The formalisation of minority governments

References

• Adam, Christian, Steffen Hurka, Christoph Knill, and Yves Steinebach (2019). Policy Accumulation and the Democratic Responsiveness Trap. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• André, Audrey, Sam Depauw, and Shane Martin (2016). ‘Trust Is Good, Control Is Better?’, Political Research Quarterly, 69:1, 108–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anghel, Veronica, and Maria Thürk (2021). ‘Under the Influence: Pay-Offs to Legislative Support Parties under Minority Governments’, Government and Opposition, 56:1, 121–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bäck, Hanna, and Torbjörn Bergman (2015). ‘The Parties in Government Formation’, in Jon Pierre (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Swedish Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 206–23.
   Google Scholar
• Bale, Tim, and Torbjörn Bergman (2006a). ‘Captives No Longer, but Servants Still? Contract Parliamentarism and the New Minority Governance in Sweden and New Zealand’, Government and Opposition, 41:3, 422–49.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bale, Tim, and Torbjörn Bergman (2006b). ‘A Taste of Honey Is Worse Than None at All?’, Party Politics, 12:2, 189–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baron, David P. (1991). ‘A Spatial Bargaining Theory of Government Formation in Parliamentary Systems’, American Political Science Review, 85:1, 137–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassi, Anna (2017). ‘Policy Preferences in Coalition Formation and the Stability of Minority and Surplus Governments’, The Journal of Politics, 79:1, 250–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman, Torbjörn (1993). ‘Formation Rules and Minority Governments’, European Journal of Political Research, 23:1, 55–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman, Torbjörn (1995). ‘Constitutional Rules and Party Goals in Coalition Formation: An Analysis of Winning Minority Governments in Sweden’, Dissertation, Department of Political Science Umeå University.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, Torbjörn, Hanna Bäck, and Johan Hellström (2021). Coalition Governance in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bergman, Torbjörn, Svante Ersson, and Johan Hellström (2015). ‘Government Formation and Breakdown in Western and Central Eastern Europe’, Comparative European Politics, 13:3, 345–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bergman, Torbjörn, Gabriella Ilonszki, and Wolfgang C. Müller (2019). Coalition Governance in Central Eastern Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Budge, Ian, and Michael Laver (1986). ‘Office Seeking and Policy Pursuit in Coalition Theory’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 11:4, 485–506.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheibub, José Antonio, Shane Martin, and Bjørn Erik Rasch (2021). ‘Investiture Rules and Formation of Minority Governments in European Parliamentary Democracies’, Party Politics, 27:2, 351–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, Flemming Juul (2008). ‘Politiske forlig i Folketinget: Partikonkurrence og samarbejde’, Doctoral dissertation, Forlaget Politica.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen, Flemming Juul, and Helene Helboe Pedersen (2014). ‘Minority Coalition Governance in Denmark’, Party Politics, 20:6, 940–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, Denis (2020). ‘Between Strategy and Protest: How Policy Demand, Political Dissatisfaction and Strategic Incentives Matter for Far-Right Voting’, Political Science Research and Methods, 8:4, 662–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crombez, Christopher (1996). ‘Minority Governments, Minimal Winning Coalitions and Surplus Majorities in Parliamentary Systems’, European Journal of Political Research, 29:1, 1–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton, Russell J. (2008). ‘The Quantity and the Quality of Party Systems: Party System Polarization, Its Measurement, and Its Consequences’, Comparative Political Studies, 41:7, 899–920.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damgaard, Erik (1969). ‘The Parliamentary Basis of Danish Governments: The Patterns of Coalition Formation’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 4:A4, 30–57.
   Google Scholar
• Däubler, Thomas (2012). ‘The Preparation and Use of Election Manifestos: Learning from the Irish Case’, Irish Political Studies, 27:1, 51–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Swaan, Abram (1973). Coalition Theories and Cabinet Formations: A Study of Formal Theories of Coalition Formation Applied to Nine European Parliaments after 1918. Vol. 4 of Progress in Mathematical Social Sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• de Winter, Lieven (1998). ‘A Comparative Analysis of the Electoral, Office and Policy Success of Ethnoregionalist Parties’, in Lieven de Winter and Huri Tursan (eds.), Regionalist Parties in Western Europe. New York: Routledge, 204–47.
   Google Scholar
• de Winter, Lieven (2002). ‘Parties and Government Formation, Portfolio Allocation and Policy Definition’, in Kurt Richard Luther and Ferdinand Müller-Rommel (eds.), Political Parties in the New Europe: Political and Analytical Challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 171–205.
   Google Scholar
• de Winter, Lieven, and Patrick Dumont (2008). ‘Uncertainty and Complexity in Cabinet Formation’, in Kaare Strøm, Wolfgang C. Müller, and Torbjörn Bergman (eds.), Cabinets and Coalition Bargaining. The Democratic Life Cycle in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 124–58.
   Google Scholar
• Dodd, Lawrence C. (1976). Coalitions in Parliamentary Government. Princeton Legacy Library. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Döring, Holger, and Philip Manow (2016). ‘Parliament and Government Composition Database (ParlGov): Information on Parties, Elections and Cabinets in Modern Democracies', Development version.
   Google Scholar
• Downs, Anthony (1957). ‘An Economic Theory of Political Action in a Democracy’, Journal of Political Economy, 65:2, 135–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Druckman, James N., Lanny W. Martin, and Michael F. Thies (2005). ‘Influence without Confidence: Upper Chambers and Government Formation’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 30:4, 529–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ecker, Alejandro, and Thomas M. Meyer (2015). ‘The Duration of Government Formation Processes in Europe’, Research & Politics, 2:4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2053168015622796.
   Google Scholar
• Ecker, Alejandro, and Thomas M. Meyer (2020). ‘Coalition Bargaining Duration in Multiparty Democracies’, British Journal of Political Science, 50:1, 261–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falcó-Gimeno, Albert (2014). ‘The Use of Control Mechanisms in Coalition Governments’, Party Politics, 20:3, 341–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falcó-Gimeno, Albert, and Ignacio Jurado (2011). ‘Minority Governments and Budget Deficits: The Role of the Opposition’, European Journal of Political Economy, 27:3, 554–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, Bonnie N. (2009). ‘Minority Government and Legislative Politics in a Multilevel State: Spain under Zapatero’, South European Society and Politics, 14:4, 417–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Field, Bonnie N. (2016). Why Minority Governments Work: Multilevel Territorial Politics in Spain. Europe in Transition. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Gamson, William A. (1961). ‘A Theory of Coalition Formation’, American Sociological Review, 26:3, 373–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golder, Sona N. (2010). ‘Bargaining Delays in the Government Formation Process’, Comparative Political Studies, 43:1, 3–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, Christoffer (2001). ‘Minority Governments and Party Politics: The Political and Institutional Background to the “Danish Miracle"’, Journal of Public Policy, 21:1, 53–70.
   Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, Christoffer (2006). ‘Long-Term Changes in Danish Party Politics: The Rise and Importance of Issue Competition’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 29:3, 219–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, Christoffer, and Asbjørn Skjaeveland (2020). ‘Governments in Action: Consensual Politics and Minority Governments’, in Peter Munk Christiansen, Jørgen Elklit, and Peter Nedergaard (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Danish Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 230–41.
   Google Scholar
• Green-Pedersen, Christoffer, Peter B. Mortensen, and Gunnar Thesen (2017). ‘The Incumbency Bonus Revisited: Causes and Consequences of Media Dominance’, British Journal of Political Science, 47:1, 131–48.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heller, William B. (2002). ‘Regional Parties and National Politics in Europe: Spain’s Estado De Las Autonomias, 1993 to 2000’, Comparative Political Studies, 35:6, 657–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hellström, Johan, Torbjörn Bergman, and Hanna Bäck (2021). ‘Party Government in Europe Database (PAGED)’, Main sponsor: Riksbankens Jubileumsfond (IN150306:1).
   Google Scholar
• Hjermitslev, Ida B. (2020). ‘The Electoral Cost of Coalition Participation: Can Anyone Escape?’, Party Politics, 26:4, 510–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kefford, Glenn, and Liam Weeks (2020). ‘Minority Party Government and Independent MPs: A Comparative Analysis of Australia and Ireland’, Parliamentary Affairs, 73:1, 89–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirkpatrick, Evron M. (1971). ‘"Toward a More Responsible Two-Party System”: Political Science, Policy Science, or Pseudo-Science?’, American Political Science Review, 65:4, 965–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klemmensen, Robert (2005). ‘Forlig i det danske folketing 1953-2001’, Politica, 37:4, 440–52.
   Google Scholar
• Klingemann, Hans-Dieter, Richard I. Hofferbert, and Ian Budge (1994). Parties, Policies, and Democracy: Theoretical Lenses on Public Policy. Boulder: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klüver, Heike, and Jae-Jae Spoon (2016). ‘Who Responds? Voters, Parties and Issue Attention’, British Journal of Political Science, 46:3, 633–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klüver, Heike, and Jae Jae Spoon (2020). ‘Helping or Hurting? How Governing as a Junior Coalition Partner Influences Electoral Outcomes’, The Journal of Politics, 82:4, 1231–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krauss, Svenja, and Maria Thürk (2022). ‘Stability of Minority Governments and the Role of Support Agreements’, West European Politics, 45:4, 767–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laakso, Markku, and Rein Taagepera (1979). ‘"Effective” Number of Parties: A Measure with Application to West Europe’, Comparative Political Studies, 12:1, 3–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, Michael, and Kenneth A. Shepsle (1990). ‘Coalitions and Cabinet Government’, American Political Science Review, 84:3, 873–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laver, Michael, and Kenneth A. Shepsle (1996). Making and Breaking Governments: Cabinets and Legislatures in Parliamentary Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Laver, Michael, and Norman Schofield (1990). Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, Arend (1984). Democracies: Patterns of Majoritarian and Consensus Government in Twenty-One Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, Arend (1994). Electoral Systems and Party Systems: A Study of Twenty-Seven Democracies, 1945-1990. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lijphart, Arend (1999). Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Democracies. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luebbert, Gregory M. (1986). Comparative Democracy: Policymaking and Governing Coalitions in Europe and Israel. Columbia: Columbia University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, Lanny W., and Georg Vanberg (2003). ‘Wasting Time? The Impact of Ideology and Size on Delay in Coalition Formation’, British Journal of Political Science, 33:02, 323–32.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meguid, Bonnie (2008). Party Competition between Unequals: Strategies and Electoral Fortunes in Western Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, Paul, and Benjamin Nyblade (2008). ‘Government Formation and Cabinet Type in Parliamentary Democracies’, in Kaare Strøm, Wolfgang C. Müller, and Torbjörn Bergman (eds.), Cabinets and Coalition Bargaining. The Democratic Life Cycle in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 201–36.
   Google Scholar
• Müller, Melanie (2022). ‘Support Party Strategies on Important Policy Issues: Results from Swedish Minority Governments’, Government and Opposition, 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, Melanie, and Pascal D. König (2021). ‘Timing in Opposition Party Support under Minority Government’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 44:2, 220–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Müller, Wolfgang C., and Kaare Strøm (2008). ‘Coalition Agreements and Cabinet Governance’, in Kaare Strøm, Wolfgang C. Müller, and Torbjörn Bergman (eds.), Cabinets and Coalition Bargaining. The Democratic Life Cycle in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 159–200.
   Google Scholar
• Narud, Hanne Marthe, and Henry Valen (2008). ‘Coalition Membership and Electoral Performance’, in Kaare Strøm, Wolfgang C. Müller, and Torbjörn Bergman (eds.), Cabinets and Coalition Bargaining. The Democratic Life Cycle in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 369–402.
   Google Scholar
• Otjes, Simon, and Tom Louwerse (2013). ‘Een bijzonder meerderheidskabinet? Parlementair gedrag tijdens het kabinet Rutte-I’, Res Publica, 55:4, 459–79.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, G. Bingham (1982). Contemporary Democracies. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Powell, G. Bingham (2000). Elections as Instruments of Democracy: Majoritarian and Proportional Visions. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rasch, Bjørn Erik, Shane Martin, and José Antonio Cheibub (2015). Parliaments and Government Formation: Unpacking Investiture Rules. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Riker, William H. (1962). The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Saalfeld, Thomas (2008). ‘Institutions, Chance and Choices: The Dynamics of Cabinet Survival in the Parliamentary Democracies of Western Europe (1945-99)’, in Kaare Strøm, Wolfgang C. Müller, and Torbjörn Bergman (eds.), Cabinets and Coalition Bargaining. The Democratic Life Cycle in Western Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 327–68.
   Google Scholar
• Sartori, Giovanni (1976). Parties and Party Systems: A Framework for Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sieberer, Ulrich, and Daniel Höhmann (2022). ‘Do Party System Parameters Explain Differences in Legislative Organization? Fragmentation, Polarization, and the Density of Regulation in European Parliaments, 1945–2009’, Party Politics, 28:4, 597–610.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sjölin, Mats (1993). Coalition Politics and Parliamentary Power. Lund: Lund University Press
   Google Scholar
• Strøm, Kaare (1984). ‘Minority Governments in Parliamentary Democracies. The Rationality of Nonwinning Cabinet Solutions’, Comparative Political Studies, 17:2, 199–227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strøm, Kaare (1990a). ‘A Behavioral Theory of Competitive Political Parties’, American Journal of Political Science, 34:2, 565–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strøm, Kaare (1990b). Minority Governments and Majority Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Strøm, Kaare, Ian Budge, and Michael Laver (1994). ‘Constraints on Cabinet Formation in Parliamentary Democracies’, American Journal of Political Science, 38:2, 303–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thesen, Gunnar (2016). ‘Win Some, Lose None? Support Parties at the Polls and in Political Agenda–Setting’, Political Studies, 64:4, 979–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thies, Michael F. (2001). ‘Keeping Tabs on Partners: The Logic of Delegation in Coalition Governments’, American Journal of Political Science, 45:3, 580–98.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thürk, Maria (2022). ‘Small in Size but Powerful in Parliament? The Legislative Performance of Minority Governments’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 47:1, 193–224.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thürk, Maria, Johan Hellström, and Holger Döring (2021). ‘Institutional Constraints on Cabinet Formation: Veto Points and Party System Dynamics’, European Journal of Political Research, 60:2, 295–316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tromborg, Mathias Wessel, Randolph T. Stevenson, and David Fortunato (2019). ‘Voters, Responsibility Attribution and Support Parties in Parliamentary Democracies’, British Journal of Political Science, 49:4, 1591–601.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, George (2002). Veto Players: How Political Institutions Work. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tsebelis, George, and Jeannette Money (1997). Bicameralism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Volkens, Andrea, Werner Krause, Pola Lehmann, Theres Matthieß, Nicolas Merz, Sven Regel, and Bernhard Weßels (2018). ‘The Manifesto Data Collection. Manifesto Project (MRG/CMP/MARPOR)'. Version 2018b.
   Google Scholar
• Warwick, Paul V. (1998). ‘Policy Distance and Parliamentary Government’, Legislative Studies Quarterly, 23:3, 319–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar