Fairness of inequality and support for redistribution: directly comparing citizens and legislators

References

• Adler, Nancy E., Elissa S. Epel, Grace Castellazzo, and Jeannette R. Ickovics (2000). ‘Relationship of Subjective and Objective Social Status with Psychological and Physiological Functioning: Preliminary Data in Healthy, White Women’, Health Psychology, 19:6, 586–92.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, Robert, and Josh Curtis (2015). ‘Social Class, Economic Inequality, and the Convergence of Policy Preferences: Evidence from 24 Modern Democracies’, Canadian Review of Sociology = Revue Canadienne De Sociologie, 52:3, 266–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Armingeon, Klaus., Fabio Bertozzi, and Giuliano Bonoli (2004). ‘Swiss Worlds of Welfare’, West European Politics, 27:1, 20–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arts, Wil, and John Gelissen (2001). ‘Welfare States, Solidarity and Justice Principles: Does the Type Really Matter?’, Acta Sociologica, 44:4, 283–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailer, Stefanie, and Sarah Bütikofer (2015). ‘From Loose Alliances to Professional Political Players: How Swiss Party Groups Changed’, Swiss Political Science Review, 21:4, 556–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartels, Larry M. (2008). Unequal Democracy: The Political Economy of the New Gilded Age. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bean, Clive, and Elim Papadakis (1998). ‘A Comparison of Attitudes towards the Welfare States in Different Institutional Regimes, 1985–1990’, International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 10, 211–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, Heinrich (2007). ‘New Challenges, New Elites? Changes in the Recruitment and Career Patterns of European Representative Elites’, Comparative Sociology, 6:1–2, 85–113.
   Google Scholar
• Blinder, A. S. (1973). ‘Wage Discrimination: Reduced Form and Structural Estimates’, Journal of Human Resources, 8:4, 436–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornschier, Simon (2015). ‘The New Cultural Conflict, Polarization, and Representation in the Swiss Party System, 1975–2011’, Swiss Political Science Review, 21:4, 680–701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bramlett, Brittany H., James G. Gimpel, and F. E. Lee (2011). ‘The Political Ecology of Opinion in Big-Donor Neighborhoods’, Political Behavior, 33:4, 565–600.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breunig, Christian, and Peter J. Loewen (2021). ‘How Legislators Perceive Inequality’. Paper presented at the APSA virtual 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, Clem, and Jeff Manza (2006). ‘Why Do Welfare States Persist?’, The Journal of Politics, 68:4, 816–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown-Iannuzzi, Jazmin L., K. B. Lundberg, A. C. Kay, and B. K. Payne (2015). ‘Subjective Status Shapes Political Preferences’, Psychological Science, 26:1, 15–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bullock, Heather E. (2017). ‘Social Class and Policy Preferences: Implications for Economic Inequality and Interclass Relations’, Current Opinion in Psychology, 18, 141–6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burstein, Paul (2003). ‘The Impact of Public Opinion on Public Policy: A Review and an Agenda’, Political Research Quarterly, 56:1, 29–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, Dan M. (2014). Representing the Advantaged: How Politicians Reinforce Inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Carnes, Nicholas, and Noam Lupu (2015). ‘Rethinking the Comparative Perspective on Class and Representation: Evidence from Latin America’, American Journal of Political Science, 59:1, 1–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cavaillé, Charlotte (2023). Fair Enough? Support for Redistribution in the Age of Inequality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Condon, Meghan, and Amber Wichowsky (2020). ‘Inequality in the Social Mind: Social Comparison and Support for Redistribution’, The Journal of Politics, 82:1, 149–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusack, Thomas, Torben Iversen, and Philipp Rehm (2006). ‘Risks at Work: The Demand and Supply Sides of Government Redistribution’, Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 22:3, 365–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fatke, Mathias (2018). ‘Inequality Perceptions, Preferences Conducive to Redistribution, and the Conditioning Role of Social Position’, Societies, 8:4, 99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feldman, Stanley, and John Zaller (1992). ‘The Political Culture of Ambivalence: Ideological Responses to the Welfare State’, American Journal of Political Science, 36:1, 268–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finseraas, Henning (2009). ‘Income Inequality and Demand for Redistribution: A Multilevel Analysis of European Public Opinion’, Scandinavian Political Studies, 32:1, 94–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giger, Nathalie, Jan Rosset, and Julian Bernauer (2012). ‘The Poor Political Representation of the Poor in a Comparative Perspective’, Representation, 48:1, 47–61.
   Google Scholar
• Giger, Nathalie, and Davy-Kim Lascombes (2019). ‘Growing Income Inequality, Growing Legitimacy: A Longitudinal Approach to Perceptions of Inequality’, Working Paper Unequal Democracies Project, 11, 1–48.
   Google Scholar
• Golder, Matt, and Jacek Stramski (2010). ‘Ideological Congruence and Electoral Institutions: Conceptualization and Measurement’, American Journal of Political Science, 54:1, 90–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haddon, Edward (2019). ‘How Class Shapes Critical Resentment toward Inequality: The Competing Forces of Stratification and Politics’, International Journal of Sociology, 49:4, 241–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helfer, Luzia, Flurina Wäspi, and Frédéric Varone (2021). ‘Does Direct Democracy Enhance Politicians’ Perceptions of Constituents’ Opinions? Evidence from Switzerland’, Swiss Political Science Review, 27:4, 695–711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iversen, Torben, and David Soskice (2001). ‘An Asset Theory of Social Policy Preferences’, American Political Science Review, 95:4, 875–93.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, Mads M. (2006a). ‘Welfare Regimes and Attitudes towards Redistribution: The Regime Hypothesis Revisited’, European Sociological Review, 22:2, 157–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jaeger, Mads M. (2006b). ‘What Makes People Support Public Responsibility for Welfare Provision: Self-Interest or Political Ideology?’, Acta Sociologica, 49:3, 321–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jann, Ben (2008). ‘The Blinder–Oaxaca Decomposition for Linear Regression Models’, The Stata Journal, 8:4, 453–79.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, John T., Christopher M. Federico, and Jaime L. Napier (2009). ‘Political Ideology: Its Structure, Functions, and Elective Affinities’, Annual Review of Psychology, 60, 307–37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kedar, Orit (2005). ‘When Moderate Voters Prefer Extreme Parties: Policy Balancingin Parliamentary Elections’, American Political Science Review, 99:2, 185–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kertzer, Joshua D. (2022). ‘Re-Assessing Elite-Public Gaps in Political Behavior’, American Journal of Political Science, 66:3, 539–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kluegel, James R., and Eliot R. Smith (1986). Beliefs about Inequality: Americans’ Views of What is and What Ought to be. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kraus, Michael W. M., Paul K. P. Piff, and Dacher D. Keltner (2009). ‘Social Class, Sense of Control, and Social Explanation’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97:6, 992–1004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus, Michael W. (2015). ‘The Emerging Psychology of Social Class’, in Robert A. Scott, Stephen Michael Kosslyn, and Marlis Buchmann (eds.), Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Science. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Kraus, Michael W., and Dacher Keltner (2013). ‘Social Class Rank, Essentialism, and Punitive Judgment’, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105:2, 247–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraus, Michael W., and B. Callaghan (2014). ‘Noblesse Oblige? Social Status and Economic Inequality Maintenance among Politicians’, PloS One, 9:1, e85293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lascombes, Davy-Kim (2022). ‘Polarized Opinion, Consensual Election: How Preferences for Restrictive Immigration Policies Water down Class Conflict over Redistribution’, Unequal Democracies Working Paper Series, 33, 1–35.
   Google Scholar
• Lefkofridi, Zoe, Markus Wagner, and Johanna E. Willmann (2014). ‘Left-Authoritarians and Policy Representation in Western Europe: Electoral Choice across Ideological Dimensions’, West European Politics, 37:1, 65–90.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesschaeve, Christophe (2017). ‘Finding Inequality in an Unlikely Place: Differences in Policy Congruence between Social Groups in Belgium’, Acta Politica, 52:3, 361–83.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder, Wolf, and Sean Mueller (2017). Schweizerische Demokratie. Institutionen, Prozesse, Perspektiven. Bern: Haupt.
   Google Scholar
• Lopez, Mathias, Graziella Moraes Silva, Chana Teeger, and Pedro Marques (2022). ‘Economic and Cultural Determinants of Elite Attitudes toward Redistribution’, Socio-Economic Review, 20:2, 489–514.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neckerman, Kathryn M., and Florencia Torche (2007). ‘Inequality: Causes and Consequences’, Annual Review of Sociology, 33:1, 335–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oaxaca, R. (1973). ‘Male-Female Wage Differentials in Urban Labor Markets’, International Economic Review, 14:3, 693–709.
   Google Scholar
• OECD (2015). In It Together: Why Less Inequality Benefits All. Paris: OECD.
   Google Scholar
• Oesch, Daniel, and Line Rennwald (2010). ‘The Class Basis of Switzerland’s Cleavage between the New Left and the Populist Right’, Swiss Political Science Review, 16:3, 343–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osberg, Lars, and Timothy Smeeding (2006). ‘“Fair” Inequality? Attitudes toward Pay Differentials: The United States in Comparative Perspective’, American Sociological Review, 71:3, 450–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pontusson, Jonas, Nathalie Giger, Jan Rosset, and Davy-Kim Lascombes (2020). ‘Introducing the Inequality and Politics Survey: Preliminary Findings’, Unequal Democracies Working Paper Series, 16.
   Google Scholar
• Rehm, Philipp (2011). ‘Social Policy by Popular Demand’, World Politics, 63:2, 271–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosset, Jan (2016). Economic Inequality and Political Representation in Switzerland. Heidelberg: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rosset, Jan, and Christian Stecker (2019). ‘How well Are Citizens Represented by Their Governments? Issue Congruence and Inequality in Europe’, European Political Science Review, 11:2, 145–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosset, Jan, and Anna-Sophie Kurella (2021). ‘The Electoral Roots of Unequal Representation. A Spatial Modelling Approach to Party Systems and Voting in Western Europe’, European Journal of Political Research, 60:4, 785–806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schakel, Wouter, and Armen Hakhverdian (2018). ‘Ideological Congruence and Socio-Economic Inequality’, European Political Science Review, 10:3, 441–65.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevenans, Julie, and Karolin Soontjes (2022). ‘Electoral Incentives Make Politicians Respond to Voter Preferences: Evidence from a Survey Experiment with Members of Parliament in Belgium’, Social Science Quarterly, 103:5, 1125–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sevenans, Julie, Karolin Soontjes, and Stefaan Walgrave (2022). ‘Inequality in the Public Priority Perceptions of Elected Representatives’, West European Politics, 45:5, 1057–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stecker, Christian, and Markus Tausendpfund (2016). ‘Multidimensional Government-Citizen Congruence and Satisfaction with Democracy’, European Journal of Political Research, 55:3, 492–511.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheffer, Lior, and Peter J. Loewen (2019). ‘Accountability, Framing Effects, and Risk-Seeking by Elected Representatives: An Experimental Study with American Local Politicians’, Political Research Quarterly, 72:1, 49–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suhay, Elizabeth, Marko Klasnja, and Gonzalo Rivero (2021). ‘Ideology of Affluence: Rich Americans’ Explanations for Inequality and Attitudes toward Redistribution’, Journal of Politics, 83:1, 367–80.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Svallfors, Stefan (1993). ‘Dimensions of Inequality: A Comparison of Attitudes in Sweden and Britain’, European Sociological Review, 9:3, 267–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomassen, Jaques (2012). ‘The Blind Corner of Representation’, Journal of Representation, 48:1, 13–27.
   Google Scholar
• Uslaner, Eric M. (1999). The Movers and the Shirkers: Downsians and Ideologues in the Senate. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Varone, Frédéric, and Luzia Helfer (2022). ‘Understanding MPs’ Perceptions of Party Voters’ Opinion in Western Democracies’, West European Politics, 45:5, 1033–56.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldfogel, Hannah B., Jennifer Sheehy-Skeffington, Oliver P. Hauser, Arnold K. Ho, and Nour S. Kteily (2021). ‘Ideology Selectively Shapes Attention to Inequality’, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118:14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walgrave, Stefaan, S. Soroka, Peter J. Loewen, Tamir Sheafer, and Karolin Soontjes (2022). ‘Revisiting Elite Perceptions as Mediator of Elite Responsiveness to Public Opinion’, Political Studies (Forthcoming).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar