Attitudes vs. actions? Direct-democratic preferences and participation of populist citizens

References

• Akkerman, Agnes, Cas Mudde, and Andrej Zaslove (2014). ‘How Populist Are the People? Measuring Populist Attitudes in Voters’, Comparative Political Studies, 47:9, 1324–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Cameron, and Elizabeth Goodyear-Grant (2010). ‘Why Are Highly Informed Citizens Sceptical of Referenda?’, Electoral Studies, 29:2, 227–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barber, Benjamin R. (1984). Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bengtsson, Åsa, and Henrik Christensen (2016). ‘Ideals and Actions: Do Citizens’ Patterns of Political Participation Correspond to Their Conceptions of Democracy?’, Government and Opposition, 51:2, 234–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, Shaun, David Denemark, Todd Donovan, and Duncan McDonnell (2017). ‘Right-Wing Populist Party Supporters: Dissatisfied but Not Direct Democrats’, European Journal of Political Research, 56:1, 70–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, Shaun, and Todd Donovan (2019). ‘Perceptions of Referendums and Democracy: The Referendum Disappointment Gap’, Politics and Governance, 7:2, 227–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caiani, Manuela, and Paolo Graziano (2019). ‘Understanding Varieties of Populism in Times of Crises’, West European Politics, 42:6, 1141–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caramani, Daniele (2017). ‘Will vs. Reason: The Populist and Technocratic Forms of Political Representation and Their Critique to Party Government’, American Political Science Review, 111:1, 54–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Claudy, Marius C., Mark Peterson, and Aidan O’Driscoll (2013). ‘Understanding the Attitude–Behavior Gap for Renewable Energy Systems Using Behavioral Reasoning Theory’, Journal of Macromarketing, 33:4, 273–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell J., Wilhelm Bürklin, and Andrew Drummond (2001). ‘Public Opinion and Direct Democracy’, Journal of Democracy, 12:4, 141–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De la Torre, Carlos (2010). Populist Seduction in Latin America. Ohio University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Donovan, Todd, and Jeffrey A. Karp (2006). ‘Popular Support for Direct Democracy’, Party Politics, 12:5, 671–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences (2019). ‘German General Social Survey - ALLBUS 2018.’ GESIS Data Archive, Cologne. ZA5272 Data file Version 1.0.0, available at: https://doi.org/10.4232/1.13325.
   Google Scholar
• Goldberg, Saskia, Dominik Wyss, and André Bächtiger (2020). ‘Deliberating or Thinking (Twice) about Democratic Preferences: What German Citizens Want from Democracy’, Political Studies, 68:2, 311–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grotz, Florian, and Marcel Lewandowsky (2020). ‘Promoting or Controlling Political Decisions? Citizen Preferences for Direct-Democratic Institutions in Germany’, German Politics, 29:2, 180–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinisch, Reinhard, and Carsten Wegscheider (2020). ‘Disentangling How Populism and Radical Host Ideologies Shape Citizens’ Conceptions of Democratic Decision-Making’, Politics and Governance, 8:3, 32–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hough, Daniel, and Daniel Keith (2019). ‘The German Left Party. A Case of Pragmatic Populism’, in Giorgos Katsambekis and Alexandros Kioupkolis (eds.), The Populist Radical Left in Europe. London: Routledge, 129–44.
   Google Scholar
• Huber, Robert A., and Saskia P. Ruth (2017). ‘Mind the Gap! Populism, Participation and Representation in Europe’, Swiss Political Science Review, 23:4, 462–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobs, Kristof, Agnes Akkerman, and Andrej Zaslove (2018). ‘The Voice of Populist People? Referendum Preferences, Practices and Populist Attitudes’, Acta Politica, 53:4, 517–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leemann, Lucas, and Isabelle Stadelmann-Steffen (2020). ‘Satisfaction with Democracy: When Government by the People Brings Electoral Winners and Losers Together’, ECPR General Conference, Virtual, 24–28 August 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Leemann, Lucas, and Fabio Wasserfallen (2016). ‘The Democratic Effect of Direct Democracy’, American Political Science Review, 110:4, 750–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leininger, Arndt, and Maurits J. Meijers (2021). ‘Do Populist Parties Increase Voter Turnout? Evidence from over 40 Years of Electoral History in 31 European Democracies’, Political Studies, 69:3, 665–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKenzie, Michael K., and Alfred Moore (2020). ‘Democratic Non-Participation’, Polity, 52:3, 430–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijers, Maurits J., and Andrej Zaslove (2020). ‘Populism and Political Parties Expert Survey 2018 (POPPA)’, Harvard Dataverse (party_means), available at: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/8NEL7B, Harvard Dataverse (party_means).
   Google Scholar
• Meijers, Maurits J., and Andrej Zaslove (2021). ‘Measuring Populism in Political Parties: Appraisal of a New Approach’, Comparative Political Studies, 54:2, 372–407.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohrenberg, Steffen, Robert A. Huber, and Tina Freyburg (2021). ‘Love at First Sight? Populist Attitudes and Support for Direct Democracy’, Party Politics, 27:3, 528–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas (2004). ‘The Populist Zeitgeist’, Government and Opposition, 39:4, 541–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudde, Cas, and Cristóbal R. Kaltwasser (2013). ‘Exclusionary vs. Inclusionary Populism: Comparing Contemporary Europe and Latin America’, Government and Opposition, 48:2, 147–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olsen, Jonathan (2018). ‘The Left Party and the AfD: Populist Competitors in Eastern Germany’, German Politics and Society, 36:1, 70–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappas, Takis S. (2019). ‘Populists in Power’, Journal of Democracy, 30:2, 70–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehmet, Frank (2019). Volksbegehrensbericht 2019. Direkte Demokratie in den deutschen Bundesländern 1946 bis 2018 [Report on Referendum Petitions 2019. Direct Democracy in the German Länder 1946 to 2018]. Berlin: Mehr Demokratie e.V.
   Google Scholar
• Rehmet, Frank, Thorsten Sterk, Volker Mittendorf, and Yazgülü Zeybek (2018). Bürgerbegehrensbericht 2018 [Public Petition Report]. Berlin: Mehr Demokratie e.V.
   Google Scholar
• Rehmet, Frank, Edgar Wunder, Volker Mittendorf, Yazgülü Zeybek, and Joel Müller (2020). Bürgerbegehrensbericht 2020 [Public Petition Report]. Berlin: Mehr Demokratie e.V.
   Google Scholar
• Rooduijn, Matthijs, Stijn van Kessel, Caterina Froio, Andrea L.P. Pirro, Sarah L. de Lange, Daphne Halikiopoulou, Paul Lewis, Cas Mudde, and Paul Taggart (2019). ‘The PopuList: An Overview of Populist, Far Right, Far Left and Eurosceptic Parties in Europe’, available at: www.popu-list.org.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, Richard, and Bernhard Weßels (2021). ‘Do Populist Values or Civic Values Drive Support for Referendums in Europe?’, European Journal of Political Research, 60:2, 359–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schulz, Anne, Philipp Müller, Christian Schemer, Dominique Wirz, Martin Wettstein, and Werner Wirth (2018). ‘Measuring Populist Attitudes on Three Dimensions’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 30:2, 316–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spruyt, Bram, Gil Keppens, and Filip van Droogenbroeck (2016). ‘Who Supports Populism and What Attracts People to It?’, Political Research Quarterly, 69:2, 335–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadelmann-Steffen, Isabelle, and Adrian Vatter (2012). ‘Does Satisfaction with Democracy Really Increase Happiness? Direct Democracy and Individual Satisfaction in Switzerland’, Political Behavior, 34:3, 535–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoker, Gerry, and Colin Hay (2017). ‘Understanding and Challenging Populist Negativity towards Politics: The Perspectives of British Citizens’, Political Studies, 65:1, 4–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Crombrugge, Ronald (2021). ‘Are Referendums Necessarily Populist? Countering the Populist Interpretation of Referendums through Institutional Design’, Representation, 57:1, 109–30.
   Google Scholar
• Urbinati, Nadia (2019). ‘Political Theory of Populism’, Annual Review of Political Science, 22:1, 111–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webb, Paul (2013). ‘Who is Willing to Participate? Dissatisfied Democrats, Stealth Democrats and Populists in the United Kingdom’, European Journal of Political Research, 52:6, 747–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner, Hannah (2020). ‘If I’ll Win It, I Want It: The Role of Instrumental Considerations in Explaining Public Support for Referendums’, European Journal of Political Research, 59:2, 312–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Werner, Hannah, and Kristof Jacobs (2021). ‘Are Populists Sore Losers? Explaining Populist Citizens’ Preferences for and Reactions to Referendums’, British Journal of Political Science, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123421000314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaslove, Andrej, Bram Geurkink, Kristof Jacobs, and Agnes Akkerman (2021). ‘Power to the People? Populism, Democracy, and Political Participation: A Citizen’s Perspective’, West European Politics, 44:4, 727–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar