Party campaign statements and portfolio allocation in coalition governments

References

• Bäck, Hanna, Marc Debus, and Patrick Dumont (2011). ‘Who Gets What in Coalition Governments? Predictors of Portfolio Allocation in Parliamentary Democracies’, European Journal of Political Research, 50:4, 441–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäck, Hanna, Wolfgang C. Müller, and Benjamin Nyblade (2017). ‘Multiparty Government and Economic Policy-Making’, Public Choice, 170:1-2, 33–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäck, Hanna, Wolfgang C. Müller, Mariyana Angelova, and Daniel Strobl (2022). ‘Ministerial Autonomy, Parliamentary Scrutiny and Government Reform Output in Parliamentary Democracies’, Comparative Political Studies, 55:2, 254–86.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumann, Markus, and Martin Gross (2016). ‘Where Is My Party? Introducing New Data Sets on Ideological Cohesion and Ambiguity of Party Positions in Media Coverage’, MZES Working Paper No. 167, Mannheim: Mannheim Centre for European Social Research.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, Matthew E., and Henry Flatt (2021). ‘Broad-Appeal Agendas: Issue Diversity and the Centre-Right’s Electoral Success’, Electoral Studies, 70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman, Torbjörn, Gabriella Ilonszki, and Wolfgang C. Müller, eds. (2019). Coalition Governance in Central Eastern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, Torbjörn, Hanna Bäck, and Johan Hellström (2021). ‘The Three Stages of the Coalition Life Cycle’, in Torbjörn Bergman, Hanna Bäck, and Johan Hellström (eds.), Coalition Governance in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 15—40.
   Google Scholar
• Dalmus, Caroline, Regula Hänggli, and Laurent Bernhard (2017). ‘The Charm of Salient Issues? Parties’ Strategic Behavior in Press Releases’, in Peter Van Aelst and Stefaan Walgrave (eds.), How Political Actors Use the Media: A Functional Analysis of the Media’s Role in Politics. Wiesbaden: Springer, 187—205.
   Google Scholar
• Däubler, Thomas (2012). ‘The Preparation and Use of Election Manifestos: Learning from the Irish Case’, Irish Political Studies, 27:1, 51–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Debus, Marc, Zeynep Somer-Topcu, and Margit Tavits (2016). Comparative Campaign Dynamics Dataset. Mannheim Centre for European Social Research, University of Mannheim. http://www.mzes.uni-mannheim.de/d7/en/datasets/comparative-campaign-dynamics-dataset.
   Google Scholar
• Dolezal, Martin, Laurenz Ennser-Jedenastik, Wolfgang C. Müller, and Katharina Winkler (2012). ‘The Life Cycle of Party Manifestos: The Austrian Case’, West European Politics, 35:4, 869–95.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, James N., and Paul V. Warwick (2005). ‘The Missing Piece: Measuring Portfolio Salience in Western European Parliamentary Democracies’, European Journal of Political Research, 44:1, 17–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecker, Alejandro, Thomas M. Meyer, and Wolfgang C. Müller (2015). ‘The Distribution of Individual Cabinet Positions in Coalition Governments: A Sequential Approach’, European Journal of Political Research, 54:4, 802–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eder, Nikolaus, Marcelo Jenny, and Wolfgang C. Müller (2017). ‘Manifesto Functions: How Party Candidates View and Use Their Party’s Central Policy Document’, Electoral Studies, 45:1, 75–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamson, William A. (1961). ‘A Theory of Coalition Formation’, American Sociological Review, 26:3, 373–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greene, Zachary (2016). ‘Competing on the Issues: How Experience in Government and Economic Conditions Influence the Scope of Parties’ Policy Messages’, Party Politics, 22:6, 809–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haselmayer, Martin, Markus Wagner, and Thomas M. Meyer (2017). ‘Partisan Bias in Message Selection: Media Gatekeeping of Party Press Releases’, Political Communication, 34:3, 367–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helbling, Marc, and Anke Tresch (2011). ‘Measuring Party Positions and Issue Salience from Media Coverage: Discussing and Cross-Validating New Indicators’, Electoral Studies, 30:1, 174–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüver, Heike, and Jae-Jae Spoon (2020). ‘Helping or Hurting? How Governing as a Junior Coalition Partner Influences Electoral Outcomes’, The Journal of Politics, 82:4, 1231–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, Lanny W., and Georg Vanberg (2020). ‘Coalition Government, Legislative Institutions, and Public Policy in Parliamentary Democracies’, American Journal of Political Science, 64:2, 325–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McFadden, Daniel (1973). ‘Conditional Logit Analysis of Qualitative Choice Behavior’, in Paul Zarembka (ed.), Frontiers in Econometrics. New York: Academic Press, 105–42.
   Google Scholar
• Strøm, Kaare, , Wolfgang C. Müller, and Torbjörn Bergman, eds. (2006). Delegation and Accountability in Parliamentary Democracies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tresch, Anke, Jonas Lefevere, and Stefaan Walgrave (2018). ‘How Parties’ Issue Emphasis Strategies Vary across Communication Channels: The 2009 Regional Election Campaign in Belgium’, Acta Politica, 53:1, 25–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Volkens, Andrea, Pola Lehmann, Theres Matthieß, Nicolas Merz, Sven Regel, and Bernhard Weßels (2017). The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR). Version 2017b. [Dataset]. Berlin: Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung (WZB). Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.25522/manifesto.mpds.2017b
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, Markus, and Thomas M. Meyer (2014). ‘Which Issues do Parties Emphasise? Salience Strategies and Party Organisation in Multiparty Systems’, West European Politics, 37:5, 1019–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar