Power to the people? Populism, democracy, and political participation: a citizen's perspective

References

• Abts, Koen, and Stefan Rummens (2007). ‘Populism versus Democracy’, Political Studies, 55:2, 405–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkerman, Agnes, Cas Mudde, and Andrej Zaslove (2014). ‘How Populist Are the People? Measuring Populist Attitudes in Voters’, Comparative Political Studies, 47:9, 1324–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akkerman, Agnes, Andrej Zaslove, and Bram Spruyt (2017). ‘We the People’ or ‘We the Peoples’? A Comparison of Support for the Populist Radical Right and Populist Radical Left in The Netherlands’, Swiss Political Science Review, 23:4, 377–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anduiza, Eva, Marc Guinjoan, and Guillem Rico (2019). ‘Populism, Participation, and Political Equality’, European Political Science Review, 11:1, 109–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansell, Christopher, and Jane Gingrich (2003). ‘Reforming the Administrative State’, in Bruce Cain, Russell J. Dalton, and Susan Scarrow (eds.), Democracy Transformed: Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 164–191.
   Google Scholar
• Aslanidis, Paris (2017). ‘Populism and Social Movements’, in Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, Paul Taggart, Paulina Ochoa Espejo, and Pierre Ostiguy (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 305–325.
   Google Scholar
• Bächtiger, André, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark E. Warren (2018). ‘Deliberative Democracy: An Introduction’, in André Bächtiger, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark E. Warren (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 35–54.
   Google Scholar
• Barr, Robert R. (2009). ‘Populists, Outsiders and Anti-Establishment Politics’, Party Politics, 15:1, 29–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, Mark B. (2018). ‘Deliberation and Representation’, in André Bächtiger, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark E. Warren (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 171–186.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, Bruce E., and Russel Dalton and Susan Scarrow, eds. (2003). Democracy Transformed? Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Canovan, Margaret (1999). ‘Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy’, Political Studies, 47:1, 2–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Canovan, Margaret (2002). ‘Taking Politics to the People: Populism as the Ideology of Democracy’, in Yves Mény and Yves Surel (eds.), Democracies and the Populist Challenge. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 25–44.
   Google Scholar
• Canovan, Margaret (2005). The People. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• CBS (2016). Statline, available at http://statline.cbs.nl/Statweb (accessed 12 August 2017).
   Google Scholar
• Curato, Nicole, John S. Dryzek, Selen A. Ercan, Carolyn M. Hendriks, and Simon Niemeyer (2017). ‘Twelve Key Findings in Deliberative Democracy Research’, Daedalus, 146:3, 28–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Della Porta, Donatella, ed. (2009a). Democracy in Social Movements. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, Donatella, ed. (2009b). Another Europe: Conceptions and Practices of Democracy in the European Social Forums. London: Routledge, 3–25.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, Donatella, and Mario Diani (2020). Social Movements: An Introduction. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Della Porta, Donatella, and Nicole Doerr (2018). ‘Deliberation in Protests and Social Movements’, in André Bächtiger, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark E. Warren (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 392–406.
   Google Scholar
• Diani, Mario (2004). ‘Networks and Participation’, in David A. Snow, Sarah A. Soule, and Hanspeter Kriesi (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 339–359.
   Google Scholar
• Diani, Mario, and Ann Mische (2015). ‘Network Approaches and Social Movements’, in Donatella della Porta, and Mario Diani (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Social Movements. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 306–325.
   Google Scholar
• Elstub, Stephen, Selen Ercan, and Ricardo F. Mendonça (2016). ‘Editorial Introduction: The Fourth Generation of Deliberative Democracy’, Critical Policy Studies, 10:2, 139–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geurkink, Bram, Andrej Zaslove, Roderick Sluiter, and Kristof Jacobs (2019). ‘Is Populism About More Than Discontent?’, LSE European Politics and Policy (EUROPP) Blog, available at https://blogs.lse.ac.uk/europpblog/2019/08/21/is-populism-about-more-than-discontent/ (accessed 4 may 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Geurkink, Bram, Andrej Zaslove, Roderick Sluiter, and Kristof Jacobs (2020). ‘Populist Attitudes, Political Trust, and External Political Efficacy: Old Wine in New Bottles?’, Political Studies, 68:1, 247–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, Kirk A. (2009). ‘Is Chávez Populist? Measuring Populist Discourse in Comparative Perspective’, Comparative Political Studies, 42:8, 1040–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, Kirk, Scott Riding, and Cas Mudde (2012). ‘Measuring Populist Attitudes’, Committee on Concepts and Methods: Working Paper Series No. 55, available at www.concepts-methods.org/Files/WorkingPaper/PC_55_Hawkins_Riding_Mudde.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Houle, Christian, and Paul D. Kenny (2018). ‘The Political and Economic Consequences of Populist Rule in Latin America’, Government and Opposition, 53:2, 256–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber, Robert A., and Saskia P. Ruth (2017). ‘Mind the Gap! Populism, Participation and Representation in Europe’, Swiss Political Science Review, 23:4, 462–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutter, Swen, and Hanspieter Kriesi (2013). ‘Movements of the Left, Movements of the Right Reconsidered’, in Jacquelien van Stekelenburg, Conny Roggeband, and Bert Klandermans (eds.), The Future of Social Movement Research: Dynamics, Mechanisms, and Processes. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 281–298.
   Google Scholar
• Immerzeel, Tim, and Mark Pickup (2015). ‘Populist Radical Right Parties Mobilizing “the People”? The Role of Populist Radical Right Success in Voter Turnout’, Electoral Studies, 40:4, 347–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, Kristof, Agnes Akkerman, and Andrej Zaslove (2018a). ‘The Voice of Populist People? Referendum Preferences, Practices and Populist Attitudes’, Acta Politica, 53:4, 517–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, Kristof, Marijn van Klingeren, Henk van der Kolk, Koen van der Krieken, Matthijs Rooduijn, and Charlotte Wagenaar (2018b). Het Wiv-referendum: Nationaal Referendum Onderzoek 2018, available at https://kennisopenbaarbestuur.nl/media/255931/wiv-referendumonderzoek-2018.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, Kristof, Marijn van Klingeren, Henk van der Kolk, Tom van der Meer, and Eefje Steenvoorden (2016). Het Oekraïne-referendum. Nationaal Referendum Onderzoek 2016, available at https://kennisopenbaarbestuur.nl/media/254244/het-oekra%c3%afne-referendum-nationaal-referendumonderzoek-2016.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jagers, Jan, and Stefaan Walgrave (2007). ‘Populism as Political Communication Style: An Empirical Study of Political Parties’ Discourse in Belgium’, European Journal of Political Research, 46:3, 319–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kioupkiolis, Alexandros (2016). ‘Podemos: The Ambiguous Promises of Left-Wing Populism in Contemporary Spain’, Journal of Political Ideologies, 21:2, 99–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitschelt, Herbert (2002). ‘Popular Dissatisfaction with Democracy: Populism and Party Systems’, in Yves Mény and Yves Surel (eds.), Democracies and the Populist Challenge. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 179–196.
   Google Scholar
• Klandermans, Bert (2008). ‘The Demand and the Supply of Participation: Social-Psychological Correlates of Participation in Social Movements’, in David A. Snow, Sarah A. Soule, and Hanspeter Kriesi (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Movements. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 360–379.
   Google Scholar
• Kriesi, Hanspieter (2018). ‘The Implications of the Euro Crisis for Democracy’, Journal of European Public Policy, 25:1, 59–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laclau, Ernesto (2005a). ‘Populism: What’s in a Name’, in Francisco Panizza (ed.), Populism and the Mirror of Democracy. London: Verso, 32–49.
   Google Scholar
• Laclau, Ernesto (2005b). On Populist Reason. London: Verso.
   Google Scholar
• Leininger, Arndt, and Maurits Meijers (2020) ‘Do Populist Parties Increase Voter Turnout? Evidence from over 40 Years of Electoral History in 31 European Democracies’, Political Studies. doi:10.1177/0032321720923257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LISS-Data (2016a). ‘Election Survey Ukraine referendum’, CentERdata, available at http://www.dataarchive.lissdata.nl/study_units/view/651.
   Google Scholar
• LISS-Data (2016b). ‘Politics and Values’, CentERdata, available at https://www.dataarchive.lissdata.nl/study_units/view/663.
   Google Scholar
• LISS-Data (2016c). ‘Backgroud Variables’, CentERdata, available at https://www.dataarchive.lissdata.nl/study_units/view/322.
   Google Scholar
• Lucardie, Paul (2014). Democratic Extremism in Theory and Practice: All Power to the People. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lucardie, Paul, and Gerrit Voerman (2012). Populisten in de Polder. Amsterdam: Boom.
   Google Scholar
• Mair, Peter (2002). ‘Populist Democracy vs Party Democracy’, in Yves Mény and Yves Surel (eds.), Democracies and the Populist Challenge. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 81–98.
   Google Scholar
• Meijers, Maurits, and Andrej Zaslove (2020). ‘Measuring Populism in Political Parties: Appraisal of a New Approach’, Comparative Political Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Mény, Yves, and Yves Surel (2002). ‘The Constitutive Ambiguity of Populism’, in Yves Mény and Yves Surel (eds.), Democracies and the Populist Challenge. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Moffitt, Benjamin, and Simon Tormey (2014). ‘Rethinking Populism: Politics, Mediatisation and Political Style’, Political Studies, 62:2, 381–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas (2004). ‘The Populist Zeitgeist’, Government and Opposition, 39:4, 541–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas (2007). Populist Radical Right Parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, eds. (2012). Populism in Europe and the Americas: Threat or Corrective for Democracy? Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas, and Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser (2017). Populism: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Jan-Werner (2014). ‘The People Must Be Extracted from within the People: Reflections on Populism’, Constellations, 21:4, 483–93.
   Google Scholar
• Niemeyer, Simon, and Julia Jennstål (2018). ‘Scaling up Deliberative Effects: Applying Lessons of Mini-Publics’, in André Bächtiger, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge, and Mark E. Warren (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 329–347.
   Google Scholar
• Norris, Pippa (2005). Radical Right: Voters and Parties in the Electoral Market. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oesch, Daniel (2008). ‘Explaining Workers’ Support for Right-Wing Populist Parties in Western Europe: Evidence from Austria, Belgium, France, Norway, and Switzerland’, International Political Science Review, 29:3, 349–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otjes, Simon, and Tom Louwerse (2015). ‘Populists in Parliament: Comparing Left-Wing and Right-Wing Populism in The Netherlands’, Political Studies, 63:1, 60–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pauwels, Teun (2014). Populism in Western Europe: Comparing Belgium, Germany and The Netherlands. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Peilingwijzer (2016). Peilingwijzer, Update 20 April 2016, available at https://peilingwijzer.tomlouwerse.nl/2016/04 (accessed 2 February 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Ramiro, Luis (2016). ‘Support for Radical Left Parties in Western Europe: Social Background, Ideology and Political Orientations’, European Political Science Review, 8:1, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, Matthijs, and Teun Pauwels (2011). ‘Measuring Populism: Comparing Two Methods of Content Analysis’, West European Politics, 34:6, 1272–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal (2012). ‘The Ambivalence of Populism: Threat and Corrective for Democracy’, Democratization, 19:2, 184–208.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rovira Kaltwasser, Cristóbal (2014). ‘The Responses of Populism to Dahl’s Democratic Dilemmas’, Political Studies, 62:3, 470–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rummens, Stefan (2017). ‘Populism as a Threat to Liberal Democracy’, in Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, Paul Taggart, Paulina Ochoa Espejo, and Pierre Ostiguy (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 554–570.
   Google Scholar
• Scarrow, Susan E. (2003). ‘Making Elections more Direct? Reducing the Role of Parties in Elections’, in Bruce Cain, Russell J. Dalton, and Susan Scarrow (eds.), Democracy Transformed? Expanding Political Opportunities in Advanced Industrial Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 44–58.
   Google Scholar
• Schaap, Linze, Frank Hendriks, Niels Karsten, Julien van Ostaaijen, and Charlotte Wagenaar (2019). ‘Ambitieuze en Ambivalente Vernieuwing Van de Lokale Democratie in Nederland’, Bestuurswetenschappen, 73:2, 47–69.
   Google Scholar
• Schwander, Hanna, Dominic Gohla, and Armin Schäfer (2020). ‘Fighting Fire with Fire? Inequality, Populism and Voter Turnout’, Politische Vierteljahresschrift, 61:2, 261–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spruyt, Bram, Gil Keppens, and Filip Van Droogenbroeck (2016). ‘Who Supports Populism and What Attracts People to It?’, Political Research Quarterly, 69:2, 335–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stavrakakis, Yannis, and Giorgos Katsambekis (2014). ‘Left-Wing Populism in the European Periphery: The Case of SYRIZA’, Journal of Political Ideologies, 19:2, 119–42.
   Google Scholar
• Taggart, Paul (2002). ‘Populism and the Pathology of Representative Politics’, in Yves Mény and Yves Surel (eds.), Democracies and the Populist Challenge. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 62–80.
   Google Scholar
• Thomassen, Jacques J., Carolien van Ham, and Rudy Andeweg (2014). De wankele democratie: Heeft de democratie haar beste tijd gehad? Amsterdam: Prometheus Bert Bakker.
   Google Scholar
• Urbinati, Nadia (2014). Democracy Disfigured. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Urbinati, Nadia (2017). ‘Populism and the Prinicple of Majority’, in Cristóbal Rovira Kaltwasser, Paul Taggart, Paulina Ochoa Espejo, and Pierre Ostiguy (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Populism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 571–589.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Brug, Wouter, Meindert Fennema, and Jean Tillie (2000). ‘Anti-Immigrant Parties in Europe: Ideological or Protest Vote?’, European Journal of Political Research, 37:1, 77–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Meer Tom (2017). Niet de kiezer is gek. Amsterdam: Unieboek Uitgeverij Het Spectrum.
   Google Scholar
• Van Hauwaert, Steven M., and Stijn Van Kessel (2018). ‘Beyond Protest and Discontent: A Cross‐National Analysis of the Effect of Populist Attitudes and Issue Positions on Populist Party Support’, European Journal of Political Research, 57:1, 68–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kessel, Stijn (2011). ‘Explaining the Electoral Performance of Populist Parties: The Netherlands as a Case Study’, Perspectives on European Politics and Society, 12:1, 68–88.
   Google Scholar
• Weyland, Kurt (2001). ‘Clarifying a Contested Concept: Populism in the Study of Latin American Politics’, Comparative Politics, 34:1, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar