Losers’ consent and emotions in the aftermath of the Brexit referendum

References

• Albertson, Bethany, and Shana Kushner Gadarian (2016). ‘Did That Scare You? Tips on Creating Emotion in Experimental Subjects’, Political Analysis, 24:4, 485–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Christopher J., André Blais, Shaun Bowler, Todd Donovan, and Ola Listhaug (2005). Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, Christopher J., and Christine A. Guillory (1997). ‘Political Institutions and Satisfaction with Democracy: A Cross-National Analysis of Consensus and Majoritarian Systems’, American Political Science Review, 91:1, 66–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Christopher J., and Andrew J. LoTempio (2002). ‘Winning, Losing and Political Trust in America’, British Journal of Political Science, 32:2, 335–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Christopher J., and Silvia M. Mendes (2006). ‘Learning to Lose: Election Outcomes, Democratic Experience and Political Protest Potential’, British Journal of Political Science, 36:1, 91–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, Christopher J., and Yuliya V. Tverdova (2001). ‘Winners, Losers, and Attitudes about Government in Contemporary Democracies’, International Political Science Review, 22:4, 321–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blais, André, and François Gélineau (2007). ‘Winning, Losing and Satisfaction with Democracy’, Political Studies, 55:2, 425–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowler, Shaun, and Todd Donovan (2002). ‘Democracy, Institutions and Attitudes about Citizen Influence on Government’, British Journal of Political Science, 32:2, 371–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brader, Ted, and George E. Marcus (2013). ‘Emotion and Political Psychology’, in Leonie Huddy, David O. Sears, and Jack S. Levy (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 165–204.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, David, and Austin Ranney, eds. (1978). Referendums: A Comparative Study of Practice and Theory. Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute for Policy Research.
   Google Scholar
• Clayton, Katherine, Nicholas T. Davis, Brendan Nyhan, Ethan Porter, Timothy J. Ryan, and Thomas J. Wood (2021). ‘Elite Rhetoric Can Undermine Democratic Norms’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 118:23, e2024125118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Easton, David (1975). ‘A Re-Assessment of the Concept of Political Support’, British Journal of Political Science, 5:4, 435–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esaiasson, Peter (2011). ‘Electoral Losers Revisited – How Citizens React to Defeat at the Ballot Box’, Electoral Studies, 30:1, 102–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esaiasson, Peter, Mikael Gilljam, and Mikael Persson (2012). ‘Which Decision-Making Arrangements Generate the Strongest Legitimacy Beliefs? Evidence from a Randomized Field Experiment’, European Journal of Political Research, 51:6, 785–808.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esaiasson, Peter, Mikael Persson, Mikael Gilljam, and Torun Lindholm (2019). ‘Reconsidering the Role of Procedures for Decision Acceptance’, British Journal of Political Science, 49:1, 291–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ezrow, Lawrence, and Georgios Xezonakis (2011). ‘Citizen Satisfaction with Democracy and Parties’ Policy Offerings’, Comparative Political Studies, 44:9, 1152–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gamble, Barbara S. (1997). ‘Putting Civil Rights to a Popular Vote’, American Journal of Political Science, 41:1, 245–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garry, John (2014). ‘Emotions and Voting in EU Referendums’, European Union Politics, 15:2, 235–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gervais, Bryan T. (2019). ‘Rousing the Partisan Combatant: Elite Incivility, Anger, and Antideliberative Attitudes’, Political Psychology, 40:3, 637–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, Ailsa (2008). ‘Satisfaction with Democracy: The Impact of Winning and Losing in Westminster Systems’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 18:1, 3–26.
   Google Scholar
• Hobolt, Sara B. (2009). Europe in Question: Referendums on European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hobolt, Sara, Thomas Leeper, and James Tilley (2021). ‘Divided by the Vote: Affective Polarization in the Wake of the Brexit Referendum’, British Journal of Political Science, 51:4, 1476–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, Sara B., and James Tilley (2022). ‘British Public Opinion towards EU Membership’, Public Opinion Quarterly, 85:4, 1126–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hobolt, Sara B., James Tilley, and Thomas Leeper (2022). ‘Policy Preferences and Policy Legitimacy after Referendums: Evidence from the Brexit Negotiations’, Political Behavior, 44:2, 839–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huddy, Leonie, Stanley Feldman, and Erin Cassese (2007). ‘On the Distinct Political Effects of Anxiety and Anger’, in W. Russell Neuman et al. (eds.), The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 202–30.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, Jennifer S., and Dacher Keltner (2001). ‘Fear, Anger, and Risk’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81:1, 146–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lijphart, Arendt (1999). Patterns of Democracy: Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Listhaug, Ola, Bernt Aardal, and Ingunn Opheim Ellis (2009). ‘Institutional Variation and Political Support: An Analysis of CSES Data from 29 Countries’, in Hans-Dieter Klingemann (ed.), The Comparative Study of Electoral Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 311–32.
   Google Scholar
• MacKuen, Michael, Jennifer Wolak, Luke Keele, and George E. Marcus (2010). ‘Civic Engagements: Resolute Partisanship or Reflective Deliberation’, American Journal of Political Science, 54:2, 440–58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marcus, George E., and Michael B. MacKuen (1993). ‘Anxiety, Enthusiasm, and the Vote: The Emotional Underpinnings of Learning and Involvement during Presidential Campaigns’, American Political Science Review, 87:3, 672–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marien, Sofie, and Anna, Kern (2018). ‘The Winner Takes It All: Revisiting the Effect of Direct Democracy on Citizens’ Political Support’, Political Behavior, 40:4, 857–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, Liliana (2015). ‘“I Disrespectfully Agree”: The Differential Effects of Partisan Sorting on Social and Issue Polarization’, American Journal of Political Science, 59:1, 128–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, Liliana (2018). Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Moehler, Devra C. (2009). ‘Critical Citizens and Submissive Subjects: Election Losers and Winners in Africa’, British Journal of Political Science, 39:2, 345–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadeau, Richard, Éric Bélanger, and Ece Özlem Atikcan (2021). ‘Emotions, Cognitions and Moderation: Understanding Losers’ Consent in the 2016 Brexit Referendum’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 31:1, 77–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadeau, Richard, and André Blais (1993). ‘Accepting the Election Outcome: The Effect of Participation on Losers’ Consent’, British Journal of Political Science, 23:4, 553–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nadeau, Richard, Richard G. Niemi, and Timothy Amato (1995). ‘Emotions, Issue Importance, and Political Learning’, American Journal of Political Science, 39:3, 558–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, W. Russell, George E. Marcus, Ann N. Crigler, and Michael MacKuen (2007). The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osnabrügge, Moritz, Sara B. Hobolt, and Toni Rodon (2021). ‘Playing to the Gallery: Emotive Rhetoric in Parliaments’, American Political Science Review, 115:3, 885–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Redlawsk, David P., Andrew J. W. Civettini, and Richard R. Lau (2007). ‘Affective Intelligence and Voting: Information Processing and Learning in a Campaign’, in W. Russell Neuman et al. (eds.), The Affect Effect: Dynamics of Emotion in Political Thinking and Behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 152–79.
   Google Scholar
• Rose, Richard (2019). ‘Referendum Challenges to the EU’s Policy Legitimacy – and How the EU Responds’, Journal of European Public Policy, 26:2, 207–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Searles, Kathleen, and Kyle Mattes (2015). ‘It’s a Mad, Mad World: Using Emotion Inductions in a Survey’, Journal of Experimental Political Science, 2:2, 172–82.
   Google Scholar
• Singh, Shane, Ignacio Lago, and André Blais (2011). ‘Winning and Competitiveness as Determinants of Political Support’, Social Science Quarterly, 92:3, 695–709.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapleton, Carey E., and Ryan Dawkins (2022). ‘Catching My Anger: How Political Elites Create Angrier Citizens’, Political Research Quarterly, 75:3, 754–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suhay, Elizabeth, and Cengiz Erisen (2018). ‘The Role of Anger in the Biased Assimilation of Political Information’, Political Psychology, 39:4, 793–810.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiedens, Larissa Z. (2001). ‘The Effect of Anger on the Hostile Inferences of Aggressive and Nonaggressive People: Specific Emotions, Cognitive Processing, and Chronic Accessibility’, Motivation and Emotion, 25:3, 233–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Umit, Resul, and Katrin Auel (2020). ‘Divergent Preferences and Legislative Speeches on Brexit’, Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 30:2, 202–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentino, Nicholas A., Vincent L. Hutchings, Antoine J. Banks, and Anne K. Davis (2008). ‘Is a Worried Citizen a Good Citizen? Emotions, Political Information Seeking, and Learning via the Internet’, Political Psychology, 29:2, 247–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentino, Nicholas A., Antoine J. Banks, Vincent L. Hutchings, and Anne K. Davis (2009). ‘Selective Exposure in the Internet Age: The Interaction between Anxiety and Information Utility’, Political Psychology, 30:4, 591–613.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentino, Nicholas A., Ted Brader, Eric W. Groenendyk, Krysha Gregorowicz, and Vincent L. Hutchings (2011). ‘Election Night’s Alright for Fighting: The Role of Emotions in Political Participation’, The Journal of Politics, 73:1, 156–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasilopoulou, Sofia, and Markus Wagner (2017). ‘Fear, Anger and Enthusiasm about the European Union: Effects of Emotional Reactions on Public Preferences towards European Integration’, European Union Politics, 18:3, 382–405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, Christopher (2013). ‘Emotions, Campaigns, and Political Participation’, Political Research Quarterly, 66:2, 414–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Webster, Steven W. (2020). American Rage: How Anger Shapes Our Politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, Steven W. (2021). ‘The Role of Political Elites in Eliciting Mass-Level Political Anger’, The Forum, 19:3, 415–37.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, Steven W., and Alan I. Abramowitz (2017). ‘The Ideological Foundations of Affective Polarization in the US Electorate’, American Politics Research, 45:4, 621–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weeks, Brian E. (2015). ‘Emotions, Partisanship, and Misperceptions: How Anger and Anxiety Moderate the Effect of Partisan Bias on Susceptibility to Political Misinformation’, Journal of Communication, 65:4, 699–719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widmann, Tobias (2021). ‘How Emotional Are Populists Really? Factors Explaining Emotional Appeals in the Communication of Political Parties’, Political Psychology, 42:1, 163–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar