Comparative Political Studies, 42:6, 793–815.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valdini, Melody E. (2012). ‘A Deterrent to Diversity: The Conditional Effect of Electoral Rules on the Nomination of Women Candidates’, Electoral Studies, 31:4, 740–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Erkel, Patrick F. (2017). Preferential Votes: Explaining Individual Electoral Success in Intra-Party Competition. Antwerp: University of Antwerp.
   Google Scholar
• Ware, Alan (1996). Political Parties and Party Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wauters, Bram, Karolien Weekers, and Bart Maddens (2010). ‘Explaining the Number of Preferential Votes for Women in an Open-List PR System: An Investigation of the 2003 Federal Elections in Flanders (Belgium)’, Acta Politica, 45:4, 468–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar