Studying expert influence: a methodological agenda

References

• Boswell, Christina (2008). ‘The Political Functions of Expert Knowledge’, Journal of European Public Policy, 15:4, 471–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell, John L (2002). ‘Ideas, Politics, and Public Policy’, Annual Review of Sociology, 28:1, 21–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, Johan (2017). The Power of Economists within the State. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Christensen, Johan (2021). ‘Expert Knowledge and Policymaking: A Multi-Disciplinary Research Agenda’, Policy & Politics, 49:3, 455–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen, Johan, and Stine.Hesstvedt (2021). ‘The Influence of Expert Groups: A Citation-Based Analysis’. Paper presented at the ECPR General Conference 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Chwieroth, Jeffrey M (2010). Capital Ideas: The IMF and the Rise of Financial Liberalization. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, Paul M.Jr., Pamela C.Corley, and JesseHamner (2015). ‘The Influence of Amicus Curiae Briefs on U.S. Supreme Court Opinion Content’, Law & Society Review, 49:4, 917–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, Maia K. Davis (2013). ‘Rethinking Epistemic Communities Twenty Years Later’, Review of International Studies, 39:1, 137–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dür, Andreas (2008). ‘Measuring Interest Group Influence in the EU: A Note on Methodology’, European Union Politics, 9:4, 559–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ege, Jörn, Michael W.Bauer, and NoraWagner (2020). ‘Improving Generalizability in Transnational Bureaucratic Influence Research: A (Modest) Proposal’, International Studies Review, 22:3, 551–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ege, Jörn, Michael W.Bauer, and NoraWagner (2021). ‘How Do International Bureaucrats Affect Policy Outputs? Studying Administrative Influence Strategies in International Organizations’, International Review of Administrative Sciences, 87:4, 737–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fourcade, Marion (2006). ‘The Construction of a Global Profession’, American Journal of Sociology, 112:1, 145–94.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fowler, James H., Timothy R.Johnson, James F.Spriggs, SangickJeon, and Paul J.Wahlbeck (2007). ‘Network Analysis and the Law: Measuring the Legal Importance of Precedents at the US Supreme Court’, Political Analysis, 15:3, 324–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• George, Alexander L, and AndrewBennett (2005). Case Studies and Theory Development in the Social Sciences. Cambridge: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Grundmann, Reiner (2017). ‘The Problem of Expertise in Knowledge Societies’, Minerva, 55:1, 25–48.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, Peter M (1992). ‘Introduction: Epistemic Communities and International Policy Coordination’, International Organization, 46:1, 1–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habermas, Jürgen (2015). The Lure of Technocracy. Cambridge: Polity Press.
   Google Scholar
• Head, Brian W (2016). ‘Toward More Evidence-Informed Policy-Making’, Public Administration Review, 76:3, 472–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Head, Brian, MicheleFerguson, AdrianCherney, and PaulBoreham (2014). ‘Are Policy-Makers Interested in Social Research? Exploring the Sources and Uses of Valued Information among Public Servants in Australia’, Policy and Society, 33:2, 89–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helboe Pedersen, Helene (2013). ‘Is Measuring Interest Group Influence a Mission Impossible?’, Interest Groups & Advocacy, 2:1, 27–47.
   Google Scholar
• Herold, Jana, AndreaLiese, Per-OlofBusch, and HaukeFeil (2021). ‘Why National Ministries Consider the Policy Advice of International Bureaucracies: Survey Evidence from 106 Countries’, International Studies Quarterly, 65:3, 669–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hesstvedt, Stine, and JohanChristensen (2021). ‘Political and Administrative Control of Expert Groups—A Mixed‐Methods Study’, Governance (Early View).
   Google Scholar
• Holst, Cathrine, and AndersMolander (2018). ‘Asymmetry, Disagreement and Biases: Epistemic Worries about Expertise’, Social Epistemology, 32:6, 358–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüver, Heike (2009). ‘Measuring Interest Group Influence Using Quantitative Text Analysis’, European Union Politics, 10:4, 535–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landry, Rejean, MoktarLamari, and NabilAmara (2003). ‘The Extent and Determinants of the Utilization of University Research in Government Agencies’, Public Administration Review, 63:2, 192–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindvall, Johannes (2009). ‘The Real but Limited Influence of Expert Ideas’, World Politics, 61:4, 703–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littoz-Monnet, Annabelle (2020). Governing through Expertise: The Politics of Bioethics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• March, James G (1955). ‘An Introduction to the Theory and Measurement of Influence’, American Political Science Review, 49:2, 431–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metz, Julia (2015). The European Commission, Expert Groups, and the Policy Process: Demystifying Technocratic Governance. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Newman, Joshua (2017). ‘Deconstructing the Debate over Evidence-Based Policy’, Critical Policy Studies, 11:2, 211–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, Tom (2017). The Death of Expertise: The Campaign against Established Knowledge and Why It Matters. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Steiner-Khamsi, Gita, BeritKarseth, and ChanwoongBaek (2020). ‘From Science to Politics: Commissioned Reports and Their Political Translation into White Papers’, Journal of Education Policy, 35:1, 119–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weiss, Carol H (1979). ‘The Many Meanings of Research Utilization’, Public Administration Review, 39:5, 426–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkerson, John, and AndreuCasas (2017). ‘Large-Scale Computerized Text Analysis in Political Science: Opportunities and Challenges’, Annual Review of Political Science, 20:1, 529–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkerson, John, DavidSmith, and NicholasStramp (2015). ‘Tracing the Flow of Policy Ideas in Legislatures: A Text Reuse Approach’, American Journal of Political Science, 59:4, 943–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wuchty, Stefan, Benjamin F.Jones, and BrianUzzi (2007). ‘The Increasing Dominance of Teams in Production of Knowledge’, Science, 316:5827, 1036–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar