Justifying enforcement or avoiding blame? The transparency of compliance assessments in the European Union

References

• Bakker, Ryan, et al. (2015). ‘Measuring Party Positions in Europe: The Chapel Hill Expert Survey Trend File, 1999–2010’, Party Politics, 21:1, 143–52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banzhaf, John (1965). ‘Weighted Voting Doesn’t Work: A Mathematical Analysis’, Rutgers Law Review, 19:2, 319–43.
   Google Scholar
• Bauhr, Monika, and Marcia Grimes (2014). ‘Indignation or Resignation: The Implications of Transparency for Societal Accountability’, Governance, 27:2, 291–320.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blom-Hansen, Jens, and Daniel Finke (2020). ‘Reputation and Organizational Politics: Inside the EU Commission’, Journal of Politics, 82:1, 135–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, Tanja (2001). ‘Non-Compliance in the European Union: Pathology or Statistical Artefact?’, Journal of European Public Policy, 8:5, 803–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, Tanja, Tobias Hofmann, and Diana Panke (2012). ‘Caving in or Sitting It out? Longitudinal Patterns of Non-Compliance in the European Union’, Journal of European Public Policy, 19:4, 454–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Börzel, Tanja, and Moritz Knoll (2012). ‘Quantifying Non-compliance in the EU: A Database on EU Infringement Proceedings’, Berlin working paper on european integration 15, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin Center for European Studies.
   Google Scholar
• Busuioc, Madalina, and Martin Lodge (2017). ‘Reputation and Accountability Relationships: Managing Accountability Expectations through Reputation’, Public Administration Review, 77:1, 91–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carpenter, Daniel (2001). The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy: Reputations, Networks, and Policy Innovation in Executive Agencies, 1862-1928. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter, Daniel (2010). Reputation and Power: Organizational Image and Pharmaceutical Regulation at the FDA. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cichowski, Rachel A. (2007). The European Court and Civil Society: Litigation, Mobilization and Governance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Coppedge, Michael, et al. (2019). ‘V-Dem Dataset Version 9’, Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) Project. https://doi.org/10.23696/vdemcy19
   Google Scholar
• Crombez, Christophe, and Simon Hix (2015). ‘Legislative Activity and Gridlock in the European Union’, British Journal of Political Science, 45:3, 477–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, James P. (2013). ‘Striking a Pose: Transparency and Position Taking in the Council of the European Union’, European Journal of Political Research, 52:3, 291–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cukierman, Alex (2009). ‘The Limits of Transparency’, Economic Notes, 38:1-2, 1–37.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl, Robert (1971). Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eijffinger, Sylvester C. W., and Petra M. Geraats (2006). ‘How Transparent Are Central Banks?’, European Journal of Political Economy, 22:1, 1–21.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, David, and Sharyn O’Halloran (1994). ‘Administrative Procedures, Information, and Agency Discretion’, American Journal of Political Science, 38:3, 697–722.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Etienne, Julien (2015). ‘The Politics of Detection in Business Regulation’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25:1, 257–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Florini, Ann M. (1999). ‘Does the Invisible Hand Need a Transparent Glove? The Politics of Transparency’, Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, 1–40 http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTWBIGOVANTCOR/Resources/florini.pdf%5Cn http://derechoasaber.org.mx/documentos/pdf0042.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gilad, Sharon, Moshe Maor, and Pazit Ben Nun Bloom (2015). ‘Organizational Reputation, the Content of Public Allegations, and Regulatory Communication’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 25:2, 451–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grigorescu, Alexandru (2007). ‘Transparency of Intergovernmental Organizations: The Roles of Member States, International Bureaucracies and Nongovernmental Organizations’, International Studies Quarterly, 51:3, 625–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofmann, Tobias (2018). ‘How Long to Compliance? Escalating Infringement Proceedings and the Diminishing Power of Special Interests’, Journal of European Integration, 40:6, 785–801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hollyer, James R., Peter Rosendorff, and James Vreeland (2011). ‘Democracy and Transparency’, Journal of Politics, 73:4, 1191–11205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, Christopher (2002). ‘The Risk Game and the Blame Game’, Government and Opposition, 37:1, 15–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, Christopher (2007). ‘What Happens When Transparency Meets Blame Avoidance?’, Public Management Review, 9:2, 191–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hood, Christopher (2011). The Blame Game: Spin, Bureaucracy, and Self-Preservation in Government. Princeton NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hooghe, Liesbet, and Gary Marks (2009). ‘A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science, 39:1, 1–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard, Marc (2003). The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Keohane, Robert O., and Joseph Nye (1977). Power and Interdependence. Boston, MA: Little, Brown and Company.
   Google Scholar
• König, Thomas, and Lars Mäder (2014). ‘The Strategic Nature of Compliance: An Empirical Evaluation of Law Implementation in the Central Monitoring System of the European Union’, American Journal of Political Science, 58:1, 246–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krämer, Ludwig (2014). ‘EU Enforcement of Environmental Laws: From Great Principles to Daily Practice-Improving Citizen Involvement’, Environmental Policy and Law, 44:1–2, 247–56.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, Arend (1999). Patterns of Democracy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lindstedt, Catharina, and Daniel Naurin (2010). ‘Transparency Is Not Enough: Making Transparency Effective in Reducing Corruption’, International Political Science Review, 31:3, 301–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggetti, Martino (2010). ‘Legitimacy and Accountability of Independent Regulatory Agencies: A Critical Review’, Living Reviews in Democracy, 2, 1–10.
   Google Scholar
• Majone, Giandomenico (2005). Dilemmas of European Integration: The Ambiguities and Pitfalls of Integration by Stealth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maor, Moshe (2011). ‘Organizational Reputations and the Observability of Public Warnings in 10 Pharmaceutical Markets’, Governance, 24:3, 557–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maor, Moshe, Sharon Gilad, and Pazit Ben Nun Bloom (2013). ‘Organizational Reputation, Regulatory Talk, and Strategic Silence’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23:3, 581–608.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maor, Moshe, and Raanan Sulitzeanu-Kenan (2013). ‘The Effect of Salient Reputational Threats on the Pace of FDA Enforcement’, Governance, 26:1, 31–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maor, Moshe, and Raanan Sulitzeanu-Kenan (2016). ‘Responsive Change: Agency Output Response to Reputational Threats’, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 26:1, 31–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCormick, John (2015). European Union Politics. 2nd ed. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• McCubbins, Mathew D., and Thomas Schwartz (1984). ‘Congressional Oversight Overlooked: Police Patrols versus Fire Alarms’, American Journal of Political Science, 28:1, 165–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naurin, Daniel (2006). ‘Transparency, Publicity, Accountability: The Missing Links’, Swiss Political Science Review, 12:3, 90–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rauh, Christian (2019). ‘EU Politicization and Policy Initiatives of the European Commission: The Case of Consumer Policy’, Journal of European Public Policy, 26:3, 344–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimkutė, Dovilė (2018). ‘Organizational Reputation and Risk Regulation: The Effect of Reputational Threats on Agency Scientific Outputs’, Public Administration, 96:1, 70–365.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rittberger, Berthold, and Klaus H. Goetz (2018). ‘Secrecy in Europe’, West European Politics, 41:4, 825–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schrama, Reini (2017). Rooted Implementation – The Practical Implementation of EU Policy through Cooperative Society. ETH Zürich, available at https://www.research-collection.ethz.ch/handle/20.500.11850/202231 (accessed 15 April 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Schrama, Reini, and Asya Zhelyazkova (2018). ‘“You Can’t Have One without the Other”: The Differential Impact of Civil Society Strength on the Implementation of EU Policy’, Journal of European Public Policy, 25:7, 1029–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwab, Klaus (2015). ‘The Global Competitiveness Report 2015–2016’, World Economic Forum, 21, 78–80.
   Google Scholar
• Sedelmeier, Ulrich (2008). ‘After Conditionality: Post-Accession Compliance with EU Law in East Central Europe’, Journal of European Public Policy, 15:6, 806–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, Melanie (2015). ‘Evaluation and the Salience of Infringement Data’, European Journal of Risk Regulation, 6:1, 90–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stasavage, David (2004). ‘Open-Door or Closed-Door? Transparency in Domestic and International Bargaining’, International Organization, 58:04, 667–703.
   Google Scholar
• Sudbery, Imogen (2010). ‘The European Union as Political Resource: NGOs as Change Agents’, Acta Politica, 45:1-2, 136–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallberg, Jonas (2002). ‘Paths to Compliance: Enforcement, Management, and the European Union’, International Organization, 56:3, 609–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, Robert (2011). Resolving Controversy in the European Union. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, Robert, and René Torenvlied (2011). ‘Information, Commitment and Consensus: A Comparison of Three Perspectives on Delegation in the European Union’, British Journal of Political Science, 41:1, 139–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, Robert, René Torenvlied, and Javier Arregui (2007). ‘The Paradox of Compliance: Infringements and Delays in Transposing European Union Directives’, British Journal of Political Science, 37:4, 685–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Voorst, Stijn, and Ellen Mastenbroek (2017). ‘Enforcement Tool or Strategic Instrument? the Initiation of Ex-Post Legislative Evaluations by the European Commission’, European Union Politics, 18:4, 640–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Visser, Jelle (2015). ICTWSS Data Base. Version 5.0. University of Amsterdam: Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies AIAS.
   Google Scholar
• Weaver, R. Kent (1986). ‘The Politics of Blame Avoidance’, Journal of Public Policy, 6:4, 371–98.
   Google Scholar
• Winzen, Thomas (2012). ‘National Parliamentary Control of European Union Affairs: A Cross-National and Longitudinal Comparison’, West European Politics, 35:3, 657–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhelyazkova, Asya, Cansarp Kaya, and Reini Schrama (2016). ‘Decoupling Practical and Legal Compliance: Analysis of Member States’ Implementation of EU Policy’, European Journal of Political Research, 55:4, 827–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhelyazkova, Asya, and Nikoleta Yordanova (2015). ‘Signalling ‘Compliance’: The Link between Notified EU Directive Implementation and Infringement Cases’, European Union Politics, 16:3, 408–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar